Enter your email to receive a free trial:
1Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, 2Clinical Research Laboratory, 81st Medical Group, Keesler Air Force Base
Enter your email to receive a free trial:
Lytic phage biosensors and antibody beads are able to discriminate between methicillin resistant (MRSA) and sensitive staphylococcus bacteria. The phages were immobilized by a Langmuir-Blodgett method onto a surface of a quartz crystal microbalance sensor and worked as broad range staphylococcus probes. Antibody beads recognize MRSA.
Keywords: Bioengineering, Issue 75, Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, Infection, Medicine, Immunology, Cellular Biology, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Anatomy, Physiology, Bacteria, Pharmacology, Staphylococcus, Bacteriophages, phage, Binding, Competitive, Biophysics, surface properties (nonmetallic materials), surface wave acoustic devices (electronic design), sensors, Lytic phage spheroids, QCM-D, Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) monolayers, MRSA, Staphylococcus aureus, assay
Guntupalli, R., Sorokulova, I., Olsen, E., Globa, L., Pustovyy, O., Vodyanoy, V. Biosensor for Detection of Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus Bacteria. J. Vis. Exp. (75), e50474, doi:10.3791/50474 (2013).
A structurally transformed lytic bacteriophage having a broad host range of Staphylococcus aureus strains and a penicillin-binding protein (PBP 2a) antibody conjugated latex beads have been utilized to create a biosensor designed for discrimination of methicillin resistant (MRSA) and sensitive (MSSA) S. aureus species 1,2. The lytic phages have been converted into phage spheroids by contact with water-chloroform interface. Phage spheroid monolayers have been moved onto a biosensor surface by Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) technique 3. The created biosensors have been examined by a quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation tracking (QCM-D) to evaluate bacteria-phage interactions. Bacteria-spheroid interactions led to reduced resonance frequency and a rise in dissipation energy for both MRSA and MSSA strains. After the bacterial binding, these sensors have been further exposed to the penicillin-binding protein antibody latex beads. Sensors analyzed with MRSA responded to PBP 2a antibody beads; although sensors inspected with MSSA gave no response. This experimental distinction determines an unambiguous discrimination between methicillin resistant and sensitive S. aureus strains. Equally bound and unbound bacteriophages suppress bacterial growth on surfaces and in water suspensions. Once lytic phages are changed into spheroids, they retain their strong lytic activity and show high bacterial capture capability. The phage and phage spheroids can be utilized for testing and sterilization of antibiotic resistant microorganisms. Other applications may include use in bacteriophage therapy and antimicrobial surfaces.
Methicillin resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus have been suggested as a factor in essential infections and nosocomial outbreaks 4-8. Common ways of the recognition of methicillin resistance, such as the disk diffusion oxacillin agar screen test, or broth microdilution, rely on tailored culture conditions to enhance the expression of resistance. Alterations include the utilization of oxacillin, incubation at 30 or 35 °C rather than 37 °C, and the inclusion of NaCl to the growth medium. Furthermore, for correct detection by these types of techniques, a long incubation period of 24 hr instead of 16 to 18 hr is required. Rapid techniques with appropriate (>96%) level of sensitivity for identification of methicillin resistance include automated microdilution techniques such as the Vitek GPS-SA card, the Rapid ATB Staph system, and the Rapid Microscan Panel system which produce results after 3-11 hr 9-11. The Crystal MRSA ID system is a rapid method based upon recognition of growth of S. aureus in the presence of 2% NaCl and 4 mg of oxacillin per liter with an oxygen-sensitive fluorescence sensor. Claimed sensitivities range between 91 to 100% after 4 hr of incubation 12-14. These phenotypic methods are limited in their accuracies by the impact of prevalent strains that express heterogeneous resistance. Therefore, the best widely accepted methods for the recognition of methicillin resistance is PCR or DNA hybridization of the mecA gene 15. However this technique requires purified DNA and is extremely sensitive to various admixtures (impurities), which include cell debris16.
Furthermore, these techniques need a long time to perform. Strategies to the recognition of the mecA gene product, protein PBP 2a, could be utilized to determine resistance and may be more reliable compared to standard test techniques 17.
