Plaque Assay for Murine Norovirus

Immunology and Infection
 

Summary

Here we describe a method to quantify infectious particles of murine norovirus (MNV), which is the only norovirus that efficiently replicates in cell culture. The plaque assay takes advantage of MNV’s tropism for murine macrophages and can be adapted for use with biological or environmental samples containing MNV.

Cite this Article

Copy Citation | Download Citations

Gonzalez-Hernandez, M. B., Bragazzi Cunha, J., Wobus, C. E. Plaque Assay for Murine Norovirus. J. Vis. Exp. (66), e4297, doi:10.3791/4297 (2012).

Abstract

Murine norovirus (MNV) is the only member of the Norovirus genus that efficiently grows in tissue culture 1, 2. Cell lysis and cytopathic effect (CPE) are observed during MNV-1 infection of murine dendritic cells or macrophages 1. This property of MNV-1 can be used to quantify the number of infectious particles in a given sample by performing a plaque assay 1. The plaque assay relies on the ability of MNV-1 to lyse cells and to form holes in a confluent cell monolayer, which are called plaques 3.

Multiple techniques can be used to detect viral infections in tissue culture, harvested tissue, clinical, and environmental samples, but not all measure the number of infectious particles (e.g. qRT-PCR). One way to quantify infectious viral particles is to perform a plaque assay 3, which will be described in detail below. A variation on the MNV plaque assay is the fluorescent focus assay, where MNV antigen is immunostained in cell monolayers 4. This assay can be faster, since viral antigen expression precedes plaque formation. It is also useful for titrating viruses unable to form plaques. However, the fluorescent focus assay requires additional resources beyond those of the plaque assay, such as antibodies and a microscope to count focus-forming units. Infectious MNV can also be quantified by determining the 50% Tissue Culture Infective Dose (TCID50) 3. This assay measures the amount of virus required to produce CPE in 50% of inoculated tissue culture cells by endpoint titration 5. However, its limit of detection is higher compared to a plaque assay 4.

In this article, we describe a plaque assay protocol that can be used to effectively determine the number of infectious MNV particles present in biological or environmental samples 1, 4, 6. This method is based on the preparation of 10-fold serial dilutions of MNV-containing samples, which are used to inoculate a monolayer of permissive cells (RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cells). Virus is allowed to attach to the cell monolayer for a given period of time and then aspirated before covering cells with a mixture of agarose and cell culture media. The agar enables the spread of viral progeny to neighboring cells while limiting spread to distantly located cells. Consequently, infected cells are lysed and form holes in the monolayer known as plaques. Upon sufficient spread of virus, plaques become visible following staining of cells with dyes, like neutral red, methylene blue, or crystal violet. At low dilutions, each plaque originates from one infectious viral particle and its progeny, which spread to neighboring cells. Thus, counting the number of plaques allows one to calculate plaque-forming units (PFU) present in the undiluted sample 3.

Protocol

1. Culturing of the Macrophage Cell Line RAW 264.7

  1. Maintain RAW 264.7 cells (ATCC, catalog # TIB-71) in DMEM-10 media, which consists of high glucose DMEM with 10% (v/v) low-endotoxin fetal bovine serum (< 10 EU/ml), 10 mM HEPES, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 1 mM non-essential amino acids, 2 mM L-glutamine. Cells are typically maintained in 175 cm2 tissue culture flasks containing 35 ml of media per flask and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in a tissue culture incubator. However, any size flask can be used with a volume of media that is appropriate for the size of the flask.
  2. To split cells: aspirate off the old media, add 10 ml of fresh DMEM-10 media to the cells, and then scrape the cells from the bottom of the flask by using a cell scraper. Next, resuspend the cells into a homogenous solution by drawing up cells into a 10 ml pipette and forcefully squeezing the cells through the pipette tip pressed against the bottom of the flask. Repeat this action at least 3 times so the cells no longer clump together. Verify by light microscopy that a single cell suspension was generated. Then transfer 1 ml (1:10 dilution or ~1x107 cells) - 2 ml (1:5 dilution or ~2x107 cells) of the cell suspension to a new 175 cm2 flask, and bring the final volume of media up to 35 ml.
  3. Split cells when they are nearly confluent (~1x108 cells total/175 cm2 flasks): every three days if starting with a 1:10 dilution, or every two days if starting with a 1:5 dilution. Use light microscopy to check cell morphology before splitting cells. Most of the cells should look round and not activated. Activated cells have granules and/or extended, spindly morphology with appendages. Do not let cells overgrow as those cells do not typically form plaques. Keep track of the passage number and frequently start over by thawing a lower passage aliquot of cells. (We use passage 30 as a cut-off).

