the-submerged-printing-cells-onto-modified-surface-using-continuous

The Submerged Printing of Cells onto a Modified Surface Using a Continuous Flow Microspotter

The printing of cells for microarray applications possesses significant challenges including the problem of maintaining physiologically relevant cell ...

WASATCH MICROFLUIDICS

Limitations in depositing ligands using conventional micro-array pin spotting have hindered the application of surface plasmon resonance imaging (SPRi) technology. To address these challenges we introduce a modification to our continuous-flow micro-spotting technology that improves ligand deposition. Using Flexchip protein A/G and neutravidin capturing surfaces, we demonstrate that our new microfluidic spotter requires 1000 times less concentrated antibodies and biotinylated ligands than is required for pin spotting. By varying the deposition flow rate, we show that the design of our tip overlay flow cell is efficient at delivering sample to the substrate surface. Finally, contact time studies show that it is possible to capture antibodies and biotinylated ligands at concentrations of less than 0.1 ug/ml and 100 pM, respectively. These improvements in spotting technology will help to expand the applications of SPRi systems in areas such as antibody screening, carbohydrate arrays, and biomarker detection.

Improved continuous-flow print head for micro-array deposition.

We describe the benefits and limitations of two biosensor approaches for screening solubilization conditions for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Assays designed for a serial processing instrument (Biacore 2000/3000/T100) and an array platform (Biacore Flexchip) were used to examine how effectively 96 different detergents solubilized the chemokine receptor CCR5 while maintaining its binding activity for a conformationally sensitive Fab (2D7). Using the serial processing instrument, we were able to analyze three samples in each 30-min binding cycle, thereby requiring approximately 24h to screen an entire 96-well plate of conditions. In-line capturing allowed us to normalize the 2D7 binding responses for different receptor capture levels. In contrast, with the array system, we could characterize the effects of all 96 detergents simultaneously, completing the assay in less than 1h. But the current array technology requires that we capture the GPCR preparations off-line, making it more challenging to normalize for receptor capture levels. Also, the array platform is less sensitive than the serial platforms, thereby limiting the size of the analyte to larger molecules (>5000Da). Overall, the two approaches proved to be highly complementary; both assays identified identical detergents that produced active solubilized CCR5 as well as those detergents that either were ineffective solubilizers or inactivated the receptor.

Detergent screening of a G-protein-coupled receptor using serial and array biosensor technologies.

Surface Plasmon Resonance Microscopy (SPRM) is a promising label-free analytical tool for the real-time study of biomolecule interactions in a microarray format. However, flow cell design and microarray fabrication have hindered throughput and limited applications of SPRM. Here we report the integration of a microfluidic flow cell array (MFCA) with SPRM enabling in situ microarray fabrication and multichannel analysis of biomolecule probe-target interactions. We demonstrate the use of the MFCA for delivery of sample solutions with continuous flow in 24 channels in parallel for rapid microarray creation and binding analysis while using SPRM for real-time monitoring of these processes. Label-free measurement of antibody-antibody interactions demonstrates the capabilities of the integrated MFCA-SPRM system and establishes the first steps of the development of a high-throughput, label-free immunogenicity assay. After in situ probe antibody immobilization, target antibody binding was monitored in real time in 24 channels simultaneously. The limit of detection for this particular antibody pair is 80 ng/mL which is approximately 6 times lower than the industry recommended immunogenicity assay detection limit. The integrated MFCA-SPRM system is a powerful and versatile combination for a range of array-based analyses, including biomarker screening and drug discovery.

In situ microarray fabrication and analysis using a microfluidic flow cell array integrated with surface plasmon resonance microscopy.

Of the diverse analytical tools used in proteomics, protein microarrays possess the greatest potential for providing fundamental information on protein, ligand, analyte, receptor, and antibody affinity-based interactions, binding partners and high-throughput analysis. Microarrays have been used to develop tools for drug screening, disease diagnosis, biochemical pathway mapping, protein-protein interaction analysis, vaccine development, enzyme-substrate profiling, and immuno-profiling. While the promise of the technology is intriguing, it is yet to be realized. Many challenges remain to be addressed to allow these methods to meet technical and research expectations, provide reliable assay answers, and to reliably diversify their capabilities. Critical issues include: (1) inconsistent printed microspot morphologies and uniformities, (2) low signal-to-noise ratios due to factors such as complex surface capture protocols, contamination, and static or no-flow mass transport conditions, (3) inconsistent quantification of captured signal due to spot uniformity issues, (4) non-optimal protocol conditions such as pH, temperature, drying that promote variability in assay kinetics, and lastly (5) poor protein (e.g., antibody) printing, storage, or shelf-life compatibility with common microarray assay fabrication methods, directly related to microarray protocols. Conventional printing approaches, including contact (e.g., quill and solid pin), non-contact (e.g., piezo and inkjet), microfluidics-based, microstamping, lithography, and cell-free protein expression microarrays, have all been used with varying degrees of success with figures of merit often defined arbitrarily without comparisons to standards, or analytical or fiduciary controls. Many microarray performance reports use bench top analyte preparations lacking real-world relevance, akin to "fishing in a barrel", for proof of concept and determinations of figures of merit. This review critiques current protein-based microarray preparation techniques commonly used for analytical and function-based proteomics and their effects on array-based assay performance.

Article	Year
Improved continuous-flow print head for micro-array deposition. Analytical biochemistry\| PubMed ID: 18703010	2008
Detergent screening of a G-protein-coupled receptor using serial and array biosensor technologies. Analytical biochemistry\| PubMed ID: 19135021	2009
In situ microarray fabrication and analysis using a microfluidic flow cell array integrated with surface plasmon resonance microscopy. Analytical chemistry\| PubMed ID: 19408947	2009
A critical comparison of protein microarray fabrication technologies. The Analyst\| PubMed ID: 24479125	2014

Adam R. Miles

Biography

JoVE Journal Publications

Other Publications