9.5
服従の研究によると、私たちは権威者の強力な圧力の下で他人を傷つける可能性があります(Milgram、1974)。不適切な注文がより少ない力で配達されたらどうでしょうか?看護師と医師の間の相互依存性が増すにつれ、ホフリングと彼の同僚たちは、権威者と認識されている人物である医師による潜在的に有害な医療要…
時には、人々は自分の個人的な基準に反して、害を及ぼす可能性のある命令に従うことをいとわないことがあります。このような社会的影響力の形態は、権威者とみなされる人物からの命令や要求に従うこと、つまり服従と呼ばれます。
例えば、あるオリジナルのフィールド調査では、自然な病院の環境で、医師とされる人物(この場合は当局)が、公式に承認されたリストに載っておらず、1日の最大安全用量を超える「未知の」薬を看護師に電話で投与するよう命じました。実際には、その薬はプラセボでした。
看護師たち(少なくともその95%)は、プロトコルに反し、患者の死亡につながる可能性があったにもかかわらず、「医師」の命令を尊重し続けました。
興味深いことに、対照群では、看護師は単に同様の状況で何をするかを尋ねられました。同じ割合の95%が、与えられた命令に従わないと答えました。
したがって、人々が実際の状況に置かれたとき、彼らは自分自身のより良い判断に反して行動するかもしれません。
Q1: What is obedience in social psychology?
Obedience is a form of social influence where people follow orders or requests from perceived authority figures, even when those commands conflict with personal standards. In a classic hospital field study, nurses administered an unapproved drug exceeding safe dosage limits when ordered by an alleged doctor, demonstrating how authority can override individual judgment and protocol.
Q2: Why do people obey harmful orders from authority figures?
Research suggests that situational pressures from authority figures compel obedience despite potential harm. In the Hofling study, 21 of 22 nurses complied with a doctor's phoned request to dispense an unfamiliar drug at dangerous dosages. Participants later reported embarrassment, anxiety, and guilt, indicating they acted against their better judgment under perceived authority pressure.
Q3: How do questionnaire responses differ from actual obedience behavior?
When asked hypothetically, 95% of nurses said they would not obey harmful orders. However, in actual field conditions, 95% of nurses complied with the dangerous drug request. This discrepancy reveals that people overestimate their ability to resist authority pressures when placed in real situations, suggesting self-awareness alone does not reduce compliance.
Q4: What workplace factors can reduce harmful compliance?
Research identifies several factors that decrease compliance with questionable orders. Opportunities to discuss decisions with colleagues successfully reduced compliance in replications of the Hofling study. Additionally, an increased sense of personal responsibility distinguished non-compliant nurses from compliant ones, suggesting that fostering autonomy and team communication strengthens ethical decision-making.
Q5: Why might nurses feel conflicted when obeying harmful medical orders?
Nurses experience competing pressures between duty to patients and need for acceptance by authority figures and their team. While a sense of duty to challenge questionable practices exists, the desire for team acceptance can override it. This internal conflict creates negative emotions like guilt and anxiety, even when nurses comply with orders, reflecting the psychological cost of obedience.
Q6: How does the interdependence between nurses and physicians affect obedience?
The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians creates power dynamics that influence compliance. Doctors hold perceived authority, while nurses depend on them professionally, strengthening the likelihood of obedience. This hierarchical relationship, combined with workplace pressures, makes it difficult for nurses to resist harmful orders despite their medical training and ethical obligations.
Q7: Can awareness of social pressures prevent obedience to authority?
No. Later replications of obedience research strongly suggest that awareness of forces underlying social pressures does not necessarily reduce compliance to authority in actual situations. Even when people understand the mechanisms of social influence, situational factors and authority presence remain powerful enough to override conscious resistance and ethical judgment.