surgical-approach-to-full-soft-tissue-face-allograft-procurement-for

Surgical Approach to Full Soft Tissue Face Allograft Procurement for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Full facial vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) offers a reconstructive option for patients with severe facial disfigurement who cannot be ...

New York University Langone Health

 Facial feminization surgery (FFS) is critical to gender-affirming surgery, consisting of craniomaxillofacial procedures to align facial features with a patient's gender identity. Central to FFS is genioplasty, which reshapes or repositions the chin; however, limited research exists on genioplasty in FFS. This review and cohort analysis aim to evaluate current practices and outcomes for individuals undergoing FFS with genioplasty.  A systematic review included transfeminine individuals undergoing FFS with genioplasty. A retrospective study reviewed FFS cases with genioplasty between 2017 and 2024. Data collected included demographics, imaging, virtual surgical planning (VSP), complications, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).  The review included 12 studies with 1417 patients, with 34.2% undergoing genioplasty. The mean age was 37.3 years, and 60.1% were White. Preoperative imaging and VSP were used in 66.7% of studies, 3D-printed cutting guides in 37.5%, and 3D reconstruction in 75.0%. Reduction genioplasty was the most common technique. All PROs indicated high satisfaction, with a 2.67% revision rate. Complications were low (0.55%), with infections being most frequent (0.48%). In the institutional cohort, 351 patients underwent FFS, with 64.4% undergoing genioplasty, significantly higher than in the review ( < 0.001). Sliding genioplasty was preferred without preoperative imaging or VSP. Postoperative dissatisfaction was 3.54%, with 0.88% requiring revision ( = 0.063). Complication rates (1.77%) were similar to those of the review ( = 0.065).  Genioplasty is important in FFS, with low complication and revision rates and high patient satisfaction. However, gaps remain in validated PROs and technique-specific outcomes. While preoperative imaging and VSP show benefits, comparable outcomes are achievable without them.

A Comprehensive Analysis of Genioplasty in Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review and Institutional Cohort Study.

Simultaneous rhytidectomy and laser resurfacing has become a common single-stage facial rejuvenation technique. However, concerns remain, particularly with photothermal injury to undermined tissue. This is the first methodologically robust systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety, satisfaction, and predictors of outcomes for this dual-modality procedure. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, a systematic review was conducted through April 2025. Data extracted included patient satisfaction, postoperative complications, and covariates for meta-regression. Seventeen studies comprising 1,361 patients were included. The pooled patient satisfaction rate was 98.1%. Complications were rare: full-thickness flap necrosis (0.01%), skin slough (0.21%), secondary superficial infections (0.74%), hypertrophic scarring (0.51%), hematoma (0.35%), ectropion (0.12%), nontransient dyspigmentation (0.35%), contour irregularity (0.04%), and delayed reepithelialization (0.03%). Meta-regression demonstrated that lasering in areas undermined in the facelift dissection at the same energy density as non-dissected regions of the face was significantly associated with higher skin slough rates. Superficial musculoaponeurotic system manipulation and biplanar rhytidectomy techniques were more likely to result in nontransient dyspigmentation compared to endoscopic subperiosteal techniques. Additionally, lasering undermined flaps with multiple different techniques was associated with higher rates of nontransient dyspigmentation. Procedures performed by plastic surgeons were also associated with lower rates of hypertrophic scarring compared to dermatologists. Concomitant rhytidectomy and laser resurfacing appears safe with high patient satisfaction when laser and surgical technique are optimized. Identification of modifiable risk factors provides guidance to reduce complications and improve outcomes.

Article	Year
A Comprehensive Analysis of Genioplasty in Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review and Institutional Cohort Study. Journal of clinical medicine\| PubMed ID: 39797264	2024
Laser Resurfacing at the Time of Facelift Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aesthetic surgery journal\| PubMed ID: 41063540	2025

Alexis K. Gursky

Biography

JoVE Journal Publications

Other Publications