Method Article

Procedure for the Development of Multi-depth Circular Cross-sectional Endothelialized Microchannels-on-a-chip

DOI:

10.3791/50771

October 21st, 2013

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

A microchannels-on-a-chip platform was developed by the combination of photolithographic reflowable photoresist technique, soft lithography, and microfluidics. The endothelialized microchannels platform mimics the three-dimensional (3D) geometry of in vivo microvessels, runs under controlled continuous perfusion flow, allows for high-quality and real-time imaging and can be applied for microvascular research.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Efforts have been focused on developing in vitro assays for the study of microvessels because in vivo animal studies are more time-consuming, expensive, and observation and quantification are very challenging. However, conventional in vitro microvessel assays have limitations when representing in vivo microvessels with respect to three-dimensional (3D) geometry and providing continuous fluid flow. Using a combination of photolithographic reflowable photoresist technique, soft lithography, and microfluidics, we have developed a multi-depth circular cross-sectional endothelialized microchannels-on-a-chip, which mimics the 3D geometry of in vivo microvessels and runs under controlled continuous perfusion flow. A positive reflowable photoresist was used to fabricate a master mold with a semicircular cross-sectional microchannel network. By the alignment and bonding of the two polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microchannels replicated from the master mold, a cylindrical microchannel network was created. The diameters of the microchannels can be well controlled. In addition, primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) seeded inside the chip showed that the cells lined the inner surface of the microchannels under controlled perfusion lasting for a time period between 4 days to 2 weeks.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Microvessels, as a part of the circulation system, mediate the interactions between blood and tissues, support metabolic activities, define tissue microenvironment, and play a critical role in many health and pathological conditions. Recapitulation of functional microvessels in vitro could provide a platform for the study of complex vascular phenomena. However, conventional in vitro microvessel assays, such as endothelial cell migration assays, endothelial tube formation assays, and rat and mouse aortic ring assays, are unable to recreate the in vivo microvessels with respect to three-dimensional (3D) geometry and continuous flow control1-8. Studies of microvessels using animal models and in vivo assays, such as corneal angiogenesis assay, chick chorioallantoic membrane angiogenesis assay, and Matrigel plug assay, are more time-consuming, high in cost, challenging with respect to observation and quantifications, and raise ethical issues1, 9-13.

Advances in micromanufacturing and microfluidic chip technologies have enabled a variety of insights into biomedical sciences while curtailing the high experimental costs and complexities associated with animals and in vivo studies14, such as easily and tightly controlled biological conditions and dynamic fluidic environments, which would not have been possible with conventional macroscale techniques.

Here, we present an approach to construct an endothelialized microchannels-on-a-chip which mimics the 3D geometry of in vivo microvessels and runs under controlled continuous perfusion flow by using the combination of photolithographic reflowable photoresist technique, soft lithography, and microfluidics.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

1. Photolithography Fabrication of Photoresist Master Mold

The following protocol shows the process to fabricate the microchannels with diameters between 30-60 μm. To get a microchannel with a smaller diameter (less than 30 μm), a single spin-coating of photoresist is needed.

  1. Transfer the reflow photoresist from the refrigerator at 4 °C to the cleanroom 24 hr prior to use and allow it to warm to room temperature.
  2. Clean a silicon wafer and bake it for one hr at 150 °C to allow it to dehydrate. The dehydration will assist the photoresist adhesion to the silicon substrate.
  3. Spin-coat the first layer of photoresist using the following recipe:
StepTime (Seconds)Speed (rpm)Acceleration
12300highest
2100
33300highest
460600highest
510500highest
610600highest
  1. Then, bake the wafer on a hotplate with a temperature of 110 °C for 90 sec. After the soft bake the thickness of the photoresist will be 20-30 μm.
  2. Spin coat a second layer of photoresist following the same recipe used for the first layer.
  3. Soft bake the wafer again by placing it on a hotplate with a temperature of 110 °C for 90 sec. After this soft bake the thickness of the photoresist will be 40-60 μm.
  4. Generate positive master patterns by exposing the photoresist to UV light with an exposure dose of 14,500 mJ/cm2 through a film mask.
  5. Dilute the developer with deionized (DI) water (1:2 (v/v)). Rinse the wafer repeatedly in the solution until the pattern is fully developed. Then wash the wafer with DI water and dry it using nitrogen gas.
  6. Reflow: Place the wafer on a hotplate with a temperature of 120 °C for 4 min and cover with a glass Petri dish to prevent solvent evaporation. Remove the wafer from the hotplate and allow it to cool to room temperature. The photoresist thickness after reflow will be 50-60 μm.

