18.15
Gry o skończonej liczbie powtórzeń
Gry powtarzane to scenariusze, w których ci sami uczestnicy grają wielokrotnie w tę samą grę. Gry te są podstawą zrozumienia, w jaki sposób procesy po…
Powtarzające się gry polegają na wielokrotnym graniu w tę samą grę z tymi samymi graczami. Te gry mają kluczowe znaczenie dla zrozumienia, jak decyzje ewoluują w czasie.
Skończenie powtarzające się gry są rozgrywane określoną liczbę razy.
Weźmy pod uwagę dwa stoiska z lemoniadą rywalizujące ze sobą od maja do sierpnia.
Na początku każdego miesiąca decydują, czy utrzymać cenę na wysokim poziomie, aby uzyskać lepszy zysk, czy też utrzymać ją na niskim poziomie, aby przyciągnąć więcej klientów.
Załóżmy, że oba stanowiska zgadzają się na współpracę, ustalając wysoką cenę.
W miarę zbliżania się ostatniego miesiąca gracze dostosowują swoje strategie, wiedząc, że w przyszłości nie będzie żadnych rund odwetu lub współpracy.
Do sierpnia oba stoiska prawdopodobnie obniżą ceny, aby przyciągnąć więcej klientów.
Każde ze stoisk oczekuje, że drugie obniży ceny w ostatnim miesiącu. Mogą więc zacząć obniżać ceny w lipcu.
Logika jest kontynuowana aż do pierwszego miesiąca, a obie stoją na niskim poziomie od samego początku.
Świadomość, że gra w końcu się skończy, zachęca ich do przyjęcia strategii rywalizacji od samego początku.
Ta metoda rozwiązywania gry od tyłu jest znana jako indukcja wsteczna.
View the full transcript and gain access to JoVE Business videos
Q1: What are finitely repeated games and how do they differ from one-time games?
Finitely repeated games occur when the same game is played a specific number of times by the same participants, unlike one-time games played only once. This predetermined endpoint fundamentally changes player behavior. Knowing the game will end encourages players to adopt competitive strategies earlier than they might in indefinite scenarios. The finite nature creates strategic pressure that evolves as players approach the final round.
Q2: How does backward induction explain player behavior in finitely repeated games?
Backward induction is a method of solving games by working backward from the final round. Players anticipate that in the last round, there is no opportunity for retaliation or future cooperation, so they adopt competitive strategies. Knowing this, players expect competitors to act competitively in earlier rounds too, causing them to reduce cooperation progressively backward through all rounds.
Q3: Why do competitors lower prices or cut costs from the beginning of a finitely repeated game?
Players lower prices or cut costs from the start because backward induction reveals that competitive behavior is inevitable by the final round. Anticipating this outcome, each player reasons that maintaining high prices or investments earlier is futile. This logic cascades backward through all rounds, causing both competitors to adopt cost-saving strategies immediately, even though sustained cooperation would yield higher collective profits.
Q4: What happens in the final round of a finitely repeated game?
In the final round, players are motivated to maximize immediate profits because no future rounds exist for retaliation or cooperation. Both competitors typically cut costs significantly or lower prices to capture more customers. Since there are no consequences for competitive behavior in the last round, players abandon any cooperative agreements they may have maintained in earlier rounds.
Q5: How does the finite nature of a game affect cooperation between players?
The finite nature of a game undermines cooperation because players know the relationship will end. As the final round approaches, the incentive to maintain cooperative agreements diminishes. Players recognize that competitors will eventually defect, so they defect first. This creates a race to competitive behavior that begins well before the final round, preventing sustained cooperation throughout the game.
Q6: Can two competitors maintain a high-price agreement throughout a finitely repeated game?
Maintaining a high-price agreement throughout a finitely repeated game is extremely difficult because backward induction reveals that both players will eventually defect. Each player knows the other will cut prices in the final round to maximize profit, so neither trusts the agreement. This anticipation of future defection causes players to abandon the agreement and adopt competitive strategies from the start.
Q7: How does game length influence strategic decision-making in repeated games?
Game length directly influences when players shift to competitive strategies. In finitely repeated games, knowing the exact endpoint causes players to adopt cost-saving or competitive strategies progressively earlier. The shorter the game, the sooner competitive behavior emerges. This demonstrates that the finite nature and known duration of a game fundamentally shape the dynamic evolution of strategic decision-making between competitors.