JoVE   
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Biology

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Neuroscience

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Immunology and Infection

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Clinical and Translational Medicine

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Bioengineering

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Applied Physics

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Chemistry

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Behavior

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Environment

|   

JoVE Science Education

General Laboratory Techniques

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Basic Methods in Cellular and Molecular Biology

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Model Organisms I

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Model Organisms II

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Essentials of
Neuroscience

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

 JoVE Biology

Analysis of Gene Expression in Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus planipennis) Using Quantitative Real Time-PCR

1, 1, 1, 1

1Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University

Article
    Downloads Comments Metrics

    You must be subscribed to JoVE to access this content.

    This article is a part of   JoVE Biology. If you think this article would be useful for your research, please recommend JoVE to your institution's librarian.

    Recommend JoVE to Your Librarian

    Current Access Through Your IP Address

    You do not have access to any JoVE content through your current IP address.

    IP: 54.82.77.50, User IP: 54.82.77.50, User IP Hex: 911363378

    Current Access Through Your Registered Email Address

    You aren't signed into JoVE. If your institution subscribes to JoVE, please or create an account with your institutional email address to access this content.

     

    Summary

    Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) is an effective tool to diagnose mRNA levels in different insect tissues and developmental stages. In this report we show the use of qRT-PCR to ascertain mRNA levels in different larval tissues and developmental stages of the invasive insect species, emerald ash borer.

    Date Published: 5/04/2010, Issue 39; doi: 10.3791/1974

    Cite this Article

    Bhandary, B., Rajarapu, S. P., Rivera-Vega, L., Mittapalli, O. Analysis of Gene Expression in Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus planipennis) Using Quantitative Real Time-PCR. J. Vis. Exp. (39), e1974, doi:10.3791/1974 (2010).

    Abstract

    Emerald ash borer (EAB, Agrilus planipennis) is an exotic invasive pest, which has killed millions of ash trees (Fraxinus spp) in North America. EAB continues to spread rapidly and attacks ash trees of different ages, from saplings to mature trees. However, to date very little or no molecular knowledge exists for EAB. We are interested in deciphering the molecular-based physiological processes at the tissue level that aid EAB in successful colonization of ash trees. In this report we show the effective use of quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) to ascertain mRNA levels in different larval tissues (including midgut, fat bodies and cuticle) and different developmental stages (including 1st-, 2nd-, 3rd-, 4th-instars, prepupae and adults) of EAB. As an example, a peritrophin gene (herein named, AP-PERI1) is exemplified as the gene of interest and a ribosomal protein (AP-RP1) as the internal control. Peritrophins are important components of the peritrophic membrane/matrix (PM), which is the lining of the insect gut. The PM has diverse functions including digestion and mechanical protection to the midgut epithelium.

    Protocol

    The complete protocol with different steps is depicted in the flow chart in Figure 1. Individual steps constituting dissection, RNA extraction, First Strand cDNA synthesis and qRT-PCR are detailed below.

    I. Larval Dissection

    1. Prior to the start of this procedure, place Emerald ash borer, or EAB, larvae on moist tissue paper until dissections are performed. Keep freshly prepared 1X phosphate buffered saline, or PBS, on ice to keep the buffer cold throughout the dissection.
    2. To begin, fix the EAB larvae on the dissection plate with fine dissection pins. Then, add cold 1X PBS to the dissection plate.
    3. First, decapitate larvae with a fine pair of dissection scissors. Subsequently remove the last abdominal segment of the larvae.
    4. Using a watchmaker pair of forceps, lift the cuticle from the larval carcass. Then, make an incision along the length of the carcass using a pair of scissors. Take care not to rupture the gut as the incision is made.
    5. Carefully isolate the midgut tissue from other tissues such as fat bodies and connective tissue. Then, rinse the tissue in fresh 1X PBS buffer to ensure that there is no contamination of fatbody. Transfer the isolated midgut to 500 μL of pre-chilled Trizol reagent in a 1.5 mL eppendorf tube.
    6. Next, isolate the fat body tissue using forceps and transfer it into a 1.5 mL eppendorf tube containing 500 μL of chilled Trizol reagent.
    7. Finally, isolate the cuticle tissue from the larval carcass by scrapping off any adhering tissue, taking care not to damage tissue integrity. Rinse the isolated cuticle tissue in fresh PBS buffer and transfer it to a 1.5 mL eppendorf tube with 500 μL of chilled Trizol reagent.
    8. The isolated fat body, cuticle and midgut tissues can be stored at -80 °C until RNA extraction.
    9. In preparation for RNA extraction, sort the various EAB samples according to the developmental stages. These stages include 1st-, 2nd-, 3rd-, and 4th-instars, prepupae and adults .

