Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.

Summary

Flow cytometric analysis of Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation provides a high throughput quantitative method to study protein-protein interaction. This methodology can be applied to mapping protein binding sites and for screening factors that regulate protein-protein interaction.

Abstract

Among methods to study protein-protein interaction inside cells, Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) is relatively simple and sensitive. BiFC is based on the production of fluorescence using two non-fluorescent fragments of a fluorescent protein (Venus, a Yellow Fluorescent Protein variant, is used here). Non-fluorescent Venus fragments (VN and VC) are fused to two interacting proteins (in this case, AKAP-Lbc and PDE4D3), yielding fluorescence due to VN-AKAP-Lbc-VC-PDE4D3 interaction and the formation of a functional fluorescent protein inside cells.

BiFC provides information on the subcellular localization of protein complexes and the strength of protein interactions based on fluorescence intensity. However, BiFC analysis using microscopy to quantify the strength of protein-protein interaction is time-consuming and somewhat subjective due to heterogeneity in protein expression and interaction. By coupling flow cytometric analysis with BiFC methodology, the fluorescent BiFC protein-protein interaction signal can be accurately measured for a large quantity of cells in a short time. Here, we demonstrate an application of this methodology to map regions in PDE4D3 that are required for the interaction with AKAP-Lbc. This high throughput methodology can be applied to screening factors that regulate protein-protein interaction.

Introduction

650,000 protein-protein interactions are estimated to exist in the human interactome, playing critical roles in maintaining normal cell functions ^1,2. Besides co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP), the gold standard to study protein-protein interaction from cell lysate, several protein fragment complementation assays (PCA) have been developed to improve sensitivity in detecting protein-protein interaction inside cells ³. Techniques include Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET), and Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) ^4,5. BiFC is based on the facilitated association of two fragments of a fluorescent protein (here we use Venus; a YFP variant) that are each fused to a potential interacting protein partner (in this example we use AKAP-Lbc and PDE4D3). Interaction of the two proteins of interest inside cells results in functional fluorescence, which can be visualized by fluorescence microscopy using either live or fixed cells ^6,7,8. Compared to other PCAs, BiFC is sensitive and less technically challenging, with potential to study the cellular localization in live cells. A major drawback of this technique however is that once formed, the fluorescent protein complex cannot be reversed. Therefore it is not a good method to study dynamic protein-protein interaction. In this paper, we use BiFC to map the interaction sites of PDE4D3 with AKAP-Lbc by monitoring the fluorescence intensities of Venus. Compared to traditional analysis using fluorescence microscopy, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive (if not carried out using automated high throughput machinery), flow cytometry provides a straightforward quantitative analysis of thousands of cells in a heterogeneous population over a short time ^9,10. Here, by carrying out a side-by-side comparison of flow cytometric-BiFC analysis and traditional co-IP, we demonstrate that the two methods provide comparable data, however, flow cytometric BiFC analysis is less time consuming and uses less material which may be more useful when cells of interest are limited.

Protocol

1. Cell Transfection

1. Plate cells the day before transfection, plating fewer cells for immunofluorescence.
   1. For immunofluorescence: in a 6-well plate, coat glass cover slips (1 per well) with 0.02% gelatin at 37 °C for at least 4 hr, wash once with medium, and for each well, plate 1 x 10⁵ HEK 293T cells in 2 ml complete growth medium [Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM) plus 10% FBS].
   2. For flow cytometric and Western blot analyses: plate 1.2 x 10⁵ HEK 293T cells/well in 2 ml complete growth medium in 6-well plate (0.3 x 10⁵ HEK 293T cells in 0.5 ml complete growth medium per well in 24-well plate).
2. Prepare DNA for transfection according to manufacture’s protocol: Effectene (Qiagen) is used for immunofluorescence. TransIT-LT1 (Mirus) is used for flow cytometric and Western blot analyses. Amount of DNA used is listed below.

   	24-well plate (ng)	6-well plate (ng)
   CFP-vector	10	50
   VNN-AKAP-Lbc	200	1000
   VCN-PDE4D3-FL(full-length PDE4D3)	2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80	100
   VCN-PDE4D3-UCR1(a PDE4D3 N-terminal fragment containing the UCR1 domain)		100
   VCN-PDE4D3-UCR2+CAT (a PDE4D3 C-terminal fragment containing the UCR2 and catalytic domains)		100

   Transfection using Effectene (6-well):
   1. Add indicated amount of plasmid DNA + 4 μl enhancer to 100 μl buffer EC, mix, and incubate for 5 min at room temperature.
   2. Add 5 μl Effectene, mix, and incubate for 10 min at room temperature. Add drop-wise to cells.
   Transfection using TransIT-LT1 (6-well/24-well):
   1. Add indicated amount of plasmid DNA to 250 μl/50 μl of Opti-MEM I serum-free medium in a sterile tube.
   2. Add TransIT-LT1 reagent to the diluted DNA mixture and pipette gently to mix. (TransIT-LT1 Reagent:DNA ratio is 3 μl of TransIT-LT1 reagent per 1 μg of DNA).
   3. Incubate for 30 min at room temperature and add drop-wise to cells.

