Enter your email to receive a free trial:
1Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School
Enter your email to receive a free trial:
The mesothelial clearance assay described here takes advantage of fluorescently labeled cells and time-lapse video microscopy to visualize and quantitatively measure the interactions of ovarian cancer multicellular spheroids and mesothelial cell monolayers. This assay models the early steps of ovarian cancer metastasis.
Davidowitz, R. A., Iwanicki, M. P., Brugge, J. S. In vitro Mesothelial Clearance Assay that Models the Early Steps of Ovarian Cancer Metastasis. J. Vis. Exp. (60), e3888, doi:10.3791/3888 (2012).
Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer related deaths in the United States1. Despite a positive initial response to therapies, 70 to 90 percent of women with ovarian cancer develop new metastases, and the recurrence is often fatal2. It is, therefore, necessary to understand how secondary metastases arise in order to develop better treatments for intermediate and late stage ovarian cancer. Ovarian cancer metastasis occurs when malignant cells detach from the primary tumor site and disseminate throughout the peritoneal cavity. The disseminated cells can form multicellular clusters, or spheroids, that will either remain unattached, or implant onto organs within the peritoneal cavity3 (Figure 1, Movie 1).
All of the organs within the peritoneal cavity are lined with a single, continuous, layer of mesothelial cells4-6 (Figure 2). However, mesothelial cells are absent from underneath peritoneal tumor masses, as revealed by electron micrograph studies of excised human tumor tissue sections3,5-7 (Figure 2). This suggests that mesothelial cells are excluded from underneath the tumor mass by an unknown process.
Previous in vitro experiments demonstrated that primary ovarian cancer cells attach more efficiently to extracellular matrix than to mesothelial cells8, and more recent studies showed that primary peritoneal mesothelial cells actually provide a barrier to ovarian cancer cell adhesion and invasion (as compared to adhesion and invasion on substrates that were not covered with mesothelial cells)9,10. This would suggest that mesothelial cells act as a barrier against ovarian cancer metastasis. The cellular and molecular mechanisms by which ovarian cancer cells breach this barrier, and exclude the mesothelium have, until recently, remained unknown.
Here we describe the methodology for an in vitro assay that models the interaction between ovarian cancer cell spheroids and mesothelial cells in vivo (Figure 3, Movie 2). Our protocol was adapted from previously described methods for analyzing ovarian tumor cell interactions with mesothelial monolayers8-16, and was first described in a report showing that ovarian tumor cells utilize an integrin –dependent activation of myosin and traction force to promote the exclusion of the mesothelial cells from under a tumor spheroid17. This model takes advantage of time-lapse fluorescence microscopy to monitor the two cell populations in real time, providing spatial and temporal information on the interaction. The ovarian cancer cells express red fluorescent protein (RFP) while the mesothelial cells express green fluorescent protein (GFP). RFP-expressing ovarian cancer cell spheroids attach to the GFP-expressing mesothelial monolayer. The spheroids spread, invade, and force the mesothelial cells aside creating a hole in the monolayer. This hole is visualized as the negative space (black) in the GFP image. The area of the hole can then be measured to quantitatively analyze differences in clearance activity between control and experimental populations of ovarian cancer and/ or mesothelial cells. This assay requires only a small number of ovarian cancer cells (100 cells per spheroid X 20-30 spheroids per condition), so it is feasible to perform this assay using precious primary tumor cell samples. Furthermore, this assay can be easily adapted for high throughput screening.
1. Ovarian Cancer Cell Spheroid Formation
2. Mesothelial Cell Monolayer Formation
3. Mesothelial Cell Clearance Assay
4. Representative Results
In this example, we compared the mesothelial clearance ability of OVCA433 ovarian cancer cell spheroids that have attenuated expression of talin-1 to control OVCA433 spheroids. OVCA433 spheroids from each group were added to a MatTek dish containing ZT mesothelial cell monolayers. Six spheroids from each group were imaged every 10 minutes for eight hours (Figure 4, Movie 3, Movie 4). The holes produced in the monolayer by the spreading spheroids were measured and six positions from each group were averaged. Figure 4 shows that the average clearance area created by talin 1 knockdown spheroids was significantly smaller than the average area created by control spheroids, suggesting that talin is required for mesothelial clearance by OVCA433 ovarian cancer spheroids.
Figure 1. Ovarian Cancer Metastasis. Primary ovarian tumors develop either from the ovarian surface epithelium or fallopian tubes. Tumor cells/ clusters break off from the primary tumor and collect in the peritoneal cavity. Tumor cells can then aggregate to form multicellular spheroids. Spheroids then attach to the mesothelial cell monolayers lining the peritoneal cavity. The mesothelial cells are excluded from underneath the attached ovarian cancer spheroid, allowing the spheroids to gain access to the underlying basement membrane.
