harvesting-disaggregation-an-overlooked-step-biofilm-methods

Harvesting and Disaggregation: An Overlooked Step in Biofilm Methods Research

Biofilm methods consist of four distinct steps: growing the biofilm in a relevant model, treating the mature biofilm, harvesting the biofilm from the ...

Montana State University

It has long been suspected that microbial biofilms harbor cells in a variety of activity states, but there have been few direct experimental visualizations of this physiological heterogeneity. Spatial patterns of DNA replication and protein synthetic activity were imaged and quantified in staphylococcal biofilms using immunofluorescent detection of pulse-labeled DNA and also an inducible green fluorescent protein (GFP) construct. Stratified patterns of DNA synthetic and protein synthetic activity were observed in all three biofilm systems to which the techniques were applied. In a colony biofilm system, the dimensions of the zone of anabolism at the air interface ranged from 16 to 38 microm and corresponded with the depth of oxygen penetration measured with a microelectrode. A second zone of activity was observed along the nutrient interface of the biofilm. Much of the biofilm was anabolically inactive. Since dead cells constituted only 10% of the biofilm population, most of the inactive cells in the biofilm were still viable. Collectively, these results suggest that staphylococcal biofilms contain cells in at least four distinct states: growing aerobically, growing fermentatively, dead, and dormant. The variety of activity states represented in a biofilm may contribute to the special ecology and tolerance to antimicrobial agents of biofilms.

Spatial patterns of DNA replication, protein synthesis, and oxygen concentration within bacterial biofilms reveal diverse physiological states.

Regulatory agencies are receiving registration applications for unprecedented, antibiofilm label claims for disinfectants. Reliable, practical, and relevant laboratory biofilm test methods are required to support such claims. This investigation describes the influence of fluid dynamics on the relevancy of a laboratory test. Several disinfectant formulations were tested using three different biofilm testing systems run side-by-side: the CDC biofilm reactor system that created turbulent flow (Reynolds number between 800 and 1850), the drip flow biofilm reactor system that created slow laminar flow (Reynolds number between 12 and 20), and the static biofilm system that involved no fluid flow. Each comparative experiment also included a dried surface carrier test and a dried biofilm test. All five disinfectant tests used glass coupons and followed the same steps for treatment, neutralization, viable cell counting, and calculating the log reduction (LR). Three different disinfectants, chlorine, a quaternary ammonium compound, and a phenolic, were each applied at two concentrations. Experiments were conducted separately with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus and every experiment was independently repeated. The results showed that biofilm grown in the CDC reactor produced the smallest LR, the static biofilm produced the largest LR, and biofilm grown in the drip flow reactor produced an intermediate LR. The differences were large enough to be of practical importance. The dried surface test often produced a significantly higher LR than the tests against hydrated or dried biofilm. The dried biofilm test produced LR values similar to those for the corresponding hydrated biofilm test. These results show that the efficacy of a disinfectant must be measured by using a laboratory method where biofilm is grown under fluid flow conditions similar to the environment where the disinfectant will be applied.

Comparative evaluation of biofilm disinfectant efficacy tests.

This protocol describes how to grow a Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm under low fluid shear close to the air-liquid interface using the drip flow reactor (DFR). The DFR can model environments such as food-processing conveyor belts, catheters, lungs with cystic fibrosis and the oral cavity. The biofilm is established by operating the reactor in batch mode for 6 h. A mature biofilm forms as the reactor operates for an additional 48 h with a continuous flow of nutrients. During continuous flow, the biofilm experiences a low shear as the media drips onto a surface set at a 10 degrees angle. At the end of 54 h, biofilm accumulation is quantified by removing coupons from the reactor channels, rinsing the coupons to remove planktonic cells, scraping the biofilm from the coupon surface, disaggregating the clumps, then diluting and plating for viable cell enumeration. The entire procedure takes 13 h of active time that is distributed over 5 d.

A method for growing a biofilm under low shear at the air-liquid interface using the drip flow biofilm reactor.

