Name: main effects and interactions in factorial designs
Uploaded: 2023-04-30T06:36:24.000Z
Duration: 6 min 58 s
Channel: JoVE

1. Introduction of topic/research question
<ol>
	<li>Research question: Human behavior is complex, such that a person’s thoughts and behaviors are the results of several causes or factors. For example, if you wanted to know why some people are better at reading another person’s facial expressions, there are many factors that can influence that ability.</li>
	<li>Justifying a factorial design: Rather than test potential explanations one at a time, you can use a factorial design, which is unique because it allows you to test two or more potential influences in the same study. </li>
	<li>Benefits of a factorial design: It saves time by testing causes simultaneously vs. sequentially. This allows the researcher to use fewer participants and reveals if the various causes combine in a special way to influence the outcome.  </li>
</ol>
2. Key variables
<ol>
	<li>Variable = anything that changes in a study</li>
	<li>Independent variable = the cause or what the researcher manipulates/changes in order to detect changes in the participant
	<ol>
		<li>Based on the researcher’s literature search, she believes that a person’s self-esteem (i.e., a person’s positive or negative evaluation of who they are as a person) and self-awareness (i.e., how conscious a person is about their own thoughts and feelings) are two independent variables to study</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Dependent variable = the effect or the outcome that the researcher measures in the participant
	<ol>
		<li>Based on the research question, ability to accurately detect or decipher nonverbal communication is the dependent variable.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
3. Research hypotheses
<ol>
	<li>Main effect hypotheses definition: Hypotheses in a factorial design that focus on one independent variable at a time, while ignoring any other independent variables
	<ol>
		<li>Main effect 1: Those who experience high self-esteem will be more accurate judges of eye expressions than those who experience low self-esteem.</li>
		<li>Main effect 2: Those who experience high self-awareness will be more accurate judges of eye expressions than those who experience low self-awareness.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Interaction hypothesis definition: A hypothesis predicting that one independent variable changes the other independent variable’s impact on the dependent variable
	<ol>
		<li>Interaction: The impact of the self-esteem on the ability to accurately detect nonverbal communication will be enhanced for those who experience high self-awareness, but reduced for those how experience low self-awareness.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
4. Defining the variables
<ol>
	<li>Self-esteem: To manipulate the independent variable of self-esteem, the researcher will provide participants with false-feedback regarding the participant’s ability to accurately name countries in Europe.</li>
	<li>Self-awareness: To manipulate the independent variable of self-awareness, place participants in front of a mirror. This is adapted from previous research.1</li>
	<li>Accuracy in decoding nonverbal communication: To measure the dependent variable of accuracy in decoding nonverbal communication, show participants several sets of eyes and ask them to identify the proper emotion being expressed. This is also an established test.2</li>
</ol>
5. Establishing conditions
<ol>
	<li>Self-Esteem: Ask participants to name as many countries in Europe as he or she could think of within 2 min. Provide feedback based on condition:
	<ol>
		<li>For high self-esteem, participants learn that they scored in the top 10% and that their performances were “superior and above average.”</li>
		<li>For low self-esteem, participants learn that they scored in the bottom 50% and that their performances were “inferior and below average.”</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Self-awareness
	<ol>
		<li>High = Sit participants in front of a mirror during the geography quiz (mirror should seem natural/inconspicuous as possible)</li>
		<li>Low = No mirror is present during geography quiz.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Combinations of conditions: In a between subjects factorial design, each person gets one combination of the independent variables (Table 1). In this study, the four possible combinations are: 
