Fill out the form to get a free trial:
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University
Fill out the form to get a free trial:
We present a simple method to produce microfluidic devices capable of applying similar dynamic conditions to multiple distinct strains, without the need for a clean room or soft lithography.
Aidelberg, G., Goldshmidt, Y., Nachman, I. A Microfluidic Device for Studying Multiple Distinct Strains. J. Vis. Exp. (69), e4257, doi:10.3791/4257 (2012).
The study of cell responses to environmental changes poses many experimental challenges: cells need to be imaged under changing conditions, often in a comparative manner. Multiwell plates are routinely used to compare many different strains or cell lines, but allow limited control over the environment dynamics. Microfluidic devices, on the other hand, allow exquisite dynamic control over the surrounding conditions, but it is challenging to image and distinguish more than a few strains in them. Here we describe a method to easily and rapidly manufacture a microfluidic device capable of applying dynamically changing conditions to multiple distinct yeast strains in one channel. The device is designed and manufactured by simple means without the need for soft lithography. It is composed of a Y-shaped flow channel attached to a second layer harboring microwells. The strains are placed in separate microwells, and imaged under the exact same dynamic conditions. We demonstrate the use of the device for measuring protein localization responses to pulses of nutrient changes in different yeast strains.
Cells are constantly reacting to a dynamically changing environment, by changing their metabolism, transcriptional profile and cellular functions. To study these phenomena, methods that can quantify such changes are needed. One type of readout for such responses is the change in localization of stress related transcription factors in response to nutritional stress.
Microfluidic devices1 have been used to dynamically manipulate environmental conditions to cells2-4. They present several advantages for live cell imaging: the environment of the cells can be precisely controlled and dynamically changed; cells can be live-imaged at all times, including during manipulation of external conditions; and minimal reagent volumes are required. A very simple design for a microfluidic device, allowing alternation between two conditions, is a Y-shaped device2. We routinely use Y-shaped microfluidic devices that allow application of dynamic changes to the cells in the channel. We use this device to follow localization changes of fluorescently tagged stress related transcription factors in yeast cells. We follow these changes under changing nutritional conditions. For example, we can provide a pulse (or series of pulses) of glucose-containing medium within a period of no-glucose medium, at a very fine temporal resolution. Often in such experiments, one is interested in comparing the responses of different cell strains (for example, different mutants, or different wild isolates). The Y-shaped channel is limited to one strain in each channel - if more than one strain is used, there is no simple way to distinguish between the strains. To overcome this, different channels can be used. If we want to apply the same dynamics conditions to multiple strains, we would like to combine the Y-channel concept with multiple channels. There are two challenges in implementing this solution: It can be hard to apply the same conditions at the same time to all channels, and there is a geometric limitation to the number of Y-channels that can be fitted in one device. We were therefore looking for a way for viewing several strains in one channel under dynamic conditions.
Here we describe a two-layered microfluidic device intended for imaging multiple strains in one channel under the same dynamic conditions. The bottom layer consists of thin PDMS with a row of holes. This layer is attached to the glass coverslip creating wells into which we will place the different strains, adhering them with Concanavalin A to the glass. The second layer is a Y-shaped microfluidic device created using the scotch tape method5. After placing the strains in the wells the second layer is quickly aligned and attached to the first one, creating one channel with several wells that contain the different strains. This final device allows following several strains in one channel, where all strains are subjected to the same conditions at the exact same time. The whole design and production process can be done on the benchtop, using simple means, with no soft lithography.
1. Creating a Scotch-tape Master5
2. Fabricating a PDMS Microfluidic Device
3. Cell Imaging Experiment
To demonstrate the separation between different strains we imaged two distinguishable yeast strains in alternate wells. Imaging the full wells shows no cell leakage between wells (Figure 5a,b). Both strains have the transcription factor MSN2 tagged with YFP. To test the simultaneous effect of dynamically changing conditions, we switched the flow rates in the two input channels, creating a step of no-glucose medium, which resulted in localization of Msn2-YFP to the nucleus (Figure 5c,d). The response measured at all the wells occurred at the same time, showing the device can be used for application of concurrent dynamic conditions to multiple wells.
