Using the Dot Assay to Analyze Migration of Cell Sheets

Published 12/05/2017
0 Comments
  CITE THIS  SHARE 
Cancer Research

Your institution must subscribe to JoVE's Cancer Research section to access this content.

Fill out the form below to receive a free trial or learn more about access:

Welcome!

Enter your email below to get your free 10 minute trial to JoVE!





By clicking "Submit", you agree to our policies.

 

Summary

Cell migration is essential for development, tissue maintenance and repair, and tumorigenesis, and is regulated by growth factors, chemokines, and cytokines. This protocol describes the dot assay, a two-dimensional, unconstrained migration assay to assess the migratory phenotype of attached, cohesive cell sheets in response to microenvironmental cues.

Cite this Article

Copy Citation

Stuelten, C. H. Using the Dot Assay to Analyze Migration of Cell Sheets. J. Vis. Exp. (130), e56451, doi:10.3791/56451 (2017).

Abstract

Although complex organisms appear static, their tissues are under a continuous turnover. As cells age, die, and are replaced by new cells, cells move within tissues in a tightly orchestrated manner. During tumor development, this equilibrium is disturbed, and tumor cells leave the epithelium of origin to invade the local microenvironment, to travel to distant sites, and to ultimately form metastatic tumors at distant sites. The dot assay is a simple, two-dimensional unconstrained migration assay, to assess the net movement of cell sheets into a cell-free area, and to analyze parameters of cell migration using time-lapse imaging. Here, the dot assay is demonstrated using a human invasive, lung colony forming breast cancer cell line, MCF10CA1a, to analyze the cells' migratory response to epidermal growth factor (EGF), which is known to increase malignant potential of breast cancer cells and to alter the migratory phenotype of cells.

Introduction

Migration assays are widely used to evaluate the invasive and metastatic potential of tumor cells in vitro. Most commonly, the wound or scratch assay is used to assess migration of epithelial sheets into a cell cleared area1,2,3. To perform the scratch assay, cells are plated into a monolayer and a "scratch" or cell-free area is created with a pipette tip The scratch assay is easy to set up with commonly available tissue culture supplies and can be performed in multi-well plates, allowing for processing of multiple samples. However, as the scratch is made, cells are physically removed from the monolayer and often undergo cell death. Furthermore, extracellular matrix attached to the plate is often damaged during the scratching process. Similarly, the use of silicon inserts (such as Ibidi chambers4) or of stencils5,6,7 can lead to mechanical disruption of the cells and the partial removal of matrix proteins used for coating the plates. Another disadvantage of assays monitoring closure of wounds or scratches is their limited time course, as cell migration can only be analyzed until the scratch is closed.

In performing the dot assay, cells are plated as a circular colony onto a coated or uncoated plate8. The rationale for this plating strategy is to obtain cell sheets with defined edges, that can migrate or invade into the surrounding cell-free areas without disturbing the culture by removal of cells or inserts. The overall goal of the dot assay is to observe migration of cell sheets as measured by edge displacement or colony diameter, as well as to perform time-lapse imaging to analyze the migratory phenotype of cells in higher spatio-temporal resolution.

Cell migration can be affected by a variety of microenvironmental cues like chemokines, cytokines, and growth factors such as EGF. EGF is a growth factor that exerts its biological effects via binding to its receptor, EGF receptor9, and increases invasive and metastatic behavior of tumor cells4,9,10. Here, the dot assay is used to study EGF stimulated cell migration in a human invasive, lung colony forming breast cancer cell line (MCF10CA1a)8,11,12.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Protocol

1. Coating of Dishes (Day 1)

NOTE: Make sure not to leave fingerprints or dirt on the bottom of the plate when handling it.

