概要

Dissociation of Human and Mouse Tumor Tissue Samples for Single-cell RNA Sequencing

Published: August 16, 2024
doi:

概要

This protocol outlines the procedure for rapidly dissociating human and mouse tumor samples for single-cell RNA sequencing.

Abstract

Human tumor samples hold a plethora of information about their microenvironment and immune repertoire. Effective dissociation of human tissue samples into viable cell suspensions is a required input for the single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) pipeline. Unlike bulk RNA sequencing approaches, scRNAseq enables us to infer the transcriptional heterogeneity in tumor specimens at the single-cell level. Incorporating this approach in recent years has led to many discoveries, such as identifying immune and tumor cellular states and programs associated with clinical responses to immunotherapies and other types of treatments. Moreover, single-cell technologies applied to dissociated tissues can be used to identify accessible chromatin regions T and B cell receptor repertoire, and the expression of proteins, using DNA barcoded antibodies (CITEseq).

The viability and quality of the dissociated sample are critical variables when using these technologies, as these can dramatically affect the cross-contamination of single cells with ambient RNA, the quality of the data, and interpretation. Moreover, long dissociation protocols can lead to the elimination of sensitive cell populations and the upregulation of a stress response gene signature. To overcome these limitations, we devised a rapid universal dissociation protocol, which has been validated on multiple types of human and murine tumors. The process begins with mechanical and enzymatic dissociation, followed by filtration, red blood lysis, and live dead enrichment, suitable for samples with a low input of cells (e.g., needle core biopsies). This protocol ensures a clean and viable single-cell suspension paramount to the successful generation of Gel Bead-In Emulsions (GEMs), barcoding, and sequencing.

Introduction

Although many advancements in cancer research have led to the development and FDA approval of agents targeting inhibitory receptors expressed on immune and tumor cells, known as checkpoint blockade inhibitors, therapy resistance and identifying mechanisms that drive patient response remain challenging1. The complex challenge of characterizing tumor heterogeneity on its molecular diversity and the intricate interplay between tumor cells and the immune microenvironment necessitates new approaches to dissect this complex ecosystem at the single-cell resolution. Understanding the molecular intricacies within tumors and their microenvironments is pivotal for advancing therapeutic strategies and deciphering the complex biology underlying cancer progression2. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has become increasingly popular because it provides high-resolution analysis of individual cells within complex tumor samples3,4.

Tumor heterogeneity, encompassing genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic diversities, poses a challenge in uncovering the intricacies of cancer biology5. The conventional methods of bulk RNA sequencing tend to obscure the unique expression profiles and phenotypes of heterogeneous cell populations present within tumors, as these methods average signals across entire cell populations4. In contrast, scRNA-seq allows the dissection of individual cell types, revealing diverse gene expression, repression patterns, and cellular states otherwise overlooked4,6. The premise of scRNA-seq lies in its capacity to decode individual cells' genetic and molecular signatures, holding immense promise in discovering new cancer therapeutics7.

By deciphering the gene expression profiles of tumor cells and the surrounding stromal and immune cells, researchers can identify novel therapeutic targets and develop precision genetic medicine strategies tailored to individual patients6. Furthermore, dissecting the immune repertoire within the tumor microenvironment provides crucial insights into the interplay between tumor cells and immune effectors, paving the way for immunotherapeutic interventions3. Despite advances in using scRNAseq on clinical samples, several challenges during the processing steps can harm the cell's RNA integrity, viability, and quality of the data generated. Moreover, processing tissue with low cell viability can increase ambient RNA levels in the droplets generated during the encapsulation of individual cells, resulting in cross-contamination and incorrect annotation of cell types, while long dissociation protocols performed at 37 °C can lead to the upregulation of a stress response gene signature in multiple cell types8,9,10.

