Adipose tissue for the isolation of ASCs can come in many forms: from solid pieces of tissue obtained through resection or lipoplasty to smaller pieces obtained through either syringe extraction or suction-assisted lipoplasty (i.e. liposuction ). Whether more SVF cells (and thereby ASCs) can be obtained from resected or aspirated adipose samples is unclear as conflicting studies have been presented 16, 17. It is possible that either form of adipose tissue is more than suitable for the isolation of SVF cells and ASCs as long as the operator is proficient in their isolation technique. However, liposuction does hold an advantage over resection in that is it less invasive and requires significantly less post-operative care. While the types of liposuction have increased over the last decade, including techniques, such as ultrasound-assisted, power-assisted and laser-assisted liposuction 18, the most common remains tumescent liposuction, in which the adipose compartment is flooded with large amounts of sterile saline, anesthetics and vasoconstrictors prior to aspiration 19. The choice of technique can vary from surgeon to surgeon. However, while the means of extraction may seem unimportant to the researcher, it is important to realize that the technique may have an effect on ASC number and viability. For example, increasing liposuction vacuum pressure can negatively impact SVF cell yield 20. Moreover, decreases in ASC proliferation have been measured upon ultrasound-assisted liposuction 17.
However obtained, the aspirate should be processed quickly as storage temperatures may impact SVF viability and eventual ASC yield. Studies by Matsumoto et al. have shown that ASC yield decreases if the aspirate is stored at room temperature for longer than 24 hr 21. If necessary, 24-hour storage at 4 °C may be used without any deleterious effects on the biologic properties of the ASC population but, again, cell viability can decrease if this storage time is increased beyond that point. The ease of lipoaspirate processing is directly related to its overall volume. Smaller volumes, obtained through syringe extraction, are relatively easy to process. However, larger volume aspirates, obtained through liposuction, can present physical challenges. For example, something as simple transferring the fat from the aspiration container so that it can be washed can present problems when the aspirate volume is large. The protocol outlined in this article is meant to alleviate some of these challenges.
By and large, the isolation of ASC populations from lipoaspirates using the enzymatic method described in this article has not changed significantly over the last 10 years. There are numerous protocols available through PubMed that are excellent in their description of the isolation of ASCs from lipoaspirates. Most of them outline a very similar protocol with minor modifications. Basically, the lipoaspirate is washed of contaminants, digested enzymatically to release the SVF and the SVF, containing the ASC population, is collected through centrifugation. Most large volume lipoaspirates arrive in some type of vacuum container - the configuration of which can vary from surgeon to surgeon. This protocol recommends the removal of the aspirate into a large, sterile beaker before washing, since the container itself may be a source of contamination if not properly cleaned before placing in the biosafety hood. Once transferred and allowed to settle by gravity, the aspirate will separate into three layers: a top, oil layer that results from the lysis of mature adipocytes, a middle adipose layer and a bottom layer of saline and contaminating red blood cells. The oil layer should be removed as we have noticed that it may be toxic to the resulting cell cultures (unpublished observations). Also this protocol recommends that the infranatant of saline and RBCs will removed prior to the first wash in order to decrease the potential number of contaminating RBCs once the ASCs are cultured. However, a study by Francis et al. has suggested that this infranatant may also be a source of ASCs 22. The use of a 10 ml serological pipette makes the removal of this infranatant relatively easy. What remains is the adipose layer that can then be easily washed using sterile PBS, or if desired, sterile PBS supplemented with antibiotics and antimycotic to decrease the chance of contamination 23-25. Following washing, the adipose tissue is enzymatically digested using a sterile solution of collagenase type IA. The use of a filtration unit such as the Millipore unit shown in this video combines a convenient means of aseptically filtering the collagenase into a closed container to which the washed adipose tissue can be added for subsequent water-bath digestion at 37 °C.