2. Infect RAW 264.7 Cells with MNV Inoculum

  1. Seed RAW 264.7 cells into 6-well plates (3.5 cm diameter) at a density of 1x106 viable cells/ml in DMEM-10 media, and add 2 ml of this suspension to each well. It is important to distribute cells evenly in wells either by rocking plates by hand at least 10 times or by using a rocking apparatus for ~10 min. Do not swirl the plates as this will cause the cells to cluster in the center of the well. Place plates into a tissue culture incubator (at 37 °C and 5% CO2). Allow cells to attach overnight or for at least 4 hr at 37 °C. Cells should be 60 - 80% confluent for the plaque assay and distributed evenly throughout the well.
  2. The next day, prepare the virus inoculum, which can be from MNV-infected cells in tissue culture or from homogenized tissues or fecal samples of MNV-infected mice. When using tissue samples, pea-sized pieces of tissue are homogenized in 2 ml screw-cap tubes containing sterile silica beads in 1 ml of DMEM-10 using a tissue homogenizer (e.g. MagnaLyser; Roche). For fecal samples, no more than 3 fecal pellets should be homogenized in 1 ml media. All samples are then frozen (at -80 °C) and thawed once before performing the plaque assay.
  3. Prepare 10-fold dilutions of the virus inoculum in complete DMEM-5 medium, which consists of DMEM/High glucose, 5% (v/v) low-endotoxin fetal bovine serum (< 10 EU/ml), 10 mM HEPES, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 1 mM non-essential amino acids, 2 mM L-glutamine.
  4. Ten-fold serial dilutions are prepared in 24-well plates: A repeater pipette is used to dispense 1.35 ml media into multiple wells, the 10-1 dilution is made by mixing 1.35 ml of media and 0.15 ml of virus-containing sample, and then 0.15 ml of the 10-1 dilution is added to 1.35 ml of media to make the 10-2 dilution and so on. It is important to change tips each time you make a new dilution. A multichannel pipette can be used to make the dilutions of multiple samples at a time with two tips fitting into one well of a 24-well plate transferring a total volume of 0.15 ml per well (see Figure 3A).
  5. A typical dilution range for tissue homogenates and fecal contents is 10-1 to 10-3. However, plaques from these samples tend to be smaller compared to those from tissue culture samples. Furthermore, in some cases a 1:100 dilution of fecal samples is needed to sufficiently dilute out any toxic components of the feces that may disrupt the cell monolayer, thus hindering the ability to count plaques. The dilution range of tissue culture lysates depends on the time point of interest during the viral life cycle. Dilutions that go up to 10-9 may be needed at the peak of infection.
  6. After the serial dilutions are prepared, label the 6-well plates containing RAW 264.7 monolayers (from section 2.1) with the sample name and dilutions being plated. One plate at a time, remove all media by flicking it out or aspirating it. Immediately afterwards add 0.5 ml of a diluted sample to a well, then repeat with a duplicate well, before proceeding to the next dilution. Once all 3 dilutions are added to one plate, tilt plate back and forth by hand to ensure all cells have been covered. Handle one plate at a time to ensure that cells will not dry out.
  7. After adding 0.5 ml of the dilutions to each well, stack plates upright and incubate them for 1 hr at room temperature. Because the volume added to each well is not sufficient to cover the monolayer completely, the plates need to be gently tilted back and forth by hand every 10-15 min or placed on a rocking apparatus (~18 oscillations per min). This prevents cells from drying out.

3. Low Melting Point Agarose (SeaPlaque) Overlay Preparation

Note: it is advisable to have several bottles with autoclaved SeaPlaque agarose prepared ahead of time. Agarose can be re-melted in a microwave before use.