	a) high self-esteem/high self-awareness 
	b) low self-esteem/high self-awareness 
	c) high self-esteem/low self-awareness 
	d) low self-esteem/low self-awareness</li>
</ol>
<img alt="Self-esteem vs self-awareness matrix chart; high-low categorization; psychological analysis." src="/files/ftp_upload/10058/10058table1.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1761830439000" data-alt="Table 1"> 
Table 1. Factorial Design. Shown are the possible combinations of factors for a 2 x 2 design.
6. Measuring the dependent variable (accuracy in decoding nonverbal communication)
<ol>
	<li>Quiz
	<ol>
		<li>Have participants complete the quiz; make sure to mouse over pictures during the presentation to show eyes more clearly.</li>
		<li>Score = total number correct, which will result in a 0-36 score</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
7. Conducting the study
<ol>
	<li>Setting = research lab with a computer and space for a person to sit in front of mirror</li>
	<li>Informed consent
	<ol>
		<li>In a research lab, meet participant for study on “The Faces of Culture.”</li>
		<li>Go through informed consent: “As you’ll read in the informed consent, this study is about perceptions of nonverbal communication and cultural knowledge. The purpose of this research is to learn how people interpret facial expressions. You’ll also read about any risks/benefits of participation, and that you are free to quit at any time”.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Random assignment to condition
	<ol>
		<li>Randomly order the packets with the participant’s combination of conditions (high self-esteem/high self-awareness; low self-esteem/high self-awareness; high self-esteem/low self-awareness; low self-esteem/low self-awareness)</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Running the study  
	<ol>
		<li>Self-awareness
		<ol>
			<li>Depending on the condition, the participant will sit in front of mirror or not.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Self-esteem
		<ol>
			<li>Give participants a sheet with 50 spaces on it and ask them to list as many countries in Europe as they can in the next 2 min. Start timer.  After analyzing the participants results compared to past participants, provide feedback (based on condition) on a sheet of paper</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Rating attractiveness of pictures
		<ol>
			<li>Sits participants in front of a computer to take the online version of an online quiz (<a href="http://www.questionwritertracker.com/quiz/61/Z4MK3TKB.html">http://www.questionwritertracker.com/quiz/61/Z4MK3TKB.html</a>). The quiz asks “For each pair of eyes, choose which word best describes what the person in the picture is thinking or feeling.” Score how many each person gets right out of 36.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Debriefing
	<ol>
		<li>Explain the purpose of the study to the participant. Read from debriefing sheet: “Thank you for participating. Our study was on the effects of self-esteem and self-awareness on how people perceive ambiguous facial expressions. We hypothesized that people with low self-esteem and low self-awareness would interpret facial expressions as more judgmental and aggressive than others with high self-esteem and high self-awareness. Do you have any questions?”</li>
		<li> Address deception.
		<ol>
			<li>Explain: “It is important that we get a natural performance, not one that the participant feels is expected. If participants were to know the true reasoning and hypothesis behind the study they may perform in an unnatural way by trying to live up to the experimenters perceived expectations. To eliminate this problem it is necessary for the experimenter to provide the participant with false information. In this experiment, we did this by providing you with false feedback of the geography quiz you took. In actuality, we did not score the quiz in any way. The feedback you received was based on random assignment and is in no way a true indication of your abilities. This was necessary so that we could be sure everyone would experience a short boost or drop in self-esteem. Because of the nature of how we did the study, it is quite natural for participants to have believed the feedback, but rest assured that it was not real.”</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>