2. Soft Lithography Fabrication of PDMS Microchannel Network

  1. Prepare polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) solution at the weight ratio of 10:1 (base:curing agent) and mix it thoroughly using a planetary centrifugal mixer.
  2. Cast the PDMS solution onto the reflowed photoresist master mold. Place the casted PDMS in a desiccator for 15 min to degas. Use nitrogen gas to remove any remaining bubbles if necessary.
  3. Bake the PDMS in an oven at a temperature of 60 °C for 3 hr to allow it to cure. Then remove the cured PDMS layer from the master mold.
  4. Use a sharpened puncher to create inlet/outlet holes by punching holes in the channel network. Clean the surface of the PDMS using nitrogen gas.
  5. Treat two PDMS layers with oxygen plasma for 30 sec inside a plasma cleaner at an operating pressure of 4.5 x 10-2 Torr and an oxygen flow rate of 3.5 ft3/min. Then, align the surfaces of the PDMS manually under an optical microscope. Use a drop of water if necessary for a better control of the alignment.
  6. Bake the device in an oven at 60 °C for 30 min to achieve permanent bonding.

3. HUVEC Culture and Seeding in the Chip

  1. Culture the HUVECs with culture medium with L-glutamine supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). For the experiment passages between 2 and 5 were used.
  2. Once the HUVECs are confluent, count the cells and harvest them by first rinsing the cells with HEPES buffered saline solution (HEPES-BSS), and then treat the cells with trypsin/EDTA and incubate for 2-6 min at 37 °C. After the trypsinization is complete, neutralize the trypsin/EDTA with trypsin neutralizing solution. Centrifuge and suspend the cells in culture medium with 8% dextran to collect them. Dextran was used to increase the medium viscosity to aid in better cell seeding and attachment.
  3. Treat the device with oxygen plasma for 5 min with an operating pressure of 4.5 x 10-2 Torr and an oxygen flow rate of 3.5 ft3/min. Then load the device with DI water and treat with UV light for 8 hr in a laminar biosafety hood for sterilization.
  4. One day before the cells are ready, wash the device with 1x phosphate buffered saline (1x PBS) then coat with fibronectin (100 μg/ml, diluted with 1x PBS) and incubate in the refrigerator at 4 °C overnight.
  5. After the fibronectin coating, wash the device with 1x PBS then load with culture medium. Incubate the device at a temperature of 37 °C for 15 min.
  6. Load the HUVEC cells in 8% dextran culture medium with a cell concentration of 3-4 x 106 cells/ml. Place a 20 μl droplet of cells at one inlet of the device and tilt it to introduce the cells into the microfluidic channel. After 15-20 min the cells will begin to attach to the side walls of the channels. Rotate the device every 15 min to create a more uniform distribution of cells. If necessary, additional loading can be performed.

4. Long-term Perfusion Setup

After 5-6 hr of static culture, the attached HUVECs will start to fully spread out. Set up perfusion using a remote controlled syringe pump system with a steady flow of 10 μl/hr. Perfusion can be adjusted for a higher flow rate, and can last for a time period between 4 days to 2 weeks.

5. Cell Staining and Microscope Characterization

  1. When the cells reach confluence inside the device, firstly, wash the device with 1x PBS to thoroughly remove the medium. Then load the device with red dye diluted with diluent (4 μl-1 ml). Load the dye similar to the cell loading procedure. Incubate the device in the dark for 5 min at room temperature, and then wash the device with culture medium to stop the staining. Long incubation of the dye can cause cellular toxicity and disadhesion.
  2. Load the device with blue dye diluted with 1x PBS (2 droplets per ml). Incubate in the dark for 5 min at room temperature then thoroughly wash the device with 1x PBS.
  3. Examine the cell staining under an inverted optical microscope. If the staining was good, load the microchannels with fixing medium (3.5% paraformaldehyde diluted with 1x PBS), then submerge the device in fixing medium and completely cover it with aluminum foil. Store the device in the refrigerator at a temperature of 4 °C to prevent the device from drying out and photobleaching. The fixed device is now ready for confocal imaging, which can be done by a laser scanning confocal microscope.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Our approach to fabricate the multi-depth microchannel network mimics the complex 3D geometries of in vivo microvessels, in which the microchannels have rounded cross sections15. Additionally, the diameters of parent branching channels and the daughter channels approximately obey Murray's law for maintaining the fluid flow at a required level so that the overall channel resistance is low and flow velocities are more uniform throughout the network16-18. The processes and results for the fabr...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

