Establishing Cell Lines Overexpressing DR3 to Assess the Apoptotic Response to Anti-mitotic Therapeutics

* These authors contributed equally
Cancer Research

Your institution must subscribe to JoVE's Cancer Research section to access this content.

Fill out the form below to receive a free trial or learn more about access:


Enter your email below to get your free 10 minute trial to JoVE!

We use/store this info to ensure you have proper access and that your account is secure. We may use this info to send you notifications about your account, your institutional access, and/or other related products. To learn more about our GDPR policies click here.

If you want more info regarding data storage, please contact



Establishing a stable cell line overexpressing a gene of interest to study gene function can be done by stable transfection-picking single clones after transfecting them via retroviral infection. Here we show that HT29-DR3 cell lines generated in this way elucidate the mechanisms by which death receptor 3 (DR3) contributes to antimitotics-induced apoptosis.

Cite this Article

Copy Citation | Download Citations

Wang, X., Zhou, J., Qi, C., Wang, G. Establishing Cell Lines Overexpressing DR3 to Assess the Apoptotic Response to Anti-mitotic Therapeutics. J. Vis. Exp. (143), e58705, doi:10.3791/58705 (2019).


Studying the function of a gene of interest can be achieved by manipulating its level of expression, such as decreasing its expression with knockdown cell lines or increasing its expression with overexpression cell lines. Transient and stable transfection are two methods that are often used for exogenous gene expression. Transient transfection is only useful for short-term expression, whereas stable transfection allows exogenous genes to be integrated into the host cell genome where it will be continuously expressed. As a result, stable transfection is usually employed for research into long-term genetic regulation. Here we describe a simple protocol to generate a stable cell line overexpressing tagged death receptor 3 (DR3) to explore DR3 function. We picked single clones after a retroviral infection in order to maintain the homogeneity and purity of the stable cell lines. The stable cell lines generated using this protocol render DR3-deficient HT29 cells sensitive to antimitotic drugs, thus reconstituting the apoptotic response in HT29 cells. Moreover, the FLAG tag on DR3 compensates for the unavailability of good DR3 antibody and facilitates the biochemical study of the molecular mechanism by which antimitotic agents induce apoptosis.


Heterologous gene expression is often employed to study the function of genes of interest. Two methods, transient and stable transfection, are prevalently used in cells and molecular biology to insert a segment of DNA or RNA into a host cell1,2. Transiently-transfected DNA or RNA cannot be passed on to daughter cells, so the genetic alteration can only be retained for a short period of time. On the other hand, in stably transfected cells, exogenous genes are integrated into the host cell genome, sustaining its expression in the cell line. Thus, stable transfection is a method that is usually reserved for research into long-term genetic regulation. The stable cell line can also be transplanted as xenografts into mouse models for in vivo study3. Stable transfection can be divided into two categories: viral and nonviral. Compared to nonviral transfection, viral infection can transfer genes into a wider variety of human cells with a higher efficiency4,5,6,7. Furthermore, a stable cell line from a single clone offers the advantage of homogeneity and clonal purity.

Uncontrolled cell growth and division are the most distinguishing features of cancer. In clinical settings, antimitotic agents are the primary treatments for many types of tumors8. However, some significant limitations of antimitotic agents cannot be ignored. First, these chemotherapies can also kill normal cells along with the undesired cancerous cells and, thus, can result in severe side effects8. Second, antitubulin drugs are not effective against all types of tumors, despite tubulin's ubiquitous expression in a wide variety of different tissues as a cytoskeletal protein9,10. It is unclear why antitubulin agents showed promising efficacy against ovarian, lung, and hematological cancers in clinical treatment, but not in kidney, colon, or pancreatic cancers11. Finally, even patients with the same type of tumor can respond to the antimitotics differently in an unpredictable manner. There may be a key effector molecule that affects the sensitivity of different patients to antimitotic agents, resulting in the diverse outcomes seen in clinical treatment12. Thus, the potential differential sensitivities of patients to antimitotic treatment should be taken into consideration in order to optimize therapeutic interventions13.