The stepwise procedure (Figure 1A) outlined in this protocol commences with rapid mechanical and enzymatic dissociation of tumors, followed by filtration and the removal of dead cells, depending on the viability of each tumor sample. At present, this procedure has been verified in melanoma11, colorectal12, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma13, pancreatic and lung (unpublished data) tumor samples. These techniques ensure the generation of high-quality viable cell suspensions crucial for downstream analyses14. Notably, removing red blood cells, devoid of synthesized RNA, becomes imperative to purify the sample15. Subsequent evaluation of cell counts and the elimination of dead cells serve as a prerequisite for successful 10x Genomics Gel bead-in Emulsion (GEM) generation, barcoding, and increase the recovery of transcripts and sequenced cells without jeopardizing the exclusion of sensitive populations (e.g., neutrophils and epithelial cells)16. These steps are fundamental in unlocking the potential of single-cell resolution analysis within tumor samples9,10, uncovering novel gene expression profiles and immune signatures necessary for driving innovative therapeutic interventions, and identifying new tumor vulnerabilities.

Protocol

This study complied with all institutional guidelines regarding human tissue sampling. Informed consent was received from patients, and identifiable sample data was anonymized. Samples are collected in the operation room, placed in a solution of RPMI, saline, or PBS, and confirmed cancerous via the pathology department before use in research. All steps, except when indicated, should be carried out at 4 °C or on ice. Work inside a biosafety hood when processing human tissue. See the Table of Materials for details on all materials, reagents, and instruments used in this protocol.

1. Obtaining the sample

  1. Obtain a solid tumor sample in a tube of media and place it on ice.
    1. Instruct the operating room staff to transport the sample in a tube containing enough RPMI, saline, or PBS to completely submerge the tissue to avoid sample dehydration.
      NOTE: Ensuring the sample is not desiccated is important, as this will decrease viability.
  2. Cool down all centrifuges to 4 ˚C and bring the thermal mixer to 37 ˚C.
  3. Take out prepared human or mouse tumor dissociation enzymes (Table of Materials), thaw on the 37 ˚C thermal mixer, and move to ice once thawed.
  4. Retrieve a 20 mL aliquot of RPMI.
  5. Record relevant sample information (e.g., Patient ID, de-identifier, sample type).
  6. Transfer the sample to a 60 mm tissue culture dish (placed on ice) by inverting the tube several times and pouring the contents into the dish to ensure all sample material is transferred. If the sample was not delivered in media upon arrival, add fresh RPMI media to the dish.
    1. If the sample is fragmented, spin the tube containing the sample at 450 × g, 4 ˚C for 5 min, discard the supernatant, resuspend the sample in 420 µL of RPMI, and move to section 2.

2. Mechanical and enzymatic digestion

  1. Pipette 420 µL of media from the 60 mm sample dish to a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube. Attempt to include any sample fragments suspended in the media.
  2. Transfer the sample tissue from the 60 mm dish to the 1.5 mL tube containing media using tweezers. Cut up the sample with clean scissors inside the tube so the pieces are maximum 2-3 mm in diameter.
  3. Add digestion enzymes, prepared according to manufacturer specifications (Table of Materials), to the sample in the following volumes: 42 µL of Enzyme H (nonspecific proteases) for human samples, Enzyme D (nonspecific proteases) for murine samples, 21 µL of enzyme R (nonspecific proteases), and 5 µL of enzyme A (nuclease).
  4. Add another 420 µL of media from the dish or up to the 1 mL mark on the tube. Do not exceed 420 µL of media.
  5. Vortex the tube for 5 s and place it in a thermal mixer positioned vertically on its side (Figure 1B). Incubate at 37 ˚C, 450 rpm, for 15 min.
    NOTE: During incubation, take out all 10x Genomics materials needed for GEM generation, as these require 30 min to equilibrate to room temperature

