Trial ends in
JoVE Science Education
Aeronautical Engineering

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content.
You will only be able to see the first 20 seconds.

Propeller Characterization

# Propeller Characterization: Variations in Pitch, Diameter, and Blade Number on Performance

Article

### Overview

Source: Shreyas Narsipur, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC

A propeller is a twisted airfoil, where the angle of the chord changes with respect to the location, along the radial station, as shown in Figure 1. Propellers are widely used in aircraft and watercraft propulsion systems thereby necessitating detailed characterizations of propellers to design high performance vehicles.

Figure 1. Chord, thickness, and pitch at a radial station.

One of the defining characteristics of a propeller is the pitch/twist. The pitch of the propeller, generally given in units of length, is the theoretical distance the propeller will travel through the air in one single revolution. However, due to the drag force on the aircraft and the propeller, the propeller never travels its theoretical distance. The actual distance travelled is referred to as the effective pitch of the propeller, and the difference between the theoretical or geometric pitch and the effective pitch is referred to as propeller slip, as illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Representation of pitch and slip.

In this demonstration, seven propellers are characterized using a propeller test rig in a subsonic wind tunnel. This is followed by a detailed parametric study to analyze the effects of variations in pitch, diameter, and number of blades on propeller performance.

### Principles

There are two main propeller types: fixed pitch and variable pitch. Fixed pitch propellers are designed for one optimum operating condition and are efficient; they have a high power output to power input ratio for a given airspeed and RPM, which in most cases is the aircraft cruise conditions. However, during take-off and landing, when the RPM and airspeeds are lower, the fixed pitch propeller is highly inefficient. Variable pitch propeller blades offer a solution to the fixed pitch problem by allowing the pilot to change the propeller pitch to maximize propeller efficiency for any operating condition. It is for this reason that in larger propeller aircrafts, where fuel efficiency is a dominant factor, variable pitch propellers are used to maximize efficiency.

Advanced ratio, coefficient of thrust, coefficient of torque, coefficient of power, and propeller efficiency are important non-dimensional parameters required to characterize a propeller. Based on these parameters, the propeller, air-brake, and windmill regimes, which are the different operating regimes of a propeller, can be identified. In the propeller regime, the propeller is producing positive thrust and torque. The air-brake regime starts when thrust goes negative while torque remains positive. In this regime, the propeller slows the system down. Lastly, when both thrust and torque drop below zero, the propeller is in the windmill regime. Here, the airflow controls the propeller as it produces forces on the propeller of which the motor/engine driving the propeller cannot overcome. The propeller efficiency is meaningless beyond the propeller region.

It is always desirable to operate the propeller in the high-efficiency propeller regime for a given airspeed and RPM. As mentioned previously, fixed pitch propellers are generally designed to operate at their highest efficiencies during cruise flight, and while they can operate at lower velocities, such as during take-off and landing, the efficiency is very low. Variable pitch propellers can be adjusted to obtain the highest efficiencies possible in the propeller regime depending on the flight regime (take-off, cruise, or landing), thereby maximizing the aircraft's fuel efficiency.

In addition to propeller pitch, the number of propeller blades plays an important role in setting the thrust available from the propeller. Generally, if there are design constraints on the diameter or pitch of the propeller, increasing the number of blades can increase the amount of thrust produced. However, the extra thrust can come at the cost of propeller efficiency, necessitating the need for a detailed analysis.

The advanced ratio, J, which is a parameter to normalize freestream velocity (V) on the propeller rate of rotation (n) and diameter (D), is given by the following equation:

Freestream flow velocity can be measured using the equation:

where ρ is the freestream density.

The thrust coefficient, CT, is a non-dimensional measure of propeller thrust, T, and is given by the equation:

Similarly, the torque, CQ, and power, CP, coefficients, the non-dimensional measures of propeller torque and the output power, respectively, are given by the equations:

where τ is the torque and P is the power supplied to the brushless DC motor to run the propeller. The power, P, can be calculated as the product of voltage, V, and current, I:

Finally, propeller efficiency can be expressed as:

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

### Procedure

1. Measuring propeller characteristics in a subsonic wind tunnel

1. Set up the propeller test rig in the subsonic wind tunnel using a 4-axis sting mount, as shown in Figure 3. A wind tunnel with a 2.6 ft x 3.7 ft test section and maximum dynamic pressure setting of 25 psf was used in this demonstration.

