JoVE Visualize What is visualize?
Stop Reading. Start Watching.
Advanced Search
Stop Reading. Start Watching.
Regular Search
Find video protocols related to scientific articles indexed in Pubmed.
Identification and validation of TGFBI as a promising prognosis marker of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Urol. Oncol.
PUBLISHED: 05-08-2014
Show Abstract
Hide Abstract
To identify prognostic biomarkers in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) using a proteomic approach.
Related JoVE Video
Double-J ureteral stent under local anesthesia for women.
Can J Urol
PUBLISHED: 02-18-2014
Show Abstract
Hide Abstract
Ureteral stent placement is a key urologic procedure used to manage ureteral obstructions. It is usually performed under general anesthesia (GA) with its inherent risks. The objective was to evaluate safety, feasibility and tolerance of ureteral stent placement under local anesthesia (LA) in women.
Related JoVE Video
Transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation: evaluation of a therapeutic option in the management of anticholinergic refractory overactive bladder.
Int Urogynecol J
PUBLISHED: 02-07-2014
Show Abstract
Hide Abstract
This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TPTNS) in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) after failure of a first-line anticholinergic treatment.
Related JoVE Video
Impact of Lower Pole Calculi in Patients Undergoing Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.
J. Endourol.
PUBLISHED: 11-05-2013
Show Abstract
Hide Abstract
Abstract Objective: To assess if the presence of a lower pole stone (LPS) decreases the stone-free (SF) rate following retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). The second purpose was to assess the result of RIRS for LPS and to identify predictors of SF status. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 205 procedures in 162 patients with renal stones treated by RIRS between January 2010 and January 2013 at a single institute. The SF status was defined as no residual fragments. Independent-sample t-tests and chi-square tests were used for comparisons of means and proportions, respectively, between patients with or without LPS. Logistic regression models were used to assess prognostic factors influencing SF status in cases of LPS. Results: LPS were present in 89 (54.9%) patients. There were no differences between patients with or without LPS regarding the mean operative time (p=0.77), the surgeons experience (p=0.522), the length of hospital stay (p=0.269), and the SF rate (p=0.224). SF status after RIRS in patients with or without LPS was 74.1% and 78% (p=0.224), respectively. In the case of LPS, the presence of multiple stones and a history of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) were predictive factors for occurrence of residual fragments in univariate analysis (p=0.037 and p=0.015). In multivariable analysis, only the presence of multiple stones remained as a predictive factor (p=0.027; HR=3.2), whereas a trend was observed when there was a history of PCNL (p=0.07; HR=3). Conclusion: The presence of a LPS does not alter the SF rate of RIRS even in cases of early experience. RIRS for LPS appears to be an effective technique, but special attention should be given to patients with multiple stones and/or a history of PCNL.
Related JoVE Video
Prognostic value of renal vein and inferior vena cava involvement in renal cell carcinoma.
Eur. Urol.
PUBLISHED: 09-26-2009
Show Abstract
Hide Abstract
The prognostic significance of venous tumor thrombus extension in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a matter of many controversies in the current literature.
Related JoVE Video
Conditional survival predictions after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.
J. Urol.
PUBLISHED: 03-31-2009
Show Abstract
Hide Abstract
Conditional survival implies that on average long-term cancer survivors have a better prognosis than do newly diagnosed individuals. We explored the effect of conditional survival in renal cell carcinoma.
Related JoVE Video

What is Visualize?

JoVE Visualize is a tool created to match the last 5 years of PubMed publications to methods in JoVE's video library.

How does it work?

We use abstracts found on PubMed and match them to JoVE videos to create a list of 10 to 30 related methods videos.

Video X seems to be unrelated to Abstract Y...

In developing our video relationships, we compare around 5 million PubMed articles to our library of over 4,500 methods videos. In some cases the language used in the PubMed abstracts makes matching that content to a JoVE video difficult. In other cases, there happens not to be any content in our video library that is relevant to the topic of a given abstract. In these cases, our algorithms are trying their best to display videos with relevant content, which can sometimes result in matched videos with only a slight relation.