1Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, 2Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Montreal, 3Department of Medicine, University of Montreal
This article is a part ofJoVE Immunology and Infection. If you think this article would be useful for your research, please recommend JoVE to your institution's librarian.Recommend JoVE to Your Librarian
Current Access Through Your IP Address
Current Access Through Your Registered Email Address
Mathieu, M., Labrecque, N. Murine Superficial Lymph Node Surgery. J. Vis. Exp. (63), e3444, doi:10.3791/3444 (2012).
In the field of immunology, to understand the progression of an immune response against a vaccine, an infection or a tumour, the response is often followed over time. Similarly, the study of lymphocyte homeostasis requires time course experiments. Performing these studies within the same mouse is ideal to reduce the experimental variability as well as the number of mice used. Blood withdrawal allows performance of time course experiments, but it only gives information about circulating lymphocytes and provides a limited number of cells1-4. Since lymphocytes circulating through the body and residing in the lymph nodes have different properties, it is important to examine both locations. The sequential removal of lymph nodes by surgery provides a unique opportunity to follow an immune response or immune cell expansion in the same mouse over time. Furthermore, this technique yields between 1-2x106 cells per lymph node which is sufficient to perform phenotypic characterization and/or functional assays. Sequential lymph node surgery or lymphadenectomy has been successfully used by us and others5-11. Here, we describe how the brachial and inguinal lymph nodes can be removed by making a small incision in the skin of an anesthetised mouse. Since the surgery is superficial and done rapidly, the mouse recovers very quickly, heals well and does not experience excessive pain. Every second day, it is possible to harvest one or two lymph nodes allowing for time course experiments. This technique is thus suitable to study the characteristics of lymph node-residing lymphocytes over time. This approach is suitable to various experimental designs and we believe that many laboratories would benefit from performing sequential lymph node surgeries.
1. Preparation Before The Surgery
Mice were treated in accordance to the Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines.
2. The Surgery
It is possible to remove 4 of the superficial lymph nodes (LN) by surgery: the 2 inguinal and the 2 brachial. The isolation of LN is easier in young lean mice (6-8 weeks) since the presence of fatty tissue in older mice can interfere with LN isolation. However, this limitation is overcome with repeated practice. For the mice comfort, we harvest a maximum of 2 LNs at a time and when we perform time-course experiments, we harvest LNs every second day. Also, to prevent infection, antibiotics could be given to the mouse, but we do not and wounds are healing just fine. One needs to be aware that depending on the experimental design, the use of an antibiotic could influence the result observed (for example if a response to a bacterium is measured). Note that all instruments are sterilized after each use and aseptic conditions are maintained throughout the procedures.
3. Postoperative Care
4. Lymph Node Handling
5. Representative Results
An example of forward and side scatter plot is shown for LNs harvested from an anesthetized mouse by surgery or from a sacrificed mouse (Figure 2). The profile and the percentages of cells in the live lymphocyte gate are the same demonstrating that LN surgery is an appropriate technique to harvest cells.
Figure 1. Inguinal and brachial LN localization in the mouse. A. The inguinal LN is located just above the hind paw, slightly toward the belly. B. The brachial LN is located behind the foreleg.
Figure 2. Flow cytometry profile of lymphocytes obtained following LN surgery. Forward and side scatter profiles are shown for LNs harvested from an anesthetized mouse by surgery (A) or from a sacrificed mouse (B). LNs were harvested, dissociated and analyzed on a flow cytometer. Percentages of cells in the live lymphocyte gate are shown.
We have described a protocol of LN surgery which can apply to many experimental systems. Although very useful to follow immune responses or immune cell homeostasis, this technique has a few limitations. First, only four LNs can be harvested. Second, the immune response studied must be systemic or occur in the superficial inguinal or brachial (skin-draining) LNs. Finally, the number of cells harvested is influenced by the quality of the LN removal, a technical limitation which may contribute to experimental variability when absolute cell numbers are needed. However, the percentage of target cells, on its own, can provide relevant and accurate information particularly when LN size does not vary across various experimental conditions. Fortunately, once the technique is well mastered, the quality of LN removal improves, allowing for highly reproducible cell numbers in each LN. We believe that despite these few limitations, LN surgery provides key advantages to study the progression of immune responses. First, the immune response over time can be tracked in a given mouse, decreasing experimental variability as well as the number of mice used. Second, events such as lymphocyte homeostasis or immune response initiation occurring in the LNs can be directly studied. Another major advantage is that more cells can be recovered from LNs than from blood allowing for extended cell characterization. This technique is also suitable for other purposes such as genotyping transgenic mice or studying other cell populations residing or trafficking through the LNs such as B cells, dendritic cells and macrophages.
Our laboratory and others have been using this technique for several years and we have never observed any interference on the course of the immune response7-9,12,13 and on immune homeostasis5-7. Sequential LN surgery in resting wild-type C57BL/6 mice did not affect the percentage and number of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells 5-7. Moreover, it also did not affect these parameters in the residual LNs. Furthermore, during the course of an immune response, superficial LN removal did not affect the kinetics of the T cell response nor the generation of memory T cells 8,9,12,13. Furthermore, side by side comparison of T cell response followed either by sequential LN surgery or sacrificed mouse did not show any differences in our hands (unpublished results and Figure 2). Therefore, sequential LN surgery is suitable to study T cell homeostasis and response.
No conflicts of interest declared.
We thank Sylvie Lesage and all lab members for critical reading of the protocol. This work was supported by a grant (MOP-77545) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Nathalie Labrecque is supported by a FRSQ Senior Scholarship and Mélissa Mathieu received a NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship.
|Graefe Fine Pattern Premium Forceps||Harvard Apparatus||52-2144||Strongly Curved, 10 cm (4 in), 0.8 mm tip|
|Michel Clip Applying and Removing Forceps||Harvard Apparatus||52-3779||12.5 cm (5 in)|
|Michel Clip 100||Harvard Apparatus||52-3746||7.5-1.75 mm|
|Temgesic (Buprenorphine hydrochloride)||Merck & Co.|
|Vetalar (Ketamine hydrochloride)||Bioniche Animal Health||DIN: 01989529|
|Rompun (Xylazine)||Bayer AG||DIN: 02169592|
|Isoflurane||Abbott Laboratories||DIN: 02032384|
|Hypotears eye ointment||Novartis AG||DIN: 02133288|
|Baxedin (Clorhexidine gluconate 2% in isopropyl alcohol 70%)||Omega Engineering, Inc.||L0000017||DIN: 02251477|