The type of collagenase used has varied from group to group with collagenase type IA seeming to be the more prevalent 1, 24, 25. However, there are over 11 different types of collagenase available commercially, each with digestion affinities for specific tissues. For the digestion of adipose tissue, companies such as Sigma Aldrich recommend collagenase types I and II and both types are well represented in today's literature 1, 24-27. In their original article, Zuk et al. use collagenase type IA obtained from bovine sources at a concentration of 0.075 % 1. However, most commercial sources of collagenase type IA are now obtained from the anaerobic bacteria Clostridium histolyticum or E. coli genetically modified with C. histolyticum genes. Many companies offer numerous preparations of collagenase type IA, from crude to those prepared through ammonium sulfate precipitation. The protocol outlined in this JoVE article uses a crude preparation of type IA collagenase that contains not only collagenase activities, but also non-specific protease, clostripain and tryptic enzymatic activities. While these additional enzymes are critical to digestion efficiency 28, there are those that report lot to lot variability associated with crude collagenase type IA 28, 29 and increase their concentrations of the collagenase up to 0.2% to obtain efficient digestion 23. Those groups using crude collagenase type IA also recommend its supplementation with bovine serum albumin (0.1-1.0% BSA) in order to improve the enzyme's performance and increase the stability of the cells within the adipose matrix. However, this may not be necessary, as the protocol outlined in this article uses collagenase without supplementation with no adverse effect on digestion efficiency.
For those wishing to use a more defined collagenase composition, commercial sources containing highly purified collagenase together with a precise blend of proteases are now available. These preparations purify clostridial collagenase types I and II to high activity and combine them with known neutral protease activities, such as dispase and thermolysin. Efficient adipose digestion using collagenase and thermolysin has been reported by Zachar et al.27. In agreement with this work, Pilgaard et al. 30 also report excellent digestion efficiency using several blends of collagenase and thermolysin. However, they do observe better digestion efficiency using preparations of collagenase and dispase.
Digestion times for the isolation of cells from adipose tissue can vary from study to study. Many published protocols recommend digestion times of 1-2 hr 27, 30. However, it is important to realize that excessive digestion times may ultimately affect the number of viable ASCs and their stem cell phenotype. Pilgaard and colleagues have determined that 2 hr digestion at 37 °C gives the best balance between tissue dissociation and ASC functionality 30, with Zachar et al. recommending that digestion, past 45 min, be observed every 15 min until 2 hr maximum, with digestion being stopped once the adipose tissue takes on a more homogenous appearance 27. We agree with this recommendation. However, it is our experience that most collagenase type IA preparations at 0.075-0.1% are capable of digesting large amounts of lipoaspirates in 30-45 min and that these times are adequate to liberate a sufficient number of cells. Therefore, this protocol recommends a digestion time of 30 min. If more time is required, the consistency of the lipoaspirate should be monitored and digestion stopped when the lipoaspirate assumes a "creamy" or "soupy" appearance (Figure 1).
Once the digestion is complete, isolation of the released SVF is simply accomplished using centrifugation. However, like aspiration pressure, the physical effects of centrifugation may have an effect on SVF viability and the number of ASCs available for culture. A study by Kurita and colleagues 31 has shown that speeds in excess of 3,000 x g can damage the ASC. However, speeds should be significant enough to ensure adequate pelleting of the SVF. As a rule, most protocols, including this one, recommend a centrifugation speed of 1,200-1,500 x g. Care should be taken by the researcher to ensure that they understand the relationship between centrifugal force (measured in g) and centrifugation speeds (measured as rpm), as the relationship depends on the specific centrifuge rotor. However, as a rule, lower centrifugal forces, such as 1,200 x g, are often equivalent to centrifugation speed and may safely be used interchangeably.