It had been earlier shown that bacteriophage 12600 can be utilized as a recognition probe for Staphylococcus aureus strains including those having methicillin resistance 1,2,18. In this work we proposed a novel technique in the specific recognition and detection of MRSA, such as the recognition of bacteria along with conformation of MRSA in real time. For this specific purpose a S. aureus bacteriophage with a wide spectrum of hosts (including MRSA strains) combined with monoclonal antibody against protein (PBP 2a) have been used. PBP 2a is a cell wall protein and it is the cause of antibiotic resistivity of MRSA. However PBP 2a antibody is not specific for S. aureus since some other bacteria have antibiotic binding proteins with sequence similarity to PBP 2a 19,20. Consequently in this work, S. aureus bacteriophage and antibodies against PBP 2a protein have been used. To be able to develop a biosensor to specifically detect and identify MRSA a device with a two-step action has been utilized. The initial step used a S. aureus bacteriophage monolayer as a sensor probe, while the second step employed PBP 2a specific antibodies. Therefore, step one will recognize S. aureus bacteria, as the other one will be sensitive to the antibiotic-binding protein. When signals received from two steps are positive, it indicates the specific detection of MRSA.
1. Setting the Stage
2. Bacteriophage Propagation and Titration
3. Gold-immobilized Phage
4. Testing of Immobilized Phage Infectivity on a Dry Surface
5. Testing of Lytic Activity of Free and Bound Phage in Liquid
6. Loss of Bound Phages During Incubation
7. Phage Spheroids Preparation
8. Biosensor Preparation
9. Biosensor Testing, Discrimination of Methicillin Resistant and Sensitive Staphylococcus Bacteria
The phage demonstrated lytic activity against all tested strains of S. aureus, including MRSA strains, as indicated by the phage spot test. Plaque sizes generally ranged from 5 to 15 mm. No activity was found against other test-cultures (Table 1).
A normal growth of S. aureus ATCC 12600 in NZY medium on shaker-incubator at 37 °C is shown in Figure 1A (a curve labeled by empty circles). The number of bacteria increased from 3.2 x 106 to 4.0 x 108 CFU/ml. Figure 1A (a curve labeled by filled circles) shows results of the co-cultivation of 2.0 x 106 PFU/ml free phage simultaneously added with the same concentration of S. aureus ATCC 12600. Phage, immobilized on the gold surface, demonstrated the lytic activity comparable with the activity of phage in suspension (Figure 1A, curve labeled by top down triangles). Immobilized phage remained infective when the gold piece with phage was first used in 24-hr growing experiment, then it was washed 5 times and stored in PBS for 6 days at 4 °C, and finally reused with a fresh bacterial suspension. (Figure 1A, curve labeled by top up triangles). It seems that immobilized phages inject their DNA in the bacteria, leaving void capsids, which are incapable to infect new bacteria. We hypothesize that immobilized phages on a gold surface served as primary "catalyzers" to infect a few bacteria, which generate free phages those in turn infect new bacteria and so on. Therefore, the most of immobilized phages were probably not used in a first 24 hr growing experiment and, therefore, can be utilized a second time. The surface density of phages deposited by physical adsorption was about ~0.7 phage particle/μm2. This concentration is high, but it can grow up to 10 times 2. Therefore, the gold plate could incorporate some of the free viable phages released by infected bacteria in the first 24 hr growing experiment.
Figure 1B shows the lysis zone around the gold piece, indicating that immobilized phages were capable of lysing bacterial cells. In the control experiments, the empty gold plate did not inhibit bacterial growth. Hence the effective decrease of bacterial growth found at the co-culture of bacteria and immobilized phage is a result of primary interaction of water suspended bacteria and bound phage as shown in Figure 1C. The phage detachment from the gold surface during co-incubation of bound phage and bacteria was small. In order to estimate how many phages were detached from the gold surface during incubation, samples with bound phage were immersed in NZY solution, shaken in the shaker-incubator at 37 °C for 8 hr, and a free phage concentration in supernatant was assessed. We determined that 4.1 x 107 PFU were bound to a 60 mm2 gold piece (~0.7 phage particle/μm2), when only 3 x 104 PFU were detached (0.007% detachment).
The transmission and scanning electron micrographs of intact lytic phage 12600 on the gold substrate surface is shown in Figures 2A and 2B. When the phage suspension was subjected to chloroform treatment, the phage physical appearance was changed. The tail contracted in length and thickened. The polygonal head became rounded (Figures 2D and 2E). We termed the structurally modified lytic phage "spheroid" similar to the name of the chloroform treated filamentous phage 26. In spite of the significant structural changes resulted from chloroform treatment, the spheroid lytic activity measured by plaque numbers has not changed (Figures 2C and 2F). The mean lytic activity of phage and spheroids were (7.4±1.5(SD)) x 1010 (N=4) and (7.5±1.0(SD)) x 1010 (N=7), PFU/ml. At the 0.05 level, the activities of phage and spheroids were not significantly different (Figure 2C and 2F).
