Here, we describe fabrication methodology for customizable carbon fiber electrode arrays for recording in vivo in nerve and brain.
Conventional peripheral nerve probes are primarily fabricated in a cleanroom, requiring the use of multiple expensive and highly specialized tools. This paper presents a cleanroom “light” fabrication process of carbon fiber neural electrode arrays that can be learned quickly by an inexperienced cleanroom user. This carbon fiber electrode array fabrication process requires just one cleanroom tool, a Parylene C deposition machine, that can be learned quickly or outsourced to a commercial processing facility at marginal cost. This fabrication process also includes hand-populating printed circuit boards, insulation, and tip optimization.
The three different tip optimizations explored here (Nd:YAG laser, blowtorch, and UV laser) result in a range of tip geometries and 1 kHz impedances, with blowtorched fibers resulting in the lowest impedance. While previous experiments have proven laser and blowtorch electrode efficacy, this paper also shows that UV laser-cut fibers can record neural signals in vivo. Existing carbon fiber arrays either do not have individuated electrodes in favor of bundles or require cleanroom fabricated guides for population and insulation. The proposed arrays use only tools that can be used at a benchtop for fiber population. This carbon fiber electrode array fabrication process allows for quick customization of bulk array fabrication at a reduced price compared to commercially available probes.
Much of neuroscience research relies upon recording neural signals using electrophysiology (ePhys). These neural signals are crucial to understanding the functions of neural networks and novel medical treatments such as brain machine and peripheral nerve interfaces1,2,3,4,5,6. Research surrounding peripheral nerves requires custom-made or commercially available neural recording electrodes. Neural recording electrodes-unique tools with micron-scale dimensions and fragile materials-require a specialized set of skills and equipment to fabricate. A variety of specialized probes have been developed for specific end uses; however, this implies that experiments must be designed around currently available commercial probes, or a laboratory must invest in the development of a specialized probe, which is a lengthy process. Due to the wide variety of neural research in peripheral nerve, there is high demand for a versatile ePhys probe4,7,8. An ideal ePhys probe would feature a small recording site, low impedance9, and a financially realistic price point for implementation in a system3.
Current commercial electrodes tend to either be extraneural or cuff electrodes (Neural Cuff10, MicroProbes Nerve Cuff Electrode11), which sit outside the nerve, or intrafascicular, which penetrate the nerve and sit within the fascicle of interest. However, as cuff electrodes sit further away from the fibers, they pick up more noise from nearby muscles and other fascicles that may not be the target. These probes also tend to constrict the nerve, which can lead to biofouling-a build-up of glial cells and scar tissue-at the electrode interface while the tissue heals. Intrafascicular electrodes (such as LIFE12, TIME13, and Utah Arrays14) add the benefit of fascicle selectivity and have good signal-to-noise ratios, which is important in discriminating signals for machine interfacing. However, these probes do have issues with biocompatibility, with nerves becoming deformed over time3,15,16. When bought commercially, both these probes have static designs with no option for experiment-specific customization and are costly for newer laboratories.
In response to the high cost and biocompatibility issues presented by other probes, carbon fiber electrodes may offer an avenue for neuroscience laboratories to build their own probes without the need for specialized equipment. Carbon fibers are an alternative recording material with a small form factor that allows for low damage insertion. Carbon fibers provide better biocompatibility and considerably lower scar response than silicon17,18,19 without the intensive cleanroom processing5,13,14. Carbon fibers are flexible, durable, easily integrated with other biomaterials19, and can penetrate and record from nerve7,20. Despite the many advantages of carbon fibers, many laboratories find the manual fabrication of these arrays arduous. Some groups21 combine carbon fibers into bundles that collectively result in a larger (~200 µm) diameter; however, to our knowledge, these bundles have not been verified in nerve. Others have fabricated individuated carbon fiber electrode arrays, although their methods require cleanroom-fabricated carbon fiber guides22,23,24 and equipment to populate their arrays17,23,24. To address this, we propose a method of fabricating a carbon fiber array that can be performed at the laboratory benchtop that allows for impromptu modifications. The resulting array maintains individuated electrode tips without specialized fiber populating tools. Additionally, multiple geometries are presented to match the needs of the research experiment. Building from previous work8,17,22,25, this paper provides detailed methodologies to build and modify several styles of arrays manually with minimal cleanroom training time needed.
