A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid

7.1K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/56059

⸱

August 8th, 2017

 ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

Phenotypic differences among cervid populations may be related to population-level genetics or nutrition; discerning which is difficult in the wild. This protocol describes how we designed a controlled study where nutritional variation was eliminated. We found that phenotypic variation of male white-tailed deer was more limited by nutrition than genetics.

Abstract

Cervid phenotype can be placed into one of two categories: efficiency, which promotes survival over extravagant morphometric growth, and luxury, which promotes growth of large weaponry and body size. Populations of the same species display each phenotype depending on environmental conditions. Although antler and body size of male white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) varies by physiographic region in Mississippi, USA and is strongly correlated with regional variation in nutritional quality, the effects of population-level genetics from native stocks and previous re-stocking efforts cannot be disregarded. This protocol describes how we designed a controlled study, where other factors that influence phenotype, such as age and nutrition, are controlled. We brought wild-caught pregnant females and six-month-old fawns from three distinct physiographic regions in Mississippi, USA to the Mississippi State University Rusty Dawkins Memorial Deer Unit. Deer from the same region were bred to produce a second generation of offspring, allowing us to assess generational responses and maternal effects. All deer ate the same high-quality (20% crude protein deer pellet) diet ad libitum. We uniquely marked each neonate and recorded body mass, hind foot, and total body length. Each subsequent fall, we sedated individuals via remote injection and sampled the same morphometrics plus antlers of adults. We found that all morphometrics increased in size from first to second generation, with full compensation of antler size (regional variation no longer present) and partial compensation of body mass (some evidence of regional variation) evident in the second generation. Second generation males that originated from our poorest quality soil region displayed about a 40% increase in antler size and about a 25% increase in body mass when compared to their wild harvested counterparts. Our results suggest phenotypic variation of wild male white-tailed deer in Mississippi are more related to differences in nutritional quality than population-level genetics.

Introduction

Environmental factors a mother experiences during gestation and lactation may influence her offspring's phenotype, independent of genotype1,2,3. Mothers who inhabit high-quality environments likely will produce offspring that exhibit a luxury phenotype (large antler and body size4), whereas mothers who inhabit a low-quality environment may produce offspring that exhibit an efficiency phenotype (small antler and body size4). Therefore, persisting in a high-quality environment may allow a mother to produce male offspring with ....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Ethics Statement: The Mississippi State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all capture, handling, and marking techniques under protocols 04-068, 07-036, 10-033 and 13-034.

1. Establish Capture Sites, Immobilize and Transport wild White-tailed Deer

  1. Identify public and private properties that are enrolled in the Deer Management Assistance Program22 and establish ≥29 capture sites throughout three source regions in Mississippi, USA.
    1. Identify several capture locations within each source region to ensure that the range of genetic variation present in the regional population....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Individual age, nutritional quality, and genetics influence male white-tailed deer phenotype. Our study design allowed us to control the quality of nutrition deer were consuming and allowed us to identify the age of each deer for valid comparisons within year classes. By controlling nutrition and age with our study design, we were better able to understand whether population-level genetics were restricting the phenotype of males from two study populations. Improved nutrition had a positiv.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

There are several steps associated with our protocol; however, there are four critical steps that must be taken to ensure success with this protocol. First, during capture of wild deer, there must be several capture locations throughout a single source region (step 1.1.1). Having multiple capture locations ensures that any genetic variability associated with the source region will be represented among deer. Second, deer must be kept separated by source region during breeding season (steps 1.4.9 and 5.2.1). Ensuring anima.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks (MDWFP) for financial support using resources from the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act (W-48-61). We thank MDWFP biologists W. McKinley, A. Blaylock, A. Gary, and L. Wilf for their extensive involvement in data collection. We also thank S. Tucker as facility coordinator and multiple graduate students and technicians for their help collecting data. This manuscript is contribution WFA427 of the Mississippi State University Forest and Wildlife Research Center.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Shelled Corn
Elevated Stand
Safety Harness
Ground Blind
Model 196 ProjectorPneu-Dart, Pennsylvania, USA
3cc Radio-Telemetry Darts(Pneu-Dart, Pennsylvania, USA)
Various Sized Darts (Pneu-Dart, Pennsylvania, USA)
Teletamine HCl (Telazol, Fort Dodge Animal Health, Iowa, USA)
Xylazine HCl (West Texas Rx Pharmacy, Amarillo, Texas, USA)
Yhoimbine HCl
Tolazoline HCl
Military Style Gurney
Rectal Thermometer
Shade Cloth
20% Crude Protein Deer Pellets (Purina AntlerMax Professional High Energy Breeder 59UB, Purina, Missouri, USA)
Trough Style Feeders
Commercial Clover (Durana Clover, Pennington Seed Co., Georgia, USA)
Commercial Fescue (Max-Q Fescue, Pennington Seed Co., Georgia, USA)
Blankets
Ice Packs
Broadleaf Weed Control (2, 4-DB Herbacide, Butyrac 200)
Grass Control (Poast Herbacide, BASF Co.)
Pelleted WormerSafeguard Co., active ingredient fenbendazole
Parasite Pour-on Treatment (Ivomec, Merial Co.)
InsecticideRiptide, McLaughlin Gormley King Co.) 
Medium and Large Plastic Ear Tags (Allflex, Texas, USA)
Remote site that assigned parentageDNA Solutions Animal Solutions Manager (DNA Solutions, Oklahoma, USA)
Digital Hanging Scale (Moultrie, EBSCO Industries, Inc.) 
Tape Measure
Clostridium Perfringens Types C and D Toxoid Essential 3 (Colorado Serum Co.)
Clostridium Perfringens Types C and D Antitoxin Equine Origin(Colorado Serum Co.)
Ivermectin in propylene glycol
Antibiotic(Nuflor, Schuering-Plough Animal Health Corp., New Jersey, USA)
Ivermectin (Norbrook Labratories, LTD., Down, Northern Ireland, UK)
Clostidrial vaccine(Vision 7 with SPUR, Ivesco LLC, Iowa, USA)
Leptospirosis vaccine (Leptoferm-5, Pfizer, Inc., New York, USA)
Trailer for transport
Reciprocating saw (DEWALT, Maryland, USA)
Scientific Digital Scale (Global Industrail, Global Equipment Company Inc)
Antler Measuring Tape
Fogger
Plastic Ear Tags (Allflex, Texas, USA)
Plastic Ear Tagger(Allflex, Texas, USA)

References

  1. Bernardo, J. Maternal effects in animal ecology. Amer Zool. 36 (2), 83-105 (1996).
  2. Forchhammer, M. C., Clutton-Brock, T. H., Lindstrom, J., Albon, S. D. Climate andpopulation density induce long-term cohort variation in a northern ungulate. J Anim Ecol. 70 (5), 721-729 (2001).
  3. Freeman, E. D., Larsen, R. T., Clegg, K., McMillan, B. R.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

White-tailed DeerAntler SizeBody MassNutritional QualityPopulation GeneticsControlled EnvironmentMorphometric MeasurementsSedation ProtocolAntler RemovalData Collection