1Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Utah School of Medicine, 2Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, UCSB, 3Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 4Stowers Institute for Medical Research
This article is a part ofJoVE General. If you think this article would be useful for your research, please recommend JoVE to your institution's librarian.Recommend JoVE to Your Librarian
Current Access Through Your IP Address
Current Access Through Your Registered Email Address
Guedelhoefer IV, O. C., Sánchez Alvarado, A. Planarian Immobilization, Partial Irradiation, and Tissue Transplantation. J. Vis. Exp. (66), e4015, doi:10.3791/4015 (2012).
The planarian, a freshwater flatworm, has proven to be a powerful system for dissecting metazoan regeneration and stem cell biology1,2. Planarian regeneration of any missing or damaged tissues is made possible by adult stem cells termed neoblasts3. Although these stem cells have been definitively shown to be pluripotent and singularly capable of reconstituting an entire animal4, the heterogeneity within the stem cell population and the dynamics of their cellular behaviors remain largely unresolved. Due to the large number and wide distribution of stem cells throughout the planarian body plan, advanced methods for manipulating subpopulations of stem cells for molecular and functional study in vivo are needed.
Tissue transplantation and partial irradiation are two methods by which a subpopulation of planarian stem cells can be isolated for further study. Each technique has distinct advantages. Tissue transplantation allows for the introduction of stem cells, into a naïve host, that are either inherently genetically distinct or have been previously treated pharmacologically. Alternatively, partial irradiation allows for the isolation of stem cells within a host, juxtaposed to tissue devoid of stem cells, without the introduction of a wound or any breech in tissue integrity. Using these two methods, one can investigate the cell autonomous and non-autonomous factors that control stem cell functions, such as proliferation, differentiation, and migration.
Both tissue transplantation5,6 and partial irradiation7 have been used historically in defining many of the questions about planarian regeneration that remain under study today. However, these techniques have remained underused due to the laborious and inconsistent nature of previous methods. The protocols presented here represent a large step forward in decreasing the time and effort necessary to reproducibly generate large numbers of grafted or partially irradiated animals with efficacies approaching 100 percent. We cover the culture of large animals, immobilization, preparation for partial irradiation, tissue transplantation, and the optimization of animal recovery. Furthermore, the work described here demonstrates the first application of the partial irradiation method for use with the most widely studied planarian, Schmidtea mediterranea. Additionally, efficient tissue grafting in planaria opens the door for the functional testing of subpopulations of naïve or treated stem cells in repopulation assays, which has long been the gold-standard method of assaying adult stem cell potential in mammals8. Broad adoption of these techniques will no doubt lead to a better understanding of the cellular behaviors of adult stem cells during tissue homeostasis and regeneration.
Note: this protocol suggests the use of potentially hazardous materials (lead and chloretone). Acquire, read, and follow MSDS for all potentially hazardous materials.
1. Animal Culture, Selection, and Preparation
2. Preparation of Solutions and Materials
3. Anesthetization and Immobilization
4. Partial Irradiation
Note: Follow these steps to prepare animals for partial irradiation. If performing transplantation instead, proceed to section 5.
5. Tissue Transplantation
6. Representative Results
Immediately following partial irradiation planaria will appear normal and unaffected. Depending on the delivered dose and the geometry of the shield used, irradiated tissue may regress and even disintegrate7. Shielded tissue should remain intact. Following tissue regression and a loss of tissue integrity, a blastema will form and missing structures will be regenerated (Figure 3A). If an amputation is made in the partially irradiated region, the irradiated tissue will be rescued (i.e. prevented from regressing or disintegrating) (Figure 3B). In both the uninjured and the amputated case regeneration will be delayed as compared to an amputated non-irradiated planaria (Figure 3C). If an X-ray dose of 30 Gy was delivered and the partially irradiated animal was uninjured, successful stem cell ablation in a pattern corresponding with the lead shield used can be confirmed 2 to 3 days following partial irradiation by in situ hybridization for the stem cell marker Smed-piwi-112 (a.k.a. smedwi-1) (Figure 4).
The morning following transplantation, a successful graft of the transplanted tissue should be obvious within the host tissue, having adhered to both the dorsal and ventral surfaces of the host (Figure 5A). Occasionally, the graft will adhere to only the ventral or dorsal surface. If the transplantation was completely unsuccessful, no sign of the graft will be visible from either the dorsal or ventral surface of the host (Figure 5B). Shortly following a successful graft of non-irradiated tissue into a host that had been ablated of stem cells by lethal irradiation13,14 , in situ hybridization for Smed-piwi-1 will reveal that stem cells are present primarily within the graft (Figure 5C). Additionally, successful grafts of non-irradiated tissue into lethally irradiated hosts will result in rescue of host tissue and long-term survival of the host15.