All animal procedures were approved by the University of Michigan Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
1. Choosing a carbon fiber array
2. Soldering the connector to the circuit board
3. Fiber population
4. Applying ultra-violet (UV) epoxy to insulate the carbon fibers
5. Checking electrical connections with 1 kHz impedance scans (Figure 5)
6. Parylene C Insulation
NOTE: Parylene C was chosen as the insulation material for the carbon fibers as it can be deposited at room temperature over batches of arrays and provides a highly conformal coating.
7. Tip preparation methods
NOTE: Two tip preparations in this section use lasers to cut fibers. Proper PPE, such as goggles resistant to the wavelengths used, should always be worn when using the laser, and other lab users in the vicinity of the laser should also be in PPE. Although fiber lengths listed in these steps are recommended lengths, users may try any length that suits their needs. The user must choose one of the following tip preparation methods as scissor cutting alone will not suffice to re-expose the electrode25.
8. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):p-toluenesulfonate (PEDOT:pTS) conductive coating for lowered impedance
9. Connecting ground and reference wires
10. Surgical procedure
NOTE: Rat cortex was used to test the efficacy of the UV Laser-prepared fibers as this has been described previously7,20. These probes will work in nerve due to their similar geometry and impedance levels to blowtorch prepared fibers. This surgery was performed with an abundance of caution to validate that the UV laser did not change the response of the electrodes.
11. Spike sorting
12. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) imaging
NOTE: This step will render arrays unusable and should be used only to inspect tip treatment results to check that the arrays are being properly processed. This step does not need to be done to build a successful array. Summarized below is a general outline of the SEM process; however, users who have not previously used SEM should receive help from a trained user.
Tip validation: SEM images
Previous work20 showed that scissor cutting resulted in unreliable impedances as Parylene C folded across the recording site. Scissor cutting is used here only to cut fibers to the desired length before processing with an additional finish cutting method. SEM images of the tips were used to determine the exposed carbon length and tip geometry (Figure 8).
Scissor and Nd:YAG laser-cut fibers were previously reviewed17,20. Scissor-cut fibers (Figure 8A) have inconsistent tip geometries, with Parylene C folding over the end when cut20. The Nd:YAG laser-cut fibers remain consistent in the recording site area, shape, and impedance (Figure 8B). Blowtorched fibers20 lead to the largest electrode size and shape variability and a sharpened tip, allowing for insertion into tough tissue. On average, 140 µm of carbon was re-exposed, with a smooth transition area between the carbon and Parylene C insulation (Figure 8C). UV laser-cut fibers were similar to blowtorched fibers, showing 120 µm of carbon exposed from the tip (Figure 8D). Impedances indicated that either the UV laser or blowtorch tip cutting methods are suitable for ePhys and are viable solutions for laboratories without access to an Nd:YAG laser.
Tip validation: electrical recording
Figure 9 shows the resulting impedances from each preparation method using Flex Arrays. The resultant values are within an appropriate range for ePhys recording. Nd:YAG laser-cut fibers resulted in the smallest surface area but the highest impedances, even with the PEDOT:pTS coating (bare carbon: 4138 ± 110 kΩ; with PEDOT:pTS: 27 ± 1.15 kΩ; n = 262). This is followed by the inverse relationship in blowtorched (bare carbon: 308 ± 7 kΩ; with PEDOT:pTS: 16 ± 0.81 kΩ; n = 262) and UV laser-cut (bare carbon: 468 ± 85.7 kΩ; with PEDOT:pTS: 27 ± 2.83 kΩ; n = 7) fibers that have a large surface area and low impedances. However, in all cases, the PEDOT:pTS-coated fibers fall under the 110 kΩ threshold set previously to indicate a good, low impedance electrode.
