7.5
Dal XVI al XVIII secolo molte nazioni europee adottarono un sistema economico noto come mercantilismo, fondato sulla convinzione che la forza di un Pa…
Il mercantilismo fu l'insieme dominante di politiche in Europa dal XVI al XVIII secolo. Si basava sulla convinzione che la forza di una nazione derivasse dalla sua ricchezza e dal controllo economico.
Per costruire potere nazionale, i governi mercantilisti cercarono di aumentare la ricchezza attraverso varie strategie.
Un approccio principale era l'accumulo di metalli preziosi, in particolare oro e argento. La ricchezza veniva sempre più misurata dai lingotti di oro conservati nei tesori nazionali, simbolo di forza e stabilità.
Un'altra pratica chiave era l'espansione delle proprietà coloniali per garantire le risorse e controllare il commercio. Le colonie fornivano materie prime e fungevano da mercati prigionieri. Il Nord America britannico, ad esempio, esportava cotone e legname in Gran Bretagna ed era obbligato a importare beni manifatturati in Gran Bretagna.
I mercantilisti sottolineavano anche il mantenimento di un saldo commerciale favorevole. Esportando più di quanto importassero, le nazioni garantivano un flusso costante di lingotti. Nella Francia del XVII secolo, Jean-Baptiste Colbert promosse questa politica promuovendo le industrie nazionali e imponendo dazi sulle importazioni.
Alla fine, il mercantilismo ha funzionato come un insieme dominante di politiche che hanno plasmato la strategia economica nazionale.
View the full transcript and gain access to JoVE Business videos
Q1: What was mercantilism and when did it dominate European economic policy?
Mercantilism was the dominant set of policies in Europe from the 16th to the 18th centuries, based on the belief that a nation's strength came from its wealth and economic control. Governments pursued various strategies to build national power through accumulating precious metals, expanding colonial holdings, and maintaining favorable trade balances to ensure steady inflows of bullion.
Q2: How did mercantilists measure national wealth?
Mercantilists measured wealth primarily by the amount of gold and silver, or bullion, stored in national treasuries. This accumulation of precious metals symbolized a nation's strength and stability. The more bullion a country possessed, the more powerful it was considered to be in the mercantilist worldview.
Q3: What role did colonies play in mercantilist economic strategy?
Colonies were essential to mercantilism, supplying raw materials like cotton, timber, sugar, coffee, and iron to the home country. These materials were transformed into finished goods and often sold back to the colonies as captive markets. This system ensured a steady flow of resources and wealth to the mother nation while maintaining economic control.
Q4: How did mercantilists view international trade?
Mercantilists viewed international trade through a zero-sum lens, believing global wealth was fixed like a single pie. One nation could grow richer only if another became poorer. This competitive worldview drove policies aimed at benefiting one nation at others' expense rather than viewing trade as mutual cooperation.
Q5: What strategies did mercantilist governments use to maintain a favorable trade balance?
Mercantilist governments encouraged exports while restricting imports to achieve trade surpluses that brought in gold and silver. They imposed tariffs on imported goods to protect domestic industries and promote local production and self-sufficiency. Jean-Baptiste Colbert in 17th-century France exemplified this approach by advancing these policies.
Q6: How did mercantilism differ from later economic theories about growth?
Unlike mercantilism's focus on accumulating precious metals and trade surpluses, later economic theories emphasized different drivers of national prosperity. The classical dynamics of Adam Smith and subsequent growth models explored how factors like capital, technology, and innovation contributed to economic development, moving beyond mercantilist assumptions about fixed global wealth.
Q7: Did all mercantilist nations require large colonial empires to prosper?
No. While colonies were vital for many mercantilist powers, some nations like the Netherlands prospered by strengthening trade routes and shipping without extensive colonial holdings. This demonstrates that mercantilist success could be achieved through different strategies, though colonial systems remained central to most European mercantilist policies.