RESEARCH
Peer reviewed scientific video journal
Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods
Visualizing science through experiment videos
EDUCATION
Video textbooks for undergraduate courses
Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments
BUSINESS
Video textbooks for business education
OTHERS
Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments
Products
RESEARCH
JoVE Journal
Peer reviewed scientific video journal
JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods
EDUCATION
JoVE Core
Video textbooks for undergraduates
JoVE Science Education
Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments
JoVE Lab Manual
Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses
BUSINESS
JoVE Business
Video textbooks for business education
Solutions
Language
English
Menu
Menu
Menu
Menu
John is evaluating a job offer from a company where his income will be uncertain. If the company performs well, John will earn an annual income of $81,000; otherwise, he will earn $49,000. It is assumed that either outcome has an equal chance, assigning a probability of 0.5 to each. This results in an expected income of $65,000. His decision-making is affected by the diminishing marginal utility of income.
John evaluates his options based on their utility. Expected utility accounts for risk preferences, unlike expected income. The expected utility is calculated as the sum of the utility values of possible incomes, weighted by their respective probabilities.
Expected utility = (P1×U1) + (P2×U2)
where P1 and P2 are the probabilities of the two outcomes, and U1 and U2 are their corresponding utility values.
For John,
Thus, John’s expected utility is (0.5×9) units +(0.5×7) units = 8 units
However, John can achieve the same utility of 8 units with a guaranteed income of $64,000. This reflects his preference for certainty over risk, even though the expected income in the uncertain scenario is higher.
The difference between the expected income of $65,000 and the guaranteed income of $64,000 represents John’s risk premium—$1,000. This is the amount he is willing to forgo to eliminate uncertainty and secure a guaranteed outcome. John’s preference for the guaranteed income highlights his risk-averse nature and demonstrates how diminishing marginal utility influences his decision.
Neil has a job offer with uncertain income. His expected income is $65,000. The diminishing marginal utility of income affects his preferences.
To understand this, the expected utility is calculated, which is the sum of the utility values of his possible incomes, weighted by their respective probabilities.
If Neil earns $81,000, his utility is 9 units. This is multiplied by its probability of 0.5.
If Neil earns $49,000, his utility is 7 units. This is multiplied by its probability of 0.5.
Adding these, Neil’s expected utility is 8 units.
However, Neil can achieve the same utility of 8 units with a guaranteed income of $64,000, as shown in the utility-income graph.
Neil prefers a guaranteed $64,000 income over a higher but uncertain $65,000 expected income, showing his risk aversion.
The risk premium is the amount Neil is willing to sacrifice from his expected income, which in this case is $1,000, to eliminate the uncertainty in his income.
Related Videos
01:23
Uncertainty
146 Views
01:28
Uncertainty
167 Views
01:08
Uncertainty
163 Views
01:19
Uncertainty
111 Views
01:24
Uncertainty
159 Views
01:29
Uncertainty
142 Views