Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) has been proposed as a treatment option for a wide range of neurological diseases. In order to prepare health care professionals for adoption of CED, accessible training models are needed. We describe the use of agarose gel as such a model of the human brain for testing, research, and training.
Cite this ArticleCopy Citation | Download Citations
Sillay, K. A., McClatchy, S. G., Shepherd, B. A., Venable, G. T., Fuehrer, T. S. Image-guided Convection-enhanced Delivery into Agarose Gel Models of the Brain. J. Vis. Exp. (87), e51466, doi:10.3791/51466 (2014).
Translate text to:
Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) has been proposed as a treatment option for a wide range of neurological diseases. Neuroinfusion catheter CED allows for positive pressure bulk flow to deliver greater quantities of therapeutics to an intracranial target than traditional drug delivery methods. The clinical utility of real time MRI guided CED (rCED) lies in the ability to accurately target, monitor therapy, and identify complications. With training, rCED is efficient and complications may be minimized. The agarose gel model of the brain provides an accessible tool for CED testing, research, and training. Simulated brain rCED allows practice of the mock surgery while also providing visual feedback of the infusion. Analysis of infusion allows for calculation of the distribution fraction (Vd/Vi) allowing the trainee to verify the similarity of the model as compared to human brain tissue. This article describes our agarose gel brain phantom and outlines important metrics during a CED infusion and analysis protocols while addressing common pitfalls faced during CED infusion for the treatment of neurological disease.
Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) has been proposed as a treatment option for a broad spectrum of neurological disorders including malignant brain tumors, epilepsy, metabolic disorders, neurodegenerative diseases (such as Parkinson disease)1, stroke, and trauma2. CED employs positive pressure bulk flow for the distribution of a drug or other infusate. CED provides safe, reliable, and homogenous delivery of molecular weight compounds, ranging from low to high, at clinically relevant volumes3. Traditional drug delivery to brain tissue is severely restricted by the blood-brain barrier4. Formed by the tight junctions between endothelial cells that make up the capillaries in the brain, the blood-brain barrier blocks polar and high molecular weight molecules from entering the parenchyma of the brain. Direct intraparenchymal brain infusion via CED can overcome the limitations of previous therapeutic drug delivery modalities and allows the use of therapeutic agents that would not cross the blood-brain barrier, and therefore have been previously unavailable as viable treatment options5.
Researchers from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) described CED in the early 1990s as a means of achieving greater therapeutic drug concentrations than by diffusion alone6-8. The first methods of CED involved implanting one or more catheters into the brain, connecting an infusion pump to the catheter, and pumping the therapeutic agents directly into the targeted region. The increased distribution fraction and relatively stable concentration is reported to occur as the positive pressure created by the infusion pump causes the tissues to dilate and allow for permeation of the drug9.
The fundamental technique for CED remains largely the same as it was first described. Advances in catheter design10, infusion technique11, line pressure monitoring2, and real time MRI monitoring to correct for brain shift12,13, optimize multiple collinear infusions14, and monitor for infusate loss15 have increased the safety and efficacy of the treatment10. Additional importance has been placed on the catheter design and infusion strategy including flow rate. Successful CED, with limited catheter reflux and tissue damage, has been correlated with catheter design and infusion rate. The use of a catheter with a narrow diameter and a low infusion rate to limit backflow along the brain-catheter interface as well as limit damage at the catheter tip16. MR imaging provides visual confirmation of the correct location for infusion catheter placement, and thus drug delivery, while also allowing for correction of infusion reflux or aberrant delivery17. MR images can also be used to approximate and track the volumes of distribution (Vd) of the infused drug. The Vd is calculated using an MR imaging signal intensity value greater than three standard deviations above the mean from the surrounding non-infused gel as a threshold for segmentation18. The Vd is a useful measurement for CED because it represents the volume of the drug distributed in the brain. Along with the volume infused (Vi), a ratio can be generated (Vd/Vi) quantifying the volume covered by the infused drug.