  1. Thaw mouse collagen IV on ice, and dilute it with 50 mM HCl (pH 1.3) to prepare 3 mL of a 10 µg/mL collagen IV solution.
    NOTE: Collagen will precipitate at 37 °C. It is therefore important to keep the collagen solution at a low temperature while thawing and working with it. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles by preparing appropriately sized aliquots and storing them at -80 °C.
  2. Add 250 µL collagen IV solution to each well of 12-well glass bottom plates and place them into an appropriately sized, tight-closing plastic box. Place wet paper towel over and around the plates to manufacture a humid chamber and close the box. Incubate the plates overnight at room temperature.
    Note: As only the growth area needs to be coated, it is sufficient to only cover the cover slip, which is attached to the bottom of the plate, with collagen solution (see Figure 1A, B for a schematic of plate).
  3. Next morning, rinse plates with deionized H2O twice to remove non-absorbed collagen and buffer. Direct the water to the edge of the plate well, not to the edge formed by the plate bottom and the coverslip (if water is pipetted into this area it will splash). Air-dry the plates in the laminar flow hood Use plates immediately or store at 4 °C for up to 5 days.
    Note: Different cell lines might require different coating, such as fibronectin or collagen I.

2. Plating the Dot Assay (Day 2)

  1. Preparing the cell suspension
    1. To prepare cell suspension, use cells that have been grown in a 60-mm tissue culture dish in DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 5% horse serum to 80% confluence
    2. Rinse the cells with calcium- and magnesium-free Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline (DPBS) once, add 500 µL trypsin-EDTA (room temperature), and incubate the cells for 3 - 5 min in an incubator at 37 °C, 5% CO2, humidified atmosphere.
    3. Suspend the detached cells in 4.5 mL culture medium to stop trypsin activity and count a 20 µL aliquot of the cell suspension in a hemocytometer.
    4. Pellet the remaining cells in a 15 mL conical tube by centrifugation at 200 x g for 3 min, aspirate the supernatant, and resuspend the cells in culture medium to 3 x 106 cells/mL.
      NOTE: For other coating substrates and/or cell lines, the optimal cell density must be established in a dilution series 3 x 106 cell/mL is recommended as a starting point.
  2. Plating cells
    1. Place a 10 µL drop of cell suspension at the center of each cover slip of the collagen IV coated 12-well glass bottom plate without touching or scratching the coating (Figure 1A, B). Incubate the plate for 30 min at 37 °C, humidified atmosphere, to allow the cells to attach. Check in an inverted microscope that the cells are attached.
      NOTE: This can be best seen at the edge of the drop, where formation of a monolayer can be observed (Figure 1C). If necessary, incubate the plate up to 3 h. Be sure that the humidity in the incubator is high enough as the drops can dry out quickly. If a reduction of the drop volume during this step is observed, add PBS to the spaces between the wells to increase humidity.
    2. Gently wash the wells with 1 mL of culture medium twice to remove non-attached cells. Add 1 mL culture medium to each well. Check in an inverted microscope that no floating cells remain, otherwise wash the wells again. Incubate cells overnight at 37 °C, 5% CO2, humidified atmosphere, to obtain well-defined cell sheets.
      Note: Floating cells are likely to re-attach to the plate and to form undesired cell colonies.

3. Stimulating Cells (Day 3)

  1. Check all wells using an inverse microscope to ensure that cell colonies have grown properly. If necessary, mark unsuitable wells and do not use them.
  2. Label each well of the plate appropriately for each condition investigated. Run each condition in duplicate or triplicate.
  3. Change the medium to starve the cells in DMEM/F12 containing 0.1% horse serum (starving medium) 3 h before cells are stimulated.
  4. Stimulate the cells by addition of EGF (5 ng/mL final concentration) or other desired mediators and gently mix the medium using a 1 mL micropipettor or by swirling the plate.
  5. Incubate the plate for 1 - 4 days to observe edge displacement and edge contour as described in section 4.1 or perform time-lapse imaging as described in section 4.2.

