9.5
복종 연구에 따르면, 우리는 권위자의 강압적인 압력에 의해 다른 사람들에게 해를 끼칠 수 있다(Milgram, 1974). 부적절한 주문이 덜 강제적으로 전달된다면 어떨까요? 간호사와 의사 사이의 상호 의존성이 증가함에 따라 Hofling과 그의 동료들은 권위자인 의사…
때로 사람들은 자신의 개인적인 기준에 어긋나고 해를 끼칠 수 있는 명령에 기꺼이 복종한다. 이러한 형태의 사회적 영향은 복종이라고 불리며, 인지된 권위 있는 인물의 명령이나 요청을 따릅니다.
예를 들어, 자연적인 병원 환경에서 진행된 한 독창적인 현장 연구에서, 의사라고 주장하는 사람(이 경우에는 당국)이 간호사에게 전화로 공식적으로 승인된 목록에 없는 "알려지지 않은" 약물을 투여하도록 지시했으며, 이 약물은 최대 안전 일일 복용량을 초과했습니다. 실제로 그 약은 위약이었다.
간호사들(그들 중 최소 95%)은 "의사"의 지시가 프로토콜에 위배되고 환자가 사망할 수
있었음에도 불구하고 계속 행동했습니다.흥미롭게도, 대조군의 간호사들은 비슷한 상황에서 무엇을 할 것인지만 물었다. 같은 비율인 95%는 주어진 명령에 복종하지 않을 것이라고 말했다.
따라서 사람들이 실제 상황에 처하게 되면 자신의 더 나은 판단에 반하는 행동을 할 수 있습니다.
Q1: What is obedience in social psychology?
Obedience is a form of social influence where people follow orders or requests from perceived authority figures, even when those commands conflict with personal standards. In a classic hospital field study, nurses administered an unapproved drug exceeding safe dosage limits when ordered by an alleged doctor, demonstrating how authority can override individual judgment and protocol.
Q2: Why do people obey harmful orders from authority figures?
Research suggests that situational pressures from authority figures compel obedience despite potential harm. In the Hofling study, 21 of 22 nurses complied with a doctor's phoned request to dispense an unfamiliar drug at dangerous dosages. Participants later reported embarrassment, anxiety, and guilt, indicating they acted against their better judgment under perceived authority pressure.
Q3: How do questionnaire responses differ from actual obedience behavior?
When asked hypothetically, 95% of nurses said they would not obey harmful orders. However, in actual field conditions, 95% of nurses complied with the dangerous drug request. This discrepancy reveals that people overestimate their ability to resist authority pressures when placed in real situations, suggesting self-awareness alone does not reduce compliance.
Q4: What workplace factors can reduce harmful compliance?
Research identifies several factors that decrease compliance with questionable orders. Opportunities to discuss decisions with colleagues successfully reduced compliance in replications of the Hofling study. Additionally, an increased sense of personal responsibility distinguished non-compliant nurses from compliant ones, suggesting that fostering autonomy and team communication strengthens ethical decision-making.
Q5: Why might nurses feel conflicted when obeying harmful medical orders?
Nurses experience competing pressures between duty to patients and need for acceptance by authority figures and their team. While a sense of duty to challenge questionable practices exists, the desire for team acceptance can override it. This internal conflict creates negative emotions like guilt and anxiety, even when nurses comply with orders, reflecting the psychological cost of obedience.
Q6: How does the interdependence between nurses and physicians affect obedience?
The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians creates power dynamics that influence compliance. Doctors hold perceived authority, while nurses depend on them professionally, strengthening the likelihood of obedience. This hierarchical relationship, combined with workplace pressures, makes it difficult for nurses to resist harmful orders despite their medical training and ethical obligations.
Q7: Can awareness of social pressures prevent obedience to authority?
No. Later replications of obedience research strongly suggest that awareness of forces underlying social pressures does not necessarily reduce compliance to authority in actual situations. Even when people understand the mechanisms of social influence, situational factors and authority presence remain powerful enough to override conscious resistance and ethical judgment.