A bioinspired scaffold is fabricated by a soft photolithography technique using mechanically robust and electrically conductive hydrogels. The micropatterned hydrogels provide directional cardiomyocyte cell alignment, resulting in a tailored direction of actuation. Flexible microelectrodes are also integrated into the scaffold to bring electrical controllability for a self-actuating cardiac tissue.
Bioinspired soft robotic systems that mimic living organisms using engineered muscle tissue and biomaterials are revolutionizing the current biorobotics paradigm, especially in biomedical research. Recreating artificial life-like actuation dynamics is crucial for a soft-robotic system. However, the precise control and tuning of actuation behavior still represents one of the main challenges of modern soft robotic systems. This method describes a low-cost, highly scalable, and easy-to-use procedure to fabricate an electrically controllable soft robot with life-like movements that is activated and controlled by the contraction of cardiac muscle tissue on a micropatterned sting ray-like hydrogel scaffold. The use of soft photolithography methods makes it possible to successfully integrate multiple components in the soft robotic system, including micropatterned hydrogel-based scaffolds with carbon nanotubes (CNTs) embedded gelatin methacryloyl (CNT-GelMA), poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA), flexible gold (Au) microelectrodes, and cardiac muscle tissue. In particular, the hydrogels alignment and micropattern are designed to mimic the muscle and cartilage structure of the sting ray. The electrically conductive CNT-GelMA hydrogel acts as a cell scaffold that improves the maturation and contraction behavior of cardiomyocytes, while the mechanically robust PEGDA hydrogel provides structural cartilage-like support to the whole soft robot. To overcome the hard and brittle nature of metal-based microelectrodes, we designed a serpentine pattern that has high flexibility and can avoid hampering the beating dynamics of cardiomyocytes. The incorporated flexible Au microelectrodes provide electrical stimulation across the soft robot, making it easier to control the contraction behavior of cardiac tissue.
Modern state-of-the-art soft robots can mimic the hierarchical structures and muscle dynamics of many living organisms, such as the jellyfish1,2, sting ray2, octopus3, bacteria4, and sperm5. Mimicking the dynamics and architecture of natural systems offers higher performances in terms of both energetic and structural efficiency6. This is intrinsically related to the soft nature of natural tissue (e.g., skin or muscle tissue with a Young's modulus between 104−109 Pa) which allows for higher degrees of freedom and superior deformation and adaptability when compared with standard engineered actuators (e.g., a Young’s modulus usually between 109−1012 Pa)6. Cardiac muscle-based soft-actuators, especially, show superior energy efficiency due to their self-actuation as well as their potential for autorepair and regeneration when compared to a mechanically based robotic system7. However, the fabrication of soft robots is challenging due to the necessity of integrating different components with different physical, biological, and mechanical properties into the one system. For example, engineered synthetic systems need to be integrated with living biological systems, not only providing them with structural support but also influencing and modulating their actuation behavior. In addition, many microfabrication methods require harsh/cytotoxic processes and chemicals that decrease the viability and function of any living components. Therefore, new approaches are necessary to enhance the functionality of the soft robots and to control and modulate their behavior.
To successfully integrate living components with good viability, a hydrogel-based scaffold is an excellent material to create the body of a soft robot. A hydrogel’s physical and mechanical properties can easily be tuned to create microenvironments for living components such as muscle tissues8,9. Also, it can easily adopt various microfabrication techniques, resulting in the creation of hierarchical structures with high fidelity1,2,10. Flexible electronic devices can be incorporated into the soft robot to control its behavior with electrical stimulation. For example, optogenetic techniques to engineer electrogenic cells (e.g., cardiomyocytes), which show a light-dependent electrophysiological activation, have been used to develop a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-based soft robotic sting ray guided by light that was able to recreate the undulatory movement of the fish in vitro2. Although optogenetic techniques have shown excellent controllability, the work presented uses electrical stimulation, a conventional and traditional simulation method. This is because electrical stimulation via flexible microelectrodes is easy and simple compared to optogenetic techniques, which require extensive development processes11. The use of flexible electronic devices can allow for long-term stimulation and standard/simple fabrication processes as well as tunable biocompatibility and physical and mechanical properties12,13.