3. Sample filtering

  1. Place a 50 µm cell filter on top of a new 15 mL conical tube and prime the filter by passing 1 mL of fresh RPMI media through it into the tube.
  2. After digestion, transfer the sample to the 15 mL tube using a 1,000 µL low-retention wide pipette tip. Wash the 1.5 mL tube with 1 mL of fresh media and transfer the media to the filter to ensure all sample material is passed through the filter.
  3. Obtain a 1 mL plastic syringe and take out just the plunger (discard the remainder of the syringe). Using the back of the syringe plunger, grind and push the sample on the filter in a twisting motion.
  4. Wash the filter with 5 mL of media and any remaining media from the dish that contained the sample (section 1) to collect any cells that might have detached from the tissue.
  5. Place a 30 µm cell filter on top of a new 15 mL conical tube, prime the filter with 1 mL of media, and transfer the contents of the tube containing the dissociated sample through the filter.
    NOTE: This step will remove large debris that might clog or cause a wetting failure when running the sample using the 10x Genomics microfluidic chips.

4. Red blood cell lysis

  1. Centrifuge the sample at 450 × g, 4 ˚C for 5 min. Aspirate the media, being careful not to disturb the pellet.
  2. Resuspend in ACK Lysis buffer to remove red blood cells (RBCs) and record the volume used. The volume will depend on pellet size and the extent of RBCs in the pellet.
    NOTE: Resuspended ACK-sample solution should be colorless when enough ACK Lysis buffer has been added, as this will clear the red blood cells from the sample.
  3. Centrifuge the sample tube at 450 × g, 4 ˚C for 5 min, and aspirate the supernatant.
  4. Repeat steps 4.2-4.3 as needed until the sample pellet has no visible red color after centrifugation (Figure 2). Record any extra volumes of ACK Lysis buffer used in this step.
  5. Resuspend the sample pellet in fresh media in preparation for counting.

5. Cell counting

  1. Place 10 µL of trypan blue in a 1.5 mL tube. Gently mix the dissociated cells, take 10 µL of sample, and mix (1:1) with the trypan blue. Load 10 µL on each side of a hemocytometer and count the cells.
  2. Record cell concentration, total live cell count, viability percentage, and final media volume after count.
  3. Ensure cell count is between 700 and 1,200 cells/µL (7 × 105– 1.2 × 106/mL) for an optimal 10x Genomics run.
    1. If the sample is too concentrated, dilute it with media and recount it.
    2. If the sample is too diluted, centrifuge the sample at 450 × g, 4 ˚C for 5 min, and resuspend in a lesser volume of media.
    3. If cell viability is below 80%, perform a live-dead procedure to remove dead cells.
    4. If there are under one million cells, see section 6.
    5. If there are over one million cells and viability > 10%, see section 6.
    6. If there are over one million cells and viability < 10%, see section 7.
    7. If cell viability is above 80%, keep the processed cells on ice and proceed immediately to GEM generation according to the manufacturer's instructions.

6. Dead cell removal – Kit 1

NOTE: Work inside a biosafety hood when using the dead cell removal reagents, as these can easily get contaminated.

  1. Centrifuge the sample at 450 × g, 4 ˚C for 5 min.
  2. Prepare isolation media in a 15 mL conical tube and keep it at room temperature: 9.8 mL of PBS, 10 µL of CaCl2, and 200 µL of heat-inactivated FCS (added in a Biosafety hood).
  3. After centrifugation, aspirate the media from the pellet and resuspend in 1 mL of the isolation media.
  4. Centrifuge the tube again at 450 × g, 4 ˚C for 5 min. Aspirate the supernatant and resuspend the pellet in 100 µL of isolation media.
  5. Transfer 100 µL of sample in isolation media into one well of a 0.2 mL PCR strip-tube.
  6. In a biosafety hood, add 10 µL of Annexin V Cocktail and 10 µL of Biotin Selection Cocktail to the well containing 100 µL of the sample in isolation media. Pipette mix the solution and allow it to sit at room temperature for 4 min.
  7. After 4 min, vortex the dextran-coated magnetic particles for 30 s. Add 20 µL of the beads and 60 µL of isolation media to the sample (a total volume of 200 µL). If viability is lower than 40%, scale the amount of beads up to 40 µL while adjusting the volume of isolation media (up to 40 µL), keeping a total volume of 200 µL. Pipette mix and allow the solution to sit at room temperature for 3 min.
  8. Place the strip tube onto a 10x Genomics Magnetic Separator (on the high setting) for 5 min at room temperature.
  9. Transfer the liquid from the strip tube without disturbing the beads into a new 1.5 mL lo-bind microcentrifuge tube. Do not remove the strip-tube from the magnet.
  10. Centrifuge the 1.5 mL tube containing the sample at 450 × g, 4 ˚C for 5 min. Aspirate the supernatant and resuspend the pellet in an appropriate volume of RPMI media based on the pellet size and count cells, as described in section 5. Repeat the dead cell removal procedure if viability remains below 80% (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
    NOTE: Do not resuspend cells in isolation media for downstream GEM generation, as the calcium chloride will interfere with the encapsulation process and the reverse transcription (RT) step.
  11. Keep processed cells on ice if cell viability is above 80% and proceed immediately to GEM generation according to the manufacturer's instructions.