Figure 1. General arrangement of basic components for partial irradiation. In an X-ray irradiator with a top positioned X-ray source (cathode tube) the anesthetized planarian is positioned directly below the X-ray source within the irradiation field. In order to maximize the X-ray dose rate, the distance between the planarian and the X-ray source should be minimized. A lead shield should be positioned between the cathode tube and the anesthetized worm, as close to the worm as practical. The lead shield should be designed, manufactured, and positioned so that it shields the desired tissue but completely exposes the rest of the worm. Many commercial manufactures will produce custom lead shields from your simple design diagram; we have successfully used Alpha Systems Corp. (Bluffdale, UT). The lead should be sufficiently thick to allow for the desired amount of shielding. For example, if near complete shielding of a 320 kV X-ray beam is desired, the lead should be 4.5 to 6 mm thick. The planarian and shield are positioned on a Holtfreter's soaked filter paper lined Petri dish which rests in an ice bucket. Given a sufficiently large X-ray irradiation field and a number of identical lead shields, many specimens may be partially irradiated at one time (not pictured).
Figure 2. Building the recovery chamber. (A) An exploded view of the tissue transplantation recovery chamber, showing all of the components that are layered on top of one another after being soaked in casein saturated Holtfreter's Solution. (B) A nearly completed recovery chamber, illustrating the interlocking placement of the Whatman #3 filter paper rectangles which snugly encase the anesthetized planarian, preventing movement during healing. The careful construction of the recovery chamber prevents animal movement and desiccation, promoting rapid healing and greater efficacy of tissue transplantation.
Figure 3. Representative outcomes of simple posterior partial irradiation. As Dubois described7, (A) when the posterior half of planarians were shielded with lead and then exposed to x-ray irradiation the anterior tissue was observed to regress back to the boundary between the irradiated and shielded tissue at which point unpigmented blastemas formed and the animals began to regenerate. (B) On the other hand, when animals were decapitated following the same partial irradiation performed in (A), tissue regression was not observed and the remaining irradiated anterior tissue was rescued. The decapitated partially irradiated animals regenerated heads (B), however, regeneration was significantly delayed as compared to unirradiated decapitated controls (C).
Figure 4. Representative outcome of partial stem cell ablation following partial irradiation. Whole-mount In situ hybridization (WISH) for the stem cell marker Smed-piwi-1 reveals that wild type planaria have stem cells distributed throughout their bodies with the exception of the tissue anterior to the photoreceptors (arrowhead) and the pharynx proper (asterisk)14. (A) WISH for Smed-piwi-1 in irradiated but fully shielded control planaria fixed three days following irradiation shows a stem cell distribution that is indistinguishable from that of wild type planaria. (B) On the other hand, WISH for Smed-piwi-1 in animals that were only partially shielded, leaving the anterior and posterior exposed, but were also fixed three days following irradiation shows that stem cells are ablated from the non-shielded regions. Scale bars are 500 microns.
Figure 5. Examples of successful and unsuccessful tissue transplantation. (A) Live images of dorsal and ventral views of a successfully transplanted planarian three days following transplantation. The graft (indicated) is clearly visible on both dorsal and ventral surfaces and is surrounded with characteristic unpigmented tissue at the graft-host interface. (B) Correspondingly, unsuccessful transplantations display no visible graft tissue at the transplantation site (indicated) and instead show a healed, unpigmented, lateral wound from the failed transplantation. A graft that adheres to only the dorsal or the ventral surface can resemble a successful transplantation (A) when viewed from one side and an unsuccessful transplantation (B) when viewed from the other. (C) When wild type (wt) tissue is grafted into an irradiated host that has been ablated of resident stem cells and the transplanted stem cells are later revealed by WISH for Smed-piwi-1 two days following transplantation, the success of the transplantation is clearly displayed by the specific presence of stem cells only in or around the graft location (arrowheads). Scale bars are 500 microns.
Importance of immobilization
Immobilization is by far the most critical step for the successful completion of any of these processes. If planaria are improperly immobilized prior to partial irradiation, they may move beneath the lead shield, producing inconsistent and confounding results. Additionally, if animals are insufficiently immobilized following transplantation, the host worm will likely move away from the graft tissue, resulting in a failure of the graft to heal properly to the host. Proper immobilization is achieved by adjusting the concentration or length of chloretone treatment and the temperature and moisture of the filter paper on which the planaria rest. Chloretone treatments at 0.2 percent of up to one half hour do not appear to be toxic, however, treatments of that length may induce ejection of the pharynx. Planaria remain still and amenable to partial irradiation during this length of time. Our experience has shown that moisture, rather than chloretone treatment, is the most crucial factor - too wet and the animals move easily; too dry and the animals will desiccate. In all cases filter paper should be completely saturated but not to the point of creating standing water within the container or on the surface. Excess liquid can be shaken from the Petri dish. The amount of liquid used to saturate the filter paper will no doubt need to be adjusted according to the specific environmental humidity.