1. Master mold fabrication

One of the designing and guiding principles for vascular morphometry is known as Murray's law16, which states that the distribution of vessel diameters throughout the network is governed by minimum energy consideration. It also states that the cube of the diameters of a parent vessel at a bifurcation equals the sum of the cubes of the diameters of the daughter vessels (

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This research was partially supported by National Science Foundation (NSF 1227359), WVU EPSCoR program funded by the National Science Foundation (EPS-1003907), WVU ADVANCE office sponsored by the National Science Foundation (1007978), and WVU PSCoR, respectively. The microfabrication work was done in WVU Shared Research Facilities (Cleanroom facilities) and Microfluidic Integrative Cellular Research on Chip Laboratory (MICRoChip Lab) at West Virginia University. The confocal imaging was done at WVU Microscope Imaging Facility.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Reagent/Material
Reflow PhotoresistAZ Electronic MaterialsAZP4620
DeveloperAZ Electronic MaterialsAZ 400K
PDMSDow Corning CorporationSylgard 184
MCDB 131 Culture MediumInvitrogen10372-019
NacBlue Nuclei StainingInvitrogenH1399
PKH Red StainSigmaMINI26 and PKH26GL
FibronectinGibcoPHE0023
L-GlutamineSigmaG7513
Phosphate Buffered SalineInvitrogen14040-133
HEPES Buffered Saline SolutionLonzaCC-5024
Trypsin/EDTAInvitrogen25300-062
Trypsin Neutralizing SolutionLonzaCC-5002
PDMS Curing AgentDow Corning CorporationSylgard 184
Primary Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsLonzaCC-2517
Fetal Bovine SerumLonza14-501F
Diluent CSigmaCGLDIL
Hoechst33342Invitrogen, Molecular ProbesR37605
DextranSigma95771
3.5% ParaformaldehydeElectron Microscopy Science15710-S
Equipment
SpinnerLaurell Technologies CorporationWS-400BZ-6NPP/LITE
DesiccatorBelArt Products999320237
Inverted MicroscopeNikonEclipse Ti
Syringe Pump SystemHarvard ApparatusPHD Ultra
Laminar Biosafety HoodThermo Scientific1300 Series A2
Planetary Centrifugal MixerThinkyARE-310
Isotemp OvenFisher Scientific13-246-516GAQ
Optical MicroscopeZeissInvertoskop 40C
Plasma CleanerHarrick PlasmaPDC-32G
HotplateBarnstead/Thermolyne CimarecSP131635
Laser Scanning Confocal MicroscopeZeissLSM 510

