$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Placing a telemetric implant in the descending aorta provides a reliable method for measuring cardiovascular parameters, core body temperature, and animal activity. Telemetry offers clear advantages over non-telemetric techniques. It allows data collection from awake, freely moving animals, eliminating the confounding effects of anesthesia, which can alter blood pressure and heart rate21,27. Unlike non-telemetric methods, telemetry prevents thermal and animal restraining stress, ensuring accurate cardiovascular measurements23,28. It enables continuous monitoring of blood pressure, heart rate, core body temperature, and activity for weeks or even months, whereas non-telemetric procedures record only intermittently21,28,29. Overall, telemetric monitoring provides greater accuracy and precision than non-telemetric approaches27.
Telemetric methods diminish physical and physiological stress, preserving natural behavior and ensuring compliance with animal welfare guidelines27. Their high precision and lower variability compared with non-telemetric techniques decrease the number of animals required and increase statistical power21,23. Telemetry also offers strong translational value in drug discovery and cardiovascular research, as the data closely resemble human physiological responses28. Collectively, the telemetric approach is superior and ethically preferable to non-telemetric methods.
Telemetric implant placement in the descending aorta of rats offers several advantages for SCI research compared with placement in the carotid or femoral arteries, which serve as alternative implant sites in animal models. Being a large central vessel, the descending aorta provides stable and representative measurements of blood pressure and heart rate, critical indicators for assessing cardiovascular dysfunction after SCI30,31. Implantation at this site minimizes interference with limb blood flow and reduces the risk of ischemia and other complications often associated with peripheral artery placement30,31. It also allows continuous monitoring of basal cardiovascular parameters and autonomic dysreflexia, both crucial in SCI research24. Implanting in the femoral artery may compromise blood supply to the ipsilateral hindlimb, potentially affecting experimental outcomes and animal welfare32,33. Although technically simpler, carotid artery implantation carries risks such as stroke or neurological complications due to its proximity to the cerebral circulation, which is undesirable in studies focused on peripheral cardiovascular effects33. Therefore, implantation in the descending aorta provides a dependable site, minimizes local complications, and enhances both the experimental rigor and translational value of data collected from conscious, freely moving animals. Several common challenges are encountered while placing telemetric implants in the descending aorta.
Through trial and error, the procedure was optimized to overcome the following obstacles: (1) Abdominal inflammation: Abdominal inflammation was observed in rats at both acute and chronic stages following telemetric implant surgery. To mitigate this, a post-operative regimen consisting of the analgesic buprenorphine and anti-inflammatory meloxicam was implemented, resulting in a reduced incidence of abdominal inflammation. Previously, in each cohort, a few animals developed bloated, firm abdomens and eventually died. During implant retrieval, the abdominal cavity often contained clear fluid or, in some cases, brownish fluid with a pungent odor. This regimen reduced the rate of inflammation by approximately 70%-80% compared to animals that underwent surgery without it; (2) Extensive bleeding during dissection of the descending aorta from the vena cava: Use fine forceps (microdissection tweezers and mirror finish forceps) to gently separate the descending aorta from the vena cava using blunt dissection (hold and tear). Avoid cutting between the two using scissors or a blade, as it can cause extensive bleeding due to rupture of the underlying vasculature; (3) Insertion of telemetric implant in superficial layer: During descending aortic piercing, ensure that the needle passes through all three layers of the upper wall and not just the superficial layer. Oozing of blood after piercing indicates that all layers of the upper wall are pierced. The telemetric implant will not record properly if the pressure catheter is inserted only in the superficial layer; (4) Insertion of incorrect catheter length: Use a microscope during and/or after implant insertion to ensure the pressure catheter crosses the occlusion thread. The implant will not function properly if the inserted catheter length is incorrect; (5) Blood leakage from descending aorta: Allow 30-45 s after implant insertion for the adhesive to dry. This ensures the piercing in the descending aorta is fully sealed and not bleeding. Reseal if minor bleeding occurs due to blood backflow. Avoid pulling the implant's pressure catheter tip while suturing the implant body to the side of the abdominal wall, as this can cause bleeding; (6) Rats removing abdominal sutures: Rats may bite and remove sutures, leading to skin and internal organ damage. To reduce this, use uninterrupted sutures with a square knot for closing the abdominal wall. For skin closure, apply intradermal continuous sutures to minimize the animal's access to the sutures and knots. Apply an e-collar for 3 days postoperatively to further restrict access. Ensure that the fit is snug but not restrictive by placing an index finger between the collar and the rat's neck; (7) Hindlimb ischemia: Previously, the aorta was occluded at two locations: one at the descending aorta 0.5 cm below the renal artery, and another above the iliac bifurcation. The bi-occlusion technique helped to keep the artery taut, facilitating smoother implant placement and limiting blood backflow. However, it led to hindlimb ischemia in some animals if catheter insertion is not performed rapidly. Presently, a mono-occlusion 0.5 cm below the renal artery is performed, which effectively eliminates hindlimb ischemia in rats. With bi-occlusion, approximately 20%-30% ischemia was observed, whereas mono-occlusion completely eliminated hindlimb ischemia.
Applications
Telemetric implants (HD-S10) are magnetically activated devices designed to record various physiological parameters in small animal models. The placement of these implants in the descending aorta is a precise and dependable method for continuous hemodynamic monitoring in unrestrained, unanesthetized, and freely moving animals. This methodology allows preclinical researchers to perform real-time assessments of various cardiovascular parameters, temperature, and animal activity in the context of disease modeling, such as SCI, drug efficacy evaluation, and diurnal changes in autonomic function parameters. Researchers can acquire comprehensive physiological data from a single telemetric implant in an animal, covering both acute and chronic timepoints, making it an efficient technique. Figure 1 highlights this telemetry application and others currently used in the laboratory.
Hemodynamic parameters, including SBP, DBP, and MAP, can be recorded over both acute and chronic periods. Monitoring the 24/7 rest-activity rhythm can serve as a reliable marker of the acute effects of SCI34. Simultaneous heart rate monitoring enables the detection of heart rate variability, including tachycardia and bradycardia. Comparing blood pressure and heart rate fluctuations pre- and post-SCI allows researchers to understand how cardiovascular physiology changes following injury. A robust daily rhythm in cardiovascular parameters, core body temperature, and activity is important for maintaining physiological homeostasis and overall health. Changes in diurnal core body temperature are also indicative of impaired thermoregulation after SCI34. It is well established that SCI is a whole-body syndrome. Therefore, incorporating telemetric-based outcomes allows researchers to collect comprehensive activity data post-SCI beyond locomotor recovery, which is typically evaluated in isolation.
However, there are certain limitations of this technique that need to be considered. The placement of a telemetric probe in the descending aorta is a complicated procedure and therefore requires microsurgical expertise. The implant can become dislodged later due to various reasons, including mishandling during bladder expression in SCI rats, infection, tissue irritation, or internal clot formation. The cardiovascular recording will be affected if any of these occur; the data should be excluded. In addition, if a rat does not recover properly, the baseline cardiovascular data may be compromised. The telemetric setup and implants are expensive and require specialized software and equipment for data acquisition. Severe SCI may possibly lead to increased mortality; therefore, careful planning of animal numbers is necessary to maintain the overall statistical power of the study.
Overall, assessing cardiovascular dysfunctions, core body temperature, and activity using telemetry after SCI, across acute and chronic periods, is critical for understanding the impact of injury on cardiovascular health, overall well-being, and for designing potential interventions.