7. Dead cell removal – Kit 2

NOTE: Work inside a biosafety hood when using the kit reagents.

  1. Place the microbeads and the 20x Binding Buffer stock solution inside a biosafety hood.
  2. Centrifuge the sample suspension at 450 × g, 4 ˚C for 5 min.
  3. Prepare 1x buffer solution under sterile conditions using 1 mL of the 20x Binding Buffer stock solution pipetted into 19 mL of DNAse-, RNAse-free distilled water.
  4. Once the centrifugation is completed, aspirate the supernatant, add the microbeads, gently mix the sample, and incubate at room temperature for 15 min.
    1. When the cell count is 107 or less, add 100 µL of the microbeads.
    2. For counts higher than 107 total cells, adjust the microbeads for a final concentration of 100 µL per 107 live cells.
  5. During incubation, obtain one MACS positive selection column, MACS multistand, and the corresponding magnetic separator. Ensure the separator is leveled on the multistand and no other metal or magnetic object is near the stand, as the magnetic force is powerful and could affect dead cell removal efficiency. Place the column snugly into a separator holder with wings facing out.
  6. After sample incubation, if the total resuspension volume is less than 500 µL, add 1x Binding Buffer until the total volume is 500 µL.
  7. Place a 15 mL conical tube below the column and prime the column with 3 mL of 1x Binding Buffer.
  8. Replace the conical tube with a new 15 mL conical for cell sample collection and add the sample to the column, allowing it to flow completely through the column.
  9. Wash the column 4 x 3 mL of 1x Binding Buffer, only adding one wash at a time after the previous wash entirely flowed through the column.
  10. After the fourth wash, centrifuge the conical tube containing the isolated cells for 5 min at 450 × g, 4 ˚C. Discard the column and the remaining 1x Binding Buffer.
  11. Resuspend the sample solution in the appropriate amount of RPMI media based on pellet size and count the isolated cells using the method described in section 5 (Figure 3 and Figure 5).
    1. If viability remains below 80%, and the total number of cells is 106 or less, repeat section 6.
    2. If cell viability is above 80%, keep processed cells on ice and proceed immediately to GEM generation according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Representative Results

A melanoma biopsy suspended in RPMI was obtained and immediately placed on ice. The sample was transferred into a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube containing 420 µL of RPMI and digestion enzymes, minced into small pieces using scissors, and subjected to subsequent enzymatic digestion for 15 min in a 37 ˚C vertically positioned thermal mixer (Figure 1). Following digestion, the sample was filtered through a 50 µm sterile disposable filter, and the filter was washed with fresh RPMI to increase cell yield (Figure 1). The remaining parts of the tissue left after the washes were discarded, as these are unwanted biological materials (e.g., adipose tissue).

