JoVE   
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Biology

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Neuroscience

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Immunology and Infection

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Clinical and Translational Medicine

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Bioengineering

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Applied Physics

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Chemistry

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Behavior

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Environment

|   

JoVE Science Education

General Laboratory Techniques

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Basic Methods in Cellular and Molecular Biology

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Model Organisms I

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Model Organisms II

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

 JoVE Biology

Quantifying Yeast Chronological Life Span by Outgrowth of Aged Cells

1, 1

1Department of Pathology, University of Washington

Article
    Downloads Comments Metrics

    You must be subscribed to JoVE to access this content.

    This article is a part of   JoVE Biology. If you think this article would be useful for your research, please recommend JoVE to your institution's librarian.

    Recommend JoVE to Your Librarian

    Current Access Through Your IP Address

    You do not have access to any JoVE content through your current IP address.

    IP: 54.196.199.101, User IP: 54.196.199.101, User IP Hex: 918865765

    Current Access Through Your Registered Email Address

    You aren't signed into JoVE. If your institution subscribes to JoVE, please or create an account with your institutional email address to access this content.

     

    Summary

    Chronological aging in yeast refers to the loss of cell viability associated with time in stationary phase. Here we describe a high-throughput method for quantitatively determining yeast chronological life span.

    Date Published: 5/06/2009, Issue 27; doi: 10.3791/1156

    Cite this Article

    Murakami, C., Kaeberlein, M. Quantifying Yeast Chronological Life Span by Outgrowth of Aged Cells. J. Vis. Exp. (27), e1156, doi:10.3791/1156 (2009).

    Abstract

    The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has proven to be an important model organism in the field of aging research 1. The replicative and chronological life spans are two established paradigms used to study aging in yeast. Replicative aging is defined as the number of daughter cells a single yeast mother cell produces before senescence; chronological aging is defined by the length of time cells can survive in a non-dividing, quiescence-like state 2. We have developed a high-throughput method for quantitative measurement of chronological life span. This method involves aging the cells in a defined medium under agitation and at constant temperature. At each age-point, a sub-population of cells is removed from the aging culture and inoculated into rich growth medium. A high-resolution growth curve is then obtained for this sub-population of aged cells using a Bioscreen C MBR machine. An algorithm is then applied to determine the relative proportion of viable cells in each sub-population based on the growth kinetics at each age-point. This method requires substantially less time and resources compared to other chronological lifespan assays while maintaining reproducibility and precision. The high-throughput nature of this assay should allow for large-scale genetic and chemical screens to identify novel longevity modifiers for further testing in more complex organisms.

    Protocol

    Part 1: Preparation of aging cultures

    1. Streak strains of interest from frozen stocks onto YEPD agar plates (1% yeast extract, 2% bacto-peptone, 2% agar, 2% glucose).
    2. Incubate the cells at 30˚C for 48 hours or until single colonies appear.
    3. Pick single colonies and inoculate into 5 mL of YEPD liquid medium (1% yeast extract, 2% bacto-peptone, 2% glucose) in test tubes.
    4. Grow cultures overnight at 30˚C while maintaining constant agitation using either a shaker or roller drum.
    5. Inoculate 5 mL of synthetic complete (SC) medium (Table 1) with 50 µL of the overnight culture. Generally three SC cultures are prepared for each strain to provide triplicate biological replication of the life span analysis for each strain being examined.
    6. Maintain the cultures at 30˚C with constant agitation on a roller drum for the entire experiment (generally 2 or more weeks).