Movie 1. Ovarian Cancer Metastasis. Click here to view movie.
Figure 2. Mesothelial cells line the surface of human peritoneal tissue and are excluded from underneath ovarian cancer cell implants.
Figure 3. Mesothelial Clearance Assay. Ovarian cancer spheroids are formed by incubating 100 RFP-expressing ovarian cancer cells per well in a poly-HEMA coated 96 well round bottom culture dish at 37°C for 16 hours. Poly-HEMA prevents the cells from attaching to the culture dish, allowing the cells to remain in suspension and adhere to one another to form a single cluster per well. Mesothelial cell monolayers are prepared by plating 6x105 mesothelial cells per well in a fibronectin coated 6 well MatTek dish and incubating the plate at 37°C for 16 hours. The spheroids are then transferred to the MatTek dish with the mesothelial monolayer and the two cell populations are imaged every 10 minutes for 8 hours using a Nikon Ti-E Inverted Motorized Widefield Fluorescence time-lapse microscope and Elements software.
Movie 2. Mesothelial Clearance Assay. Click here to view movie.
Figure 4. Attenuation of talin 1 expression in OVCA433 spheroids decreases mesothelial clearance ability. OVCA433 spheroids (red) with and without attenuated expression of talin 1 were allowed to attach to and invade into a ZT mesothelial monolayer (green). The two cell populations were imaged every 10 minutes for 8 hours using a Nikon Ti-E Inverted Motorized Widefield Fluorescence time-lapse microscope and elements software. The graph shows that talin 1 attenuation significantly decreases mesothelial cell clearance (Quantile plot with green bars at the means).
Movie 3. Control OVCA433 spheroids (red) invading into a mesothelial monolayer (green). Click here to view movie.
Movie 4. Attenuation of talin 1 expression in OVCA433 spheroids (red) decreases mesothelial (green) clearance ability. Click here to view movie.
The "Mesothelial Clearance Assay" presented here uses time-lapse microscopy to monitor the interactions of ovarian cancer multicellular spheroids and mesothelial cell monolayers, in great spatial and temporal detail. Previously, several groups8-14 had used endpoint assays to show that ovarian cancer cells attach to and invade into mesothelial cell monolayers. This assay is unique in that it uses fluorescently labeled cells to distinguish tumor cells from mesothelial cells, so that the dynamics of these two cell populations can be monitored throughout the assay. The process of intercalation can be visualized in real time and the rate of mesothelial clearance can be quantitatively measured over time. The use of timelapse microscopy allows one to closely monitor the dynamics of the interaction between the two cell populations under different experimental conditions. Additionally, a small percentage of either the mesothelial cells or the ovarian cancer cells can be labeled with a third fluorescent marker to monitor the dynamics of individual cells within the population. By tracking individual cells over time, the directionality and rate of migration can be calculated. To perform higher resolution analyses of mesothelial clearance, total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy can be used. If focal adhesions are labeled in the mesothelial cells, the dissociation of mesothelial adhesions by protrusive extensions of the tumor cells can be monitored, as described in our previous publication17.
This assay can be used to compare the invasion ability of ovarian cancer cell spheroids that have been genetically or pharmacologically modified to elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which ovarian cancer cell spheroids clear the mesothelial monolayer or to identify small molecule inhibitors of the process. Furthermore, the assay requires a very small number of ovarian cancer cells, so primary tumor cells from fluid exudates can be used (see limitations below) if labeled by preincubating the cells with cytotracker dyes (Invitrogen). The assay is also amenable to high throughput analysis. To perform high throughput genetic or pharmacological studies, the ovarian cancer cells can be transfected with different siRNA vectors or treated with different pharmacological inhibitors in each well of the 96-well plate Mesothelial cell monolayers can be plated in 96 well glass-bottom culture dishes, and the spheroids can be transferred 1:1 from the poly-HEMA coated plates to the monolayer-containing plates. All of these steps can be optimized for use with screening robots so that hundreds of siRNAs or inhibitors can screened at one time.
One of the strengths of this assay is to be able to model the force-dependent intercalation of ovarian cancer cells into the mesothelial monolayer. Our lab used traction force microscopy (TFM) to determine whether mechanical force regulates mesothelial clearance17. We found that overexpression of α5 integrin increased the contractility of cells plated on a fibronectin-coated substrate, while RNAi-mediated knockdown of talin, or myosin II decreased cell contractility17. Since downregulation of α5 integrin, talin, or myosin II in the ovarian cancer cell spheroids also decreased mesothelial clearance, our TFM measurements support the idea that mesothelial clearance in an event dependent on cellular contractile forces, in which cells with higher contractile forces caused greater mesothelial clearance. Therefore, the mesothelial clearance assay can be used to further understand intercalation events, associated with ovarian spheroid metastasis, that are dependent on mechanical forces.