Figure 1. Device design. The device is composed of a coverslip, a thin "Wells" layer and a "Flow" layer to which tubing is connected.
Figure 2. Flow layer design. A scotch-tape mold is made for this layer. Here we used two Y-shaped channels of opposing directions.
Figure 3. Wells layer. The thin layer of PDMS with punched-out wells is adhered to a glass coverslip. Then ConA is placed in each well and allowed to dry. Cells are then loaded to the 10 wells.
Figure 4. Controlled channel coverage. By controlling the relative flow rates of the two inputs of a Y channel, a specific fraction of its width is covered with medium A vs. medium B. (a) Left channel: Flowing at 0.8ml/hr (red) and 0.2 ml/hr (clear) results in 80%/20% coverage. Right channel: Flowing both media at 0.5 ml/hr results in 50%/50% coverage. (b) Photographs of the device with 10%/90%, 50%/50% and 90%/10% flow rates.
Figure 5. Dynamic experiment with multiple yeast strains. (a,b) Whole-well images of wells containing yeast cells with (b) or without (a) HTB2-Mcherry tagging, showing no cell leakage between wells. (c,d) Response of the cells in two wells to a no-glucose step at t=0. Msn2-YFP localizes to the nucleus at the same time following the step, demonstrating simultaneous media changes in the two wells. (e) Time-tracks of nuclear Msn2-YFP levels in single cells analyzed from one of the wells in (c,d). Click here to view larger figure.
In this paper we present a simple benchtop method for creating a microfluidic device that allows following several yeast strains simultaneously under dynamic conditions. Following several strains in one channel provides a reliable tool for comparing dynamics of single cell responses in multiple strains. One advantage of our approach is the ability to fabricate the device with simple techniques without the need for a clean room. In fact, we have also carried out the protocol skipping the plasma treatment operations (in steps 2.9 and 3.6) and got good results, so labs without any plasma equipment can still perform the protocol.
By seeding each of the different strains in its own well we avoid cell mixing during the assembly of the device, while still allowing medium flow to reach the cells during the experiment. A critical point in this protocol is not letting the cells dry out before reflowing medium over them (Steps 3.4 - 3.6). Drying out severely affects the viability of the cells, while trying to close the device with too much medium at each well results in adhesion problems between the two PDMS layers. These constraints force us to leave the wells layer in the device, rather then peel it off after the cells have settled in their spot. The wells layer, therefore, has to be deep enough to contain the initial droplet of seeded cells, but as thin as possible, so the aspect ratio of the wells allows medium flow to reach their bottom and the cells get external signals through direct flow.
The device as we describe here is limited to about 5 strains per channel. We routinely create devices with two adjacent Y channels at opposing directionalities (Figure 2). While this can be extended to a few more channels, or a few more wells per channel, it is still not as high throughput as some of the VLSI style devices 7, that so far have not been applied to living cells. We note, however, that since the main purpose of this device is to subject different strains to the exact same conditions while imaging their responses, there are limitations to concurrent imaging that stem from the number of strains imaged, regardless of the device implementation: at high magnification, strains have to be imaged sequentially, therefore the more strains imaged, the larger are the time differences of imaging between the first and last strain.
No conflicts of interest declared.
YG is supported by a fellowship from IDB. IN is an Alon fellow and a faculty fellow of the Edmond J. Safra Center for Bioinformatics at Tel Aviv University. This research was supported by ISF grant 1499/10.
|PDMS- SYLGARD 184||Dow Corning USA|
|Biopsy punchers||Ted Pella Inc.||Harris Uni-Core 15076 (2 mm), 15074 (1.2 mm)|
|Syringe pumps||Chemyx||Fusion 200|
|Corona treater||Electro-technic products||BD-20|
|Scotch tape||3M Scotch||Transparent Tape 1/2"|
You must be signed in to post a comment. Please sign in or create an account.