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Adair, T. H. Angiogenesis: Integrated systems physiology: from molecule to function to disease. , 1st edition, Biota Publishing. (2011).
  2. Goodwin, A. M. In vitro assays of angiogenesis for assessment of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic agents. Microvasc. Res. 74, 172-183 (2007).
  3. Smith, E. J., Staton, C. A. Tubule formation assays. Angiogenesis assays: A critical appraisal of current techniques. , John Wiley & Sons Ltd. West Sussex, UK. 65-87 (2006).
  4. Nakatsu, M. N., Davis, J. J., Hughes, C. C. W. Optimized fibrin gel bead assay for the study of angiogenesis. J. Vis. Exp. (3), e186(2007).
  5. Nicosia, R. F., Ottinetti, A. Growth of microvessels in serum-free matrix culture of rat aorta. A quantitative assay of angiogenesis in vitro. Lab. Invest. 63, 115-122 (1990).
  6. Aplin, A. C., Fogel, E., Zorzi, P., Nicosia, R. F. The aortic ring model of angiogenesis. Methods Enzymol. 443, 119-136 (2008).
  7. Nicosia, R. F. The aortic ring model of angiogenesis: A quarter century of search and discovery. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 13, 4113-4136 (2009).
  8. Griffith, L. G., Swart, M. A. Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 211-224 (2006).
  9. Folkman, J. History of angiogenesis. Angiogenesis: An integrative approach from science to medicine. , Springer. (2008).
  10. Auerbach, R., Lewis, R., Shinners, B., Kubai, L., Akhtar, N. Angiogenesis assays: A critical overview. Clin. Chem. 49, 32-40 (2003).
  11. Auerbach, R., Akhtar, N., Lewis, R. L., Shinners, B. L. Angiogenesis assays: Problems and pitfalls. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 19, 167-172 (2000).
  12. Staton, C. A., Reed, M. W., Brown, N. J. A critical analysis of current in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis assays. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 90, 195-221 (2009).
  13. Staton, C. A., Stribbling, S. M., et al. Current methods for assaying angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 85, 233-248 (2004).
  14. Moraes, C., Mehta, G., Lesher-Perez, S. C., Takayama, S. Organs-on-a-Chip: A focus on compartmentalized microdevices. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40 (6), 1211-1227 (2012).
  15. Huang, Z., Li, X., Martins-Green, M., Liu, Y. Microfabrication cylindrical microfluidic channel networks for microvascular research. Biomedical Microdevices. 14 (5), 873-883 (2012).
  16. Murray, C. D. The physiological principle of minimum work applied to the angle of branching of arteries. J. Gen. Physiol. 9 (6), 835-841 (1926).
  17. Zamir, M., Medeiros, J. A. Arterial branching in man and monkey. J. Gen. Physiol. 79, 353-360 (1982).
  18. Gafiychuk, V. V., Lubashevsky, I. A. On the principles of the vascular network branching. J. Theor. Biol. 212, 1-9 (2001).
  19. Sherman, T. F. On connecting large vessels to small. The meaning of Murray's law. J. Gen. Physiol. 78 (4), 431-453 (1981).
  20. Kamiya, A., Bukhari, R., Togawa, T. Adaptive regulation of wall shear stress optimizing vascular tree function. Bull Math Biol. 46 (1), 127-137 (1984).
  21. LaBarbera, M. Principles of design of fluid transport systems in zoology. Science. 249, 992-1000 (1990).
  22. Emerson, D. R., Cieslicki, K., Gu, X., Barber, R. W. Biomimetic design of microfluidic manifolds based on a generalized Murray's law. Lab Chip. 6, 447-454 (2006).
  23. Lu, H., Koo, L. Y., et al. Microfluidic shear devices for quantitative analysis of cell adhesion. Anal. Chem. 76, 5257-5264 (2004).
  24. Shevkoplyas, S. S., Gifford, S. C., Yoshida, T., Bitensky, M. W. Prototype of an in vitro model of the microcirculation. Microvasc. Res. 65, 132-136 (2003).
  25. Kaihara, S., Borenstein, J., et al. Silicon micromachining to tissue engineer branched vascular channels for liver fabrication. Tissue Eng. 6, 105-117 (2000).
  26. Fisher, A. B., Chien, S., Barakat, A. I., Nerem, R. M. Endothelial cellular response to altered shear stress. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 281 (3), L529-L533 (2001).
  27. Nerem, R. M., Alexander, R. W., et al. The study of the influence of flow on vascular endothelial biology. Am. J. Med. Sci. 316 (3), 169-175 (1998).
  28. Daly, D., Stevens, R. F., Hutley, M. C., Davies, N. The manufacture of microlenses by melting photoresist. Meas. Sci. Technol. 1 (8), 759-766 (1990).
  29. Schilling, A., Merz, R., Ossmann, C., Herzig, H. P. Surface profiles of reflow microlenses under the influence of surface tension and gravity. Opt. Eng. 39 (8), 2171-2176 (2000).
  30. Young, B., Heath, J. W. Wheater's functional histology: A text and colour atlas. , 4th edition, Churchill Livingstone. (2000).
  31. O'Neill, F. T., Sheridan, J. T. Photoresist reflow method of microlens production. Part 1: Background and experiments. Optik Int. J. Light Electron Opt. 113, 391-404 (2002).