A high-throughput whole-genome siRNA library screen demonstrated that DR3 knockdown could render sensitive cells resistant to antimitotic drugs, implicating a role for DR3 in chemotherapy-induced apoptosis14. As a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) superfamily, DR3 has been reported to mediate cell apoptosis in various systems15,16,17,18. Thus, we set out to establish stable cell lines overexpressing DR3 to study the molecular mechanisms by which antimitotic drugs induce apoptosis. An appropriate cell model for studying DR3 overexpression can be provided by the human colon cancer cell line HT29, which was found to be DR3-deficient. Additionally, in the clinic, colon cancers are insensitive to antimitotic drugs19.

In this article, we describe a method which allows the generation of an HT29-DR3 stable cell line through retroviral infection. We further show how to validate the DR3 expression in these cells using western blotting and how to assess the sensitivity to antimitotic agents by using a cell viability assay and morphological observation. The cells are amplified from single clones and, thus, have the advantage of a homogeneous genetic background. In addition, the FLAG tag on DR3 allowed for the visualization of cellular DR3 by microscopy and analysis of gene expression and protein interaction by biochemical approaches. Furthermore, the cells can be xenografted in mice to further analyze tumor progression in response to antimitotics in vivo14.

The HT29-DR3 cell system presented here offered an effective tool for studying the molecular mechanisms of how antimitotics kill cancer cells14. Since overexpression and knockdown cell lines are common tools for studying gene function, this protocol can be adapted easily to other genes of interest or other cell lines and, thus, turned into an extensively used approach.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


Please note that all the mouse experiments described here were approved and performed in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Tsinghua University.

1. Generation of DR3 Overexpression Cell Lines

  1. Construct the plasmid for DR3 expression (pMXs-IRES-DR3-FLAG) by inserting full-length DR3 cDNA with 3x FLAG at the C-terminus into retroviral vector pMXs-IRES-Blasticidin at the restriction sites of BamHI/XhoI.
  2. Grow Plat-A cells in 60 mm dishes with 4 mL of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM). The next day, when the cells reach 80% - 90% confluence, transfect the cells with 2 μg of plasmid pMXs-IRES-DR3-FLAG using transfection reagent (see Table of Materials) according to the manufacturer’s manual20.
  3. After 72 h, collect the supernatant, filtrate the media using a 0.45 μm sterile filter, and keep the viral suspension in the dark at 4 °C.
  4. Grow HT29 cells in DMEM in a 60 mm dish and incubate the cells at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
  5. The next day, when the cells reach 30% - 50% confluence, infect the cells with 2 mL of viral suspension in the presence of 8 μg of 1,5-Dimethyl-1,5-diazaundecamethylene polymethobromide per milliliter of viral suspension. After 4 - 6 h of incubation at 37 °C, aspirate the viral suspension, add 4 mL of fresh DMEM, and return the dish to the incubator.
  6. Discard the media from the dishes 24 h postinfection and carefully wash cells with 2 mL of prewarmed PBS. Add 1 mL of trypsin-EDTA to the cells and incubate at 37 °C for 3 min.
  7. After observing under a microscope at 10X magnification that most of the cells have detached, stop the trypsinization with 2 mL of complete DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Collect the cell suspension in a 15 mL tube and centrifuge the cells at 200 x g for 5 min at room temperature (RT).
  8. Remove the supernatant and resuspend the cell pellet in 10 mL of DMEM. Mix well by gently pipetting up and down. Dilute the cells by factors of 30, 100, and 300. Seed the cells in 150 mm dishes with 20 mL of DMEM containing 1 µg/mL blasticidin. Incubate at a 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2 for ~1 - 2 weeks.
  9. During this period, observe the colonies every day with an inverted microscope at 10X magnification. Mark the well-isolated colonies at the bottom of the dish when the colony diameter is about 1 - 2 mm.
  10. Aspirate the medium and wash the cells with 3 mL of pre-warmed PBS. Add 2 milliliters of trypsin-EDTA in a 60 mm dish. Use sterile forceps to pick up autoclaved sterile cloning cylinders, and place them in the 60 mm dish. Pick up the cylinders containing trypsin-EDTA and gently place them over the marked colonies. Make sure every cloning cylinder only contains one colony and avoid contamination with nearby colonies.
  11. Return the dish to the incubator for 3 minutes.
  12. After 3 min, check the cells under the microscope at 10X magnification to see whether they have detached. When the cells have lifted up, add 70 μL of culture medium to each cylinder to inactivate the trypsin. Gently mix the cell suspension with a 200 μL pipette. Make sure not to move the cylinder during this process.
  13. Transfer the cell suspension from each colony to two 24-well plates containing 1 mL of DMEM per well. Add 30 μL of cell suspension per well in plate A and 70 μL in the corresponding wells in plate B. Label the plates properly and put them back in the incubator.

