RESEARCH
Peer reviewed scientific video journal
Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods
Visualizing science through experiment videos
EDUCATION
Video textbooks for undergraduate courses
Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments
BUSINESS
Video textbooks for business education
OTHERS
Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments
Products
RESEARCH
JoVE Journal
Peer reviewed scientific video journal
JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods
EDUCATION
JoVE Core
Video textbooks for undergraduates
JoVE Science Education
Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments
JoVE Lab Manual
Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses
BUSINESS
JoVE Business
Video textbooks for business education
Solutions
Language
Spanish
Menu
Menu
Menu
Menu
Please note that some of the translations on this page are AI generated. Click here for the English version.
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use one system at a time for processing information (Darlow & Sloman, 2010) and that the two systems are directed by different parts of the brain. The prefrontal cortex is more involved in the rational system, and the basal ganglia and amygdala (more primitive parts of the brain, from an evolutionary perspective) are more involved in the intuitive system.
Intuitive Decision-Making
We tend to assume that the logical, analytical route leads to superior decisions, but whether this is accurate depends on the situation. The quick, intuitive route can be lifesaving; when we suddenly feel intense fear, a fight-or-flight response kicks in that leads to immediate action without methodically weighing all possible options and their consequences. Additionally, individuals can often make decisions very quickly because experience or expertise has taught them what to do in a given situation. As a result, they might not be able to explain the logic behind their decision and will instead say they just went with their “gut,” or did what “felt” right. Because they faced a similar situation in the past and figured out how to deal with it, the brain shifts immediately to the quick, intuitive decision-making system.
Rational Decision-Making
However, the quick route is not always the best decision-making path to take. When faced with novel and complex situations, it is better to process available information logically, analytically, and methodically. Someone may need to think about whether a situation requires serious thought prior to making a decision. It is especially important to pay attention to your emotions, because strong emotions can make it difficult to process information rationally. This response is why it’s often best to wait and address a volatile situation after emotions have calmed down. Intense emotions—whether positive or negative—tend to pull us toward the quick, reactive route of decision-making. Have you ever made a large “impulse” purchase that you were excited about, only to regret it later? This speaks to the power our emotions exert on our decision-making. Big decisions should generally not be made impulsively, but reflectively.
This text is adapted from OpenStax, Organizational Behavior. OpenStax CNX.
Las personas pueden creer que casi siempre toman decisiones racionales, aunque este modo de pensar sea mentalmente agotador.
Basándose en una serie de estudios científicos, los investigadores han sugerido que hay "dos mentes", o dos sistemas de pensamiento, que guían las respuestas.
Uno, el sistema intuitivo, funciona de forma rápida y automática, con el mínimo esfuerzo. El proceso de la intuición es la mente que "ve" una respuesta en ausencia de un razonamiento explícito. En otras palabras, es como si la persona estuviera en piloto automático, simplemente siguiendo la corriente.
En consecuencia, las decisiones intuitivas parecen atajos eficientes, ya que pueden basarse en experiencias previas y similares. Sin embargo, confiar en estas operaciones mentales, conocidas como heurísticas, puede conducir a juicios sesgados o incorrectos.
Si, en cambio, hubiera utilizado el segundo sistema, el sistema racional, tomaría su decisión lenta y deliberadamente y podría anular cualquier respuesta intuitiva. Después de todo, este sistema debe delinear los pasos lógicos de una elección en particular, lo que requiere mucho más esfuerzo y demanda cognitiva en el proceso.
En situaciones novedosas, este tipo de razonamiento y pensamiento racional tienen sentido. Nunca antes había ido de compras durante las horas pico y solo tiene cinco minutos de sobra. Razona que la fila más larga se moverá más rápido que la fila más corta, debido a la cantidad de artículos que tiene cada persona.
A veces, la intuición es difícil de anular: ciertas asociaciones parecen tan plausibles, aunque la evidencia pueda apuntar a una solución diferente.
Related Videos
01:37
Social Judgement and Decision-Making
7.4K Vistas
01:42
Social Judgement and Decision-Making
12.3K Vistas
02:10
Social Judgement and Decision-Making
10.2K Vistas
01:08
Social Judgement and Decision-Making
6.9K Vistas
02:13
Social Judgement and Decision-Making
16.7K Vistas
01:25
Social Judgement and Decision-Making
7.7K Vistas
01:31
Social Judgement and Decision-Making
7.6K Vistas
01:12
Social Judgement and Decision-Making
4.2K Vistas
03:26
Social Judgement and Decision-Making
7.9K Vistas