Acute ePhys recordings were taken from a Long Evans rat acutely implanted with a ZIF array with UV laser-cut and PEDOT:pTS-treated fibers to demonstrate the viability of this method. ePhys has previously been tested and proven with scissor-cut20 and Nd:YAG-17 and blowtorch-treated fibers7,8 and so was not revalidated in this text. Acute recordings from four UV laser treatment fibers (2 mm in length) that were simultaneously implanted in rat motor cortex (n = 1) are presented in Figure 10. Three units were found across all fibers, suggesting that the treatment of the fibers with the inexpensive UV laser is similar to other cutting methods that enable the carbon fiber to record neural units, as would be expected by the SEMs and impedances. While carbon fiber arrays are easily built and modified to suit the user's needs, it should be noted that additional validation is necessary for some builds (Table 3), while others are less suitable for certain end tasks.
Commercial Parylene C
Commercially coated arrays were determined to have a Parylene C thickness of 710 nm by the vendor, well within the target range of insulation. The arrays were prepared for ePhys recordings using the blowtorch tip preparation. Impedances were taken after the preparation of the tips and compared to existing data. A blowtorched and PEDOT:pTS-coated probe had an average of 14.5 ± 1.3 kΩ impedance across 16 fibers. SEM images were taken of the tip and shank to compare Parylene C deposition (Figure 11 A,B, respectively). These results show that the use of a commercial vendor did not change the expected impedance values, suggesting that this will be an equally viable substitution to deposition in the university cleanroom.
Device cost analysis
Provided all tools and bulk materials (e.g., epoxies, solder) are accessible to the researcher, a Parylene C user fee of $41, and a batch of 8 probes, the total materials cost is $1168 ($146 per probe). Personnel effort (Table 4) is ~25 h for the batch. If using a substituted fabrication step, the cost of the probes will vary based on commercial Parylene C coating cost ($500-800 quoted). The time for the build steps (Table 4) is grouped for all instances of a repeated task for simplicity. Build times for designs with a larger pitch (Wide Board and ZIF) are dramatically reduced as the manually intensive steps (e.g., carbon fiber placement) are easier and faster to complete.
Figure 1: Connectors and associated printed circuit boards. (A) Wide Board with one of sixteen necessary connectors in inset (inset scale bar = 5 mm). (B) ZIF and one of two connectors and one shroud. (C) Flex Array with a 36-pin connector; scale bar = 1 cm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Soldering and insulation steps for the Flex Array. (A) Laying the solder for the bottom connector pins. (B) Back pins secured in place with the front pins ready for soldering. (C) Delayed set epoxy insulated Flex Array; note that the delayed-set epoxy does not cover the reference and ground vias on either side. (D) Backside of the Flex Array with a band of delayed set epoxy across the pad vias (not the ground and reference vias) and wrapped around the side of the board toward the edge of the connector. Scale bar = 0.5 cm (B) and 1 cm (A, C, D). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Applying silver epoxy and aligning carbon fibers between the traces of the Flex Array. Capillaries have been highlighted with a white overlay. (A) The end of the capillary fits between the traces to get (B) clean silver epoxy (denoted with arrows at the end of the capillary and within the traces) deposition without spillover outside of the trace pairs. (C) Carbon fibers are placed into the epoxy and then (D) straightened with a clean capillary. Scale bars = 500 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Insulation with UV Epoxy Application (A) UV epoxy is applied using a clean capillary and two drops of UV epoxy (marked with white overlays). UV epoxy is applied in droplets of 0.25-0.75 mm diameters until the UV epoxy forms a smooth bubble over the top of the traces. (B) UV epoxy is cured under UV light. The Flex Array is placed in putty on a wooden block for ease of movement and alignment underneath the UV light. The UV light is held with a holder ~1 cm above the end of the Flex Array. Inset (B) shows the side profile of a properly UV epoxy-insulated Flex Array. The UV epoxy bubble on either side of the board is roughly 50 µm in height. Scale bars = 500 µm (A and inset B). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Setup for impedance measurements. All parts are labeled, and system connectors and adapters are system-dependent. PBS is starred as the solution is swapped for PEDOT:pTS later on in the build; however, the setup is identical otherwise. Abbreviations: PBS = phosphate-buffered saline; PEDOT:pTS = poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):p-toluenesulfonate. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Flex Array prepared for Parylene C coating. The Flex Array is secured to a raised foam platform with tape, adhesive side up during the coating process. Scale bar =10 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: Ground and reference wires attached to the finalized Flex Array. Solder was applied to each side of the via on either side of the board (A) to create a secure bond. ePhys vias are labeled on the board as GND and Ref and paired on opposite sides of the board from one another. There are two additional vias also labeled GND and Ref2. Both GND vias are shorted together. Ref2 is meant to be used in electrochemical experiments. Excess wire in (A) is denoted with a red box and is removed (B) from the backside of the probe (red box shows where wire used to be) to help with noise reduction and handling the probe. (C) Final Flex Array stored for future use. Note that the paired GND and Ref vias on this board make it designated for ePhys recordings. Scale bars = 200 µm (A, B). Abbreviations: ePhys = electrophysiology; GND = ground; Ref = reference. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 8: SEM images of fibers with different tip-cutting techniques. (A) Scissor-cut fiber with very little exposed carbon. (B) Nd:YAG laser cut. (C) Blowtorched fiber with ~140 mm of carbon exposed from the tip. (D) UV laser-cut fibers with ~120 mm of carbon exposed from the tip. Red arrows indicate the transition area between Parylene C and bare carbon fiber. Scale bars = 5 µm (A), 10 µm (B), 50 µm (C, D). Abbreviations: SEM = scanning electron microscopic; Nd:YAG = Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 9: Impedance differences between only applying the treatment (bare carbon exposed) and with the addition of PEDOT:pTS. In all cases, the addition of PEDOT:pTS decreases the impedance by an order of magnitude. Sample size: Nd:YAG = 262, Blowtorch = 262, UV = 7. UV sample size difference is due to the novelty of the preparation method; however, it shows a similar range to blowtorch, as expected. Impedance data are expressed as mean ± standard error. Abbreviations: PEDOT:pTS = poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):p-toluenesulfonate; Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 10: Acute electrophysiological spiking data from four UV laser-cut electrodes. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 11: Commercial Parylene C-coated arrays. (A) The sharpened array shows uniform sharpening across all fibers indicating that there are no drawbacks to commercial coating. (B) After blowtorching, the transition (red box) between bare carbon fiber and Parylene C shows no discernable difference between arrays coated in a cleanroom facility. Scale bars = 200 µm (A) and 10 µm (B). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
PCB Name | Connector | Soldering Pad Size (mm) | Exposed Trace Size (mm) | Trace Pitch (µm) | Channels | |
Wide Board | Mill-Max 9976-0-00-15-00-00-03-0 | 3.25 x 1.6 | 1.5 x 4.0 | 3000 | 8 | |
ZIF | Hirose DF30FC-20DS-0.4V, | 0.23 x 0.7 | 0.75 x 0.07 | 152.4 | 16 | |
Flex Array | Omnetics A79024-001 | 0.4 x 0.8 | 0.6 x 0.033 | 132 | 16 |
Table 1: Each PCB has a different connector and pitch associated with it. Abbreviation: PCB = printed circuit board.