A chemical disinfectant against surface-associated bacteria typically uses carriers (e.g., glass disks) that are purposely contaminated with bacteria prior to disinfection. After disinfection, the bacteria are harvested by mechanically separating them from the carrier surface to form a suspension of cells in a dilution tube. Bacterial clumps in the tube are disaggregated using mechanical or chemical techniques, thereby creating a well-mixed suspension of single cells suitable for enumeration. Efficacy is quantified by comparing the viable cell count for a disinfected carrier to the viable cell count for sham-disinfected (control) carrier. A test is said to be biased (invalid) if the observed efficacy measure is systematically higher or lower than the true efficacy. It is shown here for the first time that the bias attributable to the harvesting and disaggregating steps of a disinfectant test can be measured. For some conventional biofilm harvesting and disaggregating techniques, laboratory checks showed either negligible bias or important bias, depending on the disinfectant. Quantitative bias checks on the harvesting and disaggregating steps are prudent for each combination of carrier material, microorganism, and disinfectant. The quantitative results should be augmented by microscopic examination of harvested disinfected and control carriers and of the disaggregated suspensions.

Checking the validity of the harvesting and disaggregating steps in laboratory tests of surface disinfectants.

Methods validated by a standard setting organization enable public, industry and regulatory stakeholders to make decisions on the acceptability of products, devices and processes. This is because standard methods are demonstrably reproducible when performed in different laboratories by different researchers, responsive to different products, and rugged when small (usually inadvertent) variations from the standard procedure occur. The Single Tube Method (ASTM E2871) is a standard method that measures the efficacy of antimicrobials against biofilm bacteria that has been shown to be reproducible, responsive and rugged. In support of the reproducibility assessment, a six-laboratory study was performed using three antimicrobials: a sodium hypochlorite, a phenolic and a quaternary/alcohol blend, each tested at low and high efficacy levels. The mean log reduction in viable bacteria in this study ranged from 2.32 to 4.58 and the associated reproducibility standard deviations ranged from 0.89 to 1.67. Independent follow-up testing showed that the method was rugged with respect to deviations in sonication duration and sonication power but slightly sensitive to sonicator reservoir degassing and tube location within the sonicator bath. It was also demonstrated that when a coupon was dropped into a test tube, bacteria can splash out of reach of the applied antimicrobials, resulting in substantial bias when estimating log reductions for the products tested. Bias can also result when testing products that hinder the harvesting of microbes from test surfaces. The culmination of this work provided recommended changes to the early version of the standard method E2871-13 (ASTM, 2013b) including use of splashguards and microscopy checks. These changes have been incorporated into a revised ASTM method E2871-19 (ASTM 2019) that is the basis for the first regulatory method (ATMP-MB-20) to substantiate "kills biofilm" claims for antimicrobials registered and sold in the US.

Development, standardization, and validation of a biofilm efficacy test: The single tube method.

A standard method for growing Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm in the Drip Flow Biofilm Reactor was assessed in a 10-laboratory study. The mean log density was 9.29 Log(CFU/cm). The repeatability and reproducibility SDs were equal to 0.22 and 0.24, respectively, providing statistical confidence in data generated by the method.

Article	Year
Spatial patterns of DNA replication, protein synthesis, and oxygen concentration within bacterial biofilms reveal diverse physiological states. Journal of bacteriology\| PubMed ID: 17337582	2007
Comparative evaluation of biofilm disinfectant efficacy tests. Journal of microbiological methods\| PubMed ID: 17524505
A method for growing a biofilm under low shear at the air-liquid interface using the drip flow biofilm reactor. Nature protocols\| PubMed ID: 19528953
Checking the validity of the harvesting and disaggregating steps in laboratory tests of surface disinfectants. Journal of AOAC International\| PubMed ID: 20166594	2009
Development, standardization, and validation of a biofilm efficacy test: The single tube method. Journal of microbiological methods\| PubMed ID: 31491442
Drip flow reactor method exhibits excellent reproducibility based on a 10-laboratory collaborative study. Journal of microbiological methods\| PubMed ID: 32454049	2020

Kelli Buckingham-Meyer

Biography

JoVE Journal Publications

Other Publications