2. Verification of the DR3 Overexpression Cell Line

  1. When the cells in plate B are at 90% confluence, remove the media and carefully wash the cells with 1 mL of PBS. Completely remove PBS and lyse the cells with 50 μL of 1x SDS-PAGE loading buffer. Transfer the cell lysates from the 24-well plate to 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes and boil the samples for 10 min at 100 °C.
  2. Run the samples on 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) gel at a constant voltage of 80 V for 15 min and, then, at 120 V for 1 h.
  3. Transfer the protein to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane by wet transfer at a constant current of 400 mA for 2 h.
  4. Test the DR3 expression in different clones with anti-FLAG antibody, using the wild-type HT29 cells as a negative control (Figure 1). Dilute the primary antibody by a factor of 5,000 in 5% nonfat milk that is dissolved in TBST (Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20). Incubate the membrane with FLAG antibody at 4 °C overnight.
  5. Wash the membrane with TBST by shaking it on a decoloring shaker at 200 rpm at RT. Refresh the TBST every 5 min for a total washing time of 15 min.
  6. Incubate the membrane with anti-mouse secondary antibody diluted by a factor of 10,000 in 5% nonfat milk at 4 °C for 5-6 h.
  7. Wash the membrane again as described in step 2.5.
  8. Detect the FLAG expression using western enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrate and image the membrane with a gel documentation system (see Table of Materials). Identify the clones expressing DR3 as the positive clones.
  9. Transfer the clones in plate A that correspond to positive clones in plate B to a 6-well plate and continue to amplify the cells until growing them in 10 cm dishes. Make frozen stocks of the cells growing from positive clones and store them at -80 °C for future use.

3. Assessment of the Apoptotic Response of Cells to Antimitotic Agents

NOTE: Diazonamide is a new class of marine natural product that has remarkable activity in inhibiting cancer cell growth, which mirrors other tubulin-destabilizing agents21. However, its mode of action remains unclear. To test the cellular response of cells to antimitotic agents, paclitaxel and diazonamide were used to treat wild-type HT29 cells and HT29-DR3 cells. The drugs were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to make 10 mM stocks and, then, further diluted to different concentrations: 30 nM, 100 nM, 300 nM, 1,000 nM, 3,000 nM, and 10,000 nM in DMSO.

