Summary

Sub-Retinal Delivery of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived Photoreceptor Progenitors in rd10 Mice

Published: October 06, 2023
doi:

Summary

We describe a detailed protocol for the preparation of post-cryopreserved hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitor cells and the sub-retinal delivery of these cells in rd10 mice.

Abstract

Regeneration of photoreceptor cells using human pluripotent stem cells is a promising therapy for the treatment of both hereditary and aging retinal diseases at advanced stages. We have shown human recombinant retina-specific laminin isoform matrix is able to support the differentiation of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) to photoreceptor progenitors. In addition, sub-retinal injection of these cells has also shown partial restoration in the rd10 rodent and rabbit models. Sub-retinal injection is known to be an established method that has been used to deliver pharmaceutical compounds to the photoreceptor cells and retinal pigmented epithelial (RPE) layer of the eye due to its proximity to the target space. It has also been used to deliver adeno-associated viral vectors into the sub-retinal space to treat retinal diseases. The sub-retinal delivery of pharmaceutical compounds and cells in the murine model is challenging due to the constraint in the size of the murine eyeball. This protocol describes the detailed procedure for the preparation of hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitor cells for injection and the sub-retinal delivery technique of these cells in genetic retinitis pigmentosa mutant, rd10 mice. This approach allows cell therapy to the targeted area, in particular the outer nuclear layer of the retina, where diseases leading to photoreceptor degeneration occur.

Introduction

Inherited retinal diseases and age-related macular degeneration lead to photoreceptor cell loss and eventual blindness. The retinal photoreceptor is the outer segment layer of the retina comprised of specialized cells responsible for phototransduction (i.e., conversion of light to neuronal signals). The rod and cone photoreceptor cells are adjacent to the retinal pigmented layer (RPE)1. Photoreceptor cell replacement therapy to compensate the cell loss has been an emerging and developing therapeutic approach. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs)2,3,4, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)-derived RPE cells, and retinal progenitor cells (RPCs)4,5,6,7,8 were used to restore the damaged photoreceptor cells. Sub-retinal space, a confined space between the retina and the RPE, is an attractive location to deposit these cells to replace damaged photoreceptor cells, RPE, and Mueller cells due to its vicinity9,10,11.

Gene and cell therapies have been utilizing the sub-retinal space for regenerative medicine for various retinal diseases in pre-clinical studies. This includes the delivery of functional copies of the gene or gene editing tools in the form of either anti-sense oligonucleotide therapy12,13 or CRISPR/Cas9 or base editing via adeno-associated virus (AAV) based strategy14,15,16, implantation of materials (e.g., RPE sheet, retinal prosthetics17,18,19) and differentiated stem cell-derived retinal organoids20,21,22 to treat retinal and RPE-related diseases. Clinical trials using hESC-RPE31 in the sub-retinal space to treat RPE65-associated Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA)23,24, CNGA3-linked achromatopsia25, MERTK-associated retinitis pigmentosa26, choroideremia27,28,29,30 have been proven to be an effective approach. Direct injection of cells to the vicinity of the damaged area greatly improves the chance of cell settlement at the appropriate region, synaptic integration, and eventual visual improvement.

Even though sub-retinal injection in human and large-eyed models (i.e., pig32,33,34,35, rabbit36,37,38,39,40, and non-human primate41,42,43) has been established, such injection in the murine model is still challenging due to the constrain of the eyeball size and enormous lens occupying the mouse eye44,45,46. However, genetically modified models are only readily available in small animals and not in large animals (i.e., rabbits and non-human primates), therefore sub-retinal injection in mice draws attention to investigate novel therapeutic approaches in retinal genetic disorders. Three major approaches are being used to deliver cells or AAVs into the sub-retinal space, namely the trans-corneal route, trans-scleral route, and the pars plana route (See Figure 2). Trans-corneal and trans-scleral routes are associated with cataract formation, synechiae, choroidal bleeding, and reflux from the injection site11,44,45,47,48,49. We adopted the pars plana approach as a direct visualization of the injection process, and the injection site can be achieved in real-time under the microscope.