Agarose gel phantoms mimic several crucial mechanical properties of the human brain important for understanding CED such as: Vd, gel-catheter interactions, poroelastic properties, and infusion cloud morphology10. Mixtures of 0.2% agarose gel have been shown to mimic in vivo changes in local pore fraction caused by gel dilation due to CED. A similar pore fraction to human brain promotes similar interactions and accurate measurements of Vd19. Additionally, similar concentrations of agarose gels such as 0.6% and 0.8% have shown similar infusion pressure profiles to the brain20. Further, the translucent agarose gels provide the advantage of real-time visualization of catheter placement and infusion reflux. Agarose gel phantoms are relatively inexpensive to produce. The cost of the agarose gel phantoms may be key to future widespread training throughout neurological surgery. Due to these properties, agarose gels provide a useful surrogate, replicating many of the key attributes of human brain infusions without the use of brain tissue.
As stated above, image-guided CED into agarose gel models provides a beneficial in vitro method for testing, research, and training. The purpose of this article is to describe how to recreate agarose gel phantoms, to outline appropriate CED testing and analysis protocols, and to address common errors faced during CED infusions for the treatment of neurological disease.
1. Preparation of Gel Phantoms and Dye
- Prepare 0.2% agarose gel by dissolving 2 g of 0.1% agarose powder in 1,000 ml of deionized water. Stir the solution for approximately 1 min to insure proper mixing; and immediately microwave the solution in 3 min intervals for 9 min or until clear, stirring between intervals.
- While the agarose gel is liquid, pour the solution into 5 cm x 5 cm x 5 cm containers. Allow space at the top of the container to add water and allow the agarose gel to cool and settle.
- Once the agarose gel has solidified (approximately 1-2 hr), add 1 cm of water to the top of the gel and refrigerate. It is best to use the gel within 24-48 hr of mixing, but it can be stored for up to a week refrigerated10.
- Prepare a radio-contrast dye in a 60 ml syringe consisting of 50 ml of 0.017% bromophenol blue dye (BPB), and 2 mM of gadoteridol radio-contrast media.
- Combine 8.5 mg of BPB dye to 50 ml deionized water to create a 0.017% BPB solution.
- Add 0.2 ml of stock 0.5 M gadoteridol to the 50 ml 0.017% BPB solution to create a 2 mM gadoteridol solution.
2. Preparation of Infusion System
- Syringe pump infusion system (preferred method): For syringe pump preparation, attach the infusion catheter directly to the syringe through the pressure sensor, reducing the dead volume of the infusion line. The purge function of the syringe pump may be used to clear the line of air using a bolus greater than the priming volume of the catheter at a rate of 10 μl/min.
- Tube pump infusion system (alternate method): Connect the syringe containing the radio-contrast dye to the infusion pump. Attach the pressure sensor to the pump outlet with the transducer attached to the IV monitor. Attach a 16 G infusion catheter to the open end of the pressure sensor. Note: The tip of the 16 G infusion catheter has an inner diameter of 0.2 mm and an outer diameter of 0.35 mm. The tip is made of fused silica and the tip length is 3 mm. It increases to approximately 0.75 mm and continues for 15 mm, the catheter then steps up in a tapered fashion to 1.6 mm or 16 G.
- Prepare for infusion by purging the system for approximately 15 min at 16.667 μl/min to remove any air bubbles. Do not exceed the 16.667 μl/min flow rate, as the machine will cease infusion due to high line pressure. Following attaching the infusion catheter to the line exiting the infusion pump, purge lines of air by using the "Bolus" function on the infusion pump.
- Attach the infusion catheter mount and trajectory frame to the gel phantom container (5 cm x 5 cm x 5 cm) and place in the MRI.
3. CED Gel Infusion and MR Scanning
- Zero the pressure value (mmHg) recorded by the IV monitor before beginning the infusion.