A factorial design is commonly used in psychology experiments. This design is beneficial for a variety of topics, ranging from pharmacological influences on fear responses to the interactions of varying levels of stress and types of exercise.

the factorial experiment

The Factorial Experiment

Source: Laboratories of <a href="https://www.jove.com/author/Gary_Lewandowski">Gary Lewandowski</a>, Dave Strohmetz, and Natalie Ciarocco&#8212;Monmouth University

A factorial design is a common type of experiment where there are two or more independent variables. This video demonstrates a 2 x 2 factorial design used to explore how self-awareness and self-esteem may influence the ability to decipher nonverbal signals. This video leads students through the basics of a factorial design including, the nature of a factorial design and what distinguishes it from other designs, the benefits of factorial design, the importance and nature of interactions, main effect and interaction hypotheses, and how to conduct a factorial experiment.

After collecting data from 136 people, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to test the two main effects and interactions. As shown in Figure 1, contrary to the hypothesized pattern, when participants had high self-awareness, they were more accurate when they had low self-esteem; however, when they had low self-awareness, they were more accurate when they had high self-esteem. 
Beyond their influence on deciphering the meaning in a person’s eyes, greater self-a...

Source: Laboratories of Gary Lewandowski, Dave Strohmetz, and Natalie Ciarocco&#8212;Monmouth University

A factorial design is a common type of ...

A factorial design is used when researchers need to manipulate two or more independent variables and measure the effects on a single dependent variable in the same study.For example, if researchers wanted to know why some people are better at reading another person?s facial expressions, they would have to examine multiple factors that could influence such ability.Rather than test many potential influences one experiment at a time, a factorial design allows the simultaneous examination of several variables within one experiment. Such design requires fewer participants, and reveals whether the various causes interact in a special way to affect the outcome.This video demonstrates how to design and conduct a simple factorial experiment to explore how self-awareness and self-esteem may influence the ability to decipher nonverbal signals, as well as how to analyze the results and examine additional cases that use this design.In this experiment, a two-by-two factorial design is used, consisting of two independent variables?self-awareness and self-esteem?with two levels, high and low.To manipulate self-awareness?how conscious an individual is about their own thoughts and feelings?participants complete a geography quiz in front of a mirror in the high self-awareness group, or in the absence of a mirror for the low self-awareness group.To simultaneously manipulate self-esteem?a person?s positive or negative evaluation of who they are as a person?participants are provided with false-feedback on the geography quiz.Those in the high self-esteem group are told that they scored in the top 10%, with superior and above average performance, while those in the low self-esteem group learn that they scored in the bottom 50%, performing inferior and below average.Thus, note that participants are subjected to one of four possible combinations: high self-esteem/high self-awareness; low self-esteem/high self-awareness; high self-esteem/low self-awareness; or low self-esteem/low self-awareness.After receiving feedback, participants are asked to view numerous sets of eyes and identify the proper emotion being expressed. In this case, the dependent variable is the accuracy of decoding the nonverbal communication.Because of the design complexity, several hypotheses are generated. The main effect hypotheses?those that focus on the effect of a single independent variable?are that those in the high levels of each condition will be more accurate judges of eye expressions than those in the low level groups.In contrast, the interaction hypothesis?one that predicts an independent variable changes another?s influence on the dependent variable?is that the impact of self-esteem on the ability to accurately detect nonverbal communication will be enhanced for those who experience high self-awareness, but reduced for those who experience low self-awareness.Before the participant arrives, randomly organize packets with each of the four combinations of conditions to ensure that group assignments are entirely based on chance.To begin the experiment, meet the participant in the lab. Provide them with informed consent, a brief description of the research, sense of the procedure, the potential risks and benefits of participating, and the right to withdrawal at any time.Depending on the assigned self-awareness condition, instruct the participant to sit in front of a one-way mirror, with blinds open and their reflection visible or closed to prevent self-reflection, to take a quiz.Next, give each participant a sheet with 50 spaces on it and ask them to list as many countries in Europe as they can in the next 2 min.After indicating to the participant that you are analyzing their results compared to past participants, provide feedback to them on a sheet of paper based on their randomly assigned condition.Then, sit the participant in front of a computer to take another quiz, which asks the participant to discern facial expressions based on ambiguous eye images.To conclude the experiment, debrief participants by telling them the nature of the study, as well as why the true purpose of the study could not be revealed beforehand.To analyze how self-esteem and self-awareness influence the ability to decipher nonverbal expressions, average the eye interpretation quiz scores in each group and plot the means by conditions.To determine if group differences were found, perform a two-way ANOVA to reveal any main or interaction effects. In this case, the effect on self-awareness depends on the level of self-esteem.Contrary to the hypothesized pattern, notice that participants with high self-awareness and low self-esteem were more accurate at deciphering nonverbal expressions. However, when exposed to low self-awareness, participants were more accurate when they had high self-esteem.Now that you are familiar with how to design and perform a two-by-two factorial experiment, let?s take a look at some other examples of this design.In one study, potentiation of the startle reflex was measured during a low or high probability of receiving an electric shock.Another independent variable, such as the administration of alcohol or placebo, allows for the investigation into how shock level and alcohol influence the startle response.In another example, consider how different levels of stress could interact with the type of exercise performed. To test all of these conditions simultaneously, a two-by-two factorial design is required.Perhaps in another situation, a researcher is interested in how students perform on an on-screen versus a written test, whereby participants? gender may influence performance. Once again, a two-by-two factorial design is necessary for simultaneous examination.You?ve just watched JoVE?s introduction to factorial experimental design.Now you should have a good understanding of how to design and conduct a two-by-two factorial experiment, as well as how to statistically analyze the results common to these studies. You?ve also been introduced to several examples where the use of a two-by-two factorial design is beneficial.Thanks for watching!?

