7.4
社会心理学家已证实,自我感觉良好并保持积极的自尊是人类行为的强大驱动力(Tavris & Aronson, 2008)。在美国,主流文化中的成员通常高度评价自己,认为自己是优于常人、具备多种理想特质的优秀个体(Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005)。当我们的自尊或积极的…
人们希望他人如何看待自己,可能因其当前优先考虑的事物而有所不同。例如,有时个体希望被看作比真实的自己更优秀,而在其他时候,则可能希望被认同为自己认为的真实身份。
一方面,如果品德高尚的人收到负面反馈,例如恋爱对象因不喜欢她的性格而取消约会,那么她的自我认知可能会因此而改变,而无需付出任何进一步的努力。
在这种情况下,个体具有自我提升的需求——即维持、增强或保护自身积极自我认知的愿望。为了实现这一动机,她可以采用多种策略。
一种方法是使用 肯定语—维护个体自我价值的声明。此处,基于 自我肯定理论她可以通过在某个与人格威胁无关的领域(如她出色的写作成就)中肯定自我,来维持自尊。
在另一种情境下,她甚至可能在无意中曲解情况以追求自我提升。例如,她会回忆他人(比如她的朋友)表现体贴的时刻,同时也会想起自己表现得极其无礼的时候。随后,她会基于一种模糊的平均印象来判断她的朋友很粗鲁。
然而,当她反思自己的善良时,她会回忆起一个极端的时刻,那时她提供了超出日常行为的非凡帮助。
这种不一致性符合优于平均效应——即大多数人在各种人格特质和能力方面都认为自己高于平均水平,至少大多数西方人如此。
另一方面,根据自我验证理论,个体也可能追求稳定且主观上准确的信念,以获得一种连贯感。换句话说,他们会促使他人验证自己已有的自我认知。
例如,她的妹妹具有负面的自我认知,往往花更多时间思考负面批评,并倾向于与同样反复思考负面问题的人交往。
为了增加他人印象与她的自我认知相一致的可能性,她采用了另一种策略——即展示身份线索。也就是说,她穿着深色衣服,收集忧郁风格的贴纸,并且有一个看起来无精打采的男朋友。因此,他们的外在身份与其自我认知保持一致。
最终,尽管人们可能会策略性地希望他人根据真实的自我来评价自己,但在情绪化的情境下,他们也可能有动机希望被看作是略优于真实自我的版本。
View the full transcript and gain access to JoVE Core videos
Q1: What is self-enhancement and why do people pursue it?
Self-enhancement is a desire to maintain, increase, or protect one's positive self-views, especially when facing threats to self-esteem. People employ strategies like affirmations—declarations that uphold valued aspects of oneself—to counteract negative feedback. For example, someone criticized for their personality might affirm their writing accomplishments in an unrelated domain to preserve self-worth.
Q2: How does the better-than-average effect influence self-perception?
The better-than-average effect describes how most people, particularly Westerners, believe they are above average across various personality traits and abilities. When evaluating themselves, people recall extreme positive examples of their behavior while judging others based on average or negative instances, creating an inflated self-image that supports self-enhancement motivations.
Q3: What is self-verification theory and how does it differ from self-enhancement?
Self-verification theory proposes that individuals strive for stable, subjectively accurate beliefs about themselves to maintain coherence and predictability. Unlike self-enhancement, which seeks to improve self-image, self-verification motivates people to seek confirmation of their existing self-views, whether positive or negative, through interactions with others.
Q4: How do people use identity cues to verify their self-views?
People display identity cues—outward expressions like clothing, accessories, and social choices—that align with their self-perceptions. Someone with a negative self-view might wear dark clothes, collect melancholy items, or associate with unenthusiastic partners. These cues signal their internal identity to others and increase the likelihood that social interactions confirm their existing self-beliefs.
Q5: What role does self-affirmation theory play in managing threats to self-esteem?
Self-affirmation theory suggests that people can maintain self-worth by affirming themselves in domains unrelated to the threat they face. When experiencing criticism in one area, affirming accomplishments in another domain preserves overall self-esteem. This strategy allows individuals to protect their positive self-views without directly confronting the source of threat.
Q6: How do self-enhancement and self-verification motivations interact in social situations?
People balance both motivations depending on circumstances and emotional context. In emotional situations, individuals may prioritize being seen as slightly better versions of themselves through self-enhancement. However, they also seek stable self-verification to maintain coherence. The sense of self reflected self appraisal and social comparison helps explain how these competing motivations shape behavior and self-presentation choices.
Q7: Why might someone with a negative self-view prefer interactions that confirm their self-perception?
According to self-verification theory, individuals seek confirmation of their existing self-views regardless of valence. Someone with a negative self-view may spend more time thinking about criticism and prefer interacting with others who ruminate similarly because these interactions validate their self-perception. This preference provides psychological consistency and predictability, even if the self-view is unfavorable.