The QCM sensors with immobilized lytic phages showed no significant changes in the resonance frequency or energy dissipation when they were exposed to MRSA (Figure 3A). These data indicate that MRSA/phage interaction resulted in a no mass change according to the QCM, and yet the electron micrographs of post assayed biosensors revealed significant bacterial binding at the sensor surface (Figure 3B).
When MRSA suspensions were injected into the flow cell with phage spheroid biosensors, a substantial decrease in the frequency (Δf ≈ -105 Hz) and an increase in the dissipation (ΔD ≈ 26 DU) were observed (Figure 3C). Following phage spheroid-bacterial (MRSA) binding interactions, assayed sensors were exposed to PBP2a antibody conjugated latex beads suspensions. These MRSA assayed biosensors responded to the PBP2a antibody conjugated latex beads suspensions, since a further decrease in the frequency (Δf ≈ -45 Hz) and an increase in the dissipation (ΔD ≈ 15 DU) were observed (Figure 3C). Binding of MRSA to phage probes and PBP2a antibody conjugated latex beads was confirmed using scanning electron microscopy investigations (Figure 3D).
When the phage spheroid biosensor was exposed to MSSA suspensions, a substantial decrease in the frequency (Δf ≈ -200 Hz) and an increase in the dissipation (ΔD ≈ 55 DU) were observed (Figure 3E). Following phage spheroid-MSSA binding interactions, assayed sensors were challenged with PBP2a antibody conjugated latex beads suspensions. Initially, the MSSA assayed biosensor showed short transients of increase in frequency and decrease in dissipation. After a few minutes of MSSA and PBP2a antibody conjugated latex beads interactions, frequency returned to post PBP2a antibody introduction levels, but the dissipative energy increased (Figure 3E). Binding of MSSA to phage probes was confirmed with scanning electron microscopy, but no binding between MSSA and PBP2a antibody conjugated latex beads was observed (Figure 3F). Ellipsometric thickness profile, 3D thickness map of lytic phages and staphylococcus bacteria are shown in Supplementary Figures S1 and S2.
Following contact of sensors with LB immobilized phages or spheroids to the suspension of 109 cells/ml of MRSA or MSSA, the bacteria were observed to bind phages or spheroids at density (ρ) of 9.1 x 107 (MRSA/intact phages), 7.9 x 107 (MRSA/spheroids), and 7.2 x 107 (MSSA/spheroids) cells/cm2. In tests using 5 different lytic phages and 2 host bacteria 27, researchers subjected phages immobilized by covalent binding method to 109 cells/ml bacteria, and determined the phage capture efficiency in a range of (2.5-8.9) x 105 cells/cm2. The phage capture efficiency presented in this work is ~100 times higher.
|Host||Strain||Strain details||Methicillin sensitivity||Phage sensitivity|
|S. aureus||MRSA 1||AU||R||+|
|S. aureus||MRSA 5||AU||R||+|
|S. aureus||MRSA 13||AU||R||+|
|S. aureus||MRSA 34||AU||R||+|
|S. aureus||MRSA 45||AU||R||+|
Table 1. Phage 12600 sensitivity of bacterial strains. IA - isolated from animals; AU - bacterial culture collection of Auburn University; NA - not applicable; a - lytic activity of phage was defined by plaques formation, +, sensitive, -, not sensitive. Overnight cultures of tested strains were plated onto the plates with NZY agar. After the surface dried, a sample (10 μl) of 1011 PFU phage suspension was spotted on the surface of the plate. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 18-24 hr. Lytic activity of the phages was detected by formation of plaques.
