We present a modified no-touch technique (MNTT) to create a radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula (RC-AVF) in which the venous and arterial wall avoid devascularization and the radial artery does not sever.
Autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the primary and best option to obtain vascular access for hemodialysis treatment; other options are arteriovenous graft (AVG) and central venous catheterization (CVC). The implementation of radio-cephalic autologous arteriovenous fistula (RC-AVF) in the forearm was preferred among patients with superior vascular conditions. However, there is a high rate of early fistula failure. The chosen surgical method is understood to have an effect on the maturation of the fistula. New surgical procedures such as radial artery deviation and reimplantation (RADAR) have been significantly improved for juxta-anastomotic stenosis. Nevertheless, new problems such as stenosis of arteries and narrowing of surgical indication were also found. In this report, we presented a modified no-touch technique (MNTT) to create an RC-AVF, in which the venous and arterial wall avoid devascularization and the radial artery does not sever.
Radio-cephalic autologous arteriovenous fistula (RC-AVF) have been regarded as the primary and best choice for vascular access in hemodialysis patients1,2. However, the early failure to mature continues to be a major problem with RC-AVF creation3. Different surgical methods have different degrees of vascular injury and affect the maturation of RC-AVF. In 1996, Souza4 first proposed the use of a no-touch technique (NTT) to separate the great saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass grafting and achieved good results5,6,7. Horer et al.8 was the first to use NTT to construct RC-AVF. At the 1-year follow-up, primary patency was 54% and secondary patency was 80%. Sadaghianloo et al.9 further extended the concept of no-touch technology and proposed the radial artery deviation and reimplantation (RADAR) technique. This technique is associated with less juxta-anastomotic stenosis. However, the inflow artery stenosis was more prominent with RADAR. We speculate that this may be related to the severance of the radial artery and skeletonization of the distal tip of the artery.
To further reduce the injury to veins and arteries during the operation, we proposed a new modified no-touch technique (MNTT), which significantly improved the patency rate and the fistula maturation10. The aim of this technique was to primarily avoid both devascularization of the venous and arterial wall and severing of the radial artery. After the skin and subcutaneous tissue were incised, the cephalic vein and its surrounding adipose tissue were seen below the superficial fascia. An 8-10-mm-long incision was made in the superficial fascia and cephalic vein wall, and the radial artery pedicle (including the radial artery and its accompanying veins) was isolated 40-50 mm. The artery pedicle was not severed, and the radial artery pedicle was raised to approach the cephalic vein. An 8-10-mm-long incision was made in the artery. The anastomosis was performed side-to-side and the distal vein was ligated to form a functional end-to-side anastomosis (Figure 1).
We evaluated blood vessels by Doppler ultrasound before the surgeries of 10 cases: there was no stenosis in the radial artery and cephalic vein with radial artery diameter≥1.6 mm and cephalic vein diameter≥2 mm. Echocardiography showed left ventricular score >60%, and the patient had no surgical contraindications. A distance of <2 cm between the artery and vein was identified as the proposed anastomosis site.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of anastomosis types in AVFs12. a: Conventional surgery for an AVF. b: AVF created using the NTT. c: AVF created using the MNTT and a functional end-to-side anastomosis. AVF: arteriovenous fistula; NTT: no-touch technique. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The MNTT was conducted according to the human research protocol approved by the ethics committee of the Affiliated Suzhou Science & Technology Town Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (IRB2021029).
1. Preoperative evaluation
2. Disinfection and anesthesia
3. Superficial fascia exposure
4. Preparation of the cephalic vein
5. Preparation of the radial artery
6. Opening the cephalic vein and the radial artery
7. Functional end-to-side anastomosis
Figure 2. Surgical steps of the modified no-touch technique. a: Exposure of the cephalic vein with the surrounding tissue in situ. b: Placing the blue vessel loop. c: Exposure of the radial artery and its companion vein. d: A side-to-side anastomosis using the Kunlin's technique. e: Anastomosed the posterior wall of the vessel. f: The distal cephalic vein was ligated to form a functional end-to-side anastomosis. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Since January 2021, we have applied the MNTT technique in 10 patients to construct AVF. Seven of the 10 patients have been under dialysis.
None of the patients had fever or infection after surgery. Physical examination of the cephalic-vein at weeks 4 and 8 showed significant dilation. Fistula can be palpable tremor with loud murmur. Doppler ultrasonography showed obvious dilation of the cephalic vein and radial artery. The blood flow spectrum of the cephalic vein 1.5 cm away from the anastomosis showed spiral laminar flow (Figure 3). The fistula constructed by MNTT can be punctured repeatedly with two needles. Blood flow of the brachial artery was >600 mL/min (Table 1). Four hours of hemodialysis was successfully completed. None of the patients had any current vascular access-related complications.