We recently described a method that can differentiate human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) into photoreceptor progenitors under xenofree, chemically defined conditions using recombinant human retina-specific laminin isoform LN523. Since LN523 was found to be present in the retina, we hypothesized that the extracellular matrix niche of the human retina could be recapitulated in vitro and thereby support photoreceptor differentiation from the hESCs36. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis showed that photoreceptor progenitors co-expressing cone-rod homeobox and recoverin were generated after 32 days. A retinal degeneration 10 (rd10) mutant mouse model that mimics autosomal human retinitis pigmentosa was used to evaluate the efficacy of the day 32 hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitors in-vivo. The hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitor cells were injected into the sub-retinal space of rd10 mice at P20, where photoceptor dysfunction and degeneration are ongoing36. Here, we describe a detailed protocol for the preparation of the post-cryopreserved hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitors and delivery into the sub-retinal space of rd10 mice. This method can also be used to administer AAVs, cell suspensions, peptides, or chemicals into the sub-retinal space in mice.

Protocol

The in vivo experiments were done in accordance with the guidelines and protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of SingHealth (IACUC) and the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Statement for the use of animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. The pups were immunosuppressed from P17 (pre-transplantation) to P30 (post-transplantation) by feeding them drinking water containing cyclosporine (260 g/L).

1. Preparation of Day 32 hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitors after cryopreservation

  1. Pre-warm photoreceptor differentiation medium (PRDM) in a 37 °C water bath.
  2. Retrieve a cryovial containing day 32 hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitor cells from liquid nitrogen. Keep on dry ice.
  3. Thaw the cryovial at 37 °C in a water bath for 3-5 min. Resuspend the day 32 cells in 1 mL of PRDM and centrifuge at 130 x g for 4 min.
  4. Remove the supernatant and resuspend cells in 1 mL of PRDM.
  5. Remove 10 µL of the mixture for cell counting. Mix cells using 0.2% trypan blue according to the manufacturer's instructions. Pipette cell mixture into the cell counting chamber slide. Determine cell number and viability by automated cell counter.
  6. Proceed to the next step when the cell viability is above 70%. Centrifuge the remaining cell suspension at 130 x g for 4 min. Remove the supernatant and resuspend the cell pellet in PRDM at the concentration of 3 x 105 cells/µL for transplantation.
  7. Observe for visible cell clumps. Resuspend cell clumps repeatedly using a 10 µL pipette tip in the microfuge tube until no visible cell clump is observed. Load into the 33G injection syringe to observe for extrusion of cell solution through the needle.

