28.9
Interactions prédateur-proie
Les prédateurs consomment des proies pour l’énergie. Les prédateurs qui se procurent des proies et les proies qui évitent la prédation augmentent leur…
All organisms need energy to survive. For example, gazelles are herbivores that feed on plants. On the other hand, cheetahs are carnivores that hunt gazelles. This predator–prey interaction is called predation, in which the cheetah acts as the predator and gains energy by consuming the gazelle, its prey.
A predator uses a range of sensory adaptations to detect prey, depending on the species. These may include sight, smell, and hearing. Specialized physical features, such as teeth or claws in cheetahs, allow the predator to capture and consume the prey.
As prey evolve traits to avoid predation, predators also evolve traits that improve hunting success, such as the cheetah’s increased speed.
For example, some birds have evolved exceptional eyesight, including color vision, which helps them locate and hunt prey. A defense called crypsis helps prey avoid visual detection by blending into their environment. For example, peppered moths have colors and patterns that match the bark and branches of their host trees.
In other cases, prey do not hide. For example, monarch butterflies show their toxicity with bright, patterned wings. This warning coloration, called aposematism, acts as a visual cue to predators that the butterfly is harmful or inedible. Birds that ignore this warning experience a bad taste or nausea and later avoid similar butterflies.
When a species’ warning coloration works well, other species that face the same predators may evolve to copy its appearance.
One such pattern is Müllerian mimicry, in which species that are toxic or unpalatable to predators evolve similar warning signals and both benefit as predators learn to avoid them. Viceroy butterflies, for example, are toxic and closely resemble monarch butterflies. When predators try one species, they learn to avoid the other species rather than risk another unpleasant feeding experience.
Alternatively, Batesian mimicry happens when a harmless species mimics a harmful species. For instance, predators avoid the bright, tricolor banded pattern of venomous coral snakes. Nonvenomous king snakes benefit from this pattern by mimicking the coral snake’s appearance.
Predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race, driving the evolution of adaptations in both predators and prey. This mutual evolutionary change between interacting species is called coevolution.
View the full transcript and gain access to JoVE Core videos
Q1: How do predators use sensory adaptations to locate and capture prey?
Predators rely on specialized sensory adaptations like sight, smell, and hearing to detect prey depending on their species. Physical features such as teeth or claws enable capture and consumption. For example, some birds have evolved exceptional eyesight including color vision to locate and hunt prey effectively.
Q2: What is crypsis and how does it help prey survive predation?
Crypsis is a defense mechanism where prey avoid visual detection by blending into their environment. Peppered moths exemplify this adaptation, displaying colors and patterns that match the bark and branches of their host trees, making them difficult for predators to spot.
Q3: How does warning coloration protect prey from predators?
Warning coloration, called aposematism, displays bright patterns that signal toxicity or unpalatability to predators. Monarch butterflies use this strategy; predators that taste them experience nausea and learn to avoid similar-looking butterflies in the future, protecting the species from repeated predation attempts.
Q4: What is the difference between Müllerian and Batesian mimicry?
Müllerian mimicry occurs when multiple toxic species evolve similar warning signals, and predators learn to avoid all of them. Batesian mimicry involves harmless species copying harmful species' appearance. For example, nonvenomous king snakes mimic venomous coral snakes, gaining protection without toxins.
Q5: How do predator-prey interactions drive coevolution?
Predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race where both species continuously evolve adaptations. As prey develop defenses like crypsis or toxins, predators evolve improved hunting traits such as increased speed or enhanced sensory abilities. This mutual evolutionary change between interacting species is called coevolution.
Q6: Why do lynx and snowshoe hare populations cycle in predictable patterns?
Lynx and snowshoe hare populations in northern Canada cycle approximately every 10 years due to predation dynamics. As hare populations increase, lynx populations rise; however, increased lynx predation reduces hares, eventually causing lynx populations to decline and allowing hares to recover, repeating the cycle.
Q7: How do herbivores overcome plant defenses in predator-prey-like interactions?
Herbivores evolve adaptations to bypass plant defenses. Giraffes have long, dexterous tongues to consume acacia leaves while avoiding thorns. Monarch butterfly caterpillars evolved immunity to milkweed toxins and store them as defenses against their own predators, demonstrating how energy budgets and reproductive strategies shape survival.