Figure 1. Infective properties of bound and free phage. A. Bacterial growth in the absence (empty circles) and presence (filled circles) of free phage, in the presence of phage bound to gold surface (top up triangles), and in the presence of phage bound to gold surface after 6 hours at 4 °C (top down triangles). Insert: The line (1) shows a linear fit of the no phage growth experimental data to the equation (4) (R=-0.99, p<0.0001). The line (2) shows a fit of the experimental data of bacterial growth at the free phage presence to the same equation. Bacterial growth constant (k) in the absence and presence of free phage, are equal 0.88 and 0.64, (-0.048, decline phase). Representative data of three independent experiments are shown in panel A. A mean relative error OD600 measurements did not exceed 5%. B. Phage immobilized to the gold surface is infective as indicated by the lysis zone around the gold piece. 1- the fragment the agar plate with bacteria; 2 - the gold piece with immobilized phage; 3 - the inhibition zone around the gold piece. C. Schematic representation of bacterium lysis by phage attached to the gold surface. 1 - gold-coated quartz piece, 2 - phage bound to the gold surface, 3 - bacterium anchored by bound phages, 4 - free phages have released by bursting infected bacterium. Used with permission from: Guntupalli, R., et al. 2012. Click here to view larger figure.
Figure 2. Properties of intact and modified phage. A and B - Transmission and scanning electron micrographs of intact phage, respectively; C - phage lytic activity on an agar plate with MRSA. D and E - Transmission and scanning electron micrographs of intact phage spheroids, respectively; F - phage spheroids lytic activity on an agar plate with MRSA. The mean activity of phage and spheroids are (7.4±1.5(SD)) x 1010 (N=4) and (7.5±1.0(SD)) x 1010 (N=7) PFU/ml. T-test: t = 0.15682, p = 0.87851. At the 0.05 level, the activities of phage and spheroids are NOT significantly different. Bars: A, B, D, and E: 200 nm. Used with permission from: Guntupalli, R., et al. 2012.
Figure 3. Combined QCM-D and EM analysis of phage-bacteria interactions. Bacteria were delivered to the sensor at concentration of 109 CFU/ml suspensions in water at a flow rate of 50 μl/min. 1, 2 represent changes in the resonance frequency and the energy dissipation, respectively. A. Phage coated QCM-D sensor response to MRSA. Arrow shows the MRSA delivery time to the sensor surface. B. Scanning electron micrograph of post assayed MRSA bound to lytic phage immobilized on the QCM sensor. M-MRSA, P-phages on the sensor surface. C. Successive responses of the phage spheroids coated QCM-D sensor to MRSA first and then to PBP antibody beads. Arrows indicate MRSA and PBP antibody delivery time to the sensor surface, respectively. D. Scanning electron micrograph of post assayed biosensor with phage spheroids, MRSA, and PBP antibody beads. Thick and thin arrows shows typical MRSA cell and antibody bead, respectively. E. Successive responses of the phage spheroids coated QCM-D sensor to S. aureus first and then to PBP antibody beads. Arrows indicate S. aureus and PBP antibody delivery time to the sensor surface, respectively. F. Scanning electron micrograph of post assayed biosensor with phage spheroids, S. aureus, and PBP antibody beads. Thick and thin arrows shows typical S. aureus cell and antibody bead, respectively. Used with permission from: Guntupalli, R., et al. 2012. Click here to view larger figure.
Figure S1. Supplementary Figure 1. (a) and (b) are an ellipsometric thickness profile and 3D thickness map of a lytic phage, respectively (effective refractive index = 1.05). Thickness profiles show mean, RMS roughness, minimum, and maximum thickness of the monolayer. A line across the thickness map was drawn to generate the thickness profile.
Figure S2. Supplementary Figure 2.
It is well known that phages can be used as biosensor probes for bacterial pathogens 28. It is demonstrated in this work that phage together with PBP 2a antibodies can be utilized to resolve the old problem: rapid discrimination antibiotic resistant and sensitive strains.
It was found however those normal unmodified staphylococcal phages are not suitable for bacteria detection with QCM devices, even though they bind bacteria. The phage tail is so long that acoustic waves cannot "reach" the bacteria bound to the end of phage tails. This condition resulted in a "missing mass" effect 29 and inability to register resonance frequency and dissipation change in spite of the significant binding showed by EM images (Figures 3A and 3B). This problem was easily solved by replacing the intact phage with spheroids, the phage modified by chloroform-water treatment. This treatment resulted in fully functional phage with short, thick and non-flexible tail (Figures 2D, 2E, and 2F). When phages were replaced with spheroids in biosensors, the MRSA were easily detected by QCM-D device.
