Single-port Robotics
Single-port Robotics - Related Videos
03:08
Single-port Robotic Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision in a Porcine Model (Sus scrofa domesticus)
0 Views •
2026
This protocol demonstrates Single-port (SP) robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) in a porcine model, highlighting procedural feasibility, technical steps, and preclinical applicability for minimally invasive rectal surgery.
03:07
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
0 Views •
2025
This prospective study evaluated the implementation of a novel, single-port, robotic platform in oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for malignant lesions. The primary endpoint focused on technical success, defined as the achievement of tumor-free resection margins confirmed by intraoperative frozen-section histopathology, with secondary assessment of aesthetic outcomes and life quality score of patients.
07:17
Single Port Donor Nephrectomy
0 Views •
Cited by 5 •
2011
Single port laparoscopic surgery is changing the standard of care in surgical care like nothing since the laparoscopic technique was introduced 20 years ago. We present out technique of single port donor nephrectomy using the Gelpoint device. We have successfully performed this surgery in 100 patients.
11:49
Single-port Non-liposuction Endoscopic Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Surgery
0 Views •
2026
This study describes a standardized surgical procedure for single-port endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection without liposuction in breast cancer. Indicated for patients with biopsy-confirmed nodal metastasis or positive sentinel lymph nodes, the technique emphasizes preservation of critical structures, particularly the intercostobrachial nerve, to reduce postoperative morbidity and optimize functional recovery.
11:40
Building An Open-source Robotic Stereotaxic Instrument
0 Views •
Cited by 18 •
2013
This protocol includes the designs and software necessary to upgrade an existing stereotaxic instrument to a robotic (computer numeric controlled; CNC) stereotaxic instrument for around $1,000 (excluding a drill).
FAQs
The surgeon operates from a console, and the system translates hand movements into computer-mediated instrument actions. This control arrangement separates the surgeon’s hands from the operative field while preserving direct command over visualization and tissue manipulation. Articulated or wristed instruments then execute those movements within the body through the shared access point.
Flexible or wristed tools can articulate within the operative field, allowing tissue manipulation while the camera and other instruments remain introduced through the same port. Their role is especially relevant where the anatomy is confined, because the system must provide both visualization and instrument movement despite the limited entry route.
Patient selection is identified as a central consideration alongside safety, procedural effectiveness, dexterity, and ergonomics. Suitability depends on matching the planned procedure and anatomical setting to the system’s single-access configuration. These considerations help determine whether the approach can provide effective instrument control and visualization without compromising the safety requirements of the procedure.
Its distinguishing configuration uses one access point for the camera and multiple instruments, whereas the relevant comparison is a multiport technique involving more than one skin incision. The potential advantage is fewer incisions, but the approach is not assumed to be superior. Safety and procedural effectiveness remain essential criteria when comparing the techniques.
The system is introduced through one access point, with the camera and articulated instruments positioned in the body. The surgeon then views the operative field at a console and controls computer-mediated movements to direct visualization and tissue manipulation. This workflow centers on coordinating access, imaging, instrument articulation, and console control throughout the procedure.
It may be considered for procedures requiring work in confined anatomical spaces, where articulated instruments and shared-port visualization can support access and tissue manipulation. The approach is not presented as universally appropriate; patient selection, safety, dexterity, ergonomics, and procedural effectiveness all contribute to deciding whether it fits a particular medical procedure.
Research focuses on more than the number of incisions. Key domains include instrument dexterity, surgeon ergonomics, patient and procedural safety, and overall procedural effectiveness. These measures help characterize how the single-access configuration performs in medical practice and whether it provides useful surgical capability in the intended anatomical setting.