This article describes a method for studying cellular metabolism in complex communities of multiple cell types, using a combination of stable isotope tracing, cell sorting to isolate specific cell types, and mass spectrometry.
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
This article describes a method for studying cellular metabolism in complex communities of multiple cell types, using a combination of stable isotope tracing, cell sorting to isolate specific cell types, and mass spectrometry.
Mammalian cell types exhibit specialized metabolism, and there is ample evidence that various co-existing cell types engage in metabolic cooperation. Moreover, even cultures of a single cell type may contain cells in distinct metabolic states, such as resting or cycling cells. Methods for measuring metabolic activities of such subpopulations are valuable tools for understanding cellular metabolism. Complex cell populations are most commonly separated using a cell sorter, and subpopulations isolated by this method can be analyzed by metabolomics methods. However, a problem with this approach is that the cell sorting procedure subjects cells to stresses that may distort their metabolism.
To overcome these issues, we reasoned that the mass isotopomer distributions (MIDs) of metabolites from cells cultured with stable isotope-labeled nutrients are likely to be more stable than absolute metabolite concentrations, because MIDs are formed over longer time scales and should be less affected by short-term exposure to cell sorting conditions. Here, we describe a method based on this principle, combining cell sorting with liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). The procedure involves analyzing three types of samples: (1) metabolite extracts obtained directly from the complex population; (2) extracts of "mock sorted" cells passed through the cell sorter instrument without gating any specific population; and (3) extracts of the actual sorted populations. The mock sorted cells are compared against direct extraction to verify that MIDs are indeed not altered by the cell sorting procedure itself, prior to analyzing the actual sorted populations. We show example results from HeLa cells sorted according to cell cycle phase, revealing changes in nucleotide metabolism.
Higher organisms contain complex communities of distinct cell types that collaborate to bring about more complex functions. For example, tumors contain not only cancerous cells, but also fibroblasts, cells that constitute blood vessels, and often immune cell infiltrates1; blood contains a complex mixture of dozens of immune cell subtypes2; and even cultured cell lines may consist of multiple subpopulations, such as the luminal and basal subtypes of breast cancer cells3. Moreover, distinct cell types that coexist can exhibit metabolic "collaboration". For example, in the brain, astrocytes a....
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
1. Metabolite Extraction
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
As an example, here we describe an experiment investigating the metabolism of HeLa cells sorted according to cell cycle phase. To label a wide range of central metabolites on both carbons and nitrogens, we cultured cells for 48 h using U-13C-glucose and U-13C, 15N-glutamine as tracers. To obtain rich MIDs for the validation experiment, we here chose a mixture of 40% U-13C-Glucose and 70% U-13C,15N2-Glutamine, as intermediat.......
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Our method is based on the principle that MIDs in cellular metabolites reflect the "history" of metabolic activities of a cell. This makes it possible to investigate metabolic activities in subpopulation of cells, as they occurred in the complex community of cells, prior to the cell sorting procedure. In contrast, peak areas of metabolites differ markedly between extracts of sorted cells and direct extraction from the culture dish11. In part this is because the different chemical compositi.......
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Anas Kamleh for valuable help with optimizing mass spectrometry methods, and Annika von Vollenhoven for assistance with cell sorting. This research was supported by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (grant no. FFL12-0220) and the Strategic Programme in Cancer Research (IR, RN); the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation (CEW, HG); and Mary Kay Foundation (JW, MJ).
....Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| HBSS | Sigma | H6648 | |
| INFLUX (inFlux v7 Sorter) | BD Biosciences | ||
| U-13C-Glucose | Cambridge isotopes | 40762-22-9 / GLC-018 | |
| U-13C,15N2-Glutamine | Cambridge isotopes | CNLM-1275-H-0.1 | |
| Methanol (JT Baker), HPLC grade | VWR | BAKR8402.2500 | |
| Ultrafree - MC - VV centrifugal Filters. Durapore PVDF 0.1 µm | Millipore | UFC30VV00 | |
| Ultimate 3,000 UHPLC | Thermo Fisher scientific | ||
| Q-Exactive Orbitrap Mass spectrometer | Thermo Fisher scientific | ||
| Merk-Sequant ZIC HILIC column (150 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 µm) | Merck KGaA | 1.50444.0001 | |
| Merk-Sequant ZIC HILIC guard column (20 mm x 2.1 mm) | Merck KGaA | ||
| Acetonitrile Optima LC-MS, amber glass | Fisher Scientific | A955-212 | |
| Milli-Q water | Millipore | Produced with a Milli-Q Gradient system | |
| Myrsyra 99.5% Optima (Formic acid) | Fisher Scientific | 11423423 | |
| X100 Screw Vial 1.5 ml, 8-425 32x11.6 mm, amber, 100 units | Thermo Fisher scientific | 10560053 | |
| X100 Lock Skruv Vitt PTFE Packing 8-425 (Screw caps) | Thermo Fisher scientific | 12458636 | |
| ProteoMass LTQ/FT-Hybrid ESI Pos. Mode Cal Mix | Sigma-Aldrich | MSCAL5 | Calibration kit |
| SNAKESKIN 10K MWCO | Thermo Fisher scientific | 88245 | |
| Mathematica v.10 | Wolfram Research |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.