4. Visualization of Cell Colonies and Cell Migration

  1. Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining to measure colony growth (Day 4 - 7)
    1. Fix cells in 70% ethanol (1 mL/well) for ~2 min.
    2. Stain nuclei with hematoxylin (1 mL/well), ~2 min.
    3. Wash cells with tap water (1 mL/well) until nuclei are blue, 5 - 10 min.
    4. Stain cytoplasm with eosin (1 mL/well), ~2 min.
    5. Rinse with deionized water (1 mL/well).
      Note: Hematoxylin and eosin solutions can be collected and used multiple times until the staining becomes faint.
    6. Air-dry plate.
    7. Flip the plate and measure the dot diameter with a ruler. Alternatively, take pictures of the plate with a camera, and analyze the dot diameter in ImageJ.
  2. Time-lapse microscopy (Day 3)
    1. Switch on the incubator microscope and adjust the temperature to 37 °C. Fill the humidifier with dH2O. Adjust the CO2 to 5%. Ensure that the incubator chamber is humidified and that the motorized stage can move freely. Close the incubator chamber and allow the microscope to adjust to 37 °C.
      NOTE: The microscope (see the Table of Materials) used here should be heated to 37 °C for at least 3 h before the cells are imaged to avoid drifting of the focus.
    2. Place the plate on the stage of the incubator microscope and set up the stage list. Image two opposing edges and the center of each cell dot (Figure 1A).
    3. Take images every 3 min, for 15 - 24 h using the 10X objective. Download the data and proceed with image analysis in a program of choice, e.g., ImageJ or Matlab.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

The dot assay presented here (Figure 1) was performed using invasive, lung colony forming breast cancer cells (MCF10CA1a) as a model system. The dot assay yields highly reproducible cell dots even in the hand of beginners, making it a convenient and easy to execute assay (Figure 1D). The dot assay combined with HE staining, or time-lapse imaging and subsequent particle image velocimetry (PIV) allows the study of various migration parameters including displacement of epithelial edges, cell speed, and cell directionality as cells at the edges of an epithelial sheet migrate into a cell-free area. Initially, phase contrast imaging of cell dots revealed that invasive, lung colony forming breast cancer cells (MCF10CA1a) maintain a mesenchymal phenotype after stimulation with EGF. However, single cells leaving the sheet are observed more frequently in EGF-stimulated cell dots (Figure 2, arrows). The response of MCF10CA1a cells to EGF was further assessed by HE staining of cultures that were stimulated with EGF for 4 days. Indeed, EGF-stimulation resulted in an increased colony diameter (Figure 3). These observations indicate that migration of EGF stimulated cells might be altered.

Therefore, the dot assay was next utilized to perform a more detailed analysis of the dynamic migration phenotype of MCF10CA1a cell sheets. Cells at the sheet edges were imaged for 9 h following stimulation of cells with EGF (Video 1 and Video 2) and images were then analyzed by PIV in Matlab4,13,14. PIV revealed that EGF increases cell speed (Figure 4A) to 0.63 µm/min from 0.45 µm/min in control cells. At the same time, EGF increased directionality of cells, and this is indicated by a reduction of the variability of cell directionality (angular spread) from 0.95 in control cultures to 0.79 in EGF-stimulated cultures (Figure 4B). EGF increased the radial displacement of the epithelial edge over 9 h from 257 µm to 356 µm (Figure 4), as was also observed by HE staining after 4 days (Figure 3). Thus, the use of the dot assay in combination with different subsequent assays shows that EGF alters migration at the edges of MCF10CA1a cells sheets such that the cell speed and directionality are increased, resulting in an increased colony radius.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Imaging the dot assay. (A, B) Cells are plated as a circular colony in the center of glass bottom plate wells. For migration analysis, images are taken at two opposing edges as well as the center of the colony (A). (C) Dark field image of cell dot during plating (left), and in higher magnification (phase contrast) showing the edge of the drop and the edge of the cell dot after cells attached to the plate (center). Attached cells are flat and polygonal, while non-attached cells are round (right). (D)The diameter of dots is highly reproducible. Dots were imaged immediately after plating and before cells were stimulated and the diameter determined using ImageJ. The dot size is highly reproducible within one experiment as well as between different users and little training is required to gain proficiency in plating the cell dots (E = more than 10 years of experience in tissue culture, I = less than 4 weeks of experience in tissue culture). n = 12 dots per group. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: EGF modulates the morphological phenotype of MCF10CA1a cells. MCF10CA1a cells were starved for 3 h in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 0.1% horse serum before they were stimulated with EGF (5 ng/mL). At the edge of EGF-stimulated colonies single cells tend to migrate out of the sheet (arrows). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: EGF increases net growth of cell colonies. MCF10CA1a cells were starved for 3 h in DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 0.1% horse serum before they were stimulated with EGF (5 ng/mL). 4 days later, cells were ethanol fixed and stained with Hematoxylin & Eosin. EGF-stimulated dots have a higher diameter after 4 days. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4: EGF modulates the migratory phenotype of MCF10CA1a cells. MCF10CA1a cells were starved for 3 h in DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 0.1% horse serum before they were stimulated with EGF (5 ng/mL). Cells were imaged every 3 min for 9 h. Subsequent particle image velocimetry analysis was performed in Matlab13. Speed values represent the average speed over time for each field. Angular spread of velocity vectors was calculated as:
Equation 1 where Equation 2, and ranges from 0 (high directionality) to Equation 3 (low directionality). A decrease in angular spread is considered an increase in directionality. Radial displacement was calculated by subtracting the colony radius at t = 0 h from the colony radius at t = 9 h. EGF-stimulation of MCF10CA1a cell dots resulted in increased cell speed (A; upper panel), decreased angular spread or increased directionality (B; middle panel), and increased colony radius (C; bottom panel). Data represent mean ± SEM of n = 3 experiments. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Movie 1
Video 1: Time-lapse imaging of unstimulated MCF10CA1a cells. Images were taken every 3 min for 9 h. Please click here to view this video. (Right-click to download.)