Build Step | Expected 1 kHz Impedance (kΩ) |
Bare Fiber | 150-300 |
Bare Fiber with UV Insulation | 400-500 |
Parylene C Insulated Fibers | >50,000 |
Nd:YAG Laser Cut | <15,000 |
Blowtorched | 300-400 |
UV Laser Cut* | 300-500 |
PEDOT:pTS Coated | <110 |
Table 2: Typical range of impedances after each build stage (n = 272). *n = 16. PEDOT:pTS-treated probes above 110 kΩ may still record signals; however, all treated electrodes typically fall under this value. Abbreviations: PEDOT:pTS = poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):p-toluenesulfonate; Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet.
Preparation Method | Wide Board | ZIF | Flex Array |
Nd:YAG | Impedance, SEM, acute ePhys | Impedance, SEM, acute/chronic ePhys | Impedance, SEM, acute/chronic ePhys |
Blowtorch | Impedance, SEM, acute ePhys | Impedance, SEM, acute/chronic ePhys | Impedance, SEM, acute/chronic ePhys |
UV Laser | Not yet validated | Impedance, SEM, acute/chronic ePhys | Not Viable |
Table 3: Validated uses of each board with the cutting methods described. All cutting methods included electrodeposition of PEDOT:pTS. 'Not Viable' indicates that a form factor of the design prevents this tip treatment from being tested at this time (i.e., fiber pitch). Abbreviations: Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet; SEM = scanning electron microscopy; ePhys = electrophysiology; ZIF = zero insertion force.
Activity | Time for 8 Devices (h) |
All Soldering | 5 |
Insulating Omnetics | 1 |
Populating Carbon Fibers | 10 |
Insulating Traces with UV Epoxy | 0.5 |
Parylene C Deposition | 1.5 |
Nd:YAG Laser Cutting | 1 |
Blowtorching | 1 |
UV Laser Cutting | 1.5 |
All Impedance Testing | 4.5 |
PEDOT:pTS Deposition | 1.5 |
Recipe Used | Total Hours |
Nd:YAG Laser Cut | 25 |
Blowtorch | 25 |
UV Laser Cut | 25.5 |
Table 4: Time required for each step of a fabrication process. Soldering of the connector and ground and reference wires have been combined here to simplify the activity list. Abbreviations: PEDOT:pTS = poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):p-toluenesulfonate; Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet.
Material substitutions
While all materials used are summarized in the Table of Materials, very few of the materials are required to come from specific vendors. The Flex Array board must come from the listed vendor as they are the only company that can print the flexible board. The Flex Array connector must also be ordered from the vendor listed as it is a proprietary connector. Parylene C is highly recommended as the insulation material for the fibers as it provides a conformal coating at room temperature in a reliable manner that can then withstand the in vivo environment. The polyimide board and epoxies on the board cannot tolerate the high temperatures required for other insulation techniques. All other materials can be purchased from other vendors or be swapped out for alternatives at the users' discretion. This build is meant to be flexible and customizable to fit the end user's experiment. However, it should be noted that any changes from the materials or vendors listed must be validated by the end user.
Troubleshooting build issues
Silver epoxy deposition tends to fail for several reasons: the width of the capillary is too wide to fit between traces, the width of the capillary is too thin to pick up and deposit epoxy, or an excess of epoxy is on the capillary. The first two problems can be solved by cutting a new capillary of a more appropriate size; the latter by dipping the capillary into the epoxy with a lighter hand or removing a portion of the epoxy blob by gently dabbing the capillary onto a spare nitrile glove.
Deciding how to prepare the electrode is often a difficult decision for many users. However, determining what is needed for the experiment will help illuminate the decision. For acute surgeries, blunt tips can be used if the site size of the electrode is important; however, they will only insert into softer tissue (brain) and only at sub-500 µm target depths.
Going into deeper brain structures is possible using a glass cannula22; however, this can cause scarring and associated unreliability in ePhys recordings. Fibers must be less than 300 µm when sharpened to be able to penetrate harder tissues (nerve) as the shorter length provides a stiffer backbone for insertion7,8. Sharpened fibers have also recently been observed to penetrate to 1 mm depths in the brain8.