Figure 3. Propeller rig. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

1. Attach a 6-axis load cell to the rig. This will be used to measure thrust and torque.
2. Secure a brushless DC motor to the rig, then attach the first propeller.
3. Connect the DC motor to the electronic speed controller and the pulsed-width modulated signal generator, which controls the speed of the motor.
4. Connect a power analyzer, which will measure the current and voltage supplied to the motor, and connect it to a lithium polymer battery.
5. Use a spirit level to ensure that the sting-propeller setup is aligned in the direction of flow with zero pitch and zero yaw.
6. Secure the wind-tunnel doors and switch on the main power.
7. Turn on the wind tunnel, then switch on the signal generator and the load cell data acquisition system.
8. Zero the forces on the load cell using virtual instrument software.
9. Set the signal generator to run the motor at 10% throttle.
10. Start recording a zero-reading with the wind tunnel off. Record the speed following data:
a. Propeller characteristics - number of blades, propeller diameter (in), and propeller pitch (in).
b. Speed (in terms of percent throttle) based on the signal generator configuration.
c. Dynamic pressure (psf) from the wind tunnel transducer.
d. Voltage (V) and current (A) supplied to the BLDC motor from the power analyzer.
e. Thrust (lb) and torque (in-lb) from the load cell.
f. Propeller RPM (rotations per minute). Note that the RPM reading can only be extracted at the end of the experiment.
11. Turn on the wind tunnel and vary the dynamic pressure from 0 psf to 10 psf in steps of 0.5 psf.
12. At each setting, allow the wind tunnel to stabilize, then record the same data as listed above.
13. Continue to increase the dynamic pressure setting in increments of 0.5 psf up to a dynamic pressure setting at which the thrust and torque become negative. Record all data at each increment.
14. Reset the tunnel dynamic pressure back to zero, and turn off the wind tunnel
15. Set the motor speed to 50% throttle and repeat steps 1.11 - 1.15.
16. Set the motor speed to 100% throttle and repeat steps 1.11 - 1.15.
17. Repeat the above procedure for all propellers, making sure to test speeds of 10%, 50% and 100% throttle up to a dynamic pressure where thrust and torque become negative.
18. When all tests have been completed, plug-in the electronic speed controller to the programming kit, record all of the propeller RPM data.
19. Shut down all of the systems.

Table 1. Propellers tested.

 Propeller Diameter x Pitch (in) # of Blades Material 18 x 8 2 APC 16 x 8 2 APC 15 x 8 2 APC 15 x 10 2 APC 15 x 12 2 APC 18 x 8 2 Wood 18 x 8 4 Wood

Note that the fixed pitch propellers used in this study are defined by their diameter and pitch in inches. For example, an 18 x 8 propeller is an 18 in diameter propeller with a geometric pitch of 8 in.

Propellers are widely used in many different types of aircraft for propulsion and the generation of thrust, and must therefore be carefully designed and characterized. A propeller is essentially a twisted airfoil, where the angle of the cord changes radially. One of the defining characteristics of the propeller is the pitch, or its twist.

The pitch of the propeller is generally given in units of length and is the theoretical distance the propeller will travel through the air in one single revolution. However, due to the drag force on the aircraft and propeller, the propeller never travels its theoretical distance. The actual distance traveled is called the effective pitch of the propeller. The difference between the theoretical pitch and the effective pitch is called the propeller's slip.

When describing propellers, we also talk about thrust, torque, and power, which are characterized by their respective dimensionless coefficients. Here, T is thrust, tau is torque, P is power supply to the motor, rho is the freestream density, n is the propeller's rate of rotation, and D is the propeller diameter. Importantly, we also define a propeller's efficiency. This is calculated using the torque and thrust coefficients along with the advanced ratio J, which normalizes the freestream velocity to the propeller rotation and diameter. Using these dimensionless values, we can determine how a propeller is operating in different conditions.