    Part 2: Taking a viability age-point

    After two days of culture in SC media, the cells should be in stationary phase and the first age-point is ready to be taken. Subsequent age-points should be taken every 2-3 days for a minimum of two weeks. For each age point:

    1. Prepare the Bioscreen 100-well Honeycomb plates for inoculation by filling each well with 145 µL of YEPD. Be sure to leave at least one well filled with only YEPD and no cells for data analysis later.
    2. Remove the aging cultures from the incubator.
    3. Briefly vortex the first culture to be inoculated into the Honeycomb plate, while being careful not to spill any of the culture.
    4. Remove 5 µL of the mixed culture and pipette it into the first well of the Honeycomb plate. Flame the mouth of each test tube before and after removing the 5 µL aliquot.
    5. Repeat this procedure for each aging culture being sure to note the well position corresponding to each culture. Identical well positions should be used for each subsequent age-point throughout the entire experiment.
    6. Replace the cultures into the 30˚C incubator when finished with the inoculations.

    Part 3: Loading the Bioscreen C MBR machine

    1. Expose the incubator compartment by lifting the lid and remove the cover to the sample tray.
    2. Insert the newly inoculated Honeycomb plate into sample tray (use the left slot if you are only reading one plate).
    3. Replace the cover to the sample tray and lower the lid to the incubator compartment.
    4. Check to make sure the heat transfer fluid is above the minimum fill level. If low, add more using a 1000 µL pipette with the heat transfer fluid provided.
    5. Using the Bioscreen software “EZExperiment”, set the following parameters to obtain suitable growth curves for Saccharomyces cerevisiae:
      • Number of samples: Enter the number of wells with media or 200
      • Filter: 420-580nm, Wideband
      • Temperature: 30˚C
      • Experiment Length: 1 Day, 0 hours, 0 seconds
      • Measurement Interval: 30 minutes
      • Shaking: On, Continuous shaking, High
    6. Click “Start” to begin readings.

    Part 4: Data Analysis

    Typically, six age-points are taken over the course of two weeks. The age-points are taken at days 2, 4, 6, 9, 11, and 13. Depending on the experimental design and strains being tested, it may be desirable to take age-points more or less frequently or for longer than 2 weeks. It is important to load the Honeycomb plate in the same order for every age-point such that each aging culture corresponds to the same well position at every age-point, as this will make data analysis much easier.

    1. Obtain the output files from the Bioscreen C MBR machine. The software “EZExperiment” will output the Bioscreen data as a tab-delimited file that is compatible with Microsoft Excel as well as other software. The first column shows at what time the OD measurement was taken during the experiment, with subsequent columns representing each well in the Bioscreen Honeycomb plates (Figure 1).
    2. Delete the first OD reading from every column. This reading is “noise”.
    3. Normalize the data by subtracting the OD value of the well with YEPD alone from all OD values in each column. This removes the background absorbance by the media.
    4. Plot the outgrowth curves. The curves will shift as a function of age (Figure 2). For example, by plotting the outgrowth curves from column 1 (well 1 of the Honeycomb plate) over the six time points, there is a distinct rightward shift of the curves over time.
    5. Calculate the doubling time (δ) for each well based on the growth kinetics of the day 2 age-point. The equation used to calculate doubling time is:
      Equation
      where OD1 and OD2 represent successive OD measurements and t1 and t2 being the time between measurements. Calculate doubling times only between OD values of 0.2 to 0.5. The average of these values is the doubling time for that well. Calculate doubling times only between OD values of 0.2 to 0.5. The average of these values is the doubling time for that well. Most wild-type yeast strains should give a doubling time value between 85 to 90 minutes.
    6. For each age-point, calculate the time shift (∆t) in the outgrowth curves relative to the initial age-point (day 2). An easy way to do this is to determine the difference in the length of time it took for each well to reach an OD of 0.3 between the initial age-point and each subsequent age-point. The time that a particular well reached an OD of 0.3 can be calculated from the linear regression equation corresponding to ln(OD) as a function of time between the two time-points bracketing OD=0.3.
    7. Calculate the fraction surviving at each age-point in order to generate a survival curve (Figure 3). Define the initial age-point (day 2) to be 100% viability. For each successive age-point calculate the percent survival using the equation:
      Second Equation
      where sn is the survival percentage, ∆tn is the time shift, and δn is the doubling time.
    8. Generate survival curves (Figure 3B) as desired for each well (or replicate wells) by plotting the fraction (or percent) of viable cells as a function of age.
    9. Calculate the survival integral (SI) for each well. SI is defined as the area under the survival curve and can be estimated by the formula:
      Equation 3
      where agen is the age-point (e.g. 2, 4, 6, 9, 11, and 13) and sn is the survival value at that age-point.
    10. Determine statistical parameters of replicate wells from the SI and survival data. Common statistical parameters of interest include mean, median, and variance for each set of biological replicates. A t-test or similar analysis can be used for pairwise comparison of SI for different experimental and control groups. It may also be desirable to generate survival curves, as described in 4.8 from averaged biological replicates.