While the arrays discussed in this paper are an excellent starting point for many labs, newer probes using carbon fibers have also been developed to chronically target deeper areas in brain21,22,29. In nerve, electrodes of low invasiveness and high selectivity are an ongoing research topic5,8,30. Jiman et al.7 were able to detect multiunit activity within the nerve with minimal invasiveness and increased selectivity using a carbon fiber silicone array8, which mirrors the design of the Flex Array presented here.
Parylene C accessibility
Parylene C is a method of conformal coating at room temperature that has been used as a biocompatible insulator in many implanted devices. The technique requires a specialized tool in a cleanroom and takes about an hour to learn. A cursory survey of institutions that have previously requested carbon fiber arrays from our group was conducted to determine Parylene C deposition accessibility. We found that out of 17 institutes, 41% had access to Parylene C-coating systems on their campus. For universities without access to a Parylene C-coating system, commercial coating services are a viable alternative, as demonstrated here. Alternatively, outsourcing to a nearby university cleanroom may also be of interest to laboratories with no direct access to a Parylene C deposition system. To reduce the cost per device, we advise sending out larger batches of arrays as commercial systems can often accommodate larger samples.
Optimizing tip preparations
Additional tip preparations need to be investigated for these fibers as the current tip preparations require the end user to choose between penetrating ability and a small recording site. While the Nd:YAG laser-cut fibers provide a small site size20, the ability to penetrate stiffer tissue (muscle, nerve) is almost non-existent, and access to a laser setup capable of this cutting technique can be difficult and expensive. While blowtorching allows for a quick and economical way to get sharpened tips that can penetrate many tissues7, the tip geometry is large and may be inconsistent from fiber to fiber20. UV laser cutting also provides low impedances and large surface areas but with the added benefit of more consistent exposure. The UV laser is more accessible than the Nd:YAG laser; however, laboratories would need to engineer a way to align the laser with fibers and would not be able to use the Flex Array due to the pitch of the fibers being smaller than the laser's focal point diameter. Previous work showed the fabrication of small, sharpened fibers via etching31,32. This approach could result in a small, reliable electrode geometry and preserve the sharpened tip necessary for penetrating nerve and muscle.
Our current tip coating, PEDOT:pTS, may also need to be replaced as it tends to degrade over time, which is an undesirable trait for a chronic probe17,25,33. A lack of PEDOT:pTS longevity leads to higher impedances and, therefore, lower signal quality, in part due to increased background noise. To increase longevity in these fiber tips, investigation into the feasibility of platinum-iridium coatings is being conducted. Platinum-iridium would allow for a greater surface area25,34 concentrated on the tip of the electrode, keeping a low impedance34,35,36 and allow for longer, chronic stability34,36. Other coatings, such as PEDOT/graphene oxide37 and gold38, have been utilized to lower carbon fiber electrode impedances, although these coatings are typically used for chemical-sensing probes rather than for ePhys recordings. Due to the inherent properties of carbon fibers39, the carbon fiber array presented here can be converted from a probe optimized for ePhys to a chemical-sensing device with a simple change of tip preparation22,40.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was financially supported by the National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (UF1NS107659 and UF1NS115817) and the National Science Foundation (1707316). The authors acknowledge financial support from the University of Michigan College of Engineering and technical support from the Michigan Center for Materials Characterization and the Van Vlack Undergraduate Laboratory. The authors thank Dr. Khalil Najafi for the use of his Nd:YAG laser and the Lurie Nanofabrication Facility for the use of their Parylene C deposition machine. We would also like to thank Specialty Coating Systems (Indianapolis, IN) for their help in the commercial coating comparison study.