Based on the color of the resulting cell pellet, 15 mL of ACK lysis buffer was needed to remove the red blood cells (Figure 2). Following resuspension in 3 mL of RPMI media, the total cell count was 1 × 106/mL, with viability that was <80% (Figure 3A). This indicated that one cycle of live cell enrichment using Kit 1 (protocol section 6) was needed before proceeding to 10x Genomics loading (Figure 4). If this sample had over 1 million cells and had a viability of less than 10%, the Dead Cell removal – Kit 2 would have been utilized instead (Figure 5). The sample was washed with isolation media, and 10 µL of Annexin V and biotin selection cocktail were added, followed by 20 µL of the magnetic beads and 60 µL of isolation media, as described in protocol section 6 (Figure 4). After this procedure, the sample was resuspended in 500 µL of media and recounted. The live cell count was 4.9 × 105/mL with viability above 90% (Figure 3B), and the sample proceeded immediately to GEM generation according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Tumor sample processing overview. (A) Illustration of the step-by-step process of the tissue dissociation protocol. (B) The digestion of a sample using a vertically positioned thermal mixer. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Pre-ACK and Post-ACK treatment of a mildly pigmented Melanoma sample. (A) Image shows a melanoma sample that was filtered and pelleted after the digestion step before red blood cell (RBC) lysis using ACK. (B) Image shows the same melanoma sample after RBC removal using ACK buffer. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: View of cells on hemocytometer under trypan blue zoomed in at 200x magnification. (A) Image showing the appearance of blue cells before live cell enrichment, representing dead cells, with viability lower than 80%. (B) Image showing the sample after live cell enrichment using the Kit 1 protocol (protocol step 6), showing increased viability above 90%. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4
Figure 4: Overview of the live-dead sample cell isolation using Kit 1. This step is performed when under one million or over one million cells with viability >10% are detected after cell count (protocol step 5). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5
Figure 5: Overview of the live-dead cell isolation using the dead cell removal microbeads in Kit 2. This step is performed when there are over one million cells and a viability of <10%. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6
Figure 6: Validation of single-cell analysis of an unmanipulated sample after one cycle of live cell enrichment using Kit 1's modified protocol. Upper part shows a UMAP analysis demonstrating consistency in cell groups and types prior to and after live cell enrichment. Lower part summarizes the sequencing outputs generated by Cell Ranger. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Discussion

This protocol describes human or murine tumor samples dissociation into a single-cell suspension for scRNA sequencing using the 10x Genomics microfluidic system. In processing tissues that often come from rare cancers or are part of ongoing clinical trials or long experiments for murine tumors, the sample must be optimally and carefully preserved between all steps. All steps should be carried out rapidly on ice or at 4 ˚C to keep the native cellular RNA profiles and prevent degradation, as working at room temperature for extended periods will affect the transcriptomic quality17,18.

Several steps should be taken to ensure the loss of cells throughout the procedure is minimal, especially when processing small needle core biopsies17. Ensuring that all fragments of the tumor sample are included in the digestion will lead to the most successful result, as more cells extracted from the sample will improve future 10x Genomics encapsulation and sequencing and the total number of cells and transcripts recovered for analysis. If the sample becomes lodged in the tube it arrives in, media can be added, the tube inverted, and transferred to the dish for processing. If the initial sample is fragmented or the solution is cloudy, indicating the presence of cells in suspension, ensure that all the sample is collected for enzymatic digestion by centrifuging the sample with the solution it arrived in and resuspending it in media volume for digestion (protocol section 1).

When aspirating, ensure that the pellet is not disturbed throughout the procedure. Leave extra volume when aspirating, which can be removed with a P200 pipette. If the pellet is disturbed, the volume can be dispensed back into the tube and re-centrifuged. Post ACK Lysis or post live dead removal, the sample may be in volumes as low as 25 µL. Thus, it is critical not to lose any supernatant containing the cells. Proper mechanical digestion is essential to ensure the cells of interest are exposed to enzymatic digestion. Longer enzymatic digestion using the appropriate enzymes and thermal mixer might be needed for larger sample sizes9,19,20. While specific enzyme names are proprietary, the manufacturer notes enzyme A as a nuclease and enzymes H, D, and R as nonspecific proteases. Passing as much of the tumor sample through the filter is vital to ensuring the highest cell yield possible. Successful filtering will result in the filter not having any or only a tiny visible sample caught in it. Some pieces of the sample might not be able to be filtered through if it has high amounts of adipose or connective tissue. If there are visible pieces of the sample on the top of the filter, continue using the back of the syringe plunger to grind and push all the sample through using the twisting motion while also washing the top of the filter with more media.