2. Cell Preparation for Flow Cytometry, Western Blot, and Immunofluorescence

1. 24 hr post transfection, check fluorescence under epifluorescence microscope before harvesting cells.
2. Cell preparation for flow cytometric analysis:
   1. Wash cells with 0.5 ml/2 ml ice-cold PBS for 24-well/6-well plates.
   2. Detach cells using 50 μl/250 μl 0.05% trypsin.
   3. Neutralize trypsin with 200 μl/1 ml DMEM medium.
   4. Collect 250 μl cells (for both 24-well and 6-well plate) by centrifugation at 500 x g for 5 min, use the remaining cells (1 ml) for Western blot analysis.
   5. Resuspend cells in 250 μl FACS buffer [PBS + 0.5% (w/v) BSA + 2 mM EDTA], store on ice for flow cytometric analysis. Cells can also be fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde (in PBS) if flow cytometry analysis will not be immediate.
3. Cell preparation for Western blot analysis: carried out in parallel with cell preparation for flow cytometry analysis.
   1. Wash cells 1x with 2 ml ice-cold PBS, lyse cells by adding 100 μl of cell lysis buffer [10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.95, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100].
   2. Collect cell lysate by centrifugation for 10 min at 21,000 x g at 4 °C.
   3. Quantify protein concentration by Bradford protein assay, load equal amounts of protein per lane for SDS-PAGE, and transfer to nitrocellulose for immunoblotting.
4. Cell preparation for immunofluorescence.
   1. Rinse cells 3x with 2 ml PBS, fix cells in 1 ml of 3.7% paraformaldehyde (in PBS) for 10 min at room temperature, then wash 3x with 2 ml PBS for 5 min.
   2. Mount cover slip on a glass slide, using mounting medium. Seal the coverslip edges using nail polish if necessary.
   3. Store the slides at 4 °C prior to examination.

3. Flow Cytometry and Immunofluorescence Microscopy

1. Flow cytometry is performed using a Beckman Coulter Cyan ADP, equipped with 488 nm, 405 nm, and 642 nm solid-state lasers. Summit software is used for acquisition and analysis.
   1. Calibrate flow cytometer using standard beads.
   2. Plot Forward scatter (FSC)/Sideward scatter (SSC) on a linear scale for gating live cell population.
   3. Plot FSC/voltage pulse width for gating non-aggregated live cell population.
   4. Plot count/FL6 (CFP fluorescence, 405 nm) on a log scale for gating non-aggregated live CFP-positive cells.
   5. Plot count/FL1 (YFP fluorescence, 488 nm) on a log scale for BiFC intensity.
   6. Run YFP-CFP- double negative samples, adjust FSC, SSC, FL1 and FL6 photo multiplier tube (PMT) voltage to set the threshold for each signal.
   7. Run single positive (both YFP+ and CFP+) samples for future off-line compensation
   8. Acquire at least 10,000 gated events (non-aggregated live CFP+ cells) for analysis.
2. Immunofluorescence microscopy is performed using a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope. Note: it is important to keep all settings (such as the zoom, pinhole, detector gain, amplifier offset, frame size, scan speed, scan average, and laser power) consistent between samples for proper comparison of all data.

4. Data Analysis (Performed Using Summit Software)

1. Set up the analysis protocol similar to that for acquisition with proper gating:
   Gate 1 in FSC/SSC dot plot for live cells.
   Gate 2 in FSC/pulse width of Gate 1 for non-aggregated live cells.
   Gate 3 in count/CFP of Gate 3 for non-aggregated CFP+ live cells.
2. Compensate YFP and CFP signal using YFP+ and CFP+ single positive cells.
3. Re-determine cut-off lines for CFP/YFP-positive cells.
4. Export YFP mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CFP+ cells to Excel for data-plotting.
5. Normalize YFP MFI to expression levels of AKAP-Lbc, PDE4D3, and loading control α-tubulin, as determined by Western blot.