This assay has a few limitations to consider. First, in order to form the multicellular spheroids, the cells must be cultured in suspension for at least 6 hours. If the cells are unable to survive without matrix contact their clearance ability will be compromised. Second, it is advantageous to use ovarian cancer cells that form uniform, compact multicellular spheroids. If the ovarian cancer cells only form loose clusters, they may break apart in the transfer from the polyHEMA-coated plate to the dish containing the mesothelial monolayer, creating spheroids of different shapes and sizes that will add variability to the data. Third, if the cells used are heterogeneous, this will add additional variability to the sizes of holes created in the monolayer. It is important to use multiple replicate wells (10-20/sample) due to the variability in extent of intercalation after eight hours. In the assays described here, well-established ovarian cancer (OVCA433) and mesothelial (ZT) cell lines were used. To make this assay more clinically relevant, primary ovarian cancer cells, from the ascites fluid of patients, can be used. It would be interesting to determine if in vitro mesothelial cell clearance ability correlates with clinical outcome. The limitations above are particularly important to consider when using primary samples, as the number of primary cells available is a limiting factor. Additionally, it is important to check the integrity of the mesothelial monolayer before performing this assay. The mesothelial monolayer can be fixed and stained for cell-cell junction proteins to ensure that mesothelial cell junctions are intact.
Finally, the mesothelial clearance assay can be easily modified to answer specific experimental questions. Here, we used fibronectin as the ECM component that allows the ovarian and mesothelial cells to adhere to the glass-bottom culture dishes, however, other ECM components can be used including collagen and laminin. Furthermore, other cell types that are found under the basement membrane, including fibroblasts, can be added to this experimental system, to assess the role of these cell types in mesothelial clearance9,19,20. Lastly, interactions of other types of tumor cells (e.g. pancreatic, breast, etc) with mesothelial cells can also be modeled using this assay. And it is feasible to study interactions between cancer cells and an endothelial monolayer, using this assay, to mimic intravasation or extravasation (Similar assays have been described in: 15,16,21-27 ).
We have nothing to disclose.
We would like to thank the Nikon Imaging Center at Harvard Medical School, specifically Jennifer Waters, Lara Petrak and Wendy Salmon, for training and the use of their timelapse microscopes. We would also like to thank Rosa Ng and Achim Besser for valuable discussions. This work was supported by NIH Grant 5695837 (to M. Iwanicki) and GM064346 to JSB; by a grant from Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation (to JSB).
|OVCA433 Ovarian Cancer Cells||Gift from Dr. Dennis Slamon|
|ZT Mesothelial Cells||Gift from Dr. Tan Ince|
|Medium 199||GIBCO, by Life Technologies||19950|
|MCDB105||Cell Applications Inc.||117-500|
|FBS-heat inactivated||GIBCO, by Life Technologies||10082|
|Pen-Strep||GIBCO, by Life Technologies||15070|
|96 well plates||Corning||3799|
|Polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate (poly-HEMA)||Sigma-Aldrich||192066-25G||For poly-HEMA solution dissolve 6mg poly-HEMA powder in 1ml of 95% EtOH|
|EtOH||Pharmco-AAPER||111ACS200||Dilute to 95% in dH20|
|Cell culture hood||Nuaire||NU-425-300|
|Tissue culture incubator||Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.||3110|
|incubator for poly-HEMA plates||Labline Instruments||Imperial III 305|
|Tabletop centrifuge||Heraeus Instruments||75003429/01|
|6 well glass-bottom dish||MatTek Corp.||P06G-1.5-20-F|
|Microscope||Nikon Instruments||Ti-E Inverted Motorized Fluorescence time-lapse microscope with integrated Perfect Focus System|
|Lens||Nikon Instruments||20X-0.75 numerical apeture|
|Halogen transilluminator||Nikon Instruments||0.52 NA long working distance condenser|
|Excitation and emission filters||Chroma Technology Corp.||GFP Ex 480/40, Em 525/50 RFP-mCherry Ex 575/50 Em 640/50|
|Transmitted and Epifluoresce light path||Sutter Instrument Co.||Smart Shutters|
|Linear-encoded motorized stage||Nikon Instruments|
|Cooled charged-coupled device camera||Hamamatsu Corp.||ORCA-AG|
|Microscope incubation chamber with temperature and CO2 control||Custom Made|
|Vibration isolation table||TMC|
|NIS-Elements software||Nikon Instruments||Version 3|
You must be signed in to post a comment. Please sign in or create an account.