Enzymatic microelectrode biosensors (also referenced as sensors in the present manuscript) have been a valuable tool for studying dynamic signaling processes in living cells and tissues. The sensors provide increased temporal and spatial resolution of cell signaling molecules in biologically relevant concentrations. Instead of sampling and analyzing extracellular fluids taken at intervals over long periods of time, these sensors respond as fast as their enzymes react to the analyte, thereby producing real-time measurements1,2. Fast detection of interstitial concentrations of autocrine and paracrine factors, like purines or hydrogen peroxide, and the dynamics of their release can be used to establish a profile for the effects of drugs in normal and pathological conditions 3. Currently, the majority of applications using sensors have been in brain tissue slices and cell cultures4-10. The protocols detailed in this manuscript aim to establish the means to accurately measure real-time concentrations of analytes in whole kidneys.
The following protocols were developed to study interstitial ATP and H2O2 signaling in kidneys. In the native environment of the kidney, extracellular ATP is rapidly catabolized by endogenous ectonucleotidases into its derivatives (ADP, AMP and adenosine). The sensors used here are highly selective to ATP over other purines or ATP degradation products11. This offers a great advantage as it allows accurate monitoring of the constant and dynamic concentrations of ATP release and its signaling function. Interstitial ATP concentration is measured using the combination of two microelectrodes, an ATP sensor and a Null sensor. The Null sensor in combination with catalase applications is able to detect interstitial H2O2 concentrations12. The following protocols use two different designs of sensors that have characteristics optimal for either ex vivo or in vivo applications.
Both designs are based on the sequential catalytic reaction of glycerol kinase and glycerol-3-phosphate oxidase contained in a sensor enzymatic layer and is driven by the presence of ATP. In the set of sensors used in the ex vivo studies, H2O2, the final enzymatic reaction product, is detected by oxidation on a platinum/iridium (Pt-Ir) wire electrode. Sensors for in vivo studies are instead based on H2O2 reduction on a mediator coated gold electrode designed for blood-perfused tissue. Shown in Figure 1 is a scheme of both protocols described in this manuscript. The Null sensor is identical to its corresponding ATP sensor except it lacks the bound enzymes. Therefore, in addition to the detection of H2O2 with the catalase enzyme, the Null sensor measures nonspecific interferences. ATP concentrations are calculated by subtracting the Null detected nonspecific interferences and background H2O2 from the ATP sensor signal. Several sensors are also commercially available to detect other analytes including adenosine, ionosine, hypoxanthine, acetylcholine, choline, glutamate, glucose, lactate, d-serine for ex vivo applications or adenosine, ionosine, and hypoxanthine for in vivo when paired with the corresponding Null sensor.
The ability of the sensor to accurately detect analytes depends on the proper pre- and post- calibrations13. This ensures that the analysis accounts for the drift in sensor sensitivity that occurs during use in biological tissues. The sensor holds a depot of glycerol that is used as a reagent in the sensor enzymatic reactions. If the sensor is not used in bath solutions containing glycerol, it will wash out over time. Shorter recording times are then necessary to minimize the sensor drift. Additionally sensor fouling by endogenous proteases and protein fragments can greatly diminish the sensitivity of the sensors14.
The present manuscript establishes the use of enzymatic microelectrode biosensors for ex vivo and in vivo kidney preparations. Real-time analyte quantification provides unprecedented detail of cellular signaling that may reveal novel insights into the mechanisms of kidney diseases and pharmacological agents.