1Department of Obstretrics & Gynaecology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, 2Department of Biochemistry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, 3Children's Health Research Institute
This article is a part ofJoVE General. If you think this article would be useful for your research, please recommend JoVE to your institution's librarian.Recommend JoVE to Your Librarian
Current Access Through Your IP Address
Current Access Through Your Registered Email Address
Denomme, M. M., Zhang, L., Mann, M. R. W. Single Oocyte Bisulfite Mutagenesis. J. Vis. Exp. (64), e4046, doi:10.3791/4046 (2012).
Epigenetics encompasses all heritable and reversible modifications to chromatin that alter gene accessibility, and thus are the primary mechanisms for regulating gene transcription1. DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification that acts predominantly as a repressive mark. Through the covalent addition of a methyl group onto cytosines in CpG dinucleotides, it can recruit additional repressive proteins and histone modifications to initiate processes involved in condensing chromatin and silencing genes2. DNA methylation is essential for normal development as it plays a critical role in developmental programming, cell differentiation, repression of retroviral elements, X-chromosome inactivation and genomic imprinting.
One of the most powerful methods for DNA methylation analysis is bisulfite mutagenesis. Sodium bisulfite is a DNA mutagen that deaminates cytosines into uracils. Following PCR amplification and sequencing, these conversion events are detected as thymines. Methylated cytosines are protected from deamination and thus remain as cytosines, enabling identification of DNA methylation at the individual nucleotide level3. Development of the bisulfite mutagenesis assay has advanced from those originally reported4-6 towards ones that are more sensitive and reproducible7. One key advancement was embedding smaller amounts of DNA in an agarose bead, thereby protecting DNA from the harsh bisulfite treatment8. This enabled methylation analysis to be performed on pools of oocytes and blastocyst-stage embryos9. The most sophisticated bisulfite mutagenesis protocol to date is for individual blastocyst-stage embryos10. However, since blastocysts have on average 64 cells (containing 120-720 pg of genomic DNA), this method is not efficacious for methylation studies on individual oocytes or cleavage-stage embryos.
Taking clues from agarose embedding of minute DNA amounts including oocytes11, here we present a method whereby oocytes are directly embedded in an agarose and lysis solution bead immediately following retrieval and removal of the zona pellucida from the oocyte. This enables us to bypass the two main challenges of single oocyte bisulfite mutagenesis: protecting a minute amount of DNA from degradation, and subsequent loss during the numerous protocol steps. Importantly, as data are obtained from single oocytes, the issue of PCR bias within pools is eliminated. Furthermore, inadvertent cumulus cell contamination is detectable by this method since any sample with more than one methylation pattern may be excluded from analysis12. This protocol provides an improved method for successful and reproducible analyses of DNA methylation at the single-cell level and is ideally suited for individual oocytes as well as cleavage-stage embryos.
Prepare the following solutions fresh on the day of oocyte collection with sterile, distilled water such as GIBCO water. To reduce the chance of DNA contamination, change gloves often and use filter tips. Keep tubes angled away when open, and recap all tubes when not in use. We recommend that solutions are made as n+1.
3% LMP Agarose
30 mg Low Melting Point (LMP) Agarose
up to 1 ml GIBCO H2O
dissolve @ 70 °C
8 μl lysis buffer
1 μl proteinase K
1 μl 10% IGEPAL
place on ice until ready for use
2:1 Agarose:Lysis Solution (10 μl per individual oocyte, amount is for 3 oocytes)
20 μl 3% LMP agarose
10 μl Lysis Solution
mix @ 70 °C
SDS Lysis Buffer (501 μl per individual oocyte)
|1x TE pH 7.5||450 μl|
|10% SDS||50 μl|
|Proteinase K||1 μl|
1. Oocyte Collection
2. Agarose Embedding and Lysis
Prepare the following solutions fresh on the day of bisulfite mutagenesis. To reduce chance of DNA contamination, change gloves often and use filter tips. Keep tubes angled away when open, and recap all tubes when not in use. We recommend that solutions are made as n+1.