When phage particles were bound to gold surfaces at a proper orientation, their receptors were accessible to the host bacteria. If direct physical contact between a solid surface with phages and a dried bacterial layer occur, the immobilized phages are capable of injecting viral genome into host bacteria (Figure 1C). These results agree well with those obtained with lytic phages immobilized to glass disk surfaces by a covalent binding technique 27. The capability of bound lytic phages to capture host bacteria were also demonstrated by using a biotinylated phage immobilization technique 30. In contrast, a very simple physical adsorption method for attaching properly oriented phages to solid surfaces has been utilized 31. The high phage spheroid capture efficiency can be used for making effective antimicrobial surfaces. A total time-to-answer for the proposed assay is about 16 min per sample. This time can be dramatically shortened by using QCM devices with a large number of chambers. The anticipated shelf life for the phage sensors is about of 3-4 months at room temperature. With a biopolymer protection it could be prolong up to a few years 32. The detection limit of S. aureus was measured for this phage by a surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy, and found to be 104 CFU/ml 18.
One of the most important conditions for using methods described in this article is to comply with clean and sterile conditions 33 requirements for all experiments with phages and bacteria.
Commonly used methods for detection of MRSA, such as the disk diffusion oxacillin agar screen test, or broth microdilution take normally up to 24 hr to carry out the test. Rapid techniques that include automated techniques such as the Vitek GPS-SA card, the Rapid ATB Staph system, the Rapid Microscan Panel system, and the Crystal MRSA ID system also produce results after 3-11 hr 9-14. PCR or DNA hybridization of the mecA gene 15 is a relatively fast and accurate method but requires purified DNA and is extremely sensitive impurities. In contrast, the method described in this work is rapid, does not need DNA extraction, and it is not sensitive to admixtures.
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
The work reported herein was supported by grants from Auburn University AUDFS and USAF CRADA 07-277-60MDG-01. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors, and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.
|Phosphate buffered saline (PBS)||Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO||P4417|
|spectrophotometric-grade chloroform||Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO||154733||(99.8% A.C.S.)|
|Hexane-Anhydrous||Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO||29609-0||(95%)|
|Ethyl Alcohol||Pharmco products Inc. Brookfield, CT||64-17-5||190 Proof|
|PBP 2a antibody conjugated latex beads||Denka Seiken Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan||The MRSA-Screen test|
|S. aureus ATCC 12600, S. aureus ATCC 27690 and Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6051 from||American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA);|
|MRSA1, MRSA 2, MRSA 5, MRSA 13, MRSA 26, MRSA 34, MRSA 45, B. anthracis Sterne, Salmonella typhimurium LT2, Shigella flexneri, Yersinia enterocolotica, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae 13882; The lytic phage 12600||The culture collection of Auburn University, Auburn, AL|
|Centrifuge||Beckman Coulter||Optima L-90K Ultra Centrifuge|
|KSV 2200 LB film balance||KSV Chemicals, Finland|
|Light microscope optical system||CitoViva Technology Inc., Auburn, AL|
|QCM-D||Q-Sense AB, Västra Frölunda, Sweden||E4|
|Scanning electron microscope (SEM)||JEOL USA Inc., Peabody, MA||JEOL-7000F SEM|
|Transmitting electron microscopy (TEM)||JEOL USA Inc., Peabody, MA||JEOL, JEM 2010|
|Stericup, Presterilized||Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA||SCGPU05RE||0.22 μm, GP Express PLUS membrane|
|Bio-Assay dish||NUNC A/S, Denmark||240835||Dimensions(mm), 245 x 245 x 25|
|Pipettes||Gilson, Pipetman, France||P100, P200, P1000|
|C24 Incubator Shaker||New Brunswick Scientific, CT||Classic C24|
|Gold-coated quartz pieces||Auburn University, AL||Homemade|
|Petri dishes||Fisher Brand, USA||0875713||100 mmX15 mm|
|SterilGard III Advance||The Baker Company, ME||SG403|
|Culture Growing Flasks||Corning Incorporated, NY||4995||PYREX 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks|
|Optical Spectrometer||Genesys 20. Thermo Spectronic, USA.||4001|
|Plasma Cleaner||Harrick Plasma, USA||PDC-32G|
|Millipore water purification system||Millipore||Direct-Q|
|Imaging Ellipsometer||Accurion, USA||nanofilm_ep3se|
|Software||Q-Sense AB, Sweden||QSoft, QTools|
You must be signed in to post a comment. Please sign in or create an account.