In the propeller regime, the propeller is producing positive thrust and torque. The air-brake regime starts when thrust goes negative, while torque remains positive. In this regime, the propeller slows the system down rather than providing positive forward motion. When thrust and torque both drop below zero, the propeller is in the windmill regime. Here, the airflow controls the propeller, as it produces forces on the propeller that the motor driving the propeller cannot overcome.

It is important to note that beyond the propeller regime, the calculation of propeller efficiency is meaningless. It is always desirable to operate the propeller in the high efficiency propeller regime for a given air speed and RPM. For fixed-pitch propellers, this can be difficult as the fixed-pitch propellers are designed for one optimum operating condition and are usually most efficient in cruise conditions and inefficient in takeoff and landing.

One way to improve operation, especially if there are no constraints on the diameter or pitch of the propeller, is by increasing the number of blades. This can increase the amount of thrust. However, it comes at the cost of lower propeller efficiency. In this experiment, we will characterize several different propellers and determine the effect of pitch, diameter, and number of blades on performance.

In this experiment, we will examine propeller characteristics in a subsonic wind tunnel using a series of five APC and two wood propellers with varying diameter, pitch, and number of blades.

To begin, set up the propeller test rig inside of the wind tunnel using a four-axis sting mount to hold the propeller test rig components. A six-axis load cell is used to measure thrust and torque. Attach the load cell to the rig, secure the brushless DC motor, which powers the propeller, and then attach the first propeller.

Now, connect the brushless DC motor to the electronic speed controller and the pulse-width modulated signal generator, which controls the speed of the motor. Also, connect the motor to a power analyzer to measure the supplied voltage and current. Then connect it and the brushless DC motor to a lithium polymer battery.

Once the setup is completely assembled, use a spirit level to ensure that the sting propeller setup is aligned in the direction of airflow without any pitch or yaw. Then secure the wind tunnel doors, switch on the main power, and turn on the wind tunnel. Then, switch on the signal generator and the load cell data acquisition system.

Before starting the tests, record the propeller characteristics in your spreadsheet, including the number of propeller blades, the diameter, and pitch. Now, zero the forces on the load cell using the data acquisition software on the wind tunnel computer. Then, set the signal generator to run the motor at 10% throttle.

Start by recording a zero reading with the wind tunnel off. Record the speed in terms of percentage of throttle and the dynamic pressure from the wind tunnel transducer. Also, record the voltage and current supplied to the motor from the power analyzer, and the thrust and torque measured by the load cell.

Now, turn on the wind tunnel and increase the dynamic pressure to 0.5 psf. Allow time for the wind tunnel to stabilize, then record all data. Continue to increase the dynamic pressure setting in increments of 0.5 psf up to a dynamic pressure setting at which thrust and torque become negative.

Record all data at each increment. Once the measurements for thrust and torque are negative, set the dynamic pressure back to zero and switch off the wind tunnel. Then increase the motor speed to 50% throttle using the signal generator. Take the zero measurement, recording all data with the wind tunnel off. Then switch on the wind tunnel and set the dynamic pressure reading to 0.5 psf. Then record all data.

Repeat the measurements as before in increments of 0. 5 psf up to a dynamic pressure reading where torque and thrust become negative. Then set the dynamic pressure back to zero, switch off the wind tunnel, and increase the propeller speed to 100% throttle. Record the zero measurement with the wind tunnel off, then repeat the tests again up to a dynamic pressure where torque and thrust become negative.

Repeat these tests for all of the propellers, making sure to test speeds of 10%, 50%, and 100% throttle for each propeller up to a dynamic pressure where thrust and torque become negative. Upon completion of all tests, plug the electronic speed controller into the programming kit and record all of the propeller RPM data. Then shut down all of the systems.

To evaluate the results of the experiment, we will first calculate the thrust coefficient, CT, using the propeller thrust, rate of rotation, diameter, and freestream density. We can also calculate the torque and power coefficients, CQ and CP, respectively. Recall that tau is propeller torque and P is the power supplied to the DC motor and is calculated as the product of voltage and current.