Speed of transplantation
Speed is essential in increasing the efficacy of both partial irradiation and transplantation. The longer partially irradiated animals are immobilized the greater the chances of an injury or a breech in tissue integrity which may skew the results of a particular assay. The speed at which transplantations are preformed roughly correlates with the successful graft rate. If the hole in the host that is to receive the graft is left empty for too long, the wounded ventral and dorsal surfaces will begin to heal to each other rather than to the graft tissue, thus resulting in an unsuccessful transplantation. In our hands, the graft plug only occasionally becomes lodged in the capillary tube. On those occasions, the plug can normally be dislodged quickly with fine forceps or by forcing air through the capillary tube by mouth. Once one becomes practiced with the transplantation procedure, the time needed to produce many grafted animals can be greatly reduced by anesthetizing the next donor-host pair while grafting the previous pair. By performing anesthetization and transplantation concurrently, the actual time necessary to produce each grafted animal can drop to as little as five minutes.
The versatility of partial irradiation and transplantation
Once the conditions for anesthetization and partial irradiation are optimized according to the specific experimental environment and the available X-ray irradiator, the number of different experiments that can be performed using the partial irradiation technique becomes large. Advanced lead machining techniques allow for the production of not only intricate irradiation shields that can target specific organs and tissues, but also the manufacture of large numbers of identical shields, permitting the rapid creation of many biological replicates. Future investigations will, no doubt, take advantage of this method to test the in vivo cellular responses to localized stem cell ablation and the functional differences between stem cell populations present in different parts of the planarian. The versatility of partial irradiation, as it pertains to the scientific question of interest, is limited only by current lead machining techniques and one's imagination. Therefore, the true power of the partial irradiation technique may lie in the ability to precisely shield and ablate nearly any differently positioned subpopulations of stem cells.
Whereas transplantation also allows for the isolation of a subpopulation of stem cells, the more significant advantage of this technique is the ability to differentially treat the host or donor prior to transplantation. Treatment of host or donor with a drug or RNA interference, will allow for the investigation of how untreated transplanted cells behave in a treated environment or how treated cells behave in an untreated environment. These types of experiments will certainly help to tease apart the autonomous and non-autonomous molecular contributions to stem cell function.
Additionally, as classical grafting experiments in planaria have already shown5,6, tissue transplantation is an ideal technique for exploring the inductive potential of different tissues during regeneration. As planarian research enters the molecular age, we have begun to uncover very specific localized expression of important signaling molecules which directly control regeneration16. Transplanting tissues that contain these signaling molecules to ectopic sites during regeneration may help us to better understand their role in directing the morphogenesis of regenerating structures.
Advantages of partial irradiation and tissue transplantation over other techniques
Besides the inherent specific strengths that partial irradiation and tissue transplantation have when compared to one another, they also provide particular advantages over other techniques used in the planarian regeneration field. For instance, low dose irradiation has been utilized as a way to isolate a small number of stem cells within an otherwise stem cell devoid host4,17 , however, because we do not know how sublethal irradiation affects planarian stem cells, we cannot be sure that the cellular behaviors observed in these experiments are characteristically normal. This caveat of low dose irradiation is less of a concern in partial irradiation because radiation exposure can be easily attenuated more than 99 percent with lead of the proper thickness. Furthermore, transplantation completely avoids this caveat because a small population of stem cells can be isolated within a stem cell devoid host without ever exposing the transplanted cells to radiation. Furthermore, the exact position of the healthy stem cells can be known and controlled in both partial irradiation and transplantation, whereas the cells surviving low dose irradiation are positioned randomly throughout the animal. Finally, whereas single cell transplantation has elegantly demonstrated the high potential of a single planarian stem cell4, tissue transplantation may prove an equally powerful technique because it is faster, less tedious, and the function and behavior of a number of cells can be observed simultaneously in each host. The analysis of a small population of cells versus a single cell not only allows for more efficient gathering of data but it may also reveal cell-cell interactions that would be missed in a single cell transplantation assay.
Partial irradiation and tissue transplantation, although old techniques, will play an important role in dissecting the functions of planarian stem cells as well as the general molecular mechanisms underlying regeneration. Modernization of these classical techniques has brought higher throughput and greater consistency while allowing for the integration of modern functional assays and molecular techniques. These classical techniques that were once used to outline major questions of planarian regeneration can now be used to discover the answers to those questions and therefore further our understanding of stem cell biology.
No conflicts of interest declared.
The authors would like to thank Chiyoko Kobayashi and Kiyokazu Agata for helpful advice on planarian transplantation as well as past and present members of the Sánchez lab for invaluable discussions during the development of these techniques. This work was supported by NIH Training Grant (5T32 HD0791) to OCG and NIH R37GM057260 to ASA. ASA is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator.
|General Purpose Transfer Pipette||Samco||691|
|Capillary tubes (ID 0.75 mm)||FHC||30-30-0|
|Capillary tubes (OD 0.7 mm)||FHC||30-50-08|
|Black filter paper||Schleicher & Schuell||10310809|
|Whatman #2 filter paper 1002-055||Fisher Scientific||09-810B|
|Whatman #3 filter paper 1003-185||Fisher Scientific||09-820E|
|Cigarette rolling paper||Zig-Zag, original||NA|
|Forceps DUMONT, INOX #5||FST||11251-20|
|Lead Shields||Alpha Systems Corp., Bluffdale, UT||Custom design|
|XRAD-320 Biological Irradiator||Precision X-Ray, North Branford, CT||NA|