The Journal of Visualized Experiments (JoVE) is a peer reviewed, PubMed-indexed video journal. Our mission is to increase the productivity of scientific research.

Recommend to Librarian
 JoVE General

Using the Gene Pulser MXcell Electroporation System to Transfect Primary Cells with High Efficiency

, ,

Gene Expression Division, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.

 

Video Article Chapters

Cite this Article: Using the Gene Pulser MXcell Electroporation System to Transfect Primary Cells with High Efficiency

McCoy, A. M., Collins, M. L., Ugozzoli, L. A. Using the Gene Pulser MXcell Electroporation System to Transfect Primary Cells with High Efficiency. J. Vis. Exp. (35), e1662, doi:10.3791/1662 (2010).

Abstract: Using the Gene Pulser MXcell Electroporation System to Transfect Primary Cells with High Efficiency

It is becoming increasingly apparent that electroporation is the most effective way to introduce plasmid DNA or siRNA into primary cells. The Gene Pulser MXcell electroporation system and Gene Pulser electroporation buffer (Bio-Rad) were specifically developed to easily transfect nucleic acids into mammalian cells and difficult-to-transfect cells, such as primary and stem cells. We will demonstrate how to perform a simple experiment to quickly identify the best electroporation conditions. We will demonstrate how to run several samples through a range of electroporation conditions so that an experiment can be conducted at the same time as optimization is performed. We will also show how optimal conditions identified using 96-well electroporation plates can be used with standard electroporation cuvettes, facilitating the switch from electroporation plates to electroporation cuvettes while maintaining the same electroporation efficiency. In the video, we will also discuss some of the key factors that can lead to the success or failure of electroporation experiments.

Protocol: Using the Gene Pulser MXcell Electroporation System to Transfect Primary Cells with High Efficiency

1) Cell preparation

  1. When using adherent cells, it is necessary to trypsinize and collect the cells prior to electroporation.
  2. To compare transfection among the four mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cultures, representing three different passage numbers, perform the following on each flask.
  3. Aspirate off cell culture media.
  4. Add PBS to wash cells.
  5. Remove PBS; add sufficient trypsin to cover cells, and wait a few minutes to allow trypsin to detach cells.
  6. Check flasks with a microscope to verify the condition of the cells, smack flask to detach cells, and then check flask again to make sure cells are all detached.
  7. Wait additional time and repeat if necessary.
  8. Once all cells are detached, add serum containing media to neutralize trypsin.
  9. Transfer cells to a centrifuge tube, and pellet cells by centrifugation (rcf = 300 x g).
  10. Remove supernatant and resuspend cells in a known volume of PBS.
  11. Count cells.
  12. Transfer to a new tube the appropriate volume of cell suspension to provide the required number of cells for experiments (you will need 150 μL of cells per well at a density of 1 x 106 cells/mL).
  13. Centrifuge cells.
  14. Remove supernatant and resuspend cells in the appropriate volume of Gene Pulser electroporation buffer to achieve a cell density of 1 x 106 cells/mL.
  15. Add 20 μg of plasmid per mL of cell suspension and mix gently.

2) Electroporation vessel setup and electroporation

Plate setup and electroporation

  1. Plug plate chamber into the power module of the Gene Pulser MXcell electroporation system.
  2. Pipette 150 μL cell mixture or buffer into the wells of a 96-well electroporation plate.
  3. Put plate in plate chamber and pulse.
  4. Remove plate from chamber.
  5. Mix well contents by pipetting up and down in each well.
  6. Transfer the cells from each well to pre-warmed buffer in 12-well plates.
  7. Tap plate to distribute cells and put it in incubator.
  8. Let cells recover for 24 hours.

Cuvette setup and electroporation

  1. Unplug plate chamber from the power module of the Gene Pulser MXcell electroporation system and plug in the ShockPod™ cuvette chamber.
  2. Pipette 600 μL of cell suspension into a 0.4 cm gap electroporation cuvette.
  3. Put cuvette in ShockPod chamber and deliver electric pulse.
  4. Remove cuvette from chamber.
  5. Mix cuvette contents by pipetting up and down in cuvette.
  6. Transfer the cells from each well to pre-warmed buffer in 12-well plates.
  7. Tap plate to distribute cells and put it in incubator.
  8. Let the cells recover for 24 hours.