2. Sub-retinal delivery of the hESCs in rd10 mice

  1. Preparation of the animals
    1. Anaesthetize the mouse (P20, male/female, 3-6 g) using a combination of ketamine (20 mg/kg body weight) and xylazine (2 mg/kg body weight) in a 1 mL tuberculin syringe attached to a 27G needle by intraperitoneal approach. Administer a subcutaneous injection of buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg) to the mouse as a pre-emptive analgesic.
    2. After administering the anesthesia, instill a drop each of 1% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine for pupil dilation. Apply an ophthalmic gel to the cornea to prevent the eye from dryness and anesthesia-related cataract.
    3. Place the mouse in an empty cage until fully anesthetized. Assess the proper anesthetic level by pinching the paw pad and confirm if the animal does not react to the hard pinch.
    4. When the mouse is fully anesthetized, place the animal on a warm pad set at 38 °C.
  2. Sub-retinal delivery of the cells
    1. To use a 1-port trans-vitreal pars plana approach, as done here, perform sub-retinal injection in a sterile environment. Use an upright operating microscope with a direct light path to perform the injection.
    2. Prepare the 10 µL glass syringe by removing the needle hub. Mount the 33G blunt needle onto the glass syringe. Take the metal hub cover and carefully secure the needle on the syringe.
    3. Flush with distilled water to check for any signs of leakage and patency of the needle. Empty the syringe and put it at the side carefully.
    4. Place the anesthetized mouse on a pillow, with the treatment eye looking up straight to the objective of the microscope. Apply the 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride and wait for 30 s. Apply 150 µL of ophthalmic gel on the eye and place a round cover slip on it.
    5. Perform a rough examination of the eye by observing the cornea, iris, pupil, lens, and conjunctiva. Through the pupil, visualize the fundus of the mouse eye by adjusting the focal plane. Adjust the head until the optic head is positioned at the center of the pupil and minimize the movement of the head by proper positioning on the pillow.
    6. Gently tap the base of the tube with the hESCs multiple times to get a uniform cell suspension. By using the 10 µL glass microliter syringe with a 33G blunt needle, withdraw 2 µL of cells/media. Withdraw the cells right before the injection to avoid cell settlement/clumping in the syringe.
    7. Using a 30G disposable needle, make a sclerectomy wound 2 mm behind the limbus. Keep the angle of the needle at ~45° to avoid touching the lens. Once the tip of the needle is visualized in the eye, gently withdraw the needle. Discard the needle into the sharp bin after use to avoid needle prick injury.
    8. Take the glass syringe and insert the blunt needle into the sclerectomy wound. Without touching the lens, advance the blunt needle until it reaches the opposite retina of the entry wound. Ensure the injection area is clear of major retinal blood vessels to avoid bleeding.
    9. Gently penetrate the retina until a pressure branch on the sclera is seen. Keep the blunt end of the needle parallel to the sclera to avoid leaking of the cells into the vitreous space.
    10. Slowly inject 2 µL of cell suspension or PRDM media (control) into the sub-retinal space while gentle pressure is maintained on the syringe. With a successful injection, a visible bleb (i.e., raised retina with the cell suspension/media in it) should be formed at the injection site.
      NOTE: Only gentle pressure should be used during injection to avoid retina tearing and blockage of the cells at the needle tip.
    11. After confirming the bleb, wait for 10 s to let the cells settle down. Gently retract the needle from the eye.
  3. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) scanning of the bleb (optional)
    1. Position the mouse eye to visualize the bleb under the microscope by slowly moving the head. Secure the position by gently holding the head. No additional pupil dilation is necessary. Do not remove the cover slip and the gel on the eye. It gives a clear optical media to visualize the bleb.
    2. Perform the intra-operative OCT using the built-in iOCT function of the operating microscope.
    3. Press the Cube option on the OCT screen and position the scanning area on the bleb by pressing the Arrow buttons. Adjust the OCT by sliding Centering and Focus for the best OCT quality. Press Capture/Scan to acquire the OCT scan of the bleb area. Review the images to check the quality of the scans.
  4. Recovery
    1. Remove the cover slip and clean the gel from the eye with gauze. Apply antibiotic ointment one time after the injection to prevent infection.
    2. Allow the animal to recover from anesthesia under a warm light until they regain sufficient consciousness to maintain sternal recumbency and return to the home cage. Monitor the animal for at least 3 days post-injection for signs of inflammation, infection, and distress.
      NOTE: The 150 W warm light should be at least 30 cm away from the animal cage, and caution should be taken to avoid a burn injury.
    3. Administer a subcutaneous injection of buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg) 8 hourly for 1 day or per veterinarian’s recommendation. If inflammation or infection of the eye is observed, consult a veterinary professional for appropriate treatment.
  5. Cleaning and sterilization of the instruments
    1. Flush the 10 µL glass microliter syringe and the 33G blunt needle with 100% ethanol 10x. Wash away the ethanol by flashing the syringe with distilled water.
    2. Dissemble the glass syringe and the needle. Dry the syringe for storage.

