$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Liquid drop impacts on surfaces are of great interest both for understanding of fundamental phenomena1 and for industrial processes2. Drop impacts have been studied for over 100 years3, but many aspects are yet to be fully investigated. High-speed photography is almost universally used for studies of drop impacts4 because it provides rich, accessible data which enables analytical measurements to be made with good time resolution. The outcomes of a drop impact on a solid surface5,6,7 range from simple deposition through to splashing8. Impacts on superhydrophobic surfaces are often studied as they can generate particularly interesting outcomes, including drop bouncing9,10,11,12. The protocol described here was developed to study water drop impacts on polymer surfaces with microscale patterning, and in particular the influence of the pattern on drop impact outcomes13,14.
The outcome of a drop impact experiment may be affected by a large range of possible variables. The size and velocity of the drop may vary, along with fluid properties such as density, surface tension, and viscosity. The drop may be either Newtonian15 or non-Newtonian16. A large variety of impact surfaces has been studied, including liquid7,17, solid18, and elastic19 surfaces. Various possible experimental configurations were described previously by Rein et al.17. The droplet can take different shapes. It can be oscillating, rotating, or impact at an angle to the surface. The surface texture, and environmental factors such as temperature may vary. All these parameters make the field of droplet impacts extremely wide-ranging.
Due to this large range of variables, studies of dynamic liquid wetting phenomena are often limited to focus on relatively specific or narrow topics. Many such investigations use a moderate number of experiments (e.g., 50−200 data points) obtained from manually processed high-speed videos10,20,21,22. The breadth of such studies is limited by the amount of data that may be obtained by the researcher in a reasonable amount of time. Manual processing of videos requires the user to perform repetitive tasks, such as measuring the diameter of impacting droplets, often achieved with the use of image analysis software (Fiji23 and Tracker24 are popular choices). The most widely-used measurement for characterizing drop impacts is the diameter of a spreading drop25,26,27,28.
Due to improvements in image processing, automatic computer-aided methods are starting to improve data collection efficiency. For example, image analysis algorithms for automatic measurement of contact angle29 and surface tension using the pendant drop method30 are now available. Much greater efficiency gains can be made for high-speed photography of drop impacts, which produces movies consisting of many individual images for analysis, and indeed some recent studies have started to use automated analysis15,18, although the experimental workflow has not clearly changed. Other improvements in the experimental design for drop impact experiments have arisen from advancements in commercially available LED light sources, which can be coupled with high-speed cameras via the shadowgraph technique31,32,33,34.
This article describes a standardized method for capture and analysis of drop impact movies. The primary aim is to enable efficient collection of large data sets, which should be generally useful for the wide variety of drop impact studies described above. Using this method, the time-resolved, digitized outline of an impacting drop may be obtained for ~100 experiments a day. The analysis automatically calculates the droplet impact parameters (size, velocity, Weber and Reynolds numbers) and the maximum spreading diameter. The protocol is directly applicable for any basic droplet parameters (including liquid, size, and impact velocity), substrate material, or environmental conditions. Studies that scan a large range of experimental parameters can be conducted in a relatively short timeframe. The method also encourages high resolution studies, covering a small range of variables, with multiple repeat experiments.
The benefits of this method are provided by the standardized experiment, and a clear data structure and workflow. The experimental setup produces images with consistent properties (spatial and contrast) that can be passed to a custom image analysis code (included as a Supplementary Coding File that runs on MATLAB) for prompt processing of recorded videos immediately following the experiment. Integration of data processing and acquisition is a primary reason for the improved overall speed of data collection. After a session of data acquisition, each video has been processed and all relevant raw data is stored for further analysis without requiring reprocessing of the video. Moreover, the user can visually inspect the quality of each experiment immediately after it is carried out and repeat the experiment if necessary. An initial calibration step ensures that the experimental setup can be reproduced between different lab sessions with good precision.
It is assumed that to implement this method the user has access to a high-speed camera arranged so that it images the surface from a horizontal (side-on) point of view. A schematic representation of this arrangement is shown in Figure 1, including definition of Cartesian axes. The system should have the ability to precisely position both the camera and sample in three dimensions (X, Y and Z). A shadowgraph method is implemented for illuminating the droplet and is placed along the optical path of the camera. The system should use a high-quality direct current (DC) LED illumination system (including a collimating condenser lens) that can be moved in X and Z directions to align the optical path with the camera. It is also assumed that the user has access to a syringe pump that they can program to produce individual droplets of desired volume when connected to a particular needle35. The droplet falls under gravity so that its impact velocity is controlled by the position of the needle above the surface. Although this setup is quite generic, Table of Materials lists specific equipment used to obtain the representative results, and notes some potential restrictions imposed by choice of equipment.

Figure 1: Schematic representation of the minimal experimental setup. A high-speed camera is positioned to image droplets impacting vertically on a sample from side-on. An LED light source is aligned with the camera's line of sight for shadowgraphy. A needle is used for individual droplet production, and Cartesian axes are defined. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The method description is focused on the measurement of the edges of liquid droplets as they fall and impact. Images are obtained from the commonly used side-on viewpoint. It is possible to investigate spreading droplets from both side-on and bottom-up views using two high speed cameras13,14, but the bottom-up view is not possible for opaque materials, and a top-down view produces alignment complications. The basic workflow could be used to improve research for any small (2−3 mm diameter) objects that impact surfaces, and it could be used for larger or smaller objects with further minor changes. Improvements and alternatives to the experimental setup and method are considered further in the discussion section.