1Institute of Microengineering (IMT), Photovoltaics and Thin Film Electronics Laboratory, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 2Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley
This article is a part ofJoVE Applied Physics. If you think this article would be useful for your research, please recommend JoVE to your institution's librarian.Recommend JoVE to Your Librarian
Current Access Through Your IP Address
Current Access Through Your Registered Email Address
Battaglia, C., Söderström, K., Escarré, J., Haug, F. J., Despeisse, M., Ballif, C. Nanomoulding of Functional Materials, a Versatile Complementary Pattern Replication Method to Nanoimprinting. J. Vis. Exp. (71), e50177, doi:10.3791/50177 (2013).
We describe a nanomoulding technique which allows low-cost nanoscale patterning of functional materials, materials stacks and full devices. Nanomoulding combined with layer transfer enables the replication of arbitrary surface patterns from a master structure onto the functional material. Nanomoulding can be performed on any nanoimprinting setup and can be applied to a wide range of materials and deposition processes. In particular we demonstrate the fabrication of patterned transparent zinc oxide electrodes for light trapping applications in solar cells.
Nanopatterning has gained tremendous importance in many fields of nanotechnology and applied sciences. Pattern generation is the first step and may be accomplished by top-down approaches such as electron-beam lithography or bottom-up approaches based on self-assembly methods such as nanosphere lithography or block copolymer lithography 1. As important as pattern generation is pattern replication. Besides photolithography, nanoimprinting (Figure 1) has emerged as a promising alternative in particular suitable for high-throughput large-area nanoscale patterning at low cost 2-4. While photolithography requires a patterned mask, nanoimprinting relies on a prefabricated master structure. Pattern transfer from the master is commonly performed into a thermoplastic or a UV- or thermally curable polymer. However there are many cases, where it is desirable to transfer the pattern directly onto a functional material.
Here we describe a replication method based on nanomoulding and layer transfer (Figure 2) which we recently introduced in Ref. 5 to transfer nanoscale patterns onto functional zinc oxide electrodes. Our nanomoulding method can be easily implemented if a nanoimprinting setup is available. Nanomoulding offers the potential to be generalized to many other functional materials, materials stacks and even complete devices, provided that the mould material is chosen such that it is compatible with the material deposition process(es). As an example we present here nanomoulding of transparent conductive zinc oxide (ZnO) electrodes deposited by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) which find their application to enhance light trapping in solar cells 5.
1. Mould Fabrication
We use our home-built nanoimprinting setup for the fabrication of the negative mould following Ref. 6, but any alternative nanoimprinting setup will work fine. Alternatively a functionalized polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) mould might also work.
2. Anti-adhesion Layer
For successful demoulding, the anti-adhesion layer must be adapted to the materials and the pattern roughness. Generally rough patterns require low sticking coefficients. Low sticking coefficients on smooth patterns may lead to peeling of the functional material from the mould. High sticking coefficients on rough patterns may result in peeling of the resin from the PEN sheet during mould fabrication as the adherence of the resin to the master is stronger.
3. Material Deposition
We demonstrate here three deposition techniques suitable for material deposition to illustrate the versatility of nanomoulding. Other deposition techniques might also be applied. The third example describes the fabrication of a complete thin-film silicon solar cell.
4. Layer Transfer
We use glass slides (Schott AF32 eco, 41 mm x 41 mm x 0.5 mm) as final substrate. But other substrates, including metal foils or polymer sheets, could be used alternatively.
5. Sample Characterization
Figure 3 summarizes some illustrative examples of nanomoulded structures. A ZnO master structure grown by CVD on glass is shown in (a). The corresponding nanomoulded ZnO replica is shown in (d). Comparison of the local height (g) and angle (j) histograms extracted from AFM images reveal the high fidelity of the nanomoulding process. Analogous results are shown for a one-dimensional grating fabricated by interference lithography (b,e,h,k) and anodically textured aluminum (c,f,i,l).
Figure 1. Standard nanoimprinting process consisting of negative stamp fabrication (a-d) and the nanoimprinting process (e-h).
Figure 2. Nanomoulding process consisting of negative mould fabrication (a-d), deposition of the functional material (e), anchoring to the final substrate (f-g). Note that the nanomoulding process conceptually resembles the nanoimprinting process in Figure 1 except for the additional material deposition step (e).
Figure 3. Representative results obtained by nanomoulding: SEM images with AFM images in the inset of three master test structures for nanomoulding: ZnO grown by CVD (a), grating fabricated by interference lithography (b), dimple array obtained by anodic oxidation of aluminum (c). The corresponding nanomoulded ZnO replicas are shown in (d-f). Fidelity analysis comparing the local height (g-i) and angle (j-l) histograms of master and replica structures (black continuous lines represent the masters, dashed red lines the replicas). The scale bar in Figure 3a is also valid for Figure 3b-f including all AFM insets.