Representative Results

The 10 µL glass syringe was assembled according to the manufacturer's instructions (Figure 1), and the blunt needle used to deliver the cell suspension/media is shown in Figure 1B. Different approaches for sub-retinal injection are illustrated in Figure 2. We describe the pars plana approach in this protocol (Figure 2C). The blunt needle mounted on a glass syringe was inserted through a sclerotomy wound and accessed the sub-retinal space across the globe. As shown in Figure 3A, the trajectory of the needle, penetration through the retina, and delivery of the cells were monitored directly under the microscope when performing the injection. Successful delivery of the cells/media was confirmed by observing a bleb at the injection site (Figure 3B). A successful bleb can be identified as a light whitish color resembling a water balloon. A failed delivery is observed by leakage of the cells/media into the vitreous space at the injection site and failure to form a bleb. The OCT scan was performed on the injected area, and the scan showed floating individualized hESCs in the cell-treated eye (Figure 4A), while the media-treated eye showed clear fluid without cells in the sub-retinal space (Figure 4B). The individualized hESCs are identified as hyperreflective materials distributed in the sub-retinal space (Figure 4A). The success rate of the injection was computed by noting the number of eyes with successful formation of the bleb. We included the applications that adopted this approach in our laboratory and the success rate of the injections (Table 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1: Instruments used during the injection. (A) The 10 µL glass syringe is mounted with a 33G blunt needle. (B) Zoom-in picture of the 33G blunt needle. (C) Pillow for the animal's head to rest on. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Different routes of sub-retinal injection. (A) Trans-corneal route: The injection needle passes through the cornea and the pupil to enter the sub-retinal space. (B) Trans-scleral route: The sub-retinal space is directly accessed through the sclera. (C) Pars plana route: The injection needle is inserted into the vitreous space via an incision at the limbus. The needle reaches the sub-retinal space by penetrating the retina. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Fundus images of the eye during the sub-retinal injection. (A) Before the sub-retinal injection was performed, the tip of the needle could be seen in the vitreous space touching the retina, avoiding the major retinal blood vessels. (B) After the sub-retinal injection, a visible bleb was formed at the injection site (yellow dotted line). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4: Intraoperative OCT scans of the injected eyes. The scans were done immediately after the injection. (A) hESCs treated eye: the top panel showed the location of the OCT scan (cyan and pink cross-sectional lines) on the eye; hESCs were observed in the treated eye in the sub-retinal space (yellow dotted line, middle and bottom panels). (B) Media-treated eye: the top panel showed the location of the OCT scan (cyan and pink cross-sectional lines) on the eye; clear fluid without cells was observed in the sub-retinal space in the media-injected eye (yellow dotted line, middle and bottom panels). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Applications Recipient Strain Success Rate
AAV Rpe65rd12/J 80%
AAV C57BL/6 95%
hESC derived progenitor cells Rd10-/- 95%

Table 1: The success rate of sub-retinal injection in different applications.

Discussion

The sub-retinal injection has been used for cell suspension transplantation to treat RPE and retinal diseases23,25,26,27,28,31,40. This approach is highly essential in rodent studies not only for cell transplantation and gene therapy approaches but also to evaluate novel therapeutic compounds for retinal diseases. Currently, three major routes are being used to deliver cells or AAVs into the sub-retinal space i.e., trans-corneal route, trans-scleral, and pars plana routes.

In the trans-corneal approach, the injection needle passes through the cornea, pupil, and lastly, the retina to deliver the cells into the sub-retinal space and form a successful bleb. The advantage of the trans-corneal approach is the ability to create a complete retinal detachment in the recipient47. It can deliver a larger number of cells; however, longitudinal observation to study structural conformation and cell integration is challenging in this approach. In addition, complications include cataract formation, synechiae, and cornea opacity, making the longitudinal observations challenging11,45,47,48. Alternatively, the trans-scleral approach is also used to deliver AAV to the sub-retinal space44,49. This approach is useful for neonatal mice and considered safer as it is not necessary for the needle to go through the ocular media. However, choroidal bleeding, reflux of the solution from the injection site, perforation of the retina, and leakage into the vitreous space should not be ignored.