    II. RNA Extraction (As per manufacturer s protocol for using Trizol Reagent)

    Homogenization

    1. To begin RNA Extraction, first use plastic pestles to homogenize the tissues in the Trizol containing 1.5 mL eppendorf tubes. After homogenization, bring the total volume of each sample to1 mL with the Trizol reagent.
    2. For the developmental stages, homogenize whole animal in liquid nitrogen with a mortar and pestle. Then add an aliquot of the homogenate (50 μg) to 1 mL of Trizol.

    Phase separation:

    1. Incubate the sample tubes with 1 mL Trizol for 15 minutes at room temperature.
    2. Following incubation, add 200μL of chloroform to each tube. Immediately after adding chloroform, shake the tubes vigorously for about 15 seconds. Then, incubate the tubes at room temperature for an additional 2-3 minutes.
    3. Next, centrifuge the samples at 12,000Xg for 15 minutes at 2 °C. After centrifugation, the RNA will be in the aqueous phase. The volume of the aqueous phase should be 600 μl, or 60% of the total Trizol volume.

    RNA precipitation

    1. Carefully remove only the aqueous phase. Presence of substances below the aqueous phase will cause contamination of the extracted RNA. Then, transfer the aqueous phase into an appropriately labeled 1.5 mL eppendorf tube.
    2. To precipitate the RNA from the aqueous phase, mix 0.5 mL of isopropyl alcohol to each tube. Incubate the samples at room temperature for 10 minutes. After the incubation, centrifuge the tubes at 12,000Xg for 10 minutes at 2°C.

    RNA Wash

    1. Following centrifugation, discard the supernatant from the tubes. RNA is present in the gel-like pellet formed at the bottom of the tube. Wash the pellet with 75% ethanol, adding at least 1 mL of 75% ethanol per 1 mL of Trizol. Mix by vortexing. Then, centrifuge the tubes at 7500Xg for 5 minutes at 2 °C.

    RNA elution

    1. Discard the supernatant from the tubes. Centrifuge the tubes again in the small table centrifuge for 1 minute. Remove any excess supernatant from the tube by careful pipetting Leave the tube open and let the pellet air dry for 5-10 minutes. Be careful not to over dry the pellet as this will significantly decrease its solubility.
    2. After air-drying, resuspend the pellet in diethylpyrocarbonate, or DEPC, treated water. The amount of water used to resuspend the pellet will depend on the size of the pellet. Use 50 μL of DEPC treated water for a small pellet or 100 μL for a big pellet. Let the pellet completely dissolve in DEPC treated water by moving the pipette tip up and down several times.
    3. Once the pellet has dissolved, place the sample at 55 °C for 10 minutes.
    4. Then, measure the concentration of each RNA sample using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (2 μL of the RNA sample).
    5. Store the RNA samples at -80°C until further use.

    III. First-Strand cDNA Synthesis (As per manufacturer s protocol using SuperScript first strand Synthesis kit by Invitrogen.)

    1. For each RNA sample add the following in a PCR tube:
      RNAx μl
      10mM dNTP mix M1μl
      Oligo(dt) (0.5 μg/ μl)1 μl
      DEPC treated water(8-x) μl
      Total Volume:10 μl
      Note: x is the volume of RNA used for cDNA synthesis. Depending on the concentration of the RNA, 2-3 μg of RNA will be used for each reaction and the total volume of each reaction should be 10 μl.
    2. Place the above reaction mix in a thermocycler at 65°C for 4 minutes.
    3. Remove the tubes from the theromocyler and place them on ice immediately for at least 2 minutes.
    4. Prepare the first-strand master mix by adding the following:
      10X RT Buffer2μl
      25mM MgCl24 μl
      0.1M DTT2 μl
      RNase out1 μl
    5. Add 9 μl of master mix to each tube containing the RNA sample, mix by pipeting and centrifuge the mixture briefly.
    6. Place the tubes back in the thermocycler and incubate for 2 minutes at 42°C.
    7. Pause the thermocycler and add 1 μl of Superscript II reverse transcriptase enzyme (Invitrogen) to each tube. This step should be done quickly.
    8. Incubate the samples at 42°C for 1.5 hours.
    9. Terminate the reaction at 70°C for 15 minutes.
    10. Remove the tubes from the thermocycler and place them on ice.
    11. Add 1 μl of RNase H to each tube and place them back in the thermocycler at 37°C for 20 minutes.
    12. After taking the samples out of the thermocycler, add 20 μl of nuclease-free water in each tube. The volume of each sample is doubled at this stage.
    13. Check the concentration of each sample by using 2 μl of the sample. Take aliquot of each sample, to make the concentration of 20ng/μl for use in qRT-PCR. The amount of water to make up the samples to a concentration of 20ng/μl will depend on the initial concentration of the cDNA synthesized.