  1. Calculate the amount of overlay required for the total volume of plates before the 1 hr incubation is complete. The volume needed is 2 ml/well or 12 ml/6-well plate. Prepare agarose (see section 3.2) and media (see section 3.3) separately.
  2. To prepare the agarose, suspend 3 g of SeaPlaque agarose in a total volume of 100 ml of distilled water (3% w/v) in a glass bottle. Autoclave for 20-30 min. (If agarose was already prepared before-hand, re-melt agarose in microwave.) It is important to equilibrate SeaPlaque agarose to 42 °C in a water bath before use because if the agarose is too hot, it will kill the cells. Make sure water level is equal to or above the level of the agarose to avoid undesired solidification.
  3. To prepare the media: make 100 ml of 2x MEM media, which consists of 2x MEM, 10% (v/v) low-endotoxin fetal bovine serum (< 10 EU/ml), 10 mM HEPES, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 4 mM L-glutamine. Equilibrate media to 37 °C in a water bath.
  4. Mix both the SeaPlaque agarose and the 2x MEM media together in a sterile bottle at a 1:1 ratio immediately before overlaying the infected cell monolayers. If more than 200 ml overlay is needed, split volume into multiple bottles and keep in 37 °C water bath until ready to use.
  5. At the end of the 1 hr incubation (see section 2.7), aspirate the inoculum off of each well. Slowly add 2 ml of overlay to the edge of each well by placing the pipette tip against the wall of each well. Up to 5 plates can be handled simultaneously without cells drying out.
  6. Allow the overlay to solidify for approximately 10 min at room temperature before placing plates upright into the tissue culture incubator. Incubate plates for 48 hr at 37 °C in 5% CO2.
  7. After the incubation period, plaques are faintly visible to the naked eye, so check unstained plates for presence of plaques. If no plaques are visible, incubate for an additional 4 hr and check again. However, the maximum incubation time should not exceed 72 hr.

4. Visualization of Plaques by Neutral Red Staining

  1. To visualize plaques, the neutral red staining solution is prepared by adding 3 ml of neutral red (0.33% w/v in DPBS; Sigma, catalog # N2889) to every 97 ml of 1x PBS (tissue culture grade, Mg2+-, Ca2+-free; Gibco, catalog # 10010). Calculate the volume of neutral red staining solution needed for the experiment: 12 ml neutral red staining solution are required for each 6-well plate. Then, add 2 ml to each well. Although some plaque assay protocols require the agarose plug to be removed from the wells, in this protocol the neutral red staining solution is added directly onto the overlay.
  2. After a one hr incubation at 37 °C, check if plaques are visible with neutral red staining solution still in wells. If plaques are not readily apparent, allow the staining to continue for another hr. Continue incubating until plaques are visible. (Note: Staining for more than 3 hr is not optimal and if no plaques are visible in the positive control sample after 3 hr of staining, the plaque assay did not work properly.) After the staining is complete, aspirate the neutral red staining solution, ensuring the agarose plug is not disturbed, and then proceed to counting the plaques.
  3. Count plaques by placing plate upside down on a light box and marking a dot on counted plaques to avoid duplicate counts. Choose the dilution to count plaques in wells where plaques are clearly separated (i.e. no visual evidence of plaques fusing together). If possible, count plaques at two dilutions. It is important to note that plaque size may vary between MNV strains, virus inoculum, and depends on the condition of the RAW 264.7 cells during the plaque assay.
  4. If no plaques are visible in a well, either there was no virus present in the sample or the amount of virus was under the limit of detection of the plaque assay. In this case, the wells stain red with a similar color as other plaque-containing wells. Alternatively, the absence of plaques is also observed when there are too many viral particles present in a given dilution. This leads to lysis of the entire monolayer and wells appear orange/yellow in color.
  5. Calculate viral titers. Add the number of plaques in both wells at a single dilution and multiply by the dilution factor (i.e. 1 ml if 2 wells are infected with 0.5 ml). This will yield the amount of plaque forming units (PFU) in your inoculum volume of 1 ml. For example, in Figure 4 at the 10-2 dilution, one well (marked "II") has 14 plaques and the other well (marked "V") has 17 plaques. Thus, the viral titer will be 14x102 + 17x102 = 3,100 (3.1x103) pfu/ml.

5. Representative Results

Infectious MNV-1 particles can be quantified using a plaque assay as outlined schematically in Figure 1. Figure 2A shows a well with a monolayer of RAW 264.7 cells just prior to infection, while Figure 2B shows three visible plaques indicated by roman numbers I, II and III in a well. Individual steps of the assay are depicted in Figures 3A through F. Figure 3A shows the preparation of the 10-fold dilution series of a virus-containing sample. Figure 3B shows the transfer of dilutions to duplicate wells of a 6-well plate. Figure 3C shows the rocking apparatus used to incubate RAW 264.7 cells with the inoculum at room temperature for 1 hr. Figure 3D shows cells being overlaid with the SeaPlaque:MEM mixture. Figure 3E shows a plate at room temperature to allow the overlay to solidify, while Figure 3F shows cells being stained with a 0.01% neutral red solution 48 hr later. After staining cells for 1-3 hr and aspirating the neutral red staining solution, plaques are visible and can be counted (Figure 4).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of the MNV plaque assay protocol.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Representative images of a well of a monolayer before infection and after formation of plaques. A) RAW 264.7 cells were cultured overnight and imaged under a light microscope at 20x magnification. B) Cells were stained with a 0.01% neutral red solution after 48 hr of infection and visualized under a light microscope at 4x magnification. Roman numbers I, II, and III indicate three visible plaques.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Representative images of the different plaque assay steps. A) MNV-1 inoculum is prepared in 10-fold dilutions. B) Inoculum is added to cell monolayers in duplicate wells. C) Cells and inoculum are incubated by rocking for 1 hr at room temperature. D) Cells are overlaid with a 1:1 mixture of SeaPlaque agarose and 2x MEM media. E) Plates are incubated for 10 min at room temperature to allow the overlay to solidify. F) Staining of cells with the neutral red staining solution 48 hr post-infection.