    Part 5: Representative results

    At the completion of the experiment, you will have plotted the survival curve and performed data analysis sufficient to determine the chronological aging potential for several different strains or conditions. If performed properly, the growth curves obtained from the Bioscreen C MBR machine should look similar to those shown in Figure 2 and the resulting survival curves should resemble those shown in Figure 3. Generally, wild-type cells cultured under the conditions described here will have a median chronological life span on the order of 7 days. Substantial variation in survival is observed in different strains and under some conditions, such as growth in 0.05% glucose media, median survival can exceed 30 days.


    Figure 1. Data output from the Bioscreen program “EZExperiment”. Column A displays the time at which an absorbance reading was taken. Successive columns represent the wells of the Honeycomb plate inoculated with cells taken from aging cultures.


    Figure 2. Outgrowth curves from a single biological replicate over the course of an experiment. There is a distinct shift in the curves over time as cells in the aging culture lose viability. The length of time between the initial time point (day 2) and a successive time point determines viability at that particular age.


    Figure 3. A) A survival curve generated using the outgrowth data from Figure 1. The day 2 time point is set as the 100% viability point. B) Final survival curves of two strains tested in the same experiment. These survival curves represent the average viabilities of three biological replicates for each strain. Error bars represent standard deviation within biological replicates. The shaded area under the survival curve represents the survival integral (SI) for strain 1.

     

    Table 1. Synthetic Defined Medium Used for Chronological Aging Studies (strain background BY4743)
    Component Concentration (g/L)
    D-glucose 20
    Yeast nitrogen base (-AA/AS) 1.7
    (NH4)2SO4 5.0
    Adenine 0.04
    L-Arginine 0.02
    L-Aspartic acid 0.1
    L-Glutamic acid 0.1
    L-Histidine 0.1
    L-Leucine 0.3
    L-Lysine 0.03
    L-Methionine 0.02
    L-Phenylalanine 0.05
    L-Serine 0.375
    L-Threonine 0.2
    L-Tryptophan 0.04
    L-Tyrosine 0.03
    L-Valine 0.15
    Uracil 0.1

    Note: This recipe accounts for auxotrophies in diploid BY4743 strain. Amino acid auxotrophies should be compensated for by adding a 5X final concentration to the synthetic complete medium.

     

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

    Discussion

    The high-throughput chronological life span assay described here is an effective method for quantifying the aging potential of large numbers of strains with high accuracy and precision. The primary advance of this method over classical methods for determining survival by counting colony-forming units (e.g. see 3) is the use of a shaker/incubator/plate reading device such as the Bioscreen C MBR machine to obtain high-resolution growth curves at each age-point. In direct comparison with low-throughput chronological life span assays, this method has been shown to achieve comparable (or better) precision, while substantially increasing the number of samples that can be analyzed 4.

    The method as described above is suitable for screening genetic variants for altered chronological longevity under commonly used culture conditions for aging studies. This method can easily be adapted, however, for alternative culture conditions, such as pre-adaptation to respiratory growth (glycerol carbon source) 5, maintenance in water rather than expired media, or studies of dietary restriction 4. Adaptation for pharmacological screening purposes can also be envisioned, for example by adding different chemical compounds from a library to the aging media rather than inoculating different strains.