- Insert the infusion catheter into the agarose gel with the infusion pump running at the lowest flow rate possible, in this case 1.667 μl/min.
- Begin the MR scan, using the parameters listed in Table 1, and continue infusing at a rate of 1.667 μl/min. Infuse the gel at a constant rate until the total volume infused reaches 60 μl (approximately 38 min).
- Scan the gel continuously in 3 min and 50 sec intervals. Record the pressure readings every 60 sec. Once the volume infused reaches 60 μl, turn off the infusion pump; and complete MR scanning while continuing to record pressure readings.
4. MR Data Analysis
- For analyzing the MR images, use an appropriate DICOM viewer with ROI segmentation functionality.
- Select the correct frame in each scan marked by the cross section of the catheter as seen in Figure 1.
- Using the "ROI - rectangle" tool, select the largest portion of the gel that does not include any portion of the infusion site. The software will output a mean pixel density with standard deviation. Find the value that corresponds to three standard deviations from the mean. This value is used as the threshold for determining when contrast is present with a confidence of 99.7%.
- Using the "ROI - circle" tool, encircle the infusion site with a large enough circle and give this a unique name.
- Select the circle and using the "ROI - set pixel values to" tool, input threshold value found in step 4.3 into "if current value is larger than:" box and checkmark this line only. Then in "to this new value:" box, enter a large value (25,000). Reset the pixel density to select the area encompassed by the threshold previously defined.
- Next, using the "ROI - grow region (2D/3D segmentation)" tool, select 2D growing region, confidence algorithm with initial radius parameter = 2, and brush ROI. Click inside of the infusion site for the software to compute the total area of this region.
- Assuming a spherical infusion cloud, calculate the volume of diffusion from the area via the following equation: V= 4/3π(√(Area/π))3
Interpreting and analyzing CED infusions involve several important factors such as distribution fraction and infusate reflux. The distribution fraction calculation depends heavily upon the calculation of the Vd. Therefore accurate interpretation of the MR images is critical. We propose a semi-automated method for reliably reproducing these measurements as listed above. These methods objectively determine the cross sectional area of the infusate cloud and an approximate radius. While variable, in agarose gel the infusion cloud often proved spherical. Assuming a spherical infusate cloud, this radius can be used to determine the Vd for the CED infusion. Vd/Vi for the agarose gel infusion can then be calculated with the measured volume infused. Agarose gel at 0.2% concentration has proven a reasonable representation of brain tissue with a Vd/Vi ratio of 5.0 10, falling in between measured Vd/Vi ratios of brain tissue ranging from 3.1 to 5.2 21,22.
The pressure measurements taken during the CED infusion are also important for ensuring the infusion remains stable and constant. Detected pressure spikes may indicate errors in the infusion such as air bubbles or blockages in the catheter. The pressure profile of the infusion is expected to initially peak before decreasing to a relatively stable plateau for the duration of the infusion20.
The main detriment to the success of the infusion is air in the infusion line. Air alters the measurement of the infusion pressure as well as the volume of the dye being infused. It may also cause local tissue disruption and affect the distribution of the infusate. A successful study was performed using coaxial catheters that yielded parameters to minimize or eliminate the effects produced by air escape into the infusion site23. From our study, we identify a need for future investigations into proper methods of CED infusions using single cannula catheters such as the SmartFlow catheter to equally minimize or eliminate the presence of air.
A key parameter for identifying the presence of air in the infusion line is infusion pressure. As shown by the infusion pressure (mmHg) line in Figure 2, there is a spike in the infusion line pressure at the same time that air is introduced into the catheter line. Comparing the pressure readings to the MR image timestamps, a pressure spike may indicate the presence of an air bubble prior to MR image confirmation. This suggests pressure may be a potential warning marker for detecting and preventing the inappropriate delivery of air in vivo. There was time between the initial spike in pressure and when the air was actually delivered into the gel. That is important to note since air should not be infused into the brain during an actual procedure. If increased pressure was observed in an actual case there might be ample time to keep air from reaching the infusion site within the brain.