    IV. qRT-PCR:

    Primer Design and Determination of reference gene

    1. Design primers with a melting temperature (Tm) of 60°C and a product size of ~100bp.
    2. AP-PERI1 is used as the gene of interest for this experiment. A reference gene or internal control is needed for later analysis and normalization of the data. Ribosomal protein (AP-RP1) is used as the reference gene for this experiment.
    3. Prepare 5uM working stocks of the primers that will be used, including your reference gene.

    Preparation of standards

    1. In order to calculate the efficiency of the primers being used standards should be made.
    2. Make a mix of the cDNA from the different samples that will be tested.
    3. Make 5X serial dilutions for each desired point in the graph. Four dilutions should be enough but five are highly recommended.
    4. The volume will vary depending on how many points and how many technical replicates are being used. There should be enough to make a standard for each gene being tested including the reference gene.

    Plate Template

    1. Design a template indicating the sample name for each well in the qRT-PCR plate. Remember to include standards for each gene and at least two technical replicates per sample.

    Set up the cycling parameters

    1. Turn the qRT-PCR machine on and enter the cycling parameters. The cycling parameters for this experiment is as follows:
      Step 1:
      • 1 cycle: 95°C 3 min
      Step 2:
      • 40 cycles: 95°C 15 sec followed by 60°C 30 sec
        (Optional: for determining the melting curve include the following steps)
      Step 3:
      • 1 cycle: 95°C 1 min
      Step 4:
      • 1cycle: 55°C 1 min
      Step 5:
      • 81 cycles: 55°C 30 sec

    Plate set up for CFX96 (BioRad) machine

    1. Prepare the master mix for each gene (including the reference gene) in separate tube. For each well, the master mix consists of
      Nuclease free water2μl
      2.5 X SYBR green4 μl
      Primer forward1 μl
      Primer reverse1 μl
      Total volume8 μl
    2. While preparing the master mix include 1-2 extra reactions to account for pipetting errors.
    3. According to the previously designed template, add 2 μL (20 ng/ μL) of cDNA to each well. Then, add 8 μL of the master mix to each well, resulting in a total volume of 10 μL per reaction.
    4. Pipette up and down (2-3X) to make sure the sample is well mixed. Check that no liquid stays on the tip. To avoid cross contamination, use a new tip for each sample.
    5. Once the entire plate is setup, cover the plate with optical tape. Avoid touching the tape as the presence of grease can affect the reading. Then, centrifuge the plate at 500 rpm for 1 minute to ensure that all the products in the wells are at the bottom of the plate.
    6. Following centrifugation, check that there is no ice or water on the bottom of the plate. Finally, place the plate in the qRT-PCR machine and run the PCR program.

    V. Diagrammatic Representation of the Experiment

    Figure 1
    Figure 1: Flow chart depicting the sequential order of steps for the gene expression study.

    Figure 2
    Figure 2: A) larval EAB dissection showing midgut in the middle. B) isolated midgut of larval EAB

    Figure 3
    Figure 3: A) Mean relative expression values (REVs) for a peritrophin gene (AP-PERI1) in different larval tissues including cuticle (Cu), midgut (MG) and fat bodies (FB). An EAB specific ribosomal protein (herein named, AP-RP1) was used as the internal control for normalizing the data obtained for the gene of interest, AP-PERI1. B) Relative fold change of AP-PERI1 in larval tissues. The cuticle tissue showed the least expression and therefore was taken as the calibrator (1X) sample (Pfaffl, 2001).