Figure 3. Postoperative ultrasound results. a: Juxta-anastomotic region. b: Spiral laminar flow was shown at the outflow tract vein and radial artery. c: Cephalic vein. d: Blood flow of cephalic vein (5 cm from the anastomosis). e: Blood flow of radial artery (1.5 cm from the anastomosis). f: Blood flow of brachial artery (elbow fossa). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Table 1: Ultrasound results of the patient 4 and 8 weeks after RC-AVF surgery Please click here to download this Table.
Venous juxta-anastomotic stenosis is one of the main factors affecting the maturation of AVF5. It is known to be closely related to intimal hyperplasia13,14,15. However, prevention strategies for intimal hyperplasia are still limited. Modified surgical procedures16 such as RADAR have been shown to have less venous juxta-anastomotic stenosis, increased maturation and patency, and fewer secondary interventions9,17. However, the inflow artery stenosis was more prominent with RADAR.
Here, we extended the RADAR technique and avoided devascularization of the venous and arterial wall and did not sever the radial artery. The results showed a significant reduction in venous stenosis, and no arterial stenosis was observed. Spiral laminar flow was shown on the blood-flow spectrum of the cephalic vein 1.5-cm from the anastomosis. The blood flow of the brachial artery was >600 mL/min. In the postoperative follow-up, we found that the patients did not have pain, ischemia, numbness, and other adverse problems in the distal forearm. These improved outcomes suggest that MNTT is likely the preferred surgical technique to perform AVF.
The first critical surgical step was exposure of the superficial fascia. The cephalic vein and its surrounding tissues below the superficial fascia could be seen clearly. Care should be taken not to damage the superficial fascia, and an electric knife should not be used to stop bleeding. The second critical surgical step was preparation of the radial artery. By bringing the cephalic vein and radial artery close together, we can achieve suturing. In the procedure of artery isolation, the arterial pedicle (artery and two veins) was dissected for 4-5 cm. The farther the distance between the artery and the vein, the longer the arterial pedicle needed to be dissected. In the 10 cases of RC-AVF that we completed with MNTT, the distance between the artery and the vein was up to 2 cm.
The advantages of this technique are listed here. The cephalic vein and radial artery were not skeletonized at the site of anastomosis. The aim of MNTT is primarily to avoid devascularization of the venous and arterial wall. The artery pedicle was not severed. MNTT is applicable to a wide range of patients (forearm and upper arm fistulas).
There are limitations associated with the technique. First, based on our experience, the operation cannot be performed if the distance between the cephalic vein and radial artery >3 cm. Second, despite the protecting the perivascular tissue, anastomosis is still needed with a vascular clamp to block blood flow.
There is a wide range of surgical indications without severing the artery. In our experience, MNTT is suitable for snuffbox, forearm, and upper arm fistula surgery.
We confirmed that MNTT can be used to create RC-AVF, and the short-term follow-up outcomes were satisfactory. A larger sample size is still needed to evaluate the long-term efficiency and applicability of this technique.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We thank doctors Zhou Feng, Ma Tiantian, and Zhu Dongming at our hospital for providing the assistance with ultrasound examination.
Curved hemostatic forceps | Xinhua Surgical Instrument Co., Ltd. | ZH131R/RN | |
Dissecting Forceps | Xinhua Surgical Instrument Co., Ltd. | ZDO25R/RN | |
Electrotome | Changzhou Yanling Electronic Equipment Co., Ltd. | TY21205812 | |
Eyelld Retractor | Xinhua Surgical Instrument Co., Ltd. | Z014602T | |
Lidocaine | Hebei Tiancheng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | 1B200612104 | |
Halsey needleholder | Xinhua Surgical Instrument Co., Ltd. | ZM208R/RN | |
Micro forceops | Xinhua Surgical Instrument Co., Ltd. | ZD275RN/T | |
Micro needle holder forceps | Xinhua Surgical Instrument Co., Ltd. | ZF2618RB/T | |
Micro scissors | Xinhua Surgical Instrument Co., Ltd. | ZF022T | |
Micro vessel knife | Xinhua Surgical Instrument Co., Ltd. | ZF1549RN | |
Non-absorbable suture 3-0 | Ethicon,LLC | SA84G | |
Poly propylene 7-0 | Ethicon,LLC | PDB601 | |
Sharp blade | Suzhou Medical Products Factory Co., Ltd. | TY21232001 | |
scalpel handle | Shanghai Medical Instrument (Group) Co., Ltd. Surgical Instruments Factory | J11030 | |
Syringe with needle (5ml) | BD medical devices (Shanghai) Co., Ltd | 2006116 | |
Triangle needle | Hangzhou Huawei medical supplies Co., Ltd | 7X17 | |
Vessel clamp | Xinhua Surgical Instrument Co., Ltd. | ZF220RN | |
Vessel loop | Shenzhen Yiman Technology Co., Ltd | EM-SR1 |