Once the air reaches the catheter tip, growth of the air bubble can be seen in the MR images as shown in Figure 3, panels A-F. The air bubble causes enlargement and irregularity of the dye acorn and also alters the measurement of Vd. Thus, it is important to identify and validate a method to prepare the system that consistently ensures it is devoid of air prior to placing the catheter, making certain air does not impair the infusion. One way to prevent air entering the catheter may be to begin the infusion prior to insertion of the catheter into the agarose gel.
Backflow of the infusate along the catheter-gel interface can adversely affect the infusion by allowing the infusate to exit the target. While backflow can occur at any point during an infusion, there is an increased incidence of backflow at the start of the infusion and when increasing the infusion rate10. Backflow has also been associated with the presence of air bubbles, catheter insertion technique, and catheter design, though back flow may still occur despite controlling for these variables23. To minimize backflow, a stepped, reflux resistant catheter was used, and the infusion rate was held constant and as low as possible (1.667 μl/min). One can also avoid unnecessary backflow by preventing pressure spikes. Along with catheter diameter, initial infusion pressure spikes (IIPS) (associated with the expulsion of an end-catheter occlusion) have been shown to increase the probability that backflow will occur. Therefore, a “trickle” technique was used where the infusion was initiated at the minimum rate just prior to insertion. Porous membrane catheters, as well as valve tip catheter designs, have been proposed to mitigate end port occlusions and associated IIPS.
Table 1. Imaging parameters and values used for the MR scan of the infusion.
Figure 1. Panel 1 showing a picture of the catheter mount and agarose gel alongside panel 2 containing a MR image of the agarose gel showing a cross section of infusion catheter. Labels as follows: the MR visible trajectory guide can be seen by labels A and B, the infusion catheter by label C, the water on top of the agarose gel by label D, pooling contrast agent at the gel water interface by label E, the agarose gel by label F, and the infusion cloud by label G.
Figure 2. Graph demonstrating the effects of air on the CED infusion. Air was noted in the infusion line 15 min into the infusion. At 17 min a spike in the pressure was recorded, as shown by the green line. The air bubble also has a drastic effect on the Vd and Vd/Vi ratio as seen by the blue and brown dashed lines respectively. Upon air entering the line, the Vd spiked from approximately 5 to 9 μl; while the Vi remained linear. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3. Magnetic resonance images showing growth of the infusion cloud and enclosed air bubble. The first image shows the gel prior to insertion of the catheter, the second image shows the insertion of the catheter after beginning the infusion, and the subsequent time lapse shown is in approximately 4-min intervals. The air bubble distorts the true volume of the infusate cloud and prevents accurate measurement of Vd. Air was seen entering the infusion catheter immediately prior to the MR scan. Panels A-F correspond to points A-F in Figure 2, demonstrating the progression of the infusion.
The critical steps for ensuring the success of the infusion are: purging the infusion line of air, mixing the agarose gel, analyzing the MR data, using small inner catheter diameters, using stepped catheter designs to minimize backflow, and minimizing the pressure felt by the gel or tissue into which the drug is being infused. As previously stated, the main detriment to the success of the infusion is infusion line air. Correctly and thoroughly purging the infusion line of air is critical to ensure no air enters the infusion. Equally as important is mixing of the agarose gel. Improper synthesis of the gel could lead to large variations in concentration and consistency, which in turn will cause fluctuations in infusate distribution. Consistent MR data analysis is key for accurate and objective measurements of Vd and Vd/Vi ratios. Precisely following the steps outlined in the protocol provides a consistent method for analyzing the MR data.