We adopted the pars plana approach to introduce the hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitors into the sub-retinal space using a 33G blunt needle. In this approach, the injection needle was inserted via the incision at the limbus area. The needle was then passed through the vitreous cavity and finally accessed the sub-retinal space through the retina. Cell clumps were often observed and may block the delivery of cells when using unsuitable needle sizes. Resuspension of cells in the microfuge tube ought to be diligently performed using a 10 µL pipette tip before loading into the injection syringe. We initially attempted to use a 34G needle, where the blockage of the needle by the cells was often observed. An appropriate size of the needle should be tested for specific cell types, especially narrow-bore needles tend to give lesser viable cells when injected50. One of the advantages of this approach is direct visualization during injection, allowing the surgeon to monitor and carefully select the specific location for cell delivery. The area of injection and the needle should be clearly visible during the procedure. Anesthesia-induced cataract and cornea opacity can greatly affect the proper delivery of cells to a specific location.

While performing the injection, the needle should penetrate the retina perpendicularly, and the blunt end of the needle should be parallel to the sclera to minimize the leakage of the injected cells into the vitreous space (Figure 3). Only gentle pressure should be applied to the syringe when performing the injection. A strong pressure can lead to retina tears, hemorrhage, leakage of the cells into the choroidal space, failure of the cells to pass through the needle, and puncturing of the eyeball. The optimal pressure can be assured when the needle tip just passed through the retina, and a small white pressure dot is seen at the needle tip. After the injection, the needle should be retracted slowly and gently from the injection spot to prevent the leakage of injected cells into the vitreous space.

The limitation of this approach is the challenging learning curve. A study showed that a trained ophthalmologist needed to perform 364 injections in mice to achieve a 95% success rate, while less experienced trainees with surgical experience were expected to require a higher number of trainings46. Complications of this approach include needle track in the retina, reflux of cells into the vitreous space, bleeding from the choroid/retina, and iatrogenic cataract. However, with a sufficient amount of training, these complications are significantly less observed46.

In conclusion, our method can deliver the hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitors into the sub-retinal space of rd10 mice, as evidently shown by the OCT scans. This approach can be adopted to explore novel therapeutic compounds, different cell type transplantation, and gene therapy for the treatment of outer retina and RPE-related diseases.

Declarações

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank Wei Sheng Tan, Luanne Chiang Xue Yen, Xinyi Lee, and Yingying Chung for providing technical assistance for the preparation of the day 32 hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitors after cryopreservation. This work was supported in part by grants from the National Medical Research Council Young Investigator Research Grant Award (NMRC/OFYIRG/0042/2017) and National Research Foundation 24th Competitive Research Program Grant (CRP24-2020-0083) to H.G.T.

