Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University
This article is a part ofJoVE Applied Physics. If you think this article would be useful for your research, please recommend JoVE to your institution's librarian.Recommend JoVE to Your Librarian
Current Access Through Your IP Address
Current Access Through Your Registered Email Address
Astley, V., Reichel, K., Mendis, R., Mittleman, D. M. Terahertz Microfluidic Sensing Using a Parallel-plate Waveguide Sensor. J. Vis. Exp. (66), e4304, doi:10.3791/4304 (2012).
Refractive index (RI) sensing is a powerful noninvasive and label-free sensing technique for the identification, detection and monitoring of microfluidic samples with a wide range of possible sensor designs such as interferometers and resonators 1,2. Most of the existing RI sensing applications focus on biological materials in aqueous solutions in visible and IR frequencies, such as DNA hybridization and genome sequencing. At terahertz frequencies, applications include quality control, monitoring of industrial processes and sensing and detection applications involving nonpolar materials.
Several potential designs for refractive index sensors in the terahertz regime exist, including photonic crystal waveguides 3, asymmetric split-ring resonators 4, and photonic band gap structures integrated into parallel-plate waveguides 5. Many of these designs are based on optical resonators such as rings or cavities. The resonant frequencies of these structures are dependent on the refractive index of the material in or around the resonator. By monitoring the shifts in resonant frequency the refractive index of a sample can be accurately measured and this in turn can be used to identify a material, monitor contamination or dilution, etc.
The sensor design we use here is based on a simple parallel-plate waveguide 6,7. A rectangular groove machined into one face acts as a resonant cavity (Figures 1 and 2). When terahertz radiation is coupled into the waveguide and propagates in the lowest-order transverse-electric (TE1) mode, the result is a single strong resonant feature with a tunable resonant frequency that is dependent on the geometry of the groove 6,8. This groove can be filled with nonpolar liquid microfluidic samples which cause a shift in the observed resonant frequency that depends on the amount of liquid in the groove and its refractive index 9.
Our technique has an advantage over other terahertz techniques in its simplicity, both in fabrication and implementation, since the procedure can be accomplished with standard laboratory equipment without the need for a clean room or any special fabrication or experimental techniques. It can also be easily expanded to multichannel operation by the incorporation of multiple grooves 10. In this video we will describe our complete experimental procedure, from the design of the sensor to the data analysis and determination of the sample refractive index.
1. Sensor Design and Fabrication
2. Experimental Apparatus
This protocol assumes the user has access to a transmission-geometry terahertz time-domain spectrometer (in our case, the Picometrix T-Ray 4,000) and is familiar with obtaining time-domain waveforms and Fourier transforming to the frequency-domain.
3. Sample Preparation
4. Experimental Procedure
5. Representative Results
Data analysis of these waveforms is straightforward and can follow the experimenter's usual techniques for transforming to the frequency domain. Frequency spectra such as those given in Figure 3 should result. These can be squared and divided by the reference waveform to obtain power transmission spectra such as Figure 4. The linewidth and central frequency of the resonances for the empty and full waveguides can be measured from these spectra, or Lorentzian fits can be performed to increase the accuracy.
The resonant shift caused by the liquid is merely the difference between the observed central frequencies of the resonances for the empty and full waveguides. To convert this to a refractive index measurement, the relationship between the shift and the RI must be established. This can done experimentally by following this procedure with samples of known index, or computationally by conducting simulations of the groove filled with samples of known index 9, or analytically using mode-matching techniques 8. Once a shift vs. RI curve is established, RI measurements of unknown samples can be accurately performed.
There are a few particular errors that may occur during this procedure. Bubbles or mistakes in the filling of the groove can result in noisy or incorrect data, which is why we recommend multiple data sets for each sample material. Another frequent source of error is in the placement of the waveguides. If the reference and sensor waveguides are placed in exactly the same alignment, any reflections or other artifacts will be the same for both and will divide out of the transmission spectrum. If the alignment is slightly off, the reflections will not divide out and ringing will be observed in the transmission spectra (some minor ringing can be seen in Figure 4). If it is not desirable to retake the data, it is possible to eliminate this ringing by trimming the time-domain waveform before the reflection appears, but this greatly reduces the spectral resolution and therefore the refractive index resolution is limited as well.