However, these techniques are not without limitations. When inserting the catheter, the agarose gel may fracture or lacerate unpredictably10. This unpredictable nature of the agarose gel could cause changes in the gel-catheter interface making it dissimilar from human brain tissue and unusable. Additional limitations may arise from assuming a spherical infusion cloud for calculation of the Vd. While spherical infusion clouds were common with infusions into agarose gel, attempting to reproduce the infusion in vivo may yield different results. Brain tissue is more anisotropic, more heterogeneous, and contains more regional anatomical boundaries than agarose gel and therefore will cause variance in infusion cloud morphology10. It is important to note that these Vd were approximated grossly, without taking into account the presence of magnetic susceptibility artifacts, which may decrease the signal intensity of the infusate cloud. For the purpose of this manuscript we made the assumption of anisotropic diffusion and we understand that this is an estimate. Additional modifications to the current technique may exist to improve consistency and accuracy of the results. Modifications may include additional purging of the lines to further prevent air in the infusion or using software to more accurately calculate a 3D volume to avoid assuming a spherical infusate cloud. Methods of computer modeling as described by Linninger et al. may be used to more accurately predict and measure the CED infusion cloud volume24,25.
Compared to existing methods that require cadaveric or animal brain tissue, agarose gel provides a more easily accessible model for CED testing. The translucent nature of agarose gel also offers real-time visualization of the infusion. This real-time visualization gives the trainee the ability to see reflux or air bubbles in the infusion before it is detected by the MR, allowing for quick correction and modification. For future applications, agarose gel provides the accessible models needed for future testing, research, and training in CED.
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
The authors would like to thank the staff from the MRI facilities at the Semmes-Murphey Clinic, Memphis, Tennessee as well as the Neurosurgical department at The University of Tennessee Health Science Center in Memphis, Tennessee.
|Prohance||Bracco||Gadoteridol radio contrast media|
|Bromophenol blue dye||Biorad||161-0404||Dye for infusate visualization|
|Agarose gel powder||Biorad||161-3101EDU||Agarose powder for creating gels|
|Medrad Veris MR Vital Signs Monitor||Medrad||MR safe infusion pressure monitor|
|16 G SmartFlow Catheter||SurgiVision||Infusion catheter|
|Medrad Continuum MR Infusion System||Medrad||MR safe infusion pump|
|SMART Frame MRI Guided trajectory frame||ClearPoint||Infusion catheter frame|
|Osirix imaging software and DICOM Viewer||Osirix Imaging Software||OsiriX 32-bit DICOM Viewer|
- Miranpuri, G. S., et al. Gene-based therapy of Parkinson's Disease: Translation from animal model to human clinical trial employing convection enhanced delivery. Annals of Neurosciences. 19, 133-146 (2012).
- Sillay, K., Hinchman, A., Akture, E., Salamat, S., Miranpuri, G., Williams, J., Berndt, D. Convection Enhanced Delivery to the Brain: Preparing for Gene Therapy and Protein Delivery to the Brain for Functional and Restorative Neurosurgery by Understanding Low-Flow Neurocatheter Infusions Using the Alaris® System Infusion Pump. Annals of Neurosciences. 20, (2013).
- Song, D. K., Lonser, R. R. Convection-enhanced delivery for the treatment of pediatric neurologic disorders. Journal of child neurology. 23, 1231-1237 (2008).
- Bobo, R. H., et al. Convection-enhanced delivery of macromolecules in the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91, 2076-2080 (1994).
- Debinski, W., Tatter, S. B. Convection-enhanced delivery for the treatment of brain tumors. Expert review of neurotherapeutics. 9, 1519-1527 (2009).
- Morrison, P. F., Laske, D. W., Bobo, H., Oldfield, E. H., Dedrick, R. L. High-flow microinfusion: tissue penetration and pharmacodynamics. The American journal of physiology. 266, 292-305 (1994).
- Nguyen, T. T., et al. Convective distribution of macromolecules in the primate brain demonstrated using computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of neurosurgery. 98, 584-590 (2003).
