$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The earthworm has been used as an important bioindicator and bioassay for previous scientific applications1,2,3,4,5,6; it is an ideal organism for assessing biological risks from hazardous and toxic waste in terrestrial environments for in situ and bioaccumulation studies, such as biocides (insecticides) in soil and adverse ecotoxicological effects7,8,9,10. Additionally, due to bioprospecting, the earthworm is an alternative source of fibrinolytic, anti-coagulative, anti-microbial, and anti-cancer molecules11,12; to the point that a team in 1991 extracted and purified lumbricine from the earthworm skin and placed on mammary tumors of SHN mice, which led to tumor growth inhibition13. The earthworm is also a pedagogically useful animal model, as it can be used to expose students to surgery and to understanding the anatomy of a specimen; from studying blood circulation to electrophysiology14,15.
In our own research we have examined the response of the vessels of live earthworms to high intensity ultrasound18. We found that vessel rupture in the worm occurred under conditions similar to those that we associated in rupture damage in human micro-vessels. Our ongoing work involves injection of microbubbles into the earthworm vasculature. Microbubbles are composed of a heavy gas encased by a lipid, albumin or polymer shell, these agents can be used as image contrast agents as well as vehicles for targeted drug delivery.
This novel protocol is relevant to any study that would benefit from intravenous (IV) injection of a compound that could utilize the earthworm's natural bioindicators. The approach is based around IV microinjection into one of several possible entry points, including any of the earthworm's five-pair pseudo hearts, the dorsal vessel, and the ventral vessel. The procedure involves an elaborate surgical incision to expose the vessels, followed by a micro-positioner-controlled injection. This is achieved using custom micropipettes constructed specifically for earthworm vascular microinjection. These micropipettes allow precision targeting of vessels as small as a 90 µm diameter ventral vessel.
This protocol is designed to improve upon earlier micro-pipetting techniques, including a 1948 study for the extraction of earthworm blood and urine16. As seen in Figure S1, the setup for this extraction can be difficult, and, as stated by the author, can take up to one hour or longer. A similar method was developed in 1970, but the author experienced multiple broken tips while injecting fluids into the giant fibers of the earthworm17. In the present method described below, extraction of blood is a matter of seconds to minutes and is relevant to both the injection of compounds and extraction of earthworm fluids. In this specific case, we injected contrast agents, microbubbles.