Movie 2
Video 2: Time-lapse imaging of MCF10CA1a cells stimulated with EGF (5 ng/mL). Images were taken every 3 min for 9 h. Please click here to view this video. (Right-click to download.)

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

During tumor progression cells migrate away from the tissue of origin to invade the surrounding tissue and metastasize to distant sites15. Migration of cells away from a cell colony can be observed in the dot assay. Here, the dot assay is illustrated by analyzing the migratory phenotype of human breast cancer cells in response to EGF.

To obtain accurate and replicable results several steps in the set-up of the dot assays are critical. First, the coating of the plate determines if and how strong cells can adhere to the plate and if cells migrate. Care should be taken that the coating of the plate with collagen IV or other extracellular matrix is homogenous to minimize experimental variability. Furthermore, it must be ensured that the cells investigated attach to and migrate on the coated plate, and multiple experiments with different matrices in several concentrations might be necessary to optimize the coating conditions for a chosen cell line. Second, the accurate plating of the cells is crucial for reproducibility. The footprint of the cell drop determines the size of the cell dot as well as its shape. Ideally, the drop is placed without the pipette tip touching the surface. The shape of the drop is then mostly determined by the surface tension of the plate surface, resulting in a circular footprint of reproducible diameter. Consequently, the diameter of the cell dot can be altered by changing the volume of cell suspension plated.

Thus, several points are to be consider when performing the dot assay. Firstly, the cell density of the cell suspension needs to be adjusted to the coating as well as to the cell type used. In general, if the drop spreads wider, higher cell densities are needed to plate cells into confluent monolayers. Furthermore, more cells need to be plated to obtain a confluent monolayer if cells are small and do not spread much as compared to large, spreading cells. Secondly, the dot assay can be adopted to different plate formats, and for this, the dot size can be adapted to smaller wells by reducing the volume of the dot plated, and if desired, larger dots can be plated by using higher drop volumes. Thirdly, some cell lines will not attach to the plate within 30 min, in which case the plating time can be extended up to 3 h. Similarly, the coating of the plate must be suitable for cells to migrate on and care should be taken not to scratch the coating when plating the cells. If cells do not attach or migrate on the chosen matrix, other types of coating, for example collagen 1 or fibronectin, can be explored, or concentrations of matrix proteins, incubation times, and incubation temperatures during the coating of plates changed. Suitable extracellular matrix for specific cell lines might be found in literature.