Education

JoVE Science Education

Psychology

Experimental Psychology

main effects and interactions in factorial designs

A factorial design uses two or more independent variables in one experiment. A 2 x 2 factorial design is a common example. It lets students see how more than one factor can shape an outcome at the same time.

This experiment uses self-awareness and self-esteem as the two independent variables. It explores whether they affect the ability to decipher nonverbal signals. The design also shows how a factorial experiment differs from other designs and why it can be useful.

A key part of this topic is the interaction, which happens when the effect of one independent variable depends on the other. The video also explains main effect and interaction hypotheses. It then shows how to conduct a factorial experiment and how to think through the results.

Main Effects and Interactions in Factorial Designs

main-effects-and-interactions-in-factorial-designs

from theory to design: the role of creativity in designing experiments

from-theory-to-design-the-role-of-creativity-in-designing-experiments

Creative Study Design in Social Psychology

Creative study design helps social psychology researchers test ideas about human thought, emotions, and behavior. Many research questions begin with a theory that suggests a possible explanation for everyday life. Some of those ideas are hard to study directly, so researchers need a careful plan to test them. One example is a theory about Facebook perception. Researchers asked whether a person’s image on Facebook is influenced by the appearance and comments of that person’s Facebook friends.

ethics in psychology research

Psychology Research Ethics and Aggression

Psychology research ethics guide how scientists study aggression while protecting participants. Researchers aim to make studies as real-world as possible, but they must also balance that goal with the best interests of the people taking part. Ethical choices begin early, when researchers decide how to measure or change a variable and then choose the safest option. Aggression is an important behavior to study because it can help explain interpersonal violence. A student who gets a poor grade on...

realism in experimentation

Mundane Realism in Lab Experiments

Mundane realism helps lab experiments feel like real life. It is used when researchers want a setting that matches how people normally behave. In some studies, the real world is the best place to observe behavior directly. For example, voting behavior is easier to study by watching people vote. But real-world research is not always ethical or practical. A lab gives researchers more control over the setting. That control helps them identify the exact variables that may influence an outcome. To...

perspectives on experimental psychology

Psychology Research Methods in Practice

Psychology research methods are shown through real experiments in this JoVE K12 collection. The pages let high school students watch studies from start to finish. They also show the experiments in their natural setting, inside the actual research process. The collection is useful because experimental psychology can be hard to connect to from a textbook alone. These videos give students exposure to more than a dozen topics they may not otherwise see. They can help bring abstract ideas to life...

pilot testing

Testing Stress Manipulations Before the Study

Pilot testing helps researchers check whether a manipulation works before they run the main study. In psychology, researchers need study experiences that are consistent, or reliable, and authentic, or valid. Pilot testing lets them try out a manipulation first and see if it produces the intended effect. This study focuses on acute stress, which is short-term stress caused during a task. The researchers compared three ways to create that stress. They tested static, a ticking clock, and a crying...

observational research

Behavior Clues in Psychological Research

Behavior clues can help psychologists study how people think and feel. Researchers may ask people directly, or they may watch what people do and look for signs of past behavior. These observations can add useful information, especially when self-reports are limited. Behavior is not always a perfect guide to a person’s real state. A person may smile and seem happy, but they could actually be annoyed and just trying to be polite. Science tries to move past self-view alone because a person’s own...