3 prong clams | 05-769-6Q | Fisher | Qty: 2 Unit Cost (USD): 20 |
3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (25 g) (PEDOT) |
96618 | Sigma-Aldrich | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 102 |
353ND-T Epoxy (8oz)++ (ZIF and Wide Board Only) |
353ND-T/8OZ | Epoxy Technology | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 48 |
Ag/AgCl (3M NaCl) Reference Electrode (pack of 3) | 50-854-570 | Fisher | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 100 |
Autolab | PGSTAT12 | Metrohm | |
Blowtorch | 1WG61 | Grainger | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 36 |
Carbon Fibers | T-650/35 3K | Cytec Thornel | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): n/a |
Carbon tape | NC1784521 | Fisher | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 27 |
Cotton Tipped Applicator | WOD1002 | MediChoice | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 0.57 |
Delayed Set Epoxy++ | 1FBG8 | Grainger | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 3 |
DI Water | n/a | n/a | Qty: n/a Unit Cost (USD): n/a |
Dumont Tweezers #5 | 50-822-409 | Fisher | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 73 |
Flex Array** | n/a | MicroConnex | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 68 |
Flux | SMD291ST8CC | DigiKey | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 13 |
Glass Capillaries (pack of 350) | 50-821-986 | Fisher | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 60 |
Glass Dish | n/a | n/a | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): n/a |
Hirose Connector (ZIF Only) |
H3859CT-ND | DigiKey | Qty: 2 Unit Cost (USD): 2 |
Light-resistant Glass Bottle | n/a | Fisher | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): n/a |
Micropipette Heating Filiment | FB315B | Sutter Instrument Co | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): n/a |
Micropipette Puller | P-97 | Sutter Instrument Co | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): n/a |
Nitrile Gloves (pack of 200) | 19-041-171C | Fisher | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 47 |
Offline Sorter software | n/a | Plexon | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): n/a |
Omnetics Connector* (Flex Array Only) |
A79025-001 | Omnetics Inc | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 35 |
Omnetics Connector* (Flex Array Only) |
A79024-001 | Omnetics Inc | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 35 |
Omnetics to ZIF connector | ZCA-OMN16 | Tucker-Davis Technologies | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): n/a |
Pin Terminal Connector (Wide Board Only) |
ED11523-ND | DigiKey | Qty: 16 Unit Cost (USD): 10 |
Probe storage box | G2085 | Melmat | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 2 |
Razor Blade | 4A807 | Grainger | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 2 |
SEM post | 16327 | lnf | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 3 |
Silver Epoxy (1oz)++ | H20E/1OZ | Epoxy Technology | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 125 |
Silver GND REF wires | 50-822-122 | Fisher | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 423.2 |
Sodium p-toulenesulphonate(pTS)- 100g | 152536 | Sigma-Aldrich | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 59 |
Solder | 24-6337-9703 | DigiKey | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 60 |
Soldering Iron Tip | T0054449899N-ND | Digikey | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 13 |
Soldering Station | WD1002N-ND | Digikey | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 374 |
SpotCure-B UV LED Cure System | n/a | FusionNet LLC | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 895 |
Stainless steel rod | n/a | n/a | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): n/a |
Stir Plate | n/a | Fisher | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): n/a |
Surgical Scissors | 08-953-1B | Fisher | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 100 |
TDT Shroud (ZIF Only) |
Z3_ZC16SHRD_RSN | TDT | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 3.5 |
Teflon Tweezers | 50-380-043 | Fisher | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 47 |
UV & Visible Light Safety Glassees | 92522 | Loctite | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 45 |
UV Epoxy (8oz)++ (Flex Array Only) |
OG142-87/8OZ | Epoxy Technology | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 83 |
UV Laser | n/a | WER | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 30 |
Weigh boat (pack of 500) |
08-732-112 | Fisher | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 58 |
Wide Board+ | n/a | Advanced Circuits | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 3 |
ZIF Active Headstage | ZC16 | Tucker-Davis Technologies | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 925 |
ZIF Passive Headstage | ZC16-P | Tucker-Davis Technologies | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 625 |
ZIF* | n/a | Coast to Coast Circuits | Qty: 1 Unit Cost (USD): 9 |