Robotic Port Placement
Robotic Port Placement - Related Videos
03:08
Single-port Robotic Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision in a Porcine Model (Sus scrofa domesticus)
0 Views •
2026
This protocol demonstrates Single-port (SP) robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) in a porcine model, highlighting procedural feasibility, technical steps, and preclinical applicability for minimally invasive rectal surgery.
06:24
A Spine Robotic-Assisted Navigation System for Pedicle Screw Placement
0 Views •
Cited by 8 •
2020
This article presents a standardized surgical technique for robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement by using robotic-assisted navigational systems. We present a step-by-step protocol and describe the workflow and precautions of this procedure.
03:07
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
0 Views •
2025
This prospective study evaluated the implementation of a novel, single-port, robotic platform in oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for malignant lesions. The primary endpoint focused on technical success, defined as the achievement of tumor-free resection margins confirmed by intraoperative frozen-section histopathology, with secondary assessment of aesthetic outcomes and life quality score of patients.
07:17
Single Port Donor Nephrectomy
0 Views •
Cited by 5 •
2011
Single port laparoscopic surgery is changing the standard of care in surgical care like nothing since the laparoscopic technique was introduced 20 years ago. We present out technique of single port donor nephrectomy using the Gelpoint device. We have successfully performed this surgery in 100 patients.
11:07
Robotic-assisted Lateral Pancreaticojejunostomy for Chronic Pancreatitis
0 Views •
2025
This protocol presents a method for performing a parenchymal sparing robotic-assisted lateral pancreaticojejunostomy intended for appropriately selected patients with a pancreatic duct obstruction without significant inflammation of the pancreatic head. This article demonstrates critical aspects of the operation in a minimally invasive, robotic fashion to treat recurrent acute/chronic pancreatitis.
FAQs
Surgeons balance the target anatomy, available working space, instrument reach, and the need for triangulation when selecting port sites. These factors determine whether the robotic instruments can approach the operative field from useful angles without compromising access. Planning must therefore match the port arrangement to the specific anatomy and technical demands of the intended procedure.
Triangulation positions the camera and instruments so they approach the operative field from complementary directions. This arrangement can improve visualization and create more effective working angles for dissection and suturing. When the ports support appropriate triangulation, the robotic instruments are less likely to collide and may provide more controlled manipulation around the target anatomy.
The spatial relationship among ports influences instrument reach, movement, and the amount of interference between robotic arms. A suitable arrangement can reduce instrument collision while supporting controlled movements at the operative field. By improving how the system accesses the anatomy, port planning may also contribute to operative efficiency and a more favorable ergonomic setup for the surgeon.
Planning begins by identifying the target anatomy and estimating the working space, instrument reach, and triangulation required for the operation. The surgeon then selects port sites, inserts the trocars through the body wall, and docks the robotic system. This sequence establishes access for the camera and specialized instruments before dissection or suturing begins.
Robotic port placement planning is useful whenever a robotic-assisted minimally invasive procedure requires reliable access to a defined operative field. Because port sites can be adapted to target anatomy and procedural demands, the approach supports operations across multiple surgical specialties. Its value lies in coordinating visualization, instrument access, and robotic control before the procedure proceeds.
Appropriate port sites can support clearer visualization, reduce interference among instruments, and facilitate precise dissection or suturing. These technical advantages may improve operative efficiency and surgeon ergonomics. In the broader clinical context, effective access planning may also influence patient recovery, making port selection an important part of preparing a robotic-assisted minimally invasive operation.