  32. de Gennes, P. G. Wetting: statics and dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 827-863 (1985).
  33. Elias, H. G. An Introduction to Polymer Science. , VCH Publishers. New York. (1997).
  34. Voinov, O. V. Dynamic edge angles of wetting upon spreading of a drop over a solid surface. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 40, 86-92 (1999).
  35. Daly, D., Stevens, R. F., Hutley, M. C., Davies, N. The manufacture of microlenses by melting photoresist. Meas. Sci. Technol. 1, 759(1990).
  36. Jay, T. R., Stern, M. B. Preshaping photoresist for refractive microlens fabrication. Opt. Eng. 33, 3552-3555 (1994).
  37. Nerem, R. M., Alexander, R. W., et al. The Study of the influence of flow on vascular endothelial biology. Am. J. Med. Sci. 316 (3), 169-175 (1998).
  38. Chien, S., Li, S., Shyy, Y. J. Effects of mechanical forces on signal transduction and gene expression in endothelial cells. Hypertension. 31, 162-169 (1998).
  39. Li, Y. S., Haga, J. H., Chien, S. Molecular basis of the effects of shear stress on vascular endothelial cells. J. Biomech. 38, 1949-1971 (2005).
  40. Lee, E. J., Vunjak-Novakovic, G., Wang, Y., Niklason, L. E. A biocompatible endothelial cell delivery system for in vitro tissue engineering. Cell Transplant. 18, 731-743 (2009).
  41. Lee, E. J., Niklason, L. E. A novel flow bioreactor for in vitro microvascularization. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods. 16, 1191-1200 (2010).
  42. Chau, L., Doran, M., Cooper-White, J. A novel multishear microdevice for studying cell mechanics. Lab Chip. 9, 1897-1902 (2009).
  43. Meeson, A., Palmer, M., Calfon, M., Lang, R. A relationship between apoptosis and flow during programmed capillary regression is revealed by vital analysis. Development. 122, 3929-3938 (1996).
  44. Van Royen, N. J., Piek, J., Schaper, W., Bode, C., Buschmann, I. Arteriogenesis: mechanisms and modulation of collateral artery development. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 8, 687-693 (2001).
  45. Schaper, W. Therapeutic arteriogenesis has arrived. Circulation. 104 (17), 1994-1995 (2001).
  46. Tarbell, J. M. Shear stress and the endothelial transport barrier. Cardiovas. Res. 87 (2), 320-330 (2010).
  47. Potter, C. M., Lundberg, M. H., et al. Role of shear stress in endothelial cell morphology and expression of cyclooxygenase isoforms. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc Biol. 31, 384-391 (2011).
  48. Montesano, R. In vitro rapid organization of endothelial cells into capillary-like networks is promoted by collagen matrices. J. Cell Biol. 97, 1648-1652 (1983).
  49. Darland, D. C., D'Amore, P. A. TGF beta is required for the formation of capillary-like structures in three-dimensional cocultures of 10T1/2 and endothelial cells. Angiogenesis. 4 (1), 11-20 (2001).
  50. Lawley, T. J., Kubota, Y. Induction to morphologic differentiation of endothelial cells in culture. J. Invest. Dermatol. 93, 59S-61S (1989).
  51. Kanzawa, S., Endo, H., Shioya, N. Improved in vitro angiogenesis model by collagen density reduction and the use of type III collagen. Ann. Plast. Surg. 30, 244-251 (1993).
  52. Davis, G. E., Bayless, K. J., Mavila, A. Molecular basis of endothelial cell morphogenesis in three-dimensional extracellular matrices. Anat. Rec. 268, 252-275 (2002).
  53. Velazquez, O. C., Snyder, R., Liu, Z., Fairman, R. M., Herlyn, M. Fibroblast-dependent differentiation of human microvascular endothelial cells into capillary-like 3-dimensional networks. FASEB J. 16, 1316-1318 (2002).
  54. Donovan, D., Brown, N. J., Bishop, E. T. Comparison of three in vitro human "angiogenesis" assays with capillaries formed in vivo. Angiogenesis. 4, 113-121 (2001).
  55. Tang, D. G., Conti, C. J. Endothelial cell development, vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and tumor neovascularization: an update. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 30, 109-117 (2004).
  56. Takayama, S., McDonald, J. C., et al. Patterning cells and their environments using multiple laminar fluid flows in capillary networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 5545-5548 (1999).
  57. Cho, B. S., Schuster, T. G., et al. Passively driven integrated microfluidic system for separation of motile sperm. Anal. Chem. 75, 1671-1675 (2003).
  58. Parsa, H., Upadhyay, R., Sia, S. K. Uncovering the behaviors of individual cells within a multicellular microvascular community. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108 (12), 5133-5138 (2011).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Microchannel FabricationPhotolithographic ReflowPDMS MoldingEndothelial Cell SeedingContinuous Perfusion FlowCircular Cross sectionMicrovascular Biomimetic SystemsHUVEC Cell CultureConfocal ImagingSyringe Pump Perfusion

Related Articles