Here, we present an innovative method to fabricate a bioinspired soft robot, actuated by the beating of engineered cardiac muscle tissue and controlled by electrical stimulation through embedded flexible Au microelectrodes. The soft robot is designed to mimic the muscle and cartilage structure of the sting ray. The sting ray is an organism with a relatively easy to mimic structure and movement compared to other swimming species. The muscles are recreated in vitro by seeding cardiomyocytes on an electrically conductive hydrogel micropattern. As previously reported, incorporating electrically conductive nanoparticles such as CNT in the GelMA hydrogel not only improves the electrical coupling of the cardiac tissue, but also induces an excellent in vitro tissue architecture and arrangement8,9. The cartilage joints are then mimicked using a mechanically robust PEGDA hydrogel pattern that acts as the mechanically robust substrate of the whole system. Flexible Au microelectrodes with a serpentine pattern are embedded in the PEGDA pattern to locally and electrically stimulate the cardiac tissue.
This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by the institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Brigham and Women's Hospital.
1. GelMA synthesis
2. Preparation of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) prepolymer solution
3. Preparation of GelMA-coated CNT dispersed stock solution
4. Preparation of 1 mg/mL CNT containing 5% GelMA prepolymer solution
5. Preparation of a 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate (TMSPMA) coated glass slide
6. Fabrication of the flexible Au microelectrodes
7. Fabrication of an Au microelectrode-integrated micropatterned multilayered hydrogel scaffold
NOTE: The result of this procedure is a membrane where a micropatterned PEGDA hydrogel is in the bottom layer, a micropatterned CNT-GelMA hydrogel is on top, and the Au microelectrodes are between the two layers. This configuration ensures a better flexibility to the electrode and limits the risk of breaking.
8. Neonatal rat cardiomyocytes isolation and culture
9. Cell staining for alignment analysis
10. Actuator testing and behavior evaluation
Flow diagram of the steps for developing the Au microelectrode-incorporated bioinspired soft robot
The aim of the soft robot design was to build a membrane capable of actuating a swimming movement with minimal complexity. The structure must be able to sustain strong flexions repeatedly over time (about 1 Hz) and be able to keep its shape while achieving a strong beating. By selectively photo crosslinking the polymer using photomasks, we fabricated a hierarchically structured scaffold comprised of a micropatterned PEGDA hydrogel layer, a flexible Au microelectrodes layer, and a micropatterned CNT–GelMA hydrogel layer. A schematic diagram and actual images of the fabrication procedure of the soft robot as described in the protocol are shown in Figure 1. Briefly, there were three main fabrication steps for the bioinspired soft robot with embedded Au microelectrodes: First, a micropatterned PEGDA hydrogel with incorporated Au microelectrodes was obtained by UV crosslinking using the 1st photomask (Figure 1A, B). Second, a multilayered construct composed of Au microelectrodes, the micropatterned CNT-GelMA, and the PEGDA hydrogels was fabricated by UV crosslinking using the 2nd photomask (Figure 1C). Finally, cardiomyocytes were seeded on the fabricated three-layer construct to provide actuation to the soft robot (Figure 1D).
Different designs of the soft robot
Regarding the shape of the soft robot, in the beginning, we designed two bioinspired shapes by biomimicking the patterns of two different aquatic animals. The first design was inspired by the appearance of a caraibic starfish (Figure 2A, B, C), because the starfish can be simplified into a two-dimensional (2D) object, has a hard backbone, and has a flexible part that joins together to move in the water, minimizing the required movement. The second device was based on the shape of a manta ray (Figure 2D, E, F) which is easy to reproduce in a 2D device. The manta ray can swim quickly using unique movements. We sketched the manta ray using basic geometric shapes with reduced complexity to be crosslinked during the photomask step. The electrode, placed along the midline of the structure, was designed with a wavy pattern, allowing for a better spread of electrical pulses and flexibility (Figure 2D). To develop the bioinspired soft robot, the manta ray-inspired shape was selected and tested thoroughly in this study.