Materials

0.3% Tobramycin Novartis NDC  0078-0813-01 Tobrex (3.5 g)
0.3% Tobramycin and 0.1% Dexamethasone Novartis NDC 0078-0876-01 Tobradex (3.5 g)
0.5% Proparacaine hydrochloride Alcon NDC 0998-0016-15 0.5% Alcaine (15 mL)
1 mL Tuberculin syringe Turemo SS01T2713
1% Tropicamide Alcon NDC 0998-0355-15 1% Mydriacyl (15 mL)
2.5% Phenylephrine hydrochloride Alcon NDC 0998-0342-05 2.5% Mydfrin (5 mL)
24-well tissue culture plate Costar 3526
30 G Disposable needle Becton Dickinson (BD) 305128
33 G, 20 mm length blunt needles Hamilton 7803-05
Automated Cell Counter NanoEnTek Model: Eve
B27 without Vitamin A Life Technologies 12587001 2%36
Buprenorphine Ceva Vetergesic vet (0.3 mg/mL)
CKI-7 Sigma C0742 5 µM36
Cyclosporine Novartis 260 g/L in drinking water
Day 32 hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitor cells DUKE-NUS Medical School Human embryonic stem cells are differentiated for 32 days. See protocol in Ref 36.
Gauze Winner Industries Co. Ltd. 1SNW475-4
Glasgow Minimum Essential Medium Gibco 11710–035
hESC cell line H1 WiCell Research Institute WA01
Human brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Peprotech 450-02-50 10 ng/mL36
Human ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) Prospec-Tany Technogene CYT-272 10 ng/mL36
Ketamine hydrochloride (100 mg/mL) Ceva Santé Animale KETALAB03
LN-521 Biolamina LN521-02 1 µg36
mFreSR STEMCELL Technologies 5854
Microlitre glass syringe (10 mL) Hamilton 7653-01
N-[N-(3,5-difluorophenacetyl-L-alanyl)]-S-phenylglycine t-butyl ester (DAPT) Selleckchem S2215 10 µM36
N-2 supplement Life Technologies A13707-01 1%36
Non-essential amino acids (NEAA) Gibco 11140–050 1x36
NutriStem XF Media Satorius 05-100-1A
Operating microscope Zeiss OPMI LUMERA 700 With Built-in iOCT function
PRDM (Photoreceptor differentiation medium, 50ml) DUKE-NUS Medical School See media composition36. Basal Medium, 10 µM DAPT, 10 ng/mL BDNF, 10 ng/mL CNTF, 0.5 µM Retinoic acid, 2% B27 and 1% N2. Basal Medium: 1x GMEM, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.1 mM B-mercaptoethanol, 1x Non-essential amino acids (NEAA).
Pyruvate Gibco 11360–070 1 mM36
Rd10 mice Jackson Laboratory B6.CXB1-Pde6brd10/J mice Gender: male/female, Age: P20 (injection), Weight: 3-6 g 
Retinoic acid Tocris Bioscience 0695/50 0.5 µM36
Round Cover Slip (12 mm) Fisher Scientific 12-545-80
SB431542 Sigma S4317 0.5 µM36
Vidisic Gel (10 g) Dr. Gerhard Mann
Xylazine hydrochloride (20 mg/mL) Troy Laboratories LI0605
β-mercaptoethanol Life Technologies 21985–023 0.1 mM36