    The method described here also provides for flexibility in the age-points used for life span determination. As described above, age-points are taken at days 2, 4, 6, 9, 11, and 13 of the experiment. These age-points are suitable for screening the yeast ORF deletion collection for mutants with altered life span, but may not be suitable for other applications, culture conditions, or genetic backgrounds. It should be noted, however, that if comparison across multiple experiments is desired, the same set of age-points should be used in each experiment.

    During the course of performing chronological life span experiments, we have noted that periodically a subset of cells in the aging culture will re-enter the cell cycle, a phenomenon referred to as ‘gasping’ 6. Gasping can be observed as a leftward shift in the outgrowth curve at one or more later age-points, corresponding to an increase in the number of viable cells in the aging culture. Cultures where gasping has occurred should be removed from the analysis, unless viability is already low enough that subsequent age-points will not significantly influence SI.

    Routine maintenance of the Bioscreen C MBR machine is necessary to obtain reproducible and accurate longevity data. It is essential that the heat transfer fluid is kept above the minimum fill level, and this should be checked before every run on the machine. It is also helpful to periodically clean the interior of the incubation chamber by wiping the tray to remove dust created by continuous shaking of the Honeycomb plates. The bulb will also need to be replaced once or twice a year. An F1.b2 error message indicates insufficient light from the bulb. It is a good idea to keep several spare bulbs on hand.

    The identification of mutants and chemicals that alter life span in simple eukaryotes has been a driving force in aging research over the past several years. Of particular interest are those interventions that slow aging across evolutionarily divergent species. The chronological life span methodology described here has contributed to our understanding of basic mechanisms of aging in the budding yeast and the identification of novel longevity factors which may ultimately prove useful as therapeutic targets for treating age-associated diseases in people.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

    Disclosures

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by NIH Grant 1R21AG031965-01A1. M. K. is an Ellison Medical Foundation New Scholar in Aging.

    Materials

    Name Type Company Catalog Number Comments
    Bacto Peptone Reagent BD Biosciences 211677
    Bacto Yeast Extract Reagent BD Biosciences 288620
    Difco Agar Reagent BD Biosciences 214530
    Yeast Nitrogen Base w/o A.A. and A.S. Reagent MidSci J630-500G
    Amino Acids Reagent Sigma-Aldrich
    Ammonium Sulfate Reagent Spectrum AM185
    Dextrose Reagent Fisher Scientific D16-10
    Bioscreen C MBR machine Tool Growth Curves USA 5101370
    Bioscreen 100-well Honeycomb plate Tool Growth Curves USA 9502550

    References

    1. Steinkraus, K. A., Kaeberlein, M., and Kennedy, B. K., Replicative aging in yeast: the means to the end. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 24, 29 (2008).
    2. Kaeberlein, M., in Handbook of models for human aging, edited by P. M. Conn (Elsevier Press, Boston, 2006), pp. 109.
    3. Fabrizio, P. and Longo, V. D., The chronological life span of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Aging Cell 2 (2), 73 (2003).
    4. Murakami, C. J., Burtner, C. R., Kennedy, B. K., and Kaeberlein, M., A method for high-throughput quantitative analysis of yeast chronological life span. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 63 (2), 113 (2008).
    5. Piper, P. W., Harris, N. L., and MacLean, M., Preadaptation to efficient respiratory maintenance is essential both for maximal longevity and the retention of replicative potential in chronologically ageing yeast. Mech Ageing Dev 127 (9), 733 (2006).
    6. Fabrizio, P. et al., Superoxide is a mediator of an altruistic aging program in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 166 (7), 1055 (2004).

    Comments

    1 Comment

    Hi there,

    What shall I do to watch your movie?

    Regards,

    Ricardo
    Reply

    Posted by: Ricardo C.February 16, 2012, 4:35 AM

    Post a Question / Comment / Request

    You must be signed in to post a comment. Please or create an account.

    Metrics

    Waiting
    simple hit counter