The challenge of embedding the Au microelectrodes between CNT-GelMA and PEGDA hydrogels
The encapsulation of 200 nm thick Au microelectrodes in the fabricated robot body could locally control the construct by providing electrical stimulation. Although the UV crosslinking of both the CNT-GelMA and PEGDA hydrogel patterns directly on the electrode surface hampered the delamination of the electrodes, it guaranteed the successful incorporation of the electrode into the soft robot. However, after transferring the Au electrode on the PEGDA hydrogels, the Au electrode with a rectangular shape and wide width (>1 mm) was easily broken during the fabrication process due to the swelling of the PEGDA hydrogel (Figure 3A, B, C). Hence, we needed to make sure that the microelectrodes were successfully transferred to the PEGDA hydrogel and embedded between the CNT-GelMA and PEGDA hydrogels while intact. Therefore, Au microelectrodes with a serpentine pattern (thickness = 200 µm) were designed and fabricated with soft lithography. Phase contrast microscope pictures with different magnifications and stages were taken in order to inspect signs of fracture on the electrode after transportation on the micropatterned PEGDA hydrogels (Figure 3D, E, F).
The optimization of spacing between hydrogel micropatterns
The cardiomyocyte seeded CNT-GelMA layer showed different beating behavior according to the pattern distances (Figure 4A, B). This may be attributed to the different ways cells attached to the membrane's surface depending on the lines' distances. In the case of the 50 μm distance, the cells were too packed and did not have the desired organized configuration. The partially interconnected and not aligned cells on the wings were not all simultaneously contributing to the swimming movement. Hence, the force generated by the cardiomyocyte was not enough to bend the wings. At a 150 μm distance, the cells were very well aligned. However, they mainly sat in the groove and there were few interconnections among cells in the upper layers, resulting in weak beating. At a 75 μm distance, the cells were aligned in the bottom part and interconnected in the upper part, showing the strongest beating. In addition, to prevent irreversible complete rolling of the soft robot during the dynamic beating of the cardiomyocytes, we optimized the pattern spacing of the PEGDA hydrogel support layer to 300 µm (Figure 4C). Finally, following this parameterization process, we decided to focus more on the manta ray-shaped membrane with 300 μm distance PEGDA patterns and 75 μm distance CNT-GelMA patterns. Cardiac tissue on micropatterned PEGDA- and CNT-GelMA patterns was also shown by phase/contrast images and F-actin/DAPI confocal images (Figure 4B).
The analysis of movement of the cardiac tissue on micropatterned PEGDA- and CNT-GelMA hydrogels
To analyze the movement of the actuator, we took videos of the membrane without the Au microelectrodes while applying an electric field using a carbon rod electrode. Figure 4D shows some frames taken from the contraction records. It was clearly visible that the manta ray-shaped actuator was bending the wings as expected. The tail was balancing the structure by straightening up a little and the wings were strongly closing in the middle. Some of the membranes showed a rotating movement while contracting due to misaligned micropatterned CNT-GelMA and PEGDA hydrogels (Figure 4E and Video 1). In this case, the movement was less defined compared to the previous one but the contraction was still strong enough to allow actuation of a rotating movement. The total time to complete an entire circle was around 45 s.
The characterization of the cardiomyocytes on the multilayered soft robot and control of beating behavior by electrical stimulation
After seeding and maturation of cardiomyocytes on the bioinspired robotic system (Figure 5A), alignment of the cardiac tissue along the direction of the CNT-GelMA patterns was observed (Figure 5B-E) by both F-actin/DAPI and sacromeric/connexin-43/DAPI immunostaining. Confocal fluorescence images showed well-elongated and aligned cardiomyocytes on the CNT–GelMA hydrogel pattern (Figure 5B, C). Partial uniaxial sarcomere alignment and interconnected sarcomere structure was observed on the patterned areas (Figure 5D). Well-interconnected sarcomere structures of cardiac tissues located directly above the microelectrodes were also observed (Figure 5E). To assess the bioinspired soft robot, we detected its function using two methods: First, we applied a biphasic electrical pulse to the soft robot though carbon rod electrodes for artificial tuning and controlling the beating behavior. Second, we connected two copper wires to the outermost end of the Au electrode for generating an electrical signal through the whole robot construct. When we applied an electrical stimulation through the external carbon electrode or copper wire connected to the Au electrode, the excitation threshold voltage was different at different frequencies (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 Hz, Figure 5F).