Referências

  1. Molday, R. S., Moritz, O. L. Photoreceptors at a glance. Journal of Cell Science. 128 (22), 4039-4045 (2015).
  2. Aboualizadeh, E., et al. Imaging Transplanted Photoreceptors in Living Nonhuman Primates with Single-Cell Resolution. Stem Cell Reports. 15 (2), 482-497 (2020).
  3. Petrus-Reurer, S., et al. Preclinical safety studies of human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelial cells for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Stem cells translational medicine. 9 (8), 936-953 (2020).
  4. Wang, S. T., et al. Transplantation of Retinal Progenitor Cells from Optic Cup-Like Structures Differentiated from Human Embryonic Stem Cells In Vitro and In Vivo Generation of Retinal Ganglion-Like Cells. Stem cells and development. 28 (4), 258-267 (2019).
  5. Wang, Z., et al. Intravitreal Injection of Human Retinal Progenitor Cells for Treatment of Retinal Degeneration. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research. 26, e921184-e921191 (2020).
  6. Semo, M., et al. Efficacy and Safety of Human Retinal Progenitor Cells. Translational vision science & technology. 5 (4), 6 (2016).
  7. Luo, J., et al. Human Retinal Progenitor Cell Transplantation Preserves Vision. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 289 (10), 6362 (2014).
  8. Liu, Y., et al. Long-term safety of human retinal progenitor cell transplantation in retinitis pigmentosa patients. Stem cell research & therapy. 8 (1), 209 (2017).
  9. Maia, M., et al. Effects of indocyanine green injection on the retinal surface and into the subretinal space in rabbits. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 24 (1), 80-91 (2004).
  10. Nickerson, J. M., et al. Subretinal delivery and electroporation in pigmented and nonpigmented adult mouse eyes. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J). 884, 53 (2012).
  11. Peng, Y., Tang, L., Zhou, Y. Subretinal Injection: A Review on the Novel Route of Therapeutic Delivery for Vitreoretinal Diseases. Ophthalmic Research. 58 (4), 217-226 (2017).
  12. Murray, S. F., et al. Allele-Specific Inhibition of Rhodopsin With an Antisense Oligonucleotide Slows Photoreceptor Cell Degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 56 (11), 6362 (2015).
  13. Cideciyan, A. V., et al. Mutation-independent rhodopsin gene therapy by knockdown and replacement with a single AAV vector. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 115 (36), E8547-E8556 (2018).
  14. Maeder, M. L., et al. Development of a gene-editing approach to restore vision loss in Leber congenital amaurosis type 10. Nature medicine. 25 (2), 229-233 (2019).
  15. Katrekar, D., et al. In vivo RNA editing of point mutations via RNA-guided adenosine deaminases. Nature methods. 16 (3), 239 (2019).
  16. Ong, T., Pennesi, M. E., Birch, D. G., Lam, B. L., Tsang, S. H. Adeno-Associated Viral Gene Therapy for Inherited Retinal Disease. Pharmaceutical Research. 36 (2), 34 (2019).
  17. Pardue, M. T., et al. Neuroprotective effect of subretinal implants in the RCS rat. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 46 (2), 674-682 (2005).
  18. Liu, Z., et al. Surgical Transplantation of Human RPE Stem Cell-Derived RPE Monolayers into Non-Human Primates with Immunosuppression. Stem cell reports. 16 (2), 237-251 (2021).
  19. Martinez Camarillo, J. C., et al. Development of a Surgical Technique for Subretinal Implants in Rats. Journal of visualized experiments: JoVE. (190), e64585 (2022).
  20. Xue, Y., et al. The Prospects for Retinal Organoids in Treatment of Retinal Diseases. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology. 11 (4), 314-327 (2022).
  21. McLelland, B. T., et al. Transplanted hESC-derived retina organoid sheets differentiate, integrate, and improve visual function in retinal degenerate rats. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 59 (6), 2586-2603 (2018).
  22. Lin, B., et al. Retina organoid transplants develop photoreceptors and improve visual function in RCS rats with RPE dysfunction. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 61 (11), 34 (2020).
  23. Russell, S., et al. Efficacy and safety of voretigene neparvovec (AAV2-hRPE65v2) in patients with RPE65-mediated inherited retinal dystrophy: a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet (London, England). 390 (10097), 849-860 (2017).
  24. Testa, F., et al. Three Year Follow-Up after Unilateral Subretinal Delivery of Adeno-Associated Virus in Patients with Leber Congenital Amaurosis Type 2. Ophthalmology. 120 (6), 1283 (2013).
  25. Fischer, M. D., et al. Safety and Vision Outcomes of Subretinal Gene Therapy Targeting Cone Photoreceptors in Achromatopsia: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA ophthalmology. 138 (6), 643-651 (2020).
  26. Ghazi, N. G., et al. Treatment of retinitis pigmentosa due to MERTK mutations by ocular subretinal injection of adeno-associated virus gene vector: results of a phase I trial. Human genetics. 135 (3), 327-343 (2016).
  27. MacLaren, R. E., et al. Retinal gene therapy in patients with choroideremia: initial findings from a phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet (London, England). 383 (9923), 1129-1137 (2014).