Following spinning, several distinct layers are observed in the centrifuge tube (Figure 1): a top layer of oil and "fluffy" white adipocytes, a middle collagenase layer and a cell pellet. The pellet itself may have two distinct layers: an upper layer of RBCs and a lower white SVF pellet, containing the ASCs. This protocol recommends the careful aspiration of the oil and adipocytes, as the oil may be toxic to the cell culture and adipocytes have been shown to be capable of dedifferentiation back to a more primitive cell type 32. However, these adipocytes may be harvested at this point if desired. Because of these contaminants, this protocol recommends an extra washing step to ensure their adequate removal. This step also allows the researcher to combine multiple SVF pellets for subsequent ease of filtration. Filtration is likely to be necessary due to the presence of large pieces of fibrotic material and cellular aggregates following digestion. These materials are easily removed through simple gravity-based filtration through 70 or 100 µm mesh filters. An aliquot of the filtrate may be taken in order to count the number of nucleated cells if desired and the remaining filtrate plated for ASC adherence and expansion.
Despite diligent attempts to remove as many RBCs as possible, no ASC preparation will be totally without RBC contamination. In our original article, we proposed the removal of these RBCs through resuspension of the pellet in a hypotonic solution of 160 mM NH4Cl. The majority of subsequent isolation articles contain this step and recommend the use of NH4Cl-based solutions or sterile water 22-24, 27, 33, although care must be taken if using sterile water, to minimize the time the SVF cells are exposed to the hypotonic solution 27. However, this step may not be necessary as RBCs are a non-adherent cell population and can easily be removed following an overnight culture of the ASC population. Moreover, while anecdotal at best, these RBCs appear to improve the initial expansion of the resulting adherent cells (Zuk, unpublished observations). As such, this protocol eliminates the RBC lysis step and proposes that the initial ASC cultures be allowed to expand in the presence of these RBCs for the first 3-4 days without any change of culture medium. The reason for this observation may be due to some type of paracrine signaling from contaminating blood cells or may simply be due to better viability with the exclusion of the RBC lysis step. Following this, the culture medium can be aspirated and the majority of RBCs removed by gently washing the plates with sterile 1x PBS. Over time, any remaining RBCs will eventually die and be removed from the culture.
Studies by Zachar and Boquest have estimated that 25-50% of the resuspended SVF pellet adheres to tissue culture plastic 23, 27. The resulting "passage 0" ASC cultures are heterogeneous, comprised of small, round cells thought to be ASCs and more irregularly shaped cells proposed to be endothelial in origin. While studies by many groups including ours have confirmed the absence of contaminating cell types such as SMCs, hematopoietic cells and fibroblasts in ASC cultures 1, the presence of additional cell types cannot be ruled out. Indeed, Tallone et al. has characterized passage 0 cultures and observed four distinct populations: 1) small, round, rapidly renewing cells, 2) spindle-shaped fibroblastic cells thought to be the ASC, 3) slowly replicating large cells with a more restricted potential (i.e. pre-adipocytes) and 4) cuboidal endothelial cells that are lost with passage 34. Subsequent studies have shown that the round, rapidly renewing cell population possesses the highest multipotentiality and express typical stem cell markers 35, 36. Moreover, they may form "spheroids" due to their rapid proliferation and are often surrounded by spindle-shaped fibroblasts. As such, it is possible that the spindle shaped ASC population proposed above may originate from these cells. Following initial expansion of these passage 0 ASC cultures, it is thought that continued culturing over time selects for the ASC, with the resulting cultures assuming a more fibroblastic, homogenous composition. However, remnants of contaminating cells cannot be totally ruled out and, therefore, the ASC population should still be considered heterogeneous.
While the protocol described in this article is straightforward, inexpensive and does not require any pieces of equipment not normally found in a tissue culture facility, it does have the disadvantage of requiring such a facility. Numerous studies have investigated the translational applications of ASCs through animal models and clinical studies using the ASC have begun to appear (for review see 4). However, their utility is limited by the need to remove the lipoaspirate from the OR in order to obtain the ASC. In response to this, there has been a call for the development of closed-systems capable of aseptically isolating ASCs from adipose tissue directly in the OR. These systems would offer the advantages of speed and consistency, with minimal input from a manual operator. In a companion article we plan to describe the use of such an automated system and compare its utility to that of manual isolation techniques.