Figure 1: Schematic diagram and actual images depicting the fabrication process of the bioinspired multilayered soft robot electrically controlled by electrical signal via the integration of flexible Au microelectrodes. (A) Patterning and crosslinking of the PEGDA hydrogel using the 1st photomask. (B) Micropatterned PEGDA hydrogel with the encapsulated Au microelectrodes on the TMSPMA glass obtained after step (A). (C) Crosslinking of the CNT-GelMA patterned hydrogel using the 2nd photomask. (D) Seeding of the cardiomyocytes on the multilayered construct. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Design of the bioinspired soft robots. (A) Real starfish picture and different views of the three-dimensional (3D) CAD model pointing out the components and stripes. (B) Mask design for CNT-GelMA pattern, PEGDA pattern, and Au microelectrodes for the starfish shape. (C) Optical microscope image of the micropatterned CNT-GelMA and PEGDA patterns for the starfish shape. (D) Real manta ray picture and different views of the 3D CAD model pointing out the components. (E) Mask design for CNT-GelMA pattern, PEGDA pattern, and Au microelectrodes for the manta ray shape, adapted with permission from Su Ryon et al.10. (F) Optical microscope image of the micropatterned CNT-GelMA and PEGDA patterns for the manta ray shape. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Design of the flexible Au microelectrodes. (A) Photograph of fabricated Au electrodes with rectangular shapes and wide widths. (B and C) Optical microscope images of Au electrodes that failed to transfer to the PEGDA hydrogels. (D) Wavy Au microelectrodes before and after (E and F) being transferred on the micropatterned PEGDA hydrogel. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: The optimization of micropatterned PEGDA and CNT–GelMA hydrogels and movement analysis of soft robots. (A) Optical images of cardiomyocytes on the CNT–GelMA hydrogel pattern with 50, 75, and 150 µm spacing. (B) Optical images and F-actin/DAPI staining of cardiomyocytes on the PEGDA- and CNT-GelMA hydrogel patterns with 300 µm and 75 µm spacing, respectively. (C) The rolling morphologies of the bioinspired constructs with and without the micropatterned PEGDA hydrogel with 300 µm spacing. (D) Frames of the free-standing bioinspired soft robot video recorded while applying the electric stimulus. (E) Collage of four different frames taken from the video recording the rotating movement of the soft robot. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Characterization of cardiomyocytes on Au microelectrode-incorporated soft robot and control of beating behavior by electrical stimulation. (A) Optical microscope image of the cultured cardiomyocytes on the Au microelectrodes encapsulated between PEGDA and CNT-GelMA hydrogels. (B) F-actin/DAPI fluorescence image showing the well-elongated and aligned cardiomyocytes on the CNT–GelMA hydrogel micropattern. (C–E) Confocal fluorescence images showing sarcomere alignment and interconnected sarcomere structures on the fabricated soft robot: (C and D) cultured cardiomyocytes on the CNT–GelMA hydrogel micropattern, and (E) near the Au microelectrodes. (F) Required excitation threshold voltage at different frequencies (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 Hz) when applying electrical stimulation via carbon rod electrode and embedded Au microelectrodes. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Video 1. Please click here to view this video (Right click to download).
Supplementary File 1. Please click here to view this file (Right click to download).
Supplementary File 2. Please click here to view this file (Right click to download).
Supplementary File 3. Please click here to view this file (Right click to download).