    Figure 4
    Figure 4: A) Mean relative expression values (REVs) for a peritrophin gene (AP-PERI1) in different developmental stages of EAB including larval instars (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th), prepupae (PP) and adults (A). An EAB specific ribosomal protein (AP-RP1) was used as the internal control for normalizing the data obtained for the gene of interest, AP-PERI1. B) Relative fold change of AP-PERI1 in various developmental stages. The PP sample showed the least level of mRNA levels and therefore was taken as the calibrator (1X sample).

    VI. Conclusion

    Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) is an effective tool to diagnose mRNA levels in different insect tissues and developmental stages. Further, qRT-PCR has mostly been the key tool to validate data generated from high throughput gene expression analyses such as microarrays and the new-generation RNA-Seq.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

    Discussion

    The threshold cycles (Ct) value is obtained for each sample in the qRT-PCR plate. For making the standard curve, the Ct value obtained for each dilution was plotted against the log of its concentration. The Ct values for the experimental samples were then plotted onto this dilution series standard curve Target quantities were calculated from separate standard curves generated for each experiment i.e. tissue and developmental expression. The relative expression values (REVs) were then determined by dividing the quantities of the target sequence of interest (in this case AP-PERI1) with the quantity obtained for the internal control (AP-RP1). For calculations of significance, the logs of the REVs for each gene were analyzed by ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User s Guide, Version 9.1). Significance in expression level was determined at p < 0.05.  Relative fold changes in the case of tissues were calculated by taking the cuticle sample as the calibrator (1X sample, Pfaffl, 2001). Therefore, the expression levels in the midgut and fat bodies were relative to the cuticle. In the case of developmental expression, the prepupal sample was taken as the calibrator. For both studies, two biological replicates and three technical replicates were used.

    Our experiment revealed significantly (p < 0.05) higher levels of AP-PERI1 transcript in the midgut tissue (Fig. 3) compared to other tissues assayed. During development the feeding stages (i.e. the larval instars and adult) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than the prepupae sample (Fig. 4). The least mRNA levels were calculated for cuticle and prepupae (Figs. 3 & 4). Given that peritrophins are integral component of the insect midgut our results corroborate previous findings in other insect species (Mittapalli et al. 2007). The patterns observed during the developmental stages further confirm the function of AP-PER1 in digestion and -related processes. The widely used Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins in crop plants indeed target and disrupt the PM in insects (Pauchet et al., 2009). Hence, the results obtained in this study could not only reveal potential control targets for EAB but also provide fundamental knowledge as to how invasive insect species adapt to their new environments.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

    Disclosures

    No conflicts of interest declared.

    Acknowledgements

    We acknowledge the help provided by Lourdes Delta Arrueta Antequera (Department of Entomology, Ohio State University/OARDC, Wooster, OH) in the setup of the experiments. We thank Dr. Therese Poland (USDA, Forest Services, NRS) for send EAB larval samples. Help provided by Dr. Luis A Canas and Nuris M Acosta with the microscope setup is appreciated. Funding for this project was provided by State and Federal funds appropriated to the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University.

    References

    1. Lehane, MJ. Peritrophic matrix structure and function. Annu Rev Entomol. 42, 525-550 (1997).
    2. Mittapalli, O., Sardesai, N. and Shukle, R.H. cDNA cloning and transcriptional expression of a peritrophin-like gene in the Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor [Say]. Arc of Insect Bio and Phy. 64, 19-29 (2007a).
    3. Pauchet, Y., Wilkinson, P., van Munster, M., Augustin, S., Pauron, D., ffrench-Constant, R.H. Pyrosequencing of the midgut transcriptome of the poplar leaf beetle Chrysomela tremulae reveals new gene families in Coleoptera. Ins Bio and Mol Bio. 39, 403-413 (2009).
    4. Pfaffl, W.M. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 2002-2007 (2001).
    5. Tellam, R.L. Biology of the Insect Midgut. Lehane, M. J., Billingsley, P.F. editors. (London, Chapman and Hall, 86 114, 1996).

    Comments

    0 Comments

    Post a Question / Comment / Request

    You must be signed in to post a comment. Please or create an account.

    Metrics

    Waiting
    simple hit counter