|3 M NaOH||2.4 g NaOH in 20 ml autoclaved ddH2O|
|0.1 M NaOH||0.5 ml of 3M in 14.5 ml autoclaved ddH2O|
|0.3 M NaOH||1.5 ml of 3M in 13.5 ml autoclaved ddH2O|
2.5 M Bisulfite Solution
When fully dissolved, mix solution (a) and (b)
*Keep away from light*
3. Bisulfite Mutagenesis
4. 1st and 2nd Round PCR amplification
|10 μM Primer Forward Outer||0.5 μl|
|10 μM Primer Reverse Outer||0.5 μl|
|240 ng/ml tRNA||1 μl|
Add to Illustra Ready-to-Go Hot Start PCR beads
Carefully slide the solid agarose bead into the PCR tube (~10 μl)
Heat to 70 °C and mix
Add 25 μl mineral oil
Total: 50 μl
|10 μM Primer Forward Inner||0.5 μl|
|10 μM Primer Reverse Inner||0.5 μl|
Add to Illustra Ready-to-Go Hot Start PCR beads
Add 5 μl 1st Round product as a template. Heat the 1st round product to 70 °C for 1 minute to soften the agarose. Be sure to pipette below the layer of mineral oil.
Add 25 μl mineral oil
Total: 50 μl
Note: Nested primer sequences for Snrpn, H19, and Peg3 can be found in Market-Velker et al10,12.
|2nd Round product||4 μl|
|Restriction Enzyme||1 μl|
5. TA Cloning and Colony PCR
|2nd Round PCR||1 μl|
|pGEMT-EASY vector||1 μl|
|2x Ligation Buffer||5 μl|
Incubate overnight @ 4 °C in PCR machine.
|20 μM M13 Forward Primer||0.7 μl|
|20 μM M13 Reverse Primer||0.7 μl|
|5X Green Go Taq Buffer||7.0 μl|
|10 mM dNTP||0.7 μl|
|Taq DNA polymerase||0.28 μl|
|35 μl Total|
Add 35 μl Colony PCR master mix into a PCR tube. Pick a white bacterial colony from the plate with a pipette tip, and swirl it into the PCR reaction.
6. Representative Results
In our work, we assay imprinted methylation in individual oocytes and embryos (Figure 1). Following nested PCR amplification using bisulfite converted primers, it is possible to confirm a successful conversion by visualizing a correct fragment size on an agarose gel (Figure 2). An individual oocyte represents one parental allele, and in theory, has one imprinted methylation pattern. As such, second round PCR products can be tested for unintentional contamination. A restriction enzyme sensitive to DNA methylation (such as HinfI or DpnII) can be used to digest the second round PCR product to assess whether it contains a methylated or unmethylated allele (Figure 3). A methylated C within the enzyme recognition sequence is cleaved while an unmethylated C that is converted to T is no longer recognized by the enzyme and is uncut. Any MII oocyte sample containing both methylated and unmethylated alleles should be discarded, as it is indicative of cumulus cell contamination (Figure 3). Following ligation and transformation, successful colony PCR amplification can be visualized on an agarose gel to ensure samples with the correct product size are sent for sequencing (Figure 4). Finally, the sequence of five individual clones from an MII oocyte should produce five identical methylation patterns and identical nonCpG conversion rates (Figure 5a). Any samples that contain more than one pattern should be discarded (Figure 5b). Since ovulated MII oocytes have two chromosome copies or an attached polar body, there is a possibility for obtaining two similar sequence patterns (Figure 5c). We recommend discarding data from oocytes that have highly dissimilar methylation patterns since cumulus cell contamination cannot be ruled out.
Figure 1. Schematic of the Single Oocyte Bisulfite Mutagenesis assay.
Figure 2. Representative results from 2nd round amplification for Snrpn from a single MII oocyte on a 1.5% agarose gel. Lanes 1-4 are four single MII oocytes and lane 5 is a negative control (no oocyte). Expected amplicon size for Snrpn is 420 bp. L, ladder.
Figure 3. Representative results from 2nd round methylation-specific restriction digestion for Snrpn from a single MII oocyte on an 8% acrylamide gel. HinfI diagnostic restriction digestion shows unmethylated DNA which harbors a T that abolishes the restriction site (420bp, lane 1) or methylated DNA which contains a C within recognition site (cut, 262, 103, and 54 bp, lane 2). Digestion showing both methylated and unmethylated restriction enzyme sites (cut & uncut bands, lane 3) are indicative of cumulus cell contamination. L, ladder.