Figure 4
Figure 4. MNV-1 forms plaques in cell monolayers. Shown here is a representative plaque assay plate 48 hr post-infection, showing plaques stained with neutral red staining solution after 1 hr of incubation. The plate shows duplicate wells of three 10-fold dilutions. Wells labeled with roman numbers I and IV correspond to the 10-1 dilution; II and V correspond to the 10-2 dilution; III and VI correspond to the 10-3 dilution. The viral titer of the sample is indicated below (see Section 4.5 for details of the calculation).

Discussion

The plaque assay method for MNV-1 presented here is a way of quantifying infectious MNV particles. By following the assay steps illustrated in Figure 3, one can obtain reproducible viral titers. The limit of detection of the assay depends on the starting dilution used. When starting with a 1:10 dilution of sample as described above, the limit of detection of the plaque assay is 10 pfu (i.e., 1 plaque visible at the 10-1 dilution). Since each plaque represents a single virus, the plaque assay can also be used to purify clonal populations of MNV by picking isolated plaques and propagating them as described previously 1. In addition, plaque purifications can also be used to separate an individual virus population from mixed virus populations. A limitation of using a plaque assay for the detection of MNV infection is that not all MNV strains form plaques 4. However, it may be possible to overcome the inability of some MNV strains, isolated from animals, to form plaques by serially passaging these viruses in tissue culture 7. An alternative to the plaque assay is to measure infectious particles via the TCID50 technique 3, 4. This assay quantifies the amount of virus required to produce CPE in 50% of inoculated tissue culture cells following endpoint dilutions and takes 1 week to complete for MNV 4. In addition to being slower than a plaque assay, the TCID50 assay is also not as sensitive (limit of detection = 200 TCID50/ml) due to the toxicity of tissue samples to RAW 264.7 cells 4.

Although critical steps within the protocol have been described throughout the protocol, the following section provides a summary to facilitate trouble-shooting. The most critical step in the protocol is to ensure that RAW 264.7 cells remain viable throughout the assay to support virus replication. This can be monitored at each stage of the assay via light microscopy. Cell viability is ensured in two ways. First, care should be taken not to let cells dry out while handling plates. Thus, plates are inoculated one at a time, rocked during the infection period, and should remain closed whenever they are not being handled. Second, solutions added onto cells should be equilibrated to ~37 °C. Furthermore, it is vital for the overall health of the RAW 264.7 cells to maintain them in media containing low endotoxin serum (< 10 EU/ml), which limits activation of cells. In addition, we have observed a higher failure rate of the plaque assay when using cells from passage 30 or higher. Although this will likely vary from lab to lab, it is important to include a positive control (e.g., a sample with a known viral titer) to ensure reproducible titers, especially when using higher passage RAW 264.7 cells. To limit use of higher passage cells, it is advisable to freeze vials of early passage cells upon receipt of RAW 264.7 cells and start a new culture from the frozen vials frequently. Starting over with low passage cell cultures will also be helpful when cells exhibit altered characteristics, such as failure to adhere, changes in cell morphology (e.g. from round to spindly and spread out), or when mycoplasma contamination has been detected. Another important point to pay attention to is to ensure that pipette tips are changed between samples and during dilutions. This will ensure accurate serial dilutions and prevent cross-contamination between samples. The one step in the protocol where the same pipette tip can be used again is when serial dilutions of the same sample are added to wells. In that case, one should start from the most diluted inoculum to the least, and vigorously pipette up and down when drawing up a new dilution.

The plaque assay protocol is amendable to several modifications. One modification that can be made when there are not enough cells for inoculating wells in duplicate is to inoculate only a single well for each dilution. However, since the inoculum volume is 0.5 ml, the number of plaques then needs to be multiplied by a factor of 2 to normalize to pfu/ml. The plaque assay can also be adapted for use with any other adherent cell line that is able to support replication of MNV, and this has been described for the murine microglial BV-2 cell line 8. Other modifications that can be implemented are adaptations that have been described for plaque assay protocols developed for other viruses. In case of MNV, the following modifications have already been implemented successfully; the use of methyl cellulose instead of Sea Plaque agarose 9, and staining of cells with crystal violet or methylene blue instead of neutral red 10, 11.

