Electrospinning of recombinant spider silk solutions with concentrations of 10% w/v from HFIP resulted in smooth fibers with diameters ranging from 80 to 120 nm, allowing the formation of nonwoven meshes. Post-treatment with ethanol vapor did not lead to conspicuous morphological changes, which was, therefore, established as a proper way of silk nonwoven post-treatment (Figure 8). Structural changes were detected using FT-IR and subsequent FSD of amid I bands was performed to analyze single contribution peaks (Figure 6). It could be shown that post-treatment leads to an increase in β-sheet structures, while the content of α-helical und random coil structures decreases (Figure 7). This result can be practically proven by dipping a post-treated nonwoven into water (Figure 5). Even after one week, no dissolution of the nonwoven mesh will occur.
The spinning duration is the most important parameter concerning the application of silk nonwovens in filter materials due to the pressure drop based on the increasing density of electrospun fibers. Extended spinning durations und thus a higher number of fiber layers result in an exponential decrease of air permeability. This effect could be detected for all different filter substrate materials before and after post-treatment (Figure 9). Likewise, the filtering efficiency of the silk-containing filter materials of sub-micrometer particles increases (Figure 10). While short spinning durations (30 sec) gain low filter efficiencies, higher spinning durations (90 sec) lead to higher efficiencies.

Figure 1. High electric voltage (0-30 kV) is applied to a syringe filled with a silk solution, and a counter electrode (0-20 kV) is placed in a distance of 8-20 cm. This setup leads to a strong electrostatic field, inducing repulsive forces within the charged solution. If the surface tension is exceeded, a Taylor cone is formed, and a thin jet erupts from the tip. After formation, bending instabilities occur within the jet causing further stretching as the solvent evaporates, and a solid fiber is formed. Finally, the fiber is randomly deposited on the counter electrode in the form of a nonwoven mesh.

Figure 2. Photographs of a regular Taylor cone (A), a dried droplet (B), and the setup without droplet (C).

Figure 3. Schematic procedure during vapor post-treatment. In the first step, the chamber is filled with ethanol, and the sample is steamed at 60 °C for 90 min. In order to soften the nonwoven meshes for subsequent handling, ethanol is removed and the fibers are steamed with water vapor for 90 min at 60 °C. Click here to view larger figure.

Figure 4. Photograph of a cardboard frame with attached silk nonwoven meshes to be used for post-treatment.

Figure 5. Electrospun and subsequently post-treated nonwoven in dry state (A) and under water (B).

Figure 6. Fourier self-deconvoluted absorbance spectrum of an amide I band of an untreated (A) and a post-treated (B) spider silk nonwoven mesh. The solid line displays the absorbance band resulting from the single contribution peaks (dotted lines) as derived after deconvolution. The assignment of the respective curves was based on previously published values from the literature 22. Click here to view larger figure.

Figure 7. Secondary structure content of non-treated and post-treated eADF4(C16) nonwoven meshes.

Figure 8. SEM images of electrospun eADF4(C16)-fibers on different filter substrates: Polyamide (PA), Polyester (PE), Polypropylene (PP) and pure eADF4(C16) fibers before (S1) and after (S2) post-treatment with ethanol vapor. Click here to view larger figure.

Figure 9. Air permeability tests, before (A) and after post-treatment (B) of the silk nonwoven meshes with ethanol vapor, increasing spinning times lead to more nonwoven layers subsequently lowering the air permeability.

Figure 10. Filter efficiency of di-ethyl-hexyl-sebacat aerosol on electrospun spider silk nonwoven meshes on polyamide filter materials at different spinning durations, influencing the silk layer quantity, after post-treatment with ethanol.