Figure 1. Photograph of the waveguide with relevant parts marked. Note that the groove does not extend the entire length or width of the waveguide and the structure is designed so that the mounting hardware will not obstruct the groove or the path of radiation propagation.
Figure 2. Schematic of the grooved waveguide.
Figure 3. (a) Sample frequency spectra for the reference waveguide (black), the grooved waveguide with no liquid fill (blue), and the grooved waveguide with liquid, in this case tetradecane (red). The cutoff frequencies for the TE1 and TE3 propagation modes are shown, as are the water vapor absorption lines. (b) Closeup of the resonances for the empty and full grooved waveguides.
Figure 4. Power transmission spectra for the empty and full grooved waveguides. The difference in frequency between the two resonant features is the resonant shift (Δf), which relates to the refractive index.
It should be noted that the refractive index of the liquid under test is determined only at the frequency of the cavity resonance, not over a broad bandwidth. This has a few distinct advantages. First, although our measurements have made use of a broadband terahertz source for characterization purposes, one could also build an equivalent sensing system with a single-frequency THz source with only a limited degree of frequency tunability, an approach that could be much less expensive and more compact. Second, the sensing approach can be parallelized by incorporating multiple grooves into a single waveguide.10 Each groove would have a slightly different geometry, and therefore a different frequency for sensing. Using a broadband terahertz pulse, one may determine refractive indices (and shifts) independently and simultaneously for multiple liquid samples. This parallel sensing capability would not be easily incorporated into a conventional time-domain terahertz measurement system, in which only a single liquid is measured at a time.
The most important concern with this experimental technique is consistency and repeatability. The assembly and placement of the waveguide and the filling volume can introduce a large amount of error if not consistent. Maintaining a consistent fill volume can be accomplished in a few ways. One, as shown in this procedure, is to use high-precision syringes to measure exact volumes. Another method is to use a laser interferometric system to monitor the actual filling level in the groove 9. To determine the best syringe volume or fill height, the best results are obtained by gradually filling the groove and monitoring the corresponding shift of the resonant feature. When the groove is full and the liquid begins to overflow, the resonant feature will be at its lowest frequency. The volume or fill height just before this overflow/saturation point is the best choice and the frequency shift vs. RI response of the device should be calibrated using this value.
There are several other key considerations besides the waveguide assembly and filling volume. Cross-contamination should be avoided through careful cleaning procedures. Evaporation must be considered for lighter molecules and can limit the resolution in these cases. The RI resolution of this procedure in general is limited by the variation between multiple data sets of the same material, but future improvements in the repeatability may reduce the resolution to the limit set by the spectral resolution of the apparatus.
Future improvements for this technique include adapting the sensor design to a closed channel to eliminate filling errors and to allow continuous flow monitoring and developing a reliable cleaning technique that does not require disassembly of the waveguide. There are some limitations that are inherent to the technique - such as the restriction to nonpolar liquids, due to strong terahertz absorption by polar molecules - but others such as the resolution and repeatability have the potential for considerable improvement. As it stands, this technique has been established as a simple and cost-effective technique for RI sensing and monitoring, particularly for industrial applications.
No conflicts of interest declared.
This project was supported in part by the National Science Foundation and by the Air Force Research Laboratory through the CONTACT program.
|10 μl syringe||Hamilton||80314||High precision syringe|
|Liquid alkanes||Acros Organics||Samples for calibration and testing|
No specific equipment is required. Suitable test materials and solvents are left to the experimenter’s discretion. The high-precision syringes used in this procedure are listed in the table below, but the experimenter may wish to use syringes of a different volume or design, including digital syringes for improved accuracy. The test alkanes used in this experiment are also listed.