Overall, this protocol can easily be adapted as needed to quantify other plaque-forming viruses or used for other viruses that cause lytic infections in RAW 264.7 cells, making it a useful tool to quantify infectious viral particles in general.

Disclosures

No conflicts of interest declared.

Acknowledgments

We thank members of the Wobus laboratory for critical comments and suggestions. Work in the laboratory of CEW was funded by start-up funds from the University of Michigan, a career development grant from the NIH/NIAID Regional Center of Excellence for Bio-defense and Emerging Infectious Diseases Research (RCE) Program, Region V 'Great Lakes' RCE (NIH award 1-U54-AI-057153) and NIH R01 AI080611. M.B.G.-H. was funded by the Experimental Immunology (NIH T32 A1007413-16) and the Molecular Mechanisms in Microbial Pathogenesis (NIH T32 A1007528) training grants to the University of Michigan. J.B.C. was funded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brasilia, Brazil.

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
DMEM/ High glucose Hyclone SH30243.02
2x MEM Gibco 11935
100x Penicillin and streptomycin Hyclone SV30010
10 mM Non-essential amino acids Hyclone SH30238.01
1M HEPES Hyclone SH30237.01
200 mM (100x) L-glutamine Hyclone SH30034.01
Fetal Bovine Serum Gibco, Hyclone 10437, SH30070.02
Sea Plaque Agarose Lonza 50100
Neutral Red 0.33% Sigma N2889
1x PBS Gibco 10010
1.0 mm Zirconia/Silica beads BioSpec Products 11079110z
Model 35 Speed Rocker Labnet S2035
Magna Lyser Instrument Roche 03358968001
Raw 264.7 cell line ATCC TIB-71
Tissue culture incubator Sanyo MCO-18AIC

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Wobus, C. E. Replication of Norovirus in cell culture reveals a tropism for dendritic cells and macrophages. PLoS Biol. 2, e432 (2004).
  2. Wobus, C. E., Thackray, L. B., Virgin, H. W. Murine norovirus: a model system to study norovirus biology and pathogenesis. Journal of virology. 80, 5104-5112 (2006).
  3. Condit, R. C. Ch. 2. Fields Virology. Knipe, D. M., Howley, P. M. 1, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 25-58 (2007).
  4. Thackray, L. B. Murine noroviruses comprising a single genogroup exhibit biological diversity despite limited sequence divergence. Journal of virology. 81, 10460-10473 (2007).
  5. Reed, L. J., Muench, H. A simple method for estimating 50% endpoints. American Journal of Hygiene. 27, 493-497 (1932).
  6. Chachu, K. A. Antibody is critical for the clearance of murine norovirus infection. Journal of virology. 82, 6610-6617 (2008).
  7. Barron, E. L. Diversity of murine norovirus strains isolated from asymptomatic mice of different genetic backgrounds within a single U.S. research institute. PLoS ONE. 6, e21435 (2011).
  8. Cox, C., Cao, S., Lu, Y. Enhanced detection and study of murine norovirus-1 using a more efficient microglial cell line. Virology journal. 6, 196 (2009).
  9. Cooper, P. D. The plaque assay of animal viruses. Adv. Virus Res. 8, 319-378 (1961).
  10. Hyde, J. L. Mouse norovirus replication is associated with virus-induced vesicle clusters originating from membranes derived from the secretory pathway. Journal of virology. 83, 9709-9719 (2009).
  11. Simmonds, P. Bioinformatic and functional analysis of RNA secondary structure elements among different genera of human and animal caliciviruses. Nucleic acids research. 36, 2530-2546 (2008).

Comments

2 Comments

  1. I am very happy to read your paper   here I have a question about Low Melting Point Agarose (SeaPlaque) Overlay Preparation   DMEM medium was used in RAW²64.7 cell culture and ²*MEM was used in overlay   why   Thank you!

    Reply
    Posted by: Shengnan T.
    April 22, 2013 - 10:52 PM
  2. Hi,
    I'm having a bit of trouble titering my virus. The virus is lysing the cells during the infection process but when I go to do plaque assay I have no plaques. Any suggestions?

    Reply
    Posted by: Thomas Y.
    August 27, 2013 - 12:06 PM

Post a Question / Comment / Request

You must be signed in to post a comment. Please or create an account.

Usage Statistics