The success of the red blood cell lysis step is determined by viewing the sample underneath the microscope once the sample is loaded on the hemocytometer for counting and viability15,21. If enough ACK is added to the sample to clear out red blood cells, there would be no red blood cells or visible redness in the pellet. If red blood cells are visible in the sample, additional ACK should be added, and the sample should be re-centrifuged at 450 × g, 4 ˚C for 5 min. Once done, the supernatant should be aspirated, and the pellet of cells can be resuspended in RPMI media for visualization and counting.

To ensure an optimal 10x Genomics run, the cell count should be between 700 and 1,200 cells/µL (7 × 105– 1.2 × 106/mL). A high concentration will increase the doublet rate (two cells in one droplet) during droplet formation. If the count is too high, an appropriate amount of media can be added to the sample and reloaded on a hemocytometer for recounting. If the concentration is too low, the sample can be re-centrifuged at 450 × g, 4 ˚C for 5 min, the supernatant aspirated and resuspended in a lower volume of media before recounting. The sample is ready to be loaded for 10x Genomics if the live cell viability is above 80% (Figure 3).

If the sample's viability is below 80%, a live-dead procedure is needed before 10x Genomics loading16. If one round of live-dead removal has not brought the viability percentage above 80%, another round should be performed if there are over 1 × 105 cells total. Higher viability will prevent clogs in the subsequent 10x Genomics protocol, increase cell recovery, and reduce the presence of ambient RNA. Kit 1's protocol has been optimized and miniaturized for rapidly dissociating smaller tissue samples with lower cell counts. The reduced volume of reagents and shortened incubation times increase cell yield and prevent a stress response gene signature (FOS, JUN, and JUNB) on various cells9,22. Alternative methods to enrich live cells include staining and sorting. However, this would result in reduced cell yield, prolonged staining incubation, which could affect cellular states (e.g., aCD3e antibodies will activate T cells), and stress induced by the machine's pressure on the cells during sorting9,22. The example shown in Figure 6 illustrates a UMAP generated after 10X Genomics Gene Expression (GEX) sequencing and the conversion of the generated cell barcodes into FASTQ files that were then concatenated and aligned via CellRanger. Subsequent sequencing results and live-dead removal comparisons were plotted, demonstrating cell populations in a sample before and after live-dead removal and improved sequencing quality. The lung sample shown in Figure 6 indicated an issue with the fraction of reads, as it was below 70%. This warning was generated due to high ambient RNA in a population of lysed or dead cells. However, after the removal of dead cells, this error was no longer present and resulted in a higher percentage of fraction reads in cells23.

Single-cell RNA sequencing is a costly and precarious process that has dramatically advanced the field of cancer immunology and cancer research. It allows for further interrogation of genes, cellular states, and programs expressed and repressed in specific cell types, divulging more about the behavior and heterogeneity of cancers. Suboptimal or low-viability tissue is more likely to generate low-quality data that can create artifacts that take away from the reality of tumor biology, emphasizing the critical importance of proper tumor dissociation and sample preparation.

開示

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Adelson Medical Research Foundation (AMRF), the Melanoma Research Alliance (MRA), and U54CA224068. Figure 1, Figure 4, and Figure 5 were created with BioRender.com.