- Lonser, R. R., et al. Successful and safe perfusion of the primate brainstem: in vivo magnetic resonance imaging of macromolecular distribution during infusion. Journal of neurosurgery. 97, 905-913 (2002).
- Raghavan, R., et al. Convection-enhanced delivery of therapeutics for brain disease, and its optimization. Neurosurg Focus. 20, (2006).
- Sillay, K., et al. Benchmarking the ERG valve tip and MRI Interventions Smart Flow neurocatheter convection-enhanced delivery system's performance in a gel model of the brain: employing infusion protocols proposed for gene therapy for Parkinson's disease. Journal of neural engineering. 9, (2012).
- Schomberg, D., Wang, A., Marshall, H., Sillay, K., Miranpuri, G. Ramped-Rate vs. continuous rate infusions: An in vitro comparison of Convection Enhanced Delivery protocols. Annals of Neurosciences. 20, (2013).
- Sillay, K. A., et al. Perioperative Brain Shift and Deep Brain Stimulating Electrode Deformation Analysis: Implications for rigid and non-rigid devices. Ann Biomed Eng. 41, 293-304 (2013).
- Brodsky, E., Block, W., Alexander, A., Emborg, M., Ross, C., Sillay, K. Intraoperative Device Targeting using Real-Time MRI. Biomedical Sciences and Engineering Conference, BSEC. (2011).
- Sillay, K., et al. Strategies for the delivery of multiple collinear infusion clouds in convection-enhanced delivery in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery. 91, 153-161 (2013).
- Brady, M. L., et al. Pathways of infusate loss during convection-enhanced delivery into the putamen nucleus. Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery. 91, 69-78 (2013).
- White, E., et al. An evaluation of the relationships between catheter design and tissue mechanics in achieving high-flow convection-enhanced delivery. J Neurosci Methods. 199, 87-97 (2011).
- Fiandaca, M. S., Forsayeth, J. R., Dickinson, P. J., Bankiewicz, K. S. Image-guided convection-enhanced delivery platform in the treatment of neurological diseases. Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics. 5, 123-127 (2008).
- Jagannathan, J., Walbridge, S., Butman, J. A., Oldfield, E. H., Lonser, R. R. Effect of ependymal and pial surfaces on convection-enhanced delivery. Journal of neurosurgery. 109, 547-552 (2008).
- Chen, Z. J., Broaddus, W. C., Viswanathan, R. R., Raghavan, R., Gillies, G. T. Intraparenchymal drug delivery via positive-pressure infusion: experimental and modeling studies of poroelasticity in brain phantom gels. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering. 49, 85-96 (2002).
- Chen, Z. J., et al. A realistic brain tissue phantom for intraparenchymal infusion studies. Journal of neurosurgery. 101, 314-322 (2004).
- Richardson, R. M., et al. Interventional MRI-guided Putaminal Delivery of AAV2-GDNF for a Planned Clinical Trial in Parkinson's Disease. Mol Ther. 19, 1048-1057 (2011).
- Thorne, R. G., Hrabetova, S., Nicholson, C. Diffusion of epidermal growth factor in rat brain extracellular space measured by integrative optical imaging. Journal of neurophysiology. 92, 3471-3481 (2004).
- Panse, S. J., Fillmore, H. L., Chen, Z. J., Gillies, G. T., Broaddus, W. C. A novel coaxial tube catheter for central nervous system infusions: performance characteristics in brain phantom gel. J Med Eng Technol. 35, 408-414 (2010).
- Linninger, A. A., Somayaji, M. R., Zhang, L., Smitha Hariharan, M., Penn, R. D. Rigorous mathematical modeling techniques for optimal delivery of macromolecules to the brain. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering. 55, 2303-2313 (2008).
- Sampson, J. H., et al. Clinical utility of a patient-specific algorithm for simulating intracerebral drug infusions. Neuro-oncology. 9, 343-353 (2007).