Nanomoulding allows the transfer of nanopatterns on arbitrary functional materials. Comparison of the individual processing steps in Figure 1 and 2 reveals the close relationship between nanomoulding and nanoimprinting. The major difference between nanomoulding and nanoimprinting is the additional material deposition step in Figure 2e. The remaining process flow is identical. Nanomoulding can therefore be performed on any available nanoimprinting setup.
Provided that a compatible mould material and anti-adhesion agent is selected, material deposition can be carried out using various methods such as the family of chemical and physical vapor deposition techniques, thermal evaporation, but also solution-based deposition approaches. Correspondingly wide is the range of materials that can be nanomoulded. While nanoimprinting is performed into a deformable polymer, nanomoulding can also be applied to hard bridle materials such as ZnO. In addition, while common nanoimprinting resins are insulating, conducting materials can be patterned.
For deposition techniques reaching elevated temperatures, the PEN sheet used as mould support can be replaced by a high performance polyimide sheet (such as DuPont's Kapton PV9202 which supports temperatures up to 500 °C). High temperature nanoimprinting resins have also been developed withstanding temperatures up to 600 °C 12.
A major advantage of our nanomoulding technique is that the material can be deposited onto the mould as a solid film. Compared to sol-gel based imprinting or moulding 8, 9 techniques, where the precursors to a functional material are diluted in a solvent, our nanomoulding approach avoids typical problems associated with solvent evaporation, curing and calcination such as shrinkage and the formation of pores, bubbles and cracks.
After material deposition, the flexible mould must be handled carefully to prevent crack formation or local peeling of the material. The PEN sheet thickness may be adjusted to avoid accidental bending of the mould beyond the critical radius of curvature for crack formation. However, a certain mould flexibility is required for the demoulding process.
ZnO deposited by CVD in this study leads to a high fidelity replication of the master pattern. Figure 3a presents a SEM image of an as-grown ZnO master texture. The corresponding nanomoulded replica is shown in Figure 3d. Height and angle histograms extracted from the AFM images for the master and replica ZnO structure shown in Figure 3g and j respectively almost coincide and confirm the high fidelity. The angle histogram, which is much more sensitive to subtle morphological changes than the height histogram, exhibits a slight shift towards lower angles for the replica. This trend is also observed for the other two test structures and represents a slight smoothing of the features. However, even very fine details such as fine genuine crystal dislocation lines along the facets of the ZnO pyramids are reproduced with high accuracy and give a rough idea of the resolution capability of our nanomoulding technique. Fine modulations along the rims of the line grating in Figure 3b are also visible in the replica Figure 3e. While the dominant morphological features are nicely reproduced for the dimple pattern, only the onset of the sharp tips occurring at domain boundaries in Figure 3c are replicated in Figure 3f. Pattern fidelity and resolution both depend on the deposited material. Preliminary tests with nanomoulded silver films, deposited by sputtering, reproduced the dominant morphological features, but lead to a much lower fidelity and resolution.
The achievable aspect ratio depends on the deposition technique. CVD of ZnO allows easily for aspect ratios up to unity. For aspect ratios above unity, a depletion of precursor gases in the valleys of the structure will lead to a faster growth rate on top resulting eventually in shadowing and possibly the inclusion of cavities in the structure. These cavities risk compromising the mechanical integrity of the film and potentially lead to breaking of the film during demoulding. These problems could be avoided using water-soluble moulds as recently in Ref. 10 in the context of transfer moulding.
As mentioned in the introduction, nanomoulding can also be used to pattern composite layer stacks and full devices. In Ref. 11 we combined the deposition of ZnO by CVD with the deposition of a full thin-film silicon solar cell by PE-CVD and transferred the complete solar cell on its final substrate.
No conflicts of interest declared.
The authors thank M. Leboeuf for assistance with the AFM, W. Lee for the anodically textured aluminum master and the Swiss Federal Energy Office and the Swiss National Science Foundation for funding. A part of this work was carried out in the framework of the FP7 project "Fast Track" funded by the EC under grant agreement no 283501.
|(1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-Perfluoroctyl)-trichlorsilane, anti-adhesion agent||Sigma Aldrich||448931-10G|
|Glass slides||Schott||AF32 eco||0.5 mm|
|Polyethylennaphtalate (PEN) sheets||Goodfellow||ES361090||0.125 mm|
|Ag sputter target 4N||Heraeus||81062165|
|B2H6, SiH4, H2, B(CH3)3, PH3, CH4, CO2||Messer|
|PVD system||Leybold||Univex 450 B|
|PE-CVD reactor||Indeotec||Octopus I|
|AFM||Digital Instruments||Nanoscope 3100|