The dot assay has few limitations. It is a two-dimensional migration assay and thus this may be considered as a disadvantage compared to three-dimensional assays, which are, however, more difficult to perform than two-dimensional assays. A major problem perhaps is that cell proliferation can influence results, particularly if fast proliferating cell lines are used and cell migration is assessed over longer time periods as was done here for the analysis of the colony diameter after 4 days. Similarly, in scratch assays the closure of a scratch wound is affected by cell proliferation within the cell sheet; and in Boyden chamber assays, particularly if serum or other mediators that induce cell proliferations are used as a chemoattractant, increased cell proliferation in the bottom chamber can skew results. Single cell tracking can be used to specifically observe movement of non-proliferating cells. Furthermore, cell proliferation can be reduced by (i) serum starvation as done here and/or (ii) inhibition of mitosis by addition of mitomycin or other proliferation inhibitors4,16. To reduce cell proliferation, however, care must be taken to not damage the cells to an extent that they can no longer migrate. Interestingly, we found in a similar unconstrained migration assay that cell proliferation is not correlated with edge displacement, although it is involved in maintaining epithelial sheet integrity during migration4,5,17. This opens an interesting question: Is cell proliferation a necessary component of migration of a cell sheet? It is expected that migration of cell sheets with strong cell-cell adhesions into the surrounding environment will be negatively affected if proliferation is blocked entirely, as the sheet eventually will no longer be able to expand and support migration of cells. At this point, the cells should either slow or stop migration, or the sheet should disrupt. Conversely, the migration of sheets with low cell-cell adhesions might be less impacted as cells can leave the sheet to migrate independently, such as scattering at the edge of the epithelial sheet. Thus, the cell migration and cell proliferation are interdependent, and any attempt of blocking cell proliferation to study sheet migration needs to be carefully considered. Thus, assays analyzing sheet migration are mostly performed under serum starvation which reduces but does not abolish cell migration.

Other migration assays to study sheet migration on two-dimensional surfaces include the scratch or wound assay and, more recently, unconstrained migration assays using silicon or PDMS chambers and stencils which allow plating of cells in defined areas and unconstrained migration of cells into the cell-free area after removal of the chamber or stencil1,3,4,5,6,7,16. These latter assays and the dot assay offer high reproducibility in the hand of experienced as well as unexperienced users as the cell plating determines the shape and size of the colony. In contrast, scratching of the cellular monolayer in scratch assays requires practice, and even in the hands of experts parts of the sheet can be ripped off erroneously if cell lines that form tight monolayers are used. This issue is improved when silicone chambers or stencils are used for plating the cells, although we observed erroneous wounding of cell sheets after removal of Ibidi chambers. The dot assay avoids this issue as the cells are plated into a colony and allowed to grow freely. For the same reasons, the dot assay also allows the cells to migrate on the unaltered coating, which is easily disturbed by scratching or removal of the chamber/stencil in other migration assays. Furthermore, as cells are not injured by scratching or removal of chambers/stencils, cell death and the associated release of cytokines associated with the removal of chambers/stencils has no impact on migration in the dot assay. Lastly, cells are often over-plated in scratch assays and assays using chambers or stencils. Thus, after clearing cells by scratching them off or removing the physical barriers that hinder cell migration, the cell monolayer will relax and cell are pushed, spreading into the cell-free area without actively migrating. In contrast, in the dot assay, cell sheets can establish themselves overnight before migration is observed, and cell migration rather than relaxation of the cell sheet can be observed.

The dot assay, which can be easily performed without any specialized equipment, lends itself to a range of subsequent assays, including staining of cells to assess gross colony morphology and cell scattering8, immunostaining8, time-lapse imaging, and subsequent data analysis using ImageJ, Matlab, or other image analysis software13. Additional parameters such as correlation of neighboring vectors or their separation trajectories can be assessed to more precisely describe the coherence of cell movement within sheets13. Time-lapse imaging can also be combined with immunostaining and ImageJ supported cell tracking to gain further insight into cell migration. For example, dots can be immunostained for cytoskeletal proteins after time-lapse imaging, and cells can then be tracked using ImageJ to analyze how expression of these proteins influences the migratory phenotype of cells. Another future use is single cell tracking of cells that express nuclear fluorescent proteins. Importantly, the dot assay can be performed in multi-well plates and is such suitable for medium-to-high throughput imaging, making it an easily accessible and very affordable tool to screen the effect of drugs or shRNAs on sheet migration.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