Materials

1x PBS Corning 21-040-CV
10 mL serological pipette Corning 357551
1000 μL low-retention pipette tips Rainin 30389213
1000 μL low-retention wide pipette tips Rainin 30389218
1000 μL pipette tips Rainin 30389212
10x Magnetic Separator 10x Genomics 120250
15 mL conical tubes Corning 430052
2 mL aspirating pipette Corning 357558
20 μL low-retention pipette tips Rainin 30389226
20 μL pipette tips Rainin 30389225
200 μL low-retention pipette tips Rainin 30389240
200 μL pipette tips Rainin 30389239
50 mL Polypropylene Conical Tube Falcon 352098
60 x 15 mm Tissue Culture Dish Falcon 353004
ACK Lysing Buffer Gibco A10492-1
BD 1 mL syringe Becton, Dickinson and Company 3090659
Bright-Line Hemocytometer Hausser Scientific 551660
Calcium Chloride Solution Sigma Aldrich 2115-100ML
Cell Ranger  10x Genomics N/A https://www.10xgenomics.com/support/software/cell-ranger/latest
Cell counting slides for TC20 cell counter Bio-Rad 1450015
CellTrics 30μm sterile disposable filters Sysmex 04-004-2326
CellTrics 50μm sterile disposable filters Sysmex 04-004-2327
Dead Cell removal Kit  Miltenyi Biotec 130-090-101 Store at -20 °C; kit 2
Dissecting Forceps, Fine Tip VWR 82027-386
DNA LoBind Microcentrifuge tubes, 1.5 mL Eppendorf 22431021
EasySepTM Dead Cell Removal
(Annexin V) Kit
STEMCELL Technologies 17899 Store at 4 °C; Kit 1
Eppendorf centrifuge 5425R Eppendorf 5406000640
Eppendorf centrifuge 5910R Eppendorf 2231000657
Eppendorf Easypet 3 Electronic Pipette controller Eppendorf EP4430000018
Eppendorf Thermomixer F1.5 Model 5384 Eppendorf EP5384000012
FBS Gibco 26140-079 Store at 4 °C, use in a Biological hood
German Stainless Scissors Fine Science Tools 14568-12
Leica Dmi1 Microscope Leica Microsystems 454793
LS Column Miltenyi Biotec 130-042-401
MACS Multistand Miltenyi Biotec 130-042-303
Pipet-Lite LTS Pipette L-1000XLS+ Rainin 17014382
Pipet-Lite LTS Pipette L-200XLS+ Rainin 17014391
Pipet-Lite LTS Pipette L-20XLS+ Rainin 17014392
Quadro MACS Magnet Miltenyi Biotec 130-091-051
RPMI Medium 1640 (1x) Gibco 21870-076 Store at 4 °C
TempAssure 0.2 mL PCR 8-Tube strips USA Scientific 1402-4700
Trypan blue stain 0.4% Thermo Fisher Scientific T10282
Tumor Dissociation Kit, Human Miltenyi Biotec 130-095-929 Store at -20 °C, prepare enzymes according to kit instructions:
Reconstitute lyophilized Enzyme H vial in 3 mL of RPMI 1640
Reconstitute lyophilized Enzyme R vial in 2.7 mL of RPMI 1640
Reconstitute lyophilized Enzyme A vial in 1 mL of Buffer A supplied with the kit.
Tumor Dissociation Kit, Mouse Miltenyi Biotec 130-096-730 Store at -20 °C, prepare enzymes according to kit instructions:
Reconstitute lyophilized Enzyme D vial in 3 mL of RPMI 1640
Reconstitute lyophilized Enzyme R vial in 2.7 mL of RPMI 1640
Reconstitute lyophilized Enzyme A vial in 1 mL of Buffer A supplied with the kit.
UltraPure Distilled Water Invitrogen 10977-015 Store at 4 °C