Representative Results

AKAP-Lbc and PDE4D3 constructs (Figure 1B) were fused to VN and VC fragments, respectively. Interaction of AKAP-Lbc and PDE4D3 results in functional YFP fluorescence (Figure 1A). Here we use the BiFC method to map AKAP-Lbc-binding sites in PDE4D3. Upstream conserved region 1 (UCR1), upstream conserved region 2 (UCR2) and catalytic region (CAT) are conserved among PDE4 family proteins, therefore, full length (FL), UCR1 and UCR2 plus CAT were used for screening the binding site of PDE4D3 t…

Discussion

BiFC is a simple and sensitive method to study protein-protein interaction. This method cannot be used to identify new protein-protein interactions, however, it is especially convenient to confirm protein-protein interaction inside cells and to study functional properties; such as subcellular localization of protein complexes, mapping of protein-protein interaction sites, and for screening of small molecules/peptides that can modulate protein-protein interaction. Because VN and VC fragments are non-fluorescent, background fluorescence is low, thus aiding the sensitivity of this assay. Time is needed to mature/stabilize the VN-protein-VC-protein interaction, thus there is delay to visualizing the protein-protein interaction, and optimal time-points may therefore have to be empirically determined. It should also be noted that VN-protein-VC-protein interaction is not reversible, therefore unfortunately with current Venus BiFC constructs this assay is not suitable to study dynamic kinetics of protein-protein interaction.

Proper controls are important for BiFC analysis. A suitable negative control includes non-interacting proteins or non-specific peptides in the relevant BiFC vector, or if possible, a mutant that disrupts protein-protein interaction. Empty BiFC vector is not a good control as it results in non-specific high background fluorescence. If BiFC is not observed in two interacting proteins, expression should be analyzed. Also, BiFC signal may vary depending on the protein-protein interaction sites. It should be noted that spatial modulation of VN and VC interaction may also affect the fluorescence intensity; therefore it is initially important to carry out BiFC experiments using both C-terminal and N-terminal VN/VC expression constructs. For example, BiFC may not occur if protein-protein interaction blocks the re-association of the Venus fragments. Therefore, multiple combinations of VN and VC constructs should be tested (i.e. both C and N terminal protein fusions).

Fluorescence intensity of BiFC is proportional to the strength of protein-protein interaction, with higher BiFC intensity indicating stronger interaction and a lower fluorescence intensity suggesting weaker interaction. BiFC MFI is therefore used as indicator for protein-protein interaction. For precise analysis of protein-protein interaction by BiFC, it is very important that Western blot analysis is performed to ensure equal expression of different constructs and that no protein degradation is occurring, which may interfere with correct analysis. Lysate from the same samples is therefore preferred for Western blot analysis to determine similar protein expression for all samples analyzed. Additionally, it is critical to determine suitable amount of plasmids for transfection to ensure linear expression and interaction of proteins, and among this range, the interaction of protein correlates with fluorescence intensity of BiFC signal.

Low amount of CFP plasmid is used as a marker for successful transfection, so only CFP positive cells were analyzed here. A different fluorescent protein, such as RFP could be used to minimize the bleed-through between colors¹¹. For Flow Cytometry, single positive cells are needed to be included for compensation. If possible, at least 10,000 CFP positive cells are counted to ensure a good sample size.

In summary, here we demonstrate that coupling BiFC methodology with flow cytometric analysis can be used as a good indicator of protein-protein interaction inside cells. Traditional analysis of BiFC using immunofluorescence microscope is time consuming, and sample size is much lower than that corresponding to flow cytometric analysis. Thus, coupling flow cytometry with BiFC may be advantageous for analysis of protein-protein interaction when transfection efficiency is low. In this report, we took advantage of BiFC-Flow Cytometry to map the interaction sites in PDE4D3 for binding to AKAP-Lbc. This technique could also be extended to screen for molecules or peptides that may disrupt or enhance protein-protein interaction, for drug discovery ¹². This method can also be used to study certain physiological events, such as ligand-induced internalization of GPCR’s ¹³.

Materials

<strong>REAGENTS</strong>
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s media (DMEM)	Invitrogen	11965-092
Penicilin-Streptomycin (pen/strep), 100x	Invitrogen	15070-063
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)	Invitrogen	16000-044
Anti-Flag antibody	Sigma	M2, F1804
Anti-HA antibody	Covance	16B12, MMS-101R
α-tubulin	Sigma	DM1A, T9026
Anti-GFP antibody	Clontech	632569
Cell culture plates, 6-well tissue culture treated	Thermo Fisher Scientific	130184
HEK 293T cells	ATCC	CRL-11268
Maxiprep plasmid purification kit, high speed	Qiagen	12663
Dulbecco’s Phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS), sterile 1x	Invitrogen	14190-144
Trypsin-EDTA, 0.05% (w/v)	Gibco	25300
Polystyrene round-bottom tubes for FACS staining	BD Biosciences	352052
Paraformaldehyde	Fisher Scientific	S74337MF
Prolong gold antifade reagent with DAPI	Invitrogen	P-36931
Superfrost plus Microscope slides	Fisher Scientific	12-550-15
Fisherfinest premium cover glass	Fisher Scientific	12-548-5P
<strong>EQUIPMENT</strong>
CO<sub>2</sub> air-jacketed Incubator	NuAIR DH autoflow
Confocal microscope LSM510 META	Carl Zeiss, Inc
Electrophoresis and transfer unit	Biorad
Cyan ADP Flow Cytometer	Beckman Coulter