18.6
A dominant strategy is one that results in the highest payoff for a player, no matter what the other players decide to do.
Conversely, a dominated strategy is one that leads to a worse payoff for a player compared to other strategies, regardless of the opponent's actions.
Consider two competing ice cream vendors at a beach. They can choose to sell high-quality or low-quality products.
To determine if Vendor A has a dominant strategy, the payoffs from Vendor A's perspective for each of Vendor B's strategies are compared.
If Vendor B chooses 'high-quality,' Vendor A compares its payoffs between $100 and $50. Here, $100 is better, so the 'high-quality' is a better strategy for Vendor A in this case.
If Vendor B chooses ' low-quality,' Vendor A compares its payoffs between $150 and $80. Here, $150 is better, so the 'high-quality' strategy is better for Vendor A.
Since 'high-quality' yields a better payoff for Vendor A regardless of Vendor B's strategy, it is Vendor A's dominant strategy.
Low-quality' for Vendor A results in a lower payoff in each case compared to 'high-quality,' low-quality is the dominated strategy for Vendor A.
Bij strategische besluitvorming is een dominante strategie er een die altijd de beste uitkomst voor een speler oplevert, ongeacht wat de andere speler…
Copyright © 2026 MyJoVE Corporation. Alle rechten voorbehouden.