Figure 4. Representative results for colony PCR amplification for Snrpn from a single MII oocyte on a 1.5% agarose gel. Expected amplicon size following ligation of Snrpn into the pGEM-T Easy vector and using M13 forward and reverse primers is 656 bp. Lane 1-8, amplicons from clones 1-8. Clone 5 has an incorrect amplicon size and should not be sent for sequencing.
Figure 5. Representative sequencing results for Snrpn from a single MII oocyte. Snrpn is methylated in oocytes. Black circles indicate methylated CpGs. White circles indicate unmethylated CpGs. CpG number and placement is representative for a B6 strain female mouse. a) Expected sequencing results for Snrpn from a single MII oocyte. Only a single strand of DNA should amplify in all five clones. Oocytes with a single methylation pattern and identical non-CpG conversion pattern should be included in analyses (percent conversion of non-CpGs indicated to the right was calculated as the number of non-CpG cytosines converted to thymine as a percentage of total non-CpG cytosines). b) Sequencing results for Snrpn from a single MII oocyte with cumulus cell contamination. Note the dissimilarity between methylation states and conversion patterns indicating multiple strand amplification. c) Sequencing results for Snrpn from a single MII oocyte with both chromosome copies or polar body inclusion.
This single oocyte assay contains many steps with a number that are critical and require special care. The first is oocyte washing. It is particularly important to wash each oocyte multiple times in fresh medium drops following hyaluronidase treatment to remove as many cumulus cells as possible. Moreover, when transferring oocytes to acidic tyrode's solution for zona pellucida removal make sure surrounding medium is clear of cumulus cells. The oocyte is very sticky following zona removal, and any surrounding cumulus cells can easily become stuck to the oocyte. It is very difficult to remove a cumulus cell that is stuck to a zona-free oocyte. While this protocol allows for detection of cumulus cell contamination at later time points, it is not constructive, nor economical, to undergo the full protocol on oocytes that will likely be discarded.
The second critical step is oocyte embedding. When embedding the oocyte in the agarose and lysis solution, it is important to note that low melting point (LMP) agarose will harden at temperatures as little as 5 °C below 70 °C. As such, we recommend mixing the agarose and lysis solution at 70 °C, and then placing the individual oocyte on the glass slide in minimal medium. Once ready, pipette the agarose/lysis solution and embed the oocyte into a prepared Eppendorf tube under mineral oil, in a careful yet timely manner.
It is critical that heat inactivation of the proteinase K be performed at 90 °C for 2.5 minutes. Deviation from this is not recommended. Higher temperatures or longer times may damage the DNA, while lower temperatures or shorter times may not inactivate the proteinase K.
As a reminder, sodium bisulfite and hydroquinone are light sensitive. Solutions should be prepared and then wrapped in foil, amber tubes and/or placed in a dark drawer until use. Once the bisulfite solution has been added to the tube, the tube should be covered with foil or a dark covered bag when incubating at 50 °C. We use empty foil bags from GE Healthcare that originally contained the hot start PCR beads.
Finally, as with most PCRs, we recommend preparing each round in a timely manner. Excessive delays, particularly after mixing at 70 °C, will reduce success rate of amplification.
At the current time, one limitation of the protocol is that the success rate of bisulfite converted DNA amplification from individual oocytes ranges from 40% to 65% depending on the gene fragment amplified. While additional trouble-shooting may increase this percentage, there is a trade-off between the bisulfite conversion treatment being too long or harsh and not having sufficient conversion rates (>85-90%). A second limitation is that currently bisulfite mutagenesis cannot distinguish between repressive 5-methylcytosine and the demethylation intermediate 5-hydroxymethylcytosine13.