  1. Collect HT29 and HT29-DR3 cells by trypsinization. Measure the cell density using an automatic cell counter. Then, seed the cells in 12-well plates in DMEM at a density of 3 x 104 cells per well. The next day, add 10 nM diazonamide and use 1% DMSO as a negative control. After 48 h of treatment, image the cells under a microscope at 10X magnification (Figure 2).
  2. Seed HT29 and HT29-DR3 cells in 96-well plates in DMEM at a density of 3 x 103 cells per well and allow them to grow overnight at 37 °C. Then, add dose-escalating diazonamide concentrations of 0.3 nM, 1 nM, 3 nM, 10 nM, 30 nM, and 100 nM to each well, using 1% DMSO as a negative control.
  3. After 48 h of treatment, measure the cell viability using a luminescence-based cell viability assay kit according to the manufacturer’s manual.
    1. Take out the 96-well plate from the incubator and let it stand at RT for approximately 30 min. Then, add 50 µL of assay reagents to each well, shake the plate at RT for 2 min to lyse the cells, and incubate the plate at RT for another 10 min. Determine the luminescence of each well using a microplate reader (Figure 3).
      NOTE: The cell viability represents the relative luminescence intensity of each well to that of the control well treated with 1% DMSO.
  4. Use six-weeks-old female BALB/c nude mice for an in vivo study14.
    NOTE: The mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions.
    1. Trypsinize HT29 and HT29-DR3 cell and, then, stop the trypsinization using DMEM prewarmed at 37 °C. Collect the cell suspension in a 50 mL tube and centrifuge the cells at 1,000 rpm for 10 min at RT. Discard the supernatant and resuspend the cell pellet in DMEM medium without FBS. Centrifuge the cells again and resuspend the cell pellet in PBS.
    2. Count the cells using an automatic cell counter and dilute the cells to a concentration of 2.5 x 107 cells/mL using PBS. Generate tumors through a subcutaneous injection of 200 μL of the HT29 or HT29-DR3 cell suspension in the right flank of each mouse (5 x 106 cells/mouse)22.
    3. Measure the tumor volume (TV) using calipers every 2 d after the transplantation. Calculate the TV using the following formula: TV = 1/2L x W x W (here, W: tumor width, L: tumor length). When the average tumor volume reaches about 100 mm3, randomize the mice into either the control or the treated group (n = 6 per group) and initiate the treatment.
    4. Prepare the paclitaxel solution as follows. First, dissolve paclitaxel completely in ethanol at 5% of the total volume and, then, add 5% of the final volume of polyoxyl 35 hydrogenated castor oil. Finally, make up the remaining 90% of the volume with D5W (5% dextrose in water, pH 7.4).
    5. Inject the paclitaxel intravenously at a dose of 20 mg/kg 3x per week for two weeks. Measure the tumor volume and body weight 3x a week14. Terminate the experiment and euthanize the animals if the body weight decreases by 20% or the tumor volume reaches about 2,000 mm3.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

A characterization of HT29 cells stably expressing DR3 is shown in Figure 1. The clones express varying levels of DR3, while the wild-type cells, which serve as a negative control, do not show exogenous gene expression. Here we only show five clones, among which clone 1 and 5 express the highest level of DR3. We chose clone 1 and 5 for the following experiments.

The morphology of HT29 and HT29-DR3 cells after the administration of diazonamide was observed by an inverted microscope at 10X magnification in Figure 2. After a 48 h treatment with 10 nM diazonamide, HT29-DR3 showed obvious apoptosis, with a broken cell membrane and cell debris (bottom panel). However, HT29 only showed mitotic arrest with intact cells exhibiting a round-up cell shape (top panel).

The cell viability of HT29 and HT29-DR3 cells after treatment with diazonamide is shown in Figure 3. After 48 h of treatment with 3 nM diazonamide, over 80% cell death was found in HT29-DR3 cells (red curve). However, the parental HT29 cells demonstrated only a slight response to diazonamide in the form of mitotic arrest (blue curve). Thus, the overexpression of DR3 reconstituted the diazonamide-induced apoptotic pathway in these cells.

The results for the in vivo tumor xenograft experiments have been shown in a previous paper14. The success rate of tumor implantation for both HT29 and HT29-DR3 is 100%. The xenograft tumors progressed similarly in the vehicle control; however, the HT29-DR3 xenografts displayed faster tumor regression than the HT29 xenografts when treated with paclitaxel at a dose of 20 mg/kg. Our observation of a better response of HT29-DR3 tumors to paclitaxel than that of HT29 tumors in vivo further confirmed that an ectopic expression of DR3 renders tumor cells more sensitive to antimitotics.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Analysis of DR3 expression in different clones. DR3 expression levels were analyzed by western blotting with anti-FLAG (top panel) and anti-beta-actin antibodies (bottom panel, as an internal control). Parental HT29 cells were used as a negative control. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Morphology analysis of HT29 and HT29-DR3 cells after the treatment with diazonamide. HT29 (top panel) and HT29-DR3 (bottom panel) were treated with 10 nM diazonamide for 48 h. The scale bars = 100 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Dose-response curves of HT29 and HT29-DR3 cells to diazonamide. Cell viability was measured after 48 h of treatment with serial concentrations of diazonamide. The error bars = the standard deviation (SD) of experimental triplicates. DA = diazonamide. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