Finally, we can calculate the advanced ratio J, in order to normalize the freestream velocity to the propeller rate of rotation and diameter. The rate of rotation is the rotations per minute that was logged during the experiment, divided by 60. The freestream velocity is calculated using the dynamic pressure, which we controlled in the wind tunnel. Then, propeller efficiency can be calculated.

Now, let's plot the three coefficients and the efficiency versus the advanced ratio, J, for one of the propellers. Here, we show data for a two-blade, 18-in diameter, 8-in pitch propeller. The propeller produces positive thrust up to an advanced ratio of 0.6, where it then transitions to the air-brake region. The air-brake region starts when thrust goes negative, while torque remains positive. In this region, the propeller slows the system down.

After an advanced ratio of 0.85, the propeller produces negative torque and behaves like a windmill. Here, the airflow produces forces on the propeller that the motor driving the propeller cannot overcome. Note that the propeller efficiency is highest at J equals 0.4 and is meaningless beyond the propeller region.

Now, let's take a look at varying propeller diameter, while keeping the number of blades and propeller pitch constant. We can see that the change in diameter has a negligible effect on efficiency. However, the three coefficients increase slightly with decreasing propeller diameter.

Next, we'll compare the effect of varied propeller pitch, while maintaining constant propeller diameter and number of blades. We see that, in general, a high pitch propeller produces more thrust, torque, and power for a given advanced ratio as compared to a low-pitch propeller. Increasing propeller pitch also increases the range of the propeller region. We see that the maximum operating efficiency occurs at a higher advanced ratio as propeller pitch increases.

Finally, we'll compare the effect of blade number, while maintaining constant propeller diameter and pitch. We can see that doubling the number of blades leads to a significantly higher amount of thrust and torque. While the extent of the propeller region is similar, the four-blade propeller starts behaving like a windmill at a higher advanced ratio as compared to the two-blade propeller. It can also be observed that the two-blade propeller is slightly more efficient than its four-blade counterpart.

In summary, we learned about the different operating regimes of propellers and how pitch affects propeller efficiency. We then characterized 7 propellers in a subsonic wind tunnel to analyze the effects of pitch, diameter, and number of blades on propeller performance.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

### Results

A freestream density, ρ: 0.074 lb/ft3, was used to determine the results. The variation in coefficients of thrust, torque, power, and propeller efficiency for the two-blade, 18 x 8 in propeller is shown in Figure 4. The propeller, air-brake, and windmill regions are demarcated. The two-blade, 18 x 8 in propeller produces positive thrust up to an advanced ratio of 0.6 after which it transitions to the air-brake region until J 0.85. At and after this point, the propeller starts producing negative torque and behaves like a windmill. The propeller achieves its highest efficiency at J = 0.4.

Figure 4. Characteristics of a two-blade, 18 x 8 in propeller.

Figures 5-7 compare the CT, CQ, CP, and η behaviors for propellers with variations in diameter, pitch, and number of blades, respectively. As shown in Figure 5, varying propeller diameter while keeping the number of blades and propeller pitch a constant had a negligible effect on propeller efficiency, η. However, the CT, CQ, and CP for a given advanced ratio, J, increased slightly with decreasing propeller diameter.

Figure 5. Comparison of characteristics for propellers of varying diameter. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Varying propeller pitch significantly affected all parameters, as shown in Figure 6. In general, a high-pitch propeller produces more thrust, torque, and power for a given advanced ratio compared to a low-pitch propeller. Increasing propeller pitch also increased the range of the propeller region, i.e., the large region of positive thrust and torque. Lastly, the maximum operating efficiency occurred at a higher advanced ratio as propeller pitch increased.

Figure 6. Comparison of characteristics for propellers with varying pitch. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7 shows that doubling the number of blades lead to a significantly higher amount of thrust and torque. While the propeller region is similar, the four-blade propeller starts behaving like a windmill at a higher advanced ratio compared to the two-blade propeller. Also, the two-blade propeller is slightly more efficient than its four-blade counterpart.

Figure 7. Comparison of characteristics for propellers varying in number of blades. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.