18.16
無限に繰り返されるゲームとは、プレイヤーが事前に決められた終わりなしに同じゲームに繰り返し参加するシナリオです。この概念は、経済学や国際関係など、社会科学のさまざまな分野における長期的な相互作用を理解する上で重要です。
例:
無限に繰り返されるゲームとは、プレイヤーがあらかじめ決まった終わりなしに同じゲームに繰り返し参加するゲームです。
例としては、企業が繰り返し価格を設定したり、国が長年にわたって取引条件を交渉したりすることがあります。
これらのゲームでは、企業はしばしばしっぺ返し戦略を採用しています。
たとえば、Alpha と Beta という 2 つの競合企業がソフトドリンクの価格を設定しているとします。
彼らは毎月の初めに価格を決定します。両社が価格を高く保てば、高い利益を享受できます。
しっぺ返し戦略では、高い価格を設定するなどの協力的な行動から始めます。
ベータは、アルファが同じことをする限り、高い価格を設定し続けます。
アルファが価格を下げると、ベータは次のラウンドでも価格を下げます。これにより、アルファは利益の優位性を得ることができ、ベータはその1ラウンドの利益の欠点となります。アルファが高値に戻ると、ベータはそれに見合った価格になります。
無限に繰り返されるゲームの結果は、持続的な協力です。企業は、価格引き下げによる短期的な利益は、低価格による長期的な損失よりも小さいことを認識しています。
高価格を維持することは、両社にとって合理的な戦略となり、長期的には相互利益につながります。
View the full transcript and gain access to JoVE Business videos
Q1: What is an infinitely repeated game?
An infinitely repeated game is a scenario where players repeatedly engage in the same game without a predetermined end. Examples include firms continuously adjusting prices or countries consistently negotiating trade terms over many years. Players recognize that short-term gains from non-cooperative actions are less valuable than long-term losses, making mutual cooperation a rational strategy that benefits all parties over time.
Q2: How does the tit-for-tat strategy work in repeated games?
Tit-for-tat involves starting with a cooperative action, such as setting a high price, then matching the opponent's previous action in each subsequent round. If one player lowers the price, the other follows suit in the next round but returns to cooperation when the opponent does. This strategy encourages mutual cooperation while punishing defection, creating sustained high profits for both firms.
Q3: Why do firms maintain high prices in infinitely repeated games?
Firms maintain high prices because they recognize that mutual cooperation yields better long-term benefits than short-term gains from price cutting. When both firms keep prices high, they enjoy sustained high profits. The threat of retaliation—where the opponent matches a price cut—makes defection unprofitable, so maintaining high prices becomes the rational equilibrium strategy for maximizing long-term payoffs.
Q4: What is the difference between infinitely repeated games and one-time games?
In infinitely repeated games, players interact repeatedly without a predetermined end, allowing them to build reputation and enforce cooperation through retaliation. In contrast, nash equilibrium in one period games involves single interactions where players cannot punish future defection. The repeated nature enables sustained cooperation, whereas one-time games often result in non-cooperative outcomes due to lack of future consequences.
Q5: How do infinitely repeated games apply to real-world scenarios?
Infinitely repeated games model long-term business and international interactions. Firms use pricing strategies to maintain market stability, while countries apply cooperation principles to trade negotiations and environmental agreements. In environmental agreements, nations agree to reduce emissions and maintain cooperation to avoid long-term detrimental effects, demonstrating how repeated interaction incentivizes mutual benefit over individual short-term gains.
Q6: What happens when a player deviates from cooperation in a repeated game?
When a player deviates by lowering prices or breaking cooperation, the opponent retaliates in the next round by matching that action, creating a profit disadvantage for the deviator. However, retaliation is temporary; when the deviator returns to cooperation, the opponent forgives and resumes high prices. This cycle of retaliation and forgiveness reinforces the incentive to maintain cooperation rather than pursue short-term gains.
Q7: Why is mutual cooperation the outcome of infinitely repeated games?
Mutual cooperation emerges because players recognize that the present value of long-term cooperative profits exceeds the one-time gain from defection plus subsequent losses from retaliation. The infinite time horizon makes future payoffs significant, and the threat of punishment deters deviation. Both players rationally choose to maintain high prices or other cooperative actions, achieving a stable equilibrium that maximizes collective and individual long-term benefits.