In this manuscript, we describe a method to generate HT29-DR3 stable cell lines. HT29-DR3 cells provide a model for studying the molecular mechanisms by which DR3 contributes to apoptosis induced by antimitotic agents. This approach is versatile and repeatable. To ensure the success of the procedure, four key steps of the protocol need to be considered. First, in order to produce a high enough virus titer, it is recommended to perform DNA transfection when the Plat-A cells are at 80% - 90% confluence. Second, the viral suspension should be stored at 4 °C for no longer than 2 weeks, covered from light. Third, when dividing the infected cells into 150 mm dishes, it is recommended to do serial dilutions to get well-separated colonies, as the infection efficiency varies in different cells. Finally, when picking up a single colony, there should not be any contamination with the surrounding colonies.

This protocol works well with most cell lines but can potentially be difficult for cells that do not tend to form single colonies. In such cases, other cell-sorting techniques, such as antibiotics combined with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), will be needed.

Stable transfection includes both viral and non-viral methods. In this protocol, we used a retroviral infection to generate cells overexpressing DR3, reasoning that physical methods, such as electroporation, are more toxic to cells23 and chemical methods, such as lipid-mediated DNA-transfection, have a low efficiency in many cell types and have potential off-target effects24,25,26.

Ectopic expression is a direct and efficient way to elucidate gene functions. Therefore, this protocol can be used to study other target molecules. Furthermore, gene knockdown is also important in functional studies, and it is possible that the protocol can be adapted to gene knockdown systems. Compared to other gene knock-in and knock-out approaches, such as CRISPR-Cas9, the protocol presented here is easy to apply and affordable for all laboratories.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


The authors have nothing to declare.


This work was supported by grants 53110000117 (to G.W.) and 043222019 (to X.W.) from Tsinghua University.


Name Company Catalog Number Comments
DMEM Invitrogen C11965500BT Supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% Penicilin/Streptomycin
Luminescent Cell Viability Assay Promega G7571
Paclitaxel Selleck S1150
pMXs-IRES-Blasicidin Cell Biolabs RTV-016
Dimethyl sulfoxide Sigma D2650
PBS Invitrogen C14190500BT
Trypsin-EDTA (0.25%) Invitrogen 25200056
1,5-Dimethyl-1,5-diazaundecamethylene polymethobromide Santa Cruz sc-134220
 Transfection Reagent Promega E2311
Anti-mouse secondary antibody Jackson ImmumoResearch 115-035-166
anti-Flag antibody Sigma F-3165
HT29 cell line ATCC HTB-38
plat-A cell line Cell Biolabs RV-102
PVDF Immobilon-P Millipore IPVH00010
Cloning Cylinder Sigma C1059
Cell Imaging Multi-Mode Reader Biotek BTCYT3MV
CKX53 Inverted Microscope Olympus CKX53
12-well cell culture plates Nest 712001
60 mm cell culture plates Nest 705001
15 mL centrifuge tubes Nest 601052
0.22 μm steril filter Millipore SLGP033RB
Centrifuge 5810 R Eppendorf 5810000327
96 Well White Polystyrene Microplate  Corning 3903
Western ECL Substrate BIO-RAD 1705060
ImageQuant LAS 4000 GE Healthcare ImageQuant LAS 4000 
Decoloring Shaker  HINOTECH TS-2000A
Blasticidin InvivoGen ant-bl-1
Automated cell counter BIO-RAD TC 20
Opti-MEM I Reduced Serum Medium Thermo Fisher 31985070