Several modifications may be required based on gene or region of interest. The bisulfite conversion time may require optimization for the highest conversion percentage with the lowest DNA damage. We suggest a range of 2.5 to 4 hours (half hour increments) for bisulfite treatment. Further optimization can involve PCR primer design for converted sequences of interest (for example http://www.urogene.org/methprimer/), as well as optimization of PCR programs based on fragment length and CG content (see Patterson et al. for additional bisulfite mutagenesis optimization options7). A final modification is that gel extraction of the 2nd round PCR product may be required if there is abundant primer-dimers or non-specific amplicons that will integrate into the vector when cloned.
We have previously shown that this protocol is effective for individual MII oocytes12. We have also tested its efficiency on growing oocytes at a range of different oocyte diameters, with the same rates of successful amplification of converted DNA. Importantly, in comparison to other bisulfite mutagenesis procedures, which are not efficacious for methylation studies on an individual cell, this protocol enables the analysis of DNA methylation of individual oocytes and early embryos. This is essential for reproductive and developmental biology studies, specifically as it relates to the manipulations of germ cells and early embryos. Future applications may include analysis of DNA methylation patterns in single cells of any origin, including in vivo-derived and cultured cells. Additionally, we have developed an individual blastocyst assay that recovers DNA and RNA from the same embryo, allowing for both expression and methylation data to be obtained. A future application will involve modifying the single oocyte assay to recover RNA for expression analyses as well as DNA for methylation assays. Another optimization would be to perform duplex assays for the same oocyte, similar to El Hajj et al14, that would allow for methylation detection at a somatically methylated, oocyte-embryo unmethyated gene, thereby permitting detection of cumulus cell contamination.
DNA methylation analyses can range from genome-wide to locus-specific. Genome-wide methods such as methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) in conjunction with microarrays or sequencing typically require abundant amounts of material. Locus-specific methods that include combined bisulfite restriction analysis (COBRA) using methylation-specific restriction enzymes, or the MethylDetector kit (Active Motif), are less than optimal for single blastocyst analyses, resulting in insufficient recovery of DNA, PCR bias and lack of reproducibility. An alternative approach to single oocyte and early embryo methylation analysis utilized the EZ-DNA Methylation kit (Zymo Research) with a limited dilution bisulfite pyrosequencing technique14, although the reported success rates of bisulfite converted DNA amplification was lower than the method described here.
Bisulfite mutagenesis is the gold standard for analyzing DNA methylation, and it is clear that the analysis of single cells is an important step forward. Agarose embedding permits smaller sample sizes to be analyzed with bisulfite treatment, as agarose protects against DNA degradation and prevents DNA loss during numerous protocol steps. However, when compared to the blastocyst, a single oocyte has approximately 3-6 pg of genomic DNA. Our modified protocol, which embeds single oocytes in agarose containing lysis buffer, prevents DNA loss beginning at the initial lysis step and moderates the harsh bisulfite treatment. In summary, the advantage of single oocyte analysis is that it allows detection of inadvertent cumulus cell contamination as well as unmasking rare events and eliminating any PCR biases in pooled samples. Altogether, this modified protocol provides quality data on the methylation state of individual oocytes and early embryos.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by the University of Western Ontario, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; and a grant ER06-02-188 from the Ministryof Research and Innovation, Early Researcher Award. MMD was supported by a CIHR Training Program in Reproduction, Early Development and the Impact on Health (REDIH) Graduate Scholarship.
|Tris pH 7.5||Bioshop||TRS001.5|
|EDTA pH 8.0||Sigma||E5134|
|SDS Lysis Buffer|
|TE pH 7.5||Bioshop(Tris)Sigma (EDTA)||TRS001.5 E5134|
|Sodium Hydrogensulfite (Sodium Bisulfite)||Sigma||243973|
|Low Melting Point (LMP) Agarose||Sigma||A9414|
|GIBCO Distilled water||Invitrogen||15230-196|
|Autoclaved double distilled (dd) water|
|Illustra Hot Start Mix RTG||GE Healthcare||28-9006-54|
|240 ng/ml yeast tRNA||Invitrogen||15401-011|
|Inner and outer nested primers||Sigma|
|Promega pGEM-T Easy Vector||Fisher Scientific||A1360|
|Competent E.coli cells||Zymo Research Corp.||T3009|
|70°C and 90°C Heat Blocks|
|37°C and 50°C Waterbaths (42°C for transformations)|