The author has nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Bhagawat Subramanian, Yi (Jason) Chang, Paul Randazzo, and Carole Parent for reading and commenting on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
MCF10CA1a cells Karmanos Research Institute N/A cells used for assay
mouse collagen IV BD Biosciences 354233 used to coat plates
trypsin / EDTA Thermo Fisher 25300054 used to remove cells from tissue culture plates
DPBS  Mediatech 21-031-CV used to wash cells
DMEM / F12 Thermo Fisher 11320082 used as culture medium
horse serum Thermo Fisher 26050088 used to supplement culture medium
12 well glass bottom plate MatTek P12G-1.5-14-F used to grow cells for imaging
EGF (epidermal growth factor, human recombinant) Peprotech AF-100-15 used to stimulate cells
fatty acid free BSA Sigma A8806-1G used to make buffer for EGF
hematoxylin Sigma HHS32 used to stain colonies
eosin Electron Microscopy Sciences 26051-10 used to stain colonies
37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator Sanyo model MCO-18AIC (UV)
Zeiss AxioObserver with incubator chamber and motorized stage Zeiss model Axio Observer.Z1 used for time lapse imaging
ORCA Flash LT sCMOS camera BioVision C11440-42U-KIT used for timelapse imaging in combination with Zeiss AxioObserver
Metamorph BioVision MMACQMIC software used for time lapse imaging
inverted microscope Olympus model IX70 used to count cells and to check colonies in tissue culture
plastic box Lock&Lock N/A used as humid chamber (any tight closing plastic box that fits the plates can be used)

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Liang, C. -C., Park, A. Y., Guan, J. -L. In vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2, (2), 329-333 (2007).
  2. Peplow, P. V., Chatterjee, M. P. A review of the influence of growth factors and cytokines in in vitro human keratinocyte migration. Cytokine. 62, (1), 1-21 (2013).
  3. Hulkower, K. I., Herber, R. L. Cell migration and invasion assays as tools for drug discovery. Pharmaceutics. 3, (1), 107-124 (2011).
  4. Weiger, M. C., Vedham, V., et al. Real-time motion analysis reveals cell directionality as an indicator of breast cancer progression. PLOS ONE. 8, (3), 58859 (2013).
  5. Poujade, M., Grasland-Mongrain, E., et al. Collective migration of an epithelial monolayer in response to a model wound. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104, (41), 15988-15993 (2007).
  6. Sunyer, R., Conte, V., et al. Collective cell durotaxis emerges from long-range intercellular force transmission. Science. 353, (6304), 1157-1161 (2016).
  7. Bazellières, E., Conte, V., et al. Control of cell-cell forces and collective cell dynamics by the intercellular adhesome. Nat Cell Biol. 17, (4), 409-420 (2015).
  8. Stuelten, C. H., Busch, J. I., et al. Transient tumor-fibroblast interactions increase tumor cell malignancy by a TGF-Beta mediated mechanism in a mouse xenograft model of breast cancer. PLOS ONE. 5, (3), 9832 (2010).
  9. Normanno, N., De Luca, A., et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in cancer. Gene. 366, (1), 2-16 (2006).
  10. Harrison, S. M. W., Knifley, T., Chen, M., O'Connor, K. L., HGF, LPA, HGF, and EGF utilize distinct combinations of signaling pathways to promote migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells. BMC Cancer. 13, 501 (2013).
  11. Santner, S. J., Dawson, P. J., et al. Malignant MCF10CA1 cell lines derived from premalignant human breast epithelial MCF10AT cells. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 65, (2), 101-110 (2001).
  12. Tang, B., Vu, M., et al. TGF-beta switches from tumor suppressor to prometastatic factor in a model of breast cancer progression. J Clin Invest. 112, (7), 1116-1124 (2003).
  13. Lee, R. M., Stuelten, C. H., Parent, C. A., Losert, W. Collective cell migration over long time scales reveals distinct phenotypes. Convergent science physical oncology. 2, (2), 025001 (2016).
  14. Lee, R. M., Kelley, D. H., Nordstrom, K. N., Ouellette, N. T., Losert, W. Quantifying stretching and rearrangement in epithelial sheet migration. New J Phys. 15, (2), (2013).
  15. Hanahan, D., Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 144, (5), 646-674 (2011).
  16. Grada, A., Otero-Vinas, M., Prieto-Castrillo, F., Obagi, Z., Falanga, V. Research techniques made simple: analysis of collective cell migration using the wound healing assay. J Invest Dermatol. 137, (2), 11-16 (2017).
  17. Rosen, P., Misfeldt, D. S. Cell density determines epithelial migration in culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 77, (8), 4760-4763 (1980).

Comments

0 Comments


    Post a Question / Comment / Request

    You must be signed in to post a comment. Please or create an account.

    Video Stats