8.1
Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; populariz…
People may believe that they almost always make rational decisions, even though this mode of thinking would be mentally exhausting.
Based on a number of scientific studies, researchers have suggested that there are “two minds”, or two systems of thought, that guide responses.
One, the intuitive system, operates quickly and automatically, with minimal effort. The process of intuition is the mind “seeing” an answer in the absence of explicit reasoning. In other words, it’s as if the person were on autopilot—simply going with the flow.
Consequently, intuitive decisions seem like efficient shortcuts, as they can draw upon previous and similar experiences. However, relying on these mental operations—referred to as heuristics—can lead to biased or incorrect judgments.
If instead, he had used the second system, the rational system, he would make his decision slowly and deliberately and could potentially override any intuitive answers. After all, this system must outline the logical steps of a particular choice, which requires much more effort and cognitive demand in the process.
In novel situations, such reasoning and rational thinking make sense. He’s never shopped during busy hours before and only has five minutes to spare. He reasons that the longer line will move faster than the shorter line, due to the number of items each person has.
Sometimes, intuition is hard to override—certain associations just seem so plausible, even though evidence might point to a different solution.
View the full transcript and gain access to JoVE Core videos
Q1: What are the two systems of thought that guide human decision-making?
The intuitive system operates quickly and automatically with minimal effort, drawing on previous experiences to provide answers without explicit reasoning. The rational system works slowly and deliberately, requiring significant cognitive effort to outline logical steps. Research suggests the brain uses one system at a time, with the prefrontal cortex directing rational thinking and the basal ganglia and amygdala guiding intuitive responses.
Q2: Why do people rely on mental shortcuts even though they can lead to biased judgments?
Heuristics are efficient shortcuts that draw on previous experiences, making decisions quick and effortless compared to deliberate reasoning. However, relying on these mental operations can produce biased or incorrect judgments because they bypass careful analysis. The availability heuristic decision making and similar shortcuts often seem plausible even when evidence suggests different solutions, making them difficult to override.
Q3: When is intuitive decision-making more effective than rational analysis?
Intuitive decision-making excels in familiar situations where experience has taught what to do, allowing immediate action without methodical analysis. Fight-or-flight responses demonstrate how quick intuition can be lifesaving. Experts often rely on gut feelings because their brains have learned patterns from similar past situations, enabling rapid decisions they cannot fully explain logically.
Q4: How do emotions influence which decision-making system we use?
Strong emotions, whether positive or negative, pull people toward quick, reactive decision-making rather than careful analysis. Intense fear triggers immediate fight-or-flight responses, while excitement can lead to impulsive purchases later regretted. It is often best to wait and address volatile situations after emotions have calmed, allowing the rational system to process information methodically.
Q5: What types of situations require rational decision-making over intuition?
Novel and complex situations benefit from logical, analytical, and methodical processing of available information. When facing unfamiliar circumstances, the rational system allows careful consideration of options and consequences. Big decisions should generally be made reflectively rather than impulsively, particularly when the situation lacks precedent in personal experience.
Q6: Why might someone choose a longer line at checkout despite having limited time?
Rational reasoning can override intuitive assumptions by analyzing specific details. Someone with five minutes might reason that the longer line will move faster because each person has fewer items, contradicting the intuitive assumption that shorter lines are quicker. This demonstrates how deliberate thinking can identify logical solutions that initial gut feelings might miss.
Q7: What brain regions are responsible for intuitive versus rational thinking?
The prefrontal cortex directs the rational system, enabling logical and analytical thought. The basal ganglia and amygdala, more primitive brain structures evolutionarily, drive the intuitive system through emotional and habitual responses. These different neural pathways explain why the two systems operate independently and why the brain processes information through one system at a time.