the simple experiment: two-group design

Testing Attraction with a Simple Experiment

A simple experiment uses a two-group design to test a cause-and-effect relationship between two variables. In this setup, a researcher compares two groups to see whether one factor changes the outcome. The video follows a research question about how physiological arousal, or excitement, influences perceived attraction. It shows how an idea becomes a testable idea and how a hypothesis is formed. The experiment variables are identified, and experimental conditions and controls are created. The...

the multi-group experiment

Testing Multiple Conditions in One Study

A multi-group experiment tests three or more conditions of the same independent variable. It lets researchers compare how each condition affects the outcome they measure. In this study, the conditions examine different interethnic ideologies and their effects on feelings about diversity and actions toward an out-group member. The video also shows how to tell levels in a variable apart and how to choose common study conditions. These can include placebo and empty-control conditions, which help...

within-subjects repeated-measures design

Repeated-Measures Study with Counterbalancing

A repeated-measures study uses the same participants in every condition of an experiment. In this design, each person receives every level of the independent variable. A simple example is a candy taste test, where each participant tastes and rates each type of candy. This psychology experiment looks at how motivational messages affect willingness to exert physical effort. The message types include hard work, self-affirmation, outcomes, and positive affect. Each participant reads all four...

A factorial design uses two or more independent variables in one experiment. A 2 x 2 factorial design is a common example. It lets students see how more than one factor can shape an outcome at the same time. This experiment uses self-awareness and self-esteem as the two independent variables. It explores whether they affect the ability to decipher nonverbal signals. The design also shows how a factorial experiment differs from other designs and why it can be useful. A key part of this topic...

self-report vs. behavioral measures of recycling

self-report-vs-behavioral-measures-of-recycling

Behavioral Observation in Recycling Studies

Behavioral observation can give a more direct measure of recycling behavior than self-report. Self-report means asking people to describe their feelings, thoughts, or actions. In some cases, participants may not be fully honest. Observing what people actually do can help researchers measure behavior more accurately. This study uses a multi-group experiment to test whether feeling close to others leads to more positive attitudes toward environmental consciousness. Researchers measured the...

reliability in psychology experiments

Content Analysis and Reliability in Psychology

Reliability in psychology is important when researchers try to measure something that is hard to quantify. In content analysis, reliability helps show whether the measurement is consistent. The video uses a simple two-group design to show how this works. The example compares two cartoons, SpongeBob SquarePants and Caillou, to ask whether one has more inappropriate content than the other. The transcript also connects this topic to a recent Pediatrics study on 4-year-olds. That study found worse...

placebos in research

Yoga Expectations and the Placebo Effect

Yoga expectations can influence how researchers measure creativity. Clinical research often tests whether a treatment really works for a disorder or illness. A common challenge is that participants may already believe a treatment will help. Those expectations can affect the results and make it harder to tell what the treatment actually did. Yoga is a good example because it has many claimed benefits in the United States, including improved creativity. But it is not always clear whether yoga...

manipulating an independent variable through embodiment

manipulating-an-independent-variable-through-embodiment

Embodiment Effects in a Weight Experiment

Embodiment can affect how people think and act in an experiment. It is a research idea that says subtle physical experiences may influence thoughts without people realizing it. Researchers use this idea to see how a simple body sensation can change later judgments. Researchers often manipulate participants in one group so they have different thoughts, experiences, or feelings than people in other groups. Some manipulations are obvious, and others are subtle. In this study, the key physical...

experimentation using a confederate

Using Confederates in Social Experiments

Confederates are used in social experiments to help researchers study how people react in a controlled setting. A confederate is a person who seems like a normal participant but follows the researcher’s directions instead. This helps create conditions that feel natural while still keeping the experiment organized. The study shown here uses a two-group design to test imitation. Researchers asked whether participants were more likely to copy a person with more power than a person with similar...

experimental psychology

This collection provides a framework for observing how psychological experiments are embedded in the actual research process, starting from the initial research design to arriving at conclusions in a study. 

Explore a 2 x 2 factorial design using self-awareness and self-esteem. Learn main effects, interactions, hypotheses, and how to conduct the experiment.

Main Effects and Interactions in Factorial Designs

Description

Transcript

Tags