  28. Lam, B. L., et al. Choroideremia Gene Therapy Phase 2 Clinical Trial: 24-Month Results. American journal of ophthalmology. 197, 65-73 (2019).
  29. Xue, K., et al. Beneficial effects on vision in patients undergoing retinal gene therapy for choroideremia. Nature medicine. 24 (10), 1507-1512 (2018).
  30. Zhai, Y., et al. AAV2-Mediated Gene Therapy for Choroideremia: 5-Year Results and Alternate Anti-sense Oligonucleotide Therapy. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 248, 145-156 (2023).
  31. Schwartz, S. D., Tan, G., Hosseini, H., Nagiel, A. Subretinal Transplantation of Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Pigment Epithelium for the Treatment of Macular Degeneration: An Assessment at 4 Years. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 57 (5), ORSFc1-ORSFc9 (2016).
  32. Vu, Q. A., et al. Structural changes in the retina after implantation of subretinal three-dimensional implants in mini pigs. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 16, 1010445 (2022).
  33. Spindler, L., et al. Controlled injection pressure prevents damage during subretinal injections in pigs. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 59 (9), 5918-5918 (2018).
  34. Yang, K., et al. Robot-assisted subretinal injection system: development and preliminary verification. BMC Ophthalmology. 22 (1), 1-10 (2022).
  35. Olufsen, M. E., et al. Controlled Subretinal Injection Pressure Prevents Damage in Pigs. Ophthalmologica. Journal international d’ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde. 245 (3), 285-293 (2022).
  36. Tay, H. G., et al. Photoreceptor laminin drives differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to photoreceptor progenitors that partially restore retina function. Molecular therapy the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 31 (3), 825-846 (2023).
  37. Petrus-Reurer, S., et al. Subretinal Transplantation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived-retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells into a Large-eyed Model of Geographic Atrophy. Journal of visualized experiments: JoVE. (131), e56702 (2018).
  38. Petrus-Reurer, S., et al. Integration of subretinal suspension transplants of human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelial cells in a large-eyed model of geographic atrophy. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 58 (2), 1314-1322 (2017).
  39. Babu, V. S., et al. Depleted Hexokinase1 and lack of AMPKα activation favor OXPHOS-dependent energetics in Retinoblastoma tumors. Translational research the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine. (23), 00108-00111 (2023).
  40. Plaza Reyes, A., et al. Xeno-Free and Defined Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells Functionally Integrate in a Large-Eyed Preclinical Model. Stem cell reports. 6 (1), 9-17 (2016).
  41. Takahashi, K., et al. The influence of subretinal injection pressure on the microstructure of the monkey retina. PLoS ONE. 13 (12), e0209996 (2018).
  42. Tan, G. S. W., et al. Hints for Gentle Submacular Injection in Non-Human Primates Based on Intraoperative OCT Guidance. Translational Vision Science & Technology. 10 (1), 10-10 (2021).
  43. Yiu, G., et al. Suprachoroidal and Subretinal Injections of AAV Using Transscleral Microneedles for Retinal Gene Delivery in Nonhuman Primates. Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development. 16, 179-191 (2020).
  44. Mühlfriedel, R., Michalakis, S., Garrido, M. G., Biel, M., Seeliger, M. W. Optimized Technique for Subretinal Injections in Mice. Methods in Molecular Biology. 935, 343-349 (2012).
  45. Huang, P., et al. Subretinal injection in mice to study retinal physiology and disease. Nature Protocols. 17 (6), 1468-1485 (2022).
  46. Huang, P., et al. The Learning Curve of Murine Subretinal Injection Among Clinically Trained Ophthalmic Surgeons. Translational Vision Science & Technology. 11 (3), 13 (2022).
  47. Qi, Y., et al. Trans-Corneal Subretinal Injection in Mice and Its Effect on the Function and Morphology of the Retina. PLOS ONE. 10 (8), e0136523 (2015).
  48. Irigoyen, C., et al. Subretinal Injection Techniques for Retinal Disease: A Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 11 (16), 4717 (2022).
  49. Parikh, S., et al. An Alternative and Validated Injection Method for Accessing the Subretinal Space via a Transcleral Posterior Approach. Journal of visualized experiments: JoVE. (118), e54808 (2016).
  50. Amer, M. H., White, L. J., Shakesheff, K. M. The effect of injection using narrow-bore needles on mammalian cells: Administration and formulation considerations for cell therapies. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 67 (5), 640-650 (2015).

Play Video

Citar este artigo
Tun, S. B. B., Shepherdson, E., Tay, H. G., Barathi, V. A. Sub-Retinal Delivery of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived Photoreceptor Progenitors in rd10 Mice. J. Vis. Exp. (200), e65848, doi:10.3791/65848 (2023).

View Video