参考文献

  1. Liu, C., Yang, M., Zhang, D., Chen, M., Zhu, D. Clinical cancer immunotherapy: Current progress and prospects. Front Immunol. 13, 961805 (2022).
  2. Baghban, R., et al. Tumor microenvironment complexity and therapeutic implications at a glance. Cell Commun Signal. 18 (1), 59 (2020).
  3. Sun, G., et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing in cancer: Applications, advances, and emerging challenges. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 21, 183-206 (2021).
  4. Huang, D., et al. Advances in single-cell RNA sequencing and its applications in cancer research. J Hematol Oncol. 16 (1), 98 (2023).
  5. Ottaiano, A., et al. From chaos to opportunity: decoding cancer heterogeneity for enhanced treatment strategies. 生物学. 12 (9), 1183 (2023).
  6. Hwang, B., Lee, J. H., Bang, D. Single-cell RNA sequencing technologies and bioinformatics pipelines. Exp Mol Med. 50 (8), 1-14 (2018).
  7. Erfanian, N., et al. Deep learning applications in single-cell genomics and transcriptomics data analysis. Biomed Pharmacother. 165, 115077 (2023).
  8. Jovic, D., et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing technologies and applications: A brief overview. Clin Transl Med. 12 (3), e694 (2022).
  9. Burja, B., et al. An optimized tissue dissociation protocol for single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of fresh and cultured human skin biopsies. Front Cell Dev Biol. 10, 872688 (2022).
  10. Denisenko, E., et al. Systematic assessment of tissue dissociation and storage biases in single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq workflows. Genome Biol. 21 (1), 130 (2020).
  11. Sade-Feldman, M., et al. Defining T cell states associated with response to checkpoint immunotherapy in melanoma. Cell. 176 (1-2), 404 (2019).
  12. Pelka, K., et al. Spatially organized multicellular immune hubs in human colorectal cancer. Cell. 184 (18), 4734-4752.e20 (2021).
  13. Bill, R., et al. CXCL9:SPP1 macrophage polarity identifies a network of cellular programs that control human cancers. Science. 381 (6657), 515-524 (2023).
  14. Al’Khafaji, A. M., et al. High-throughput RNA isoform sequencing using programmed cDNA concatenation. Nat Biotechnol. 42 (4), 582-586 (2024).
  15. Xing, Y., et al. The effect of cell isolation methods on the human transcriptome profiling and microbial transcripts of peripheral blood. Mol Biol Rep. 48 (4), 3059-3068 (2021).
  16. Ma, F., Hernandez, G. E., Romay, M., Iruela-Arispe, M. L. Single-cell RNA sequencing to study vascular diversity and function. Curr Opin Hematol. 28 (3), 221-229 (2021).
  17. Fan, X. -. J., et al. Impact of cold ischemic time and freeze-thaw cycles on RNA, DNA and protein quality in colorectal cancer tissues biobanking. J Cancer. 10 (20), 4978-4988 (2019).
  18. LoCoco, P. M., et al. Reliable approaches to extract high-integrity RNA from skin and other pertinent tissues used in pain research. Pain Rep. 5 (2), e818 (2020).
  19. Montanari, M., et al. Automated-mechanical procedure compared to gentle enzymatic tissue dissociation in cell function studies. Biomolecules. 12 (5), 701 (2022).
  20. Yosefov-Levi, O., Tornovsky, S., Parnas, O. Pancreatic tissue dissection to isolate viable single cells. J Vis Exp. (195), (2023).
  21. Janssen, P., et al. The effect of background noise and its removal on the analysis of single-cell expression data. Genome Biol. 24 (1), 140 (2023).
  22. Adam, M., Potter, A. S., Potter, S. S. Psychrophilic proteases dramatically reduce single cell RNA-seq artifacts: A molecular atlas of kidney development. Development. 144 (19), 3625-3632 (2017).
  23. Sutermaster, B. A., Darling, E. M. Considerations for high-yield, high-throughput cell enrichment: fluorescence versus magnetic sorting. Sci Rep. 9 (1), 227 (2019).

Play Video

記事を引用
Fang, J., Salinas, I., San Vicente, S., Zielinski, C., Sade-Feldman, M. Dissociation of Human and Mouse Tumor Tissue Samples for Single-cell RNA Sequencing. J. Vis. Exp. (210), e66766, doi:10.3791/66766 (2024).

View Video