  1. Kim, T. K., Eberwine, J. H. Mammalian cell transfection: the present and the future. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 397, (8), 3173-3178 (2010).
  2. Recillas-Targa, F. Multiple strategies for gene transfer, expression, knockdown, and chromatin influence in mammalian cell lines and transgenic animals. Molecular Biotechnology. 34, (3), 337-354 (2006).
  3. Daley, G. Q. Animal models of BCR/ABL-induced leukemias. Leukemia & Lymphoma. 11, 57-60 (1993).
  4. Hacein-Bey-Abina, S., et al. Sustained correction of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency by ex vivo gene therapy. The New England. Journal of Medicine. 346, (16), 1185-1193 (2002).
  5. Roesler, J., et al. Third-generation, self-inactivating gp91(phox) lentivector corrects the oxidase defect in NOD/SCID mouse-repopulating peripheral blood-mobilized CD34+ cells from patients with X-linked chronic granulomatous disease. Blood. 100, (13), 4381-4390 (2002).
  6. Russell, W. C. Update on adenovirus and its vectors. Journal of General Virology. 81, (Pt 11), 2573-2604 (2000).
  7. Wasala, N. B., Shin, J. H., Duan, D. The evolution of heart gene delivery vectors. The Journal of Gene Medicine. 13, (10), 557-565 (2011).
  8. Zhou, J., Giannakakou, P. Targeting microtubules for cancer chemotherapy. Current Medicinal Chemistry - Anti-Cancer Agents. 5, (1), 65-71 (2005).
  9. Rovini, A., Savry, A., Braguer, D., Carre, M. Microtubule-targeted agents: when mitochondria become essential to chemotherapy. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1807, (6), 679-688 (2011).
  10. Bhalla, K. N. Microtubule-targeted anticancer agents and apoptosis. Oncogene. 22, (56), 9075-9086 (2003).
  11. Jordan, M. A., Wilson, L. Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nature Reviews Cancer. 4, (4), 253-265 (2004).
  12. Bhat, K. M., Setaluri, V. Microtubule-associated proteins as targets in cancer chemotherapy. Clinical Cancer Research. 13, (10), 2849-2854 (2007).
  13. Bates, D., Eastman, A. Microtubule destabilising agents: far more than just antimitotic anticancer drugs. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 83, (2), 255-268 (2017).
  14. Qi, C., et al. Anti-mitotic chemotherapeutics promote apoptosis through TL1A-activated death receptor 3 in cancer cells. Cell Research. 28, (5), 544-555 (2018).
  15. Marsters, S. A., et al. Apo-3, a new member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family, contains a death domain and activates apoptosis and NF-kappa B. Current Biology. 6, (12), 1669-1676 (1996).
  16. Chinnaiyan, A. M., et al. Signal transduction by DR3, a death domain-containing receptor related to TNFR-1 and CD95. Science. 274, (5289), 990-992 (1996).
  17. Xu, L. X., et al. Death receptor 3 mediates TNFSF15- and TNFalpha-induced endothelial cell apoptosis. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 55, 109-118 (2014).
  18. Wen, L., Zhuang, L., Luo, X., Wei, P. TL1A-induced NF-kappaB activation and c-IAP2 production prevent DR3-mediated apoptosis in TF-1 cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 278, (40), 39251-39258 (2003).
  19. Nakayama, M., et al. Multiple pathways of TWEAK-induced cell death. Journal of Immunology. 168, (2), 734-743 (2002).
  20. Kitamura, T., et al. Retrovirus-mediated gene transfer and expression cloning: powerful tools in functional genomics. Experimental Hematology. 31, (11), 1007-1014 (2003).
  21. Wang, G., Shang, L., Burgett, A. W., Harran, P. G., Wang, X. Diazonamide toxins reveal an unexpected function for ornithine delta-amino transferase in mitotic cell division. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104, (7), 2068-2073 (2007).
  22. Hassan, M. S., von Holzen, U. Animal Model: Xenograft Mouse Models in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Methods in Molecular Biology. 151-164 (2018).
  23. Potter, H., Heller, R. Transfection by electroporation. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Chapter 9, Unit9 3 (2010).
  24. Jacobsen, L., Calvin, S., Lobenhofer, E. Transcriptional effects of transfection: the potential for misinterpretation of gene expression data generated from transiently transfected cells. Biotechniques. 47, (1), 617-624 (2009).
  25. Hagen, L., Sharma, A., Aas, P. A., Slupphaug, G. Off-target responses in the HeLa proteome subsequent to transient plasmid-mediated transfection. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1854, (1), 84-90 (2015).
  26. Omidi, Y., et al. Microarray analysis of the toxicogenomics and the genotoxic potential of a cationic lipid-based gene delivery nanosystem in human alveolar epithelial a549 cells. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods. 18, (4), 369-378 (2008).



    Post a Question / Comment / Request

    You must be signed in to post a comment. Please or create an account.

    Usage Statistics