The Journal of Visualized Experiments (JoVE) is a peer reviewed, PubMed-indexed video journal. Our mission is to increase the productivity of scientific research.
The JoVE video player is compatible with HTML5 and Adobe Flash. Older browsers that do not support HTML5 and the H.264 video codec will still use a Flash-based video player. We recommend downloading the newest version of Flash here, but we support all versions 10 and above.
Unable to load video. Please check your Internet connection and reload this page. If the problem continues, please let us know and we'll try to help.
An unexpected error occurred. Please check your Internet connection and reload this page. If the problem continues, please let us know and we'll try to help.
Stillwell, R. C., Dworkin, I., Shingleton, A. W., Frankino, W. A. Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila. J. Vis. Exp. (56), e3162, doi:10.3791/3162 (2011).
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. Scaling: Why is animal size so important? (Cambridge University Press, 1984).
Calder, W.A. Size, function and life history. (Harvard University Press, 1984).
Huxley, J.S. Problems of relative growth. (Methuen & Co., 1932).
Gould, S.J. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev.41, 587-640 (1966).
Alberch, P., Gould, S.J., Oster, G.F., & Wake, D.B. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology.5, 296-317 (1979).
Thompson, D.W. On growth and form. (Cambridge University Press, 1917).
Klingenberg, C.P. Heterochrony and allometry: The analysis of evolutionary change in ontogeny. Biol. Rev.73, 79-123 (1998).
Dubois, E. Sur le rapport de l'encéphale avec la grandeur du corps chez les Mammiferes. Bull. Soc. Anthropol.8, 337-374 (1897).
Huxley, J.S. & Teissier, G. Terminology of relative growth. Nature.137, 780-781 (1936).
Huxley, J.S. Constant differential growth-ratios and their significance. Nature.114, 895-896 (1924).
Shingleton, A.W., Frankino, W.A., Flatt, T., Nijhout, H.F. & Emlen, D.J. Size and shape: The developmental regulation of static allometry in insects. BioEssays.29, 536-548 (2007).
Frankino, W. A., Emlen, D. & Shingleton, A. W. Experimental approaches to studying the evolution of morphological allometries: The shape of things to come. inExperimental evolution: Concepts, methods, and applications. eds. T. Garland & M. Rose (University of California Press, 2009).
Emlen, D.J. Artificial selection on horn length-body size allometry in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus. Evolution.50 (1996).
Emlen, D.J. & Nijhout, H.F. The development and evolution of exaggerated morphologies in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol.45, 661-708 (2000).
Nijhout, H.F., Davidowitz, G., & Roff, D.A. A quantitative analysis of the mechanism that controls body size in Manduca sexta. J. Biol.5, 16.11-16.15 (2006).
Davidowitz, G. & Nijhout, H.F. The physiological basis of reaction norms: The interaction among growth rate, the duration of growth and body size. Integr. Comp. Biol.44, 443-449 (2004).
Colombani, J., et al. A nutrient sensor mechanism controls Drosophila growth. Cell.114, 739-749 (2003).
Mirth, C.K. & Riddiford, L.M. Size assessment and growth control: How adult size is determined in insects. BioEssays. 29, 344-355 (2007).
Thissen, J.P., Ketelslegers, J.M., & Underwood, L.E. Nutritional regulation of the insulin-like growth factors. Endocr. Rev.15, 80-101 (1994).
Boots, M. & Begon, M. Resource limitation and the lethal and sublethal effects of a viral pathogen in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. Ecol. Entomol.19, 319-326 (1994).
Shingleton, A.W., Mirth, C.K., & Bates, P.W. Developmental model of static allometry in holometabolous insects. Proc. R. Soc. B.275, 1875-1885 (2008).
Stern, D.L. & Emlen, D.J. The developmental basis of allometry in insects. Development.126, 1091-1101 (1999).
Emlen, D.J. & Allen, C.E. Genotype to phenotype: Physiological control of trait size and scaling in insects. Integr. Comp. Biol.43, 617-634 (2003).
1
ReplyPosted by: Kim van der LindeMarch 20, 2012, 3:39 PM