Using this method, we were able to successfully fabricate a batoid fish-like bioinspired soft robot with an integrated self-actuating cardiac tissue on a multilayer structured scaffold that is controlled by embedded Au microelectrodes. Due to two distinct micropatterned hydrogel layers made of PEGDA and CNT–GelMA hydrogels, the bioinspired scaffold showed good mechanical stability and ideal cell alignment and maturation. The PEGDA pattern layer, which serves as a cartilage joint of the skeletal architecture in a sting ray, provides mechanical support for the whole robot body. Specifically, it maintained mechanical stability during cardiac tissue contraction and relaxation, while allowing for efficient beating due to its ability to release the membrane tension following contraction. Furthermore, the nanometric thickness of the microelectrodes (200 nm), as well as their serpentine pattern, allowed them to be flexible enough to not impede or influence the contraction of the cardiac tissue (Figure 2). To easily transfer microelectrodes on the hydrogel surface without any breakage, Au microelectrodes were fabricated on the glass without any adhesion layer, such as titanium, which is commonly used to create strong adhesion between the glass and Au. Meanwhile, the CNT-GelMA layer, which provides support for cardiomyocyte attachment and alignment, was made with patterns perpendicular to the orientation of the PEGDA hydrogel pattern (Figure 3). After maturation, the cardiomyocytes on the top layer provided self-actuation for the whole scaffold. Through the local electrical stimulation of the incorporated Au flexible microelectrodes, we could modulate the beating frequency of the robot without harming the cardiac tissue on it. Although this fabrication method is easy to learn and to reproduce, there are still a few technically challenging steps in the fabrication process that need to be emphasized.
There are five critical steps for the fabrication of the soft biorobot: 1) correct dispersion of the CNTs in the GelMA hydrogel; 2) successful UV crosslinking of the PEGDA and CNT-GelMA hydrogels on the TMSPMA-coated glass; 3) transfer of the Au microelectrodes from the support glass to the hydrogel pattern; 4) correct detachment of the actuator from the supporting glass slide; 5) creation of good electrical contact between the Au microelectrodes and the wires used for the connection to the waveform generator.
Compared with pristine GelMA substrates, the incorporation of CNTs provides the GelMA hydrogel with enhanced mechanical properties and advanced electrophysiological functions that contribute to higher spontaneous synchronous beating rates and a lower excitation threshold of myocardial tissue9. The problem of CNT cytotoxicity is prevented not only by using surface functionalized CNTs but also by incorporating the nanostructures in the GelMA hydrogel matrix up to a concentration of 5.0 mg/mL9. In fact, the interaction between the hydrophobic segments of the GelMA hydrogel with the CNTs sidewalls lead to the encapsulation of CNTs in the hydrogel porous matrix14. This not only prevents them from forming potentially toxic aggregates, but it also enhances CNTs solubility in saline solutions (e.g., DPBS or cell culture medium).
To successfully incorporate the Au microelectrodes between the PEGDA and CNT-GelMA hydrogels, specific attention needs to be put into the UV crosslinking of each single layer. Specifically, to transfer the Au microelectrodes on the PEGDA hydrogel layer, it is necessary to ensure that the hydrogel solution covers the entire electrode area to avoid the rupture of the electrodes during the peeling step. Therefore, the quality of the TMSPMA glass coating is fundamental to guarantee an optimal adhesion of the PEGDA hydrogel onto the glass substrate, thereby preventing its detachment during the transfer step of the microelectrodes.
Another critical step of the method is the detachment of the bioactuator from the supporting glass slide. This problem can be easily solved when the spontaneous beating of the cardiac tissues is synchronous and strong enough to naturally peel the supporting hydrogel from the glass slide. For this reason, as reported before, it is fundamental to optimize the hydrogel patterns to induce a specific cell alignment favorable for the organization of a functional and synchronous cardiac tissue.
To electrically connect the microelectrodes to the waveform generator, electrical connections must be created on the microelectrodes. During this step, it is important to completely encapsulate the silver glue used for contacting the microelectrodes to the copper wire to avoid cytotoxic effects. This is successfully achieved by depositing a thin drop of PDMS on the top of the electrical contact.
This method could not only overcome the limitations of existing optogenetic techniques, such as complicated fabrication processes, long fabrication times and potential toxicity of optogenetic tools, but also strongly enhance the performance of cell-based actuators leading to real-time stimulation using low-cost and easy-to-handle techniques. Although the design of our current bioinspired actuators could not generate forward propulsion, its success in the field of autonomous cell-based robots could attract a lot of interest. This method can also potentially contribute to the development of wirelessly-powered implantable patches for a whole robot body. This method paves the way for future wireless electrical stimulation of soft-biorobots though the integration of flexible RF circuits directly in the hydrogel-based scaffold.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This paper was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R01AR074234, R21EB026824, R01 AR073822-01), the Brigham Research Institute Stepping Strong Innovator Award, and AHA Innovative Project Award (19IPLOI34660079).
250 mL Beaker | PYREX | 1000-250CNEa | |
2-Hydroxy-4'-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-2-methylpropiophenone | Sigma-Aldrich | 410896 | |
3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate | Milipore | M6514 | |
37° Water bath | VWR | W6M | |
4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) | Sigma-Aldrich | D9542 | |
50mL Conical Centrifuge Tubes | Falcon | 14-959-49A | |
70 µm Cell Strainer | Falcon | 352350 | |
80° incubator | VWR | 1370GM | |
Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) | Invitrogen | A11029 | |
Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) | Invitrogen | A11037 | |
Alexa Fluor 488 Phalloidin | Invitrogen | A12379 | |
Antibiotic/Antimycotic solution | ThermoFisher Scientific | 15240062 | |
Anti-Connexin 43/GJAI antibody | Abcam | ab11370 | Rabbit polyclonal |
Anti-Sarcomeric α-actinin | Abcam | ab9465 | Mouse monoclonal |
Benchtop Freeze Dryers | Labconco | 77500-00 K | |
Biosafety cabinet | Sterilgard | A/B3 | |
Carbon rod electrodes | SGL Carbon Group | 6971105 | |
Centrifuge | Eppendorf | 5804 | |
CO2 incubator | Forma Scientific | 3110 | |
Collagenase, Type II, Powder | Gibco | 17-101-015 | |
Confocal Microscope | Zeiss | LSM 880 | |
COOH Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes | NanoLab | PD30L5-20-COOH | |
Dicing saw machine | Giorgio Technology | DAD-321 | |
DMEM, High Glucose | Gibco | 11-965-118 | |
DPBS without Calcium and Magnesium | Gibco | 14-190-144 | |
E-beam evaporator | CHA | 57367 | |
Fetal Bovine Serum | Gibco | 10-437-028 | |
Gelatin | Sigma-Aldrich | G9391 | Type B, 300 bloom from porcine skin |
Glass slide | VWR | 48382-180 | |
HBSS without Calcium, Magnesium or Phenol Red | Gibco | 14-175-079 | |
Inverted optical microscope | Olympus | CK40 | |
Magnetic hotplate | Corning | PC-420 | |
methacrylic anhydride | Sigma-Aldrich | 276695 | Contains 2,000ppm topanol A as inhibitor |
Nunc EasYFlask 175cm2 | ThermoFisher Scientific | 159910 | |
Olicscope | Siglent | SDS1052DL+ | |
Paraformaldehyde Aqueous Solution -16% | Electron Microscopy Sciences | 15710 | |
PDMS SYLGARD 184 | Sigma-Aldrich | 761036 | |
Photomask | Mini micro stencil inc | ||
Platinum wire | Alfa Aesar | AA43014BU | |
Polyethylene glycol dimethcrylate | Polysciences Inc. | 15178-100 | |
Regenerated Cellulose Dialysis Tubing | Fisherbrand | 21-152-14 | |
Silver Epoxy Adhesive | MG Chemicals | 8330S | |
Stericup Quick Release-GP Sterile Vacuum Filtration System | Millipore | S2GPU02RE | |
Ultra sonicator | Qsonica | Q500 | |
UV Curing System | OmniCure | S2000 | |
Vortex mixer | Scientific Industry | SI-0246A | |
Waveform generator | Agilent | 33500B | |
Wrap Aluminium foil | Reynolds | N/A |