3) Representative Results

After transfecting cells and allowing them to recover, analyze the transfection efficiency qualitatively, using epifluorescent microscopy, and quantitatively, using flow cytometry.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cells that have been successfully electroporated and are now expressing the GFP gene appear under epifluorescent microscopy.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Viewing the cells under phase contrast allows visualization of both transfected and untransfected cells. These are the cells that were exposed to the lowest voltage electroporation pulse at 200V. The cells are largely confluent due to the high cell density.

Figure 3
Figure 3. The same field of view under epifluorescence shows a number of cells are expressing the GFP marker, but these are only a small percentage of the cells visible in the previous image.

Figure 4
Figure 4. At 250V, the total number of live cells seen under phase contrast decreases slightly.

Figure 5
Figure 5. Under epifluorescence, one can see that the number of GFP expressing cells has increased.

Figure 6
Figure 6. At the highest voltage applied, 375V, there are fewer live cells visible.

Figure 7
Figure 7. However, a large percentage of the remaining cells are expressing GFP. Which condition is optimal depends on the experimental design. In some experiments the largest number of transfected cells might be optimal, in other experiments the highest percentage transfection might be best.

We are interested in the percentage of cells that are GFP positive under each condition and how the percentages vary with cell age. Flow cytometry can provide quantitative information about the transfection results under each of the different electroporation conditions.

Figure 8
Figure 8. Here the percentage of cells that are GFP positive in the passage 5 cells under each of the 12 electroporation conditions are shown. The maximum transfection percentage was approximately 80% under the highest voltage exponential decay pulse, condition 6, and 70% under the strongest square wave pulse tested, condition 12.

Figure 9
Figure 9. With the cells passed 9 times prior to the electroporation, the overall pattern of transfection percentage is nearly identical, but with a very slight decrease in the transfection percentages.

Figure 10
Figure 10. Shown here are the percentages of GFP cells in the passage 13 cells which show a marked decrease in transfection percentage relative to the younger cells. The highest transfection percentages were approximately half what was achieved with the younger cells demonstrating the importance of using healthy cells as soon after isolation as possible.

Electroporation Conditions used for transfecting MEF cells using the Gene Pulser MXcell
Condition (1-6)
Exponential Decay pulses,
all with 350 uF, 1000ohm
Voltage (V)  
1 200  
2 250  
3 300  
4 326  
5 350  
6 376  
Condition (7-12)
Square Wave pulses,
all with 2000 uF, 1000 ohm, and 1 pulse
Voltage (V) Pulse Duration (ms)
7 200 10
8 250 10
9 300 10
10 200 20
11 250 20
12 300 20

Discussion: Using the Gene Pulser MXcell Electroporation System to Transfect Primary Cells with High Efficiency

This video article demonstrates how to use the MXcell electroporation system to easily identify optimal electroporation conditions for MEFs or other primary cell lines. The 96-well plate format allows for many replicates of experimental or optimization conditions to be performed simultaneously, which can eliminate the need for many separate experiments. While carrying out this procedure, one should to remember to use healthy cells as soon after isolation as possible and to use electroporation conditions that are matched to the electroporation buffer.

Disclosures: Using the Gene Pulser MXcell Electroporation System to Transfect Primary Cells with High Efficiency

The authors are employed by Bio-Rad Laboratories that produces reagents and instrument used in this article

Materials: Using the Gene Pulser MXcell Electroporation System to Transfect Primary Cells with High Efficiency

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
Gene Pulser® Electroporation Buffer Bio-Rad 165-2676
Gene Pulser MXcell™ Electroporation System Bio-Rad 165-2670
Gene Pulser MXcell™ ShockPod™ Cuvette Chamber Bio-Rad 165-2673
Gene Pulser MXcell™ Electroporation System With ShockPod™ Cuvette Chamber Bio-Rad 165-2674

Ask the Author: Using the Gene Pulser MXcell Electroporation System to Transfect Primary Cells with High Efficiency

5 Comments

We are using a Gene Pulser II to transfect MEFs. Do you have a recommendation for conditions to try?
Thank you,

1

Reply

Posted by: KathyJuly 15, 2011, 10:34 AM

MEFs and other primary cells can optimize at different conditions due to variation among cells and differences in the methods used to generate the MEFs. For best results, we recommend optimizing to identify the best conditions for your experiment. There is a good chance that you will achieve success with the conditions used here although they may not be the absolute best conditions for your particular MEFs. I would recommend using 375V and 350 uF on your GP II with 600 ul of cells resuspended in the Gene Pulser electroporation buffer in a 0.4 cm cuvette as a good starting point. Alternatively, 250V and 500 uF capacitance would be another good starting point. With a gene pulser II you will want to set the voltage to either 375V or 250V then set the capacitance to high capacitance setting. The high capacitance settings need to be multiplied by 1000 to get units of uF, so a setting of 0.35 is 350 uf and 0.5 for 500 uF. I hope that helps!

2

Reply

Posted by: Adam McCoyJuly 19, 2011, 1:56 PM

We are using a gene pulser (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) to transfect adipose tissue stem cells. We want to transfect the cells by electroporation (250 V, 500 v, 900 v and 1500 v, pulse time 30 ms), but we dont know which capacitance, current and resistane is approperiatefor this. Do you have any recommendation in this regard?
Thank you

3

Reply

Posted by: Mahsa TahaSeptember 3, 2011, 6:41 AM

Hello, Thank you for your inquiry. It seems you are interested in using a square wave protocol. Bio-Rad Gene Pulser systems can use either exponential or square wave protocols. The set up will be slightly different depending on which system you have (Gene Pulser I, Gene Pulser II, Gene Pulser Xcell or Gene Pulser MXcell) and also the buffer you will be using. We would suggest you try optimizing conditions using the wide range of voltages you have listed. Generally speaking, we have found lower voltages and higher capacitance settings to be best for difficult to transfect cells (such as stem cells). A starting point for a square wave protocol might be 250V, 950 uF, 30 ms pulse. You can similarly try a wide range of conditions using exponential decay pulses. A starting point for exponential protocols might be 250V, 200uF, and 1000 ohms.

3.1

Reply

Posted by: Michelle CollinsMarch 14, 2012, 11:32 AM

We are using the Gene Pulser Xcell system. Must we use the Gene Pulser electroporation buffer to get a high transfection efficiency? And where can I find the optimal capicitance for the medium or buffer I am currently using? Moreover, how will the size of the cuvettes and volume of cell suspension influence the transfection efficiency?

5

Reply

Posted by: Crystal ShenFebruary 20, 2012, 3:00 AM

Crystal, thank you for the questions. It depends on the type of cells you are working with. Gene Pulser electroporation buffer is recommended for mammalian cells especially difficult to transfect cells including primary and stem cells. Other buffers may be sufficient as well. Gene Pulser electroporation buffer can yield both high transfection efficiency and high viability in difficult cell lines. Because of the electrical properties of the buffer it also gives pretty consistent results which helps greatly with optimization.

Both size of the cuvette and volume of cell suspension should also been taken into consideration when optimizing electroporation conditions as these will alter the electric fields. You can achieve essentially the same electric field through different combinations of parameters. The goal is to find the conditions which work best with your cells and your biological question. If you change the volume of cell suspension you will need to change the conditions applied to achieve the same electrical field. I normally recommend determining the volume and cuvette size you need first, and then optimizing the instrument settings.

5.1

Reply

Posted by: Michelle CollinsMarch 14, 2012, 11:33 AM

I am setting up an electroporation experiment using mouse primary MEF and my question is...using the Gene pulser MXcell, I want to know if one condition is good for a 0.4 cuvette size, would the same condition be good for 0.2 cuvette size for the electroporation expt.

6

Reply

Posted by: saiphone w.August 16, 2012, 2:48 PM

Post a Question / Comment / Request

You